卧龙自然保护区针阔混交林林隙更新规律

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2007.0051

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

卧龙自然保护区五一棚大熊猫野外观测站周围的针阔混交林由于历史原因破坏严重,长期以来自然恢复较差。为调查该区林隙更新的现状及其影响因素,作者采用林隙样线调查方法研究了该区针阔混交林林隙更新规律。结果显示,历史上的自然干扰与人为干扰共同影响着该区林隙更新的格局和特征,林隙天然更新受环境因素制约,更新规律表现为:更新幼苗的种类较形成木的种类丰富,更新乔木幼苗的优势度排序与形成木不同;林隙主要树种的更新受各类环境因子的影响而存在差异,桦木(Betula spp.)更新受地形影响较大,岷江冷杉(Abies faxoniana)受土壤因素影响显著,杜鹃(Rhododendron spp.)更新则受地形因子和林隙形成木的特征影响显著;更新物种的多样性指数均表现出受土壤因子的影响显著。由此推测,林隙大小并非影响该区林隙更新的关键因素,而土壤因素可能是制约优势树种天然更新和更新物种多样性的重要原因之一。

关键词: 林隙更新, 林隙形成木, 多样性指数, 主成分分析, 相关分析

Abstract:

Aims Wolong Nature Reserve is the largest reserve for the endangered wild panda. Owing to historical factors, much of the forest has been disturbed and poorly restored, even in many sections of the core protection area. The relative importance of determinants for species recruitment after disturbance is poorly known. We investigated factors affecting regeneration of conifer-broadleaved mixed forest in forest gaps near Wuyipeng, an observation station for pandas.
Methods We examined environmental factors, gap characteristics and recruitment of new individuals in every forest gap along three line transects and analyzed the data using principal component analysis and correlation analysis in SPSS.
Important findings A range of natural and human disturbances influenced the pattern and characteristics of forest gaps in this area. Richness was higher for seedlings than for gap makers, but the ranking of species dominance was different between seedlings and gap makers. The establishment success of dominant species was affected by a variety of factors. For instance, the establishment of Betula spp. was correlated significantly with topographic factors, while that of Abies faxoniana was affected heavily by soil characteristics and that of Rhododendron spp. was correlated significantly with topographic factors and gap-maker characteristics. Moreover, all biodiversity indexes of regenerating seedlings were significantly correlated to principal components mostly reflecting soil characteristics. Therefore, soil characteristics appear to be the most important factor influencing regeneration of dominant species and seedling richness following gap disturbance.

Key words: gap regeneration, gap maker, biodiversity index, principal component analysis, correlation analysis

杨娟, 葛剑平, 刘丽娟, 丁易, 谭迎春. 卧龙自然保护区针阔混交林林隙更新规律. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(3): 425-430. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0051

YANG Juan, GE Jian-Ping, LIU Li-Juan, DING Yi, TAN Ying-Chun. GAP-PHASE REGENERATION RULES OF CONIFER-BROADLEAVED MIXED FOREST IN WOLONG NATURE RESERVE, CHINA. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(3): 425-430. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0051

