长白山阔叶红松林生态系统光能利用率的动态变化及其主控因子

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0112

植物生态学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 1156-1165.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0112

所属专题：碳水能量通量

长白山阔叶红松林生态系统光能利用率的动态变化及其主控因子

张雷明^1,,A;^*, 曹沛雨^1,², 朱亚平³, 李庆康¹, 张军辉⁴, 王晓凌³, 戴冠华⁴, 李金功⁵

¹中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101
²中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
³河南科技大学农学院, 河南洛阳 471003
⁴中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016
⁵长白山自然保护管理中心, 吉林延边 133613

出版日期:2015-12-01 发布日期:2015-12-31
通讯作者: 张雷明
作者简介:
# 共同第一作者
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项项目(XDA05050208和XDA05050602)和国家自然科学基金(31170422和31570446)

Dynamics and regulations of ecosystem light use efficiency in a broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest, Changbai Mountain

ZHANG Lei-Ming^1,^*, CAO Pei-Yu^1,², ZHU Ya-Ping³, LI Qing-Kang¹, ZHANG Jun-Hui⁴, WANG Xiao-Ling³, DAI Guan-Hua⁴, LI Jin-Gong⁵

¹Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
²University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
³College of Agricultural, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan 471003, China
⁴Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
and ⁵The Administration Center of Changbai Mountain National Nature Reserve, Yanbian, Jilin 133613, China

Online:2015-12-01 Published:2015-12-31
Contact: Lei-Ming ZHANG
About author:
# Co-first authors

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生态系统光能利用率(LUE)反映了植被通过光合作用利用光能吸收和固定大气中CO₂的能力, 是表征生态系统生产力的重要指标。选取长白山温带阔叶红松(Pinus koraiensis)林生态系统为研究对象, 利用涡度相关通量观测数据, 采用直角双曲线方程获取了生态系统光合作用的表观量子效率(ε); 基于总生态系统初级生产力(GEP)与下垫面入射光合有效辐射(Q)的比值得到生态光能利用率(LUE_eco)。研究表明: 在季节尺度上, ε与LUE_eco均表现出显著的单峰变化特征, 并主要受到土壤温度和归一化植被指数(NDVI)的调控, 同时, ε和LUE_eco都受到GEP的显著影响, 而与Q的相关性较弱或无显著相关关系, 但散射辐射的增加在一定程度上有助于提高生态系统的LUE。ε与LUE_eco存在显著的线性正相关关系, 但ε明显高于LUE_eco。2003-2005年, ε与LUE_eco每年最大值的平均值分别为(0.087 ± 0.003)和(0.040 ± 0.002) μmol CO₂·μmol photon^-1, 年际间变异度分别为4.17%和4.25%, 而不同年份之间最大差异均达到8%或8%以上, 从而对模型模拟结果产生明显影响。因此, 在基