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2007.0051

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2007/V31/I3/425

图/表 6

参考文献 23

[1]	Administration Bureau of Wolong Nature Reserve(卧龙自然保护区管理局) (1987). Vegetation and Plant Resources of Wolong (卧龙植被及资源植物). Sichuan Science & Technology Publishing House, Chengdu. (in Chinese)
[2]	Brokaw NVL (1985). Gap-phase regeneration in a tropical forest. Ecology, 66, 682-687. DOI URL
[3]	Duke NC (2001). Gap creation and regenerative processes driving diversity and structure of mangrove ecosystems. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 9, 257-269.
[4]	Jiang MX (江明喜), Deng HB (邓红兵), Tang T (唐涛), Cai QH (蔡庆华) (2002). On spatial pattern of species richness in plant communities along riparian zone in Xiangxi River watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 22, 629-635. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	Luo DQ (罗大庆), Guo QS (郭泉水), Xue HY (薛会英), Bianbaduoji (边巴多吉) (2002). Characteristics and disturbance status of gaps in subalpine fir forest in Southeast Tibet. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 13, 777-780. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Rebertus AJ, Burns BR (1997). The importance of gap processes in the development and maintenance of oak savannas and dry forest. Journal of Ecology, 85, 635-645. DOI URL
[7]	Runkle JR (1982). Pattern of disturbance in some old-growth mesic forest of eastern North American. Ecology, 62, 1041-1051. DOI URL
[8]	Runkle JR (1985). Comparison of methods for determining fraction of land area in tree-fall gaps. Forest Science, 31, 15-19.
[9]	Schupp EW (1989). Arrival and survival in tropical tree fall gaps. Ecology, 70, 562-564.
[10]	Shao GF (邵国凡), Zhao SD (赵士洞), Shugart H (1989). Forest Dynamics Modeling: Preliminary Explanations of Optimizing Management for Korean Pine Forests (森林动态模拟——兼论红松林的优化经营). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[11]	Shen ZH (沈泽昊), Li DX (李道兴), Wang GF (王功芳) (2001). Studies on the gap disturbance of the mountain mixed forests of evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved species at Mt. Dalaoling in the Three Gorges Ⅰ. The essential characteristics of the gaps. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25, 276-282. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	Sichuan Vegetation Collaborative Group(四川植被协作组) (1980). Sichuan Vegetation (四川植被). Sichuan People's Publishing House, Chengdu. (in Chinese)
[13]	Spies TA, Franklin JF (1989). Gap characteristics and vegetation responses in coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecology, 70, 543-545.
[14]	Taylor AH, Qin ZS (1988). Regeneration patterns in old-growth Abies-Betula forest in Wolong Natural Reserve, Sichuan, China. Journal of Ecology, 76, 1024-1218.
[15]	Veblen TT (1992). Regeneration dynamics. In: Glenn-Lewin DC ed. Plant Succession: Theory and Prediction. Chapman & Hall, London, 152-177.
[16]	Wang ZP (王周平), Li XG (李旭光), Shi SY (石胜友), Qi DH (齐代华), He ZM (何正明), Xu WW (许文蔚), Deng XB (邓先宝) (2003). A comparison study on the species diversity between the gap and non-gap in Jinyun Mountain. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 14, 7-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Wu G (吴刚), Yin RB (尹若波), Zhou YB (周永斌), Hao ZQ (郝占庆), Liang XY (梁秀英) (1999). The influence of gap regeneration dynamics to early-spring herb in the Korean pine broad-leaved forests in Changbai Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19, 659-663. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Wu N (吴宁) (1999). Dynamics of forest gaps in subalpine coniferous forests on the eastern slope of Gongga Mountain. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 23, 228-237. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	Yang J (杨娟), Liu LJ (刘丽娟), Ge JP (葛剑平), Ding Y (丁易), Tan YC (谭迎春) (2004). Characteristics of canopy gap disturbance in Wolong Nature Reserve. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28, 723-726. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Yang X (杨修) (2002). Gap characteristics and disturbance regime in a dark coniferous forest in Changbai Mountain areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 22, 1825-1831. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	Yu ZL (于振良), Zhao SD (赵士洞) (1997). Advances of gap model. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 16(2), 42-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	Zang RG (臧润国), Liu JY (刘静艳), Dong DF (董大方). Gap Dynamics and Forest Biodiversity (林隙动态与森林生物多样性). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[23]	Zang RG (臧润国), Yu SX (余世孝), Liu JY (刘静艳), Yang YC (杨彦承) (1999b). The gap phase regeneration in a tropical montane rain forest in Bawangling, Hainan Island. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19, 151-158. (in Chinese with English abstract)

林隙干扰特征 Gap disturbance characteristics		海拔 Elevation	坡度 Slope angle	坡向 Aspect
林隙大小特征 Gap size characteristics	EG	0.094	-0.192	0.111
	CG	0.050	-0.083	0.167
	D_cg/H	0.091	-0.105	0.183
形成木特征 Gap maker characteristics	GM_n	-0.152	0.231	0.304^*
	SP_n	-0.115	0.197	0.144
	S_max	0.156	-0.153	-0.182
	S_tol	0.122	-0.122	0.023
林隙形成方式 Gap forming manners	DM	-0.135	0.226	0.142
	KF	0.297^*	-0.168	0.046
	GB	-0.236	0.295^*	0.175
	ZG	-0.219	-0.033	0.031
	KL	-0.011	0.153	0.186

林隙干扰特征 Gap disturbance characteristics		海拔 Elevation	坡度 Slope angle	坡向 Aspect
林隙大小特征 Gap size characteristics	EG	0.094	-0.192	0.111
	CG	0.050	-0.083	0.167
	D_cg/H	0.091	-0.105	0.183
形成木特征 Gap maker characteristics	GM_n	-0.152	0.231	0.304^*
	SP_n	-0.115	0.197	0.144
	S_max	0.156	-0.153	-0.182
	S_tol	0.122	-0.122	0.023
林隙形成方式 Gap forming manners	DM	-0.135	0.226	0.142
	KF	0.297^*	-0.168	0.046
	GB	-0.236	0.295^*	0.175
	ZG	-0.219	-0.033	0.031
	KL	-0.011	0.153	0.186

	岷江冷杉²⁾	铁杉³⁾	杜鹃⁴⁾
桦木¹⁾	0.258	-0.089	-0.124
岷江冷杉²⁾		0.292^*	0.056
铁杉³⁾			0.060

	岷江冷杉²⁾	铁杉³⁾	杜鹃⁴⁾
桦木¹⁾	0.258	-0.089	-0.124
岷江冷杉²⁾		0.292^*	0.056
铁杉³⁾			0.060

更新物种 Regeneration species	PC₁	PC₂	PC₃	PC₄	PC₅
桦木¹⁾	-0.048	-0.011	-0.275^*	0.010	-0.048
岷江冷杉²⁾	-0.111	0.563^**	-0.143	-0.079	-0.210
铁杉³⁾	-0.024	-0.056	0.093	-0.020	0.121
杜鹃⁴⁾	-0.048	0.196	0.351^**	0.298^*	0.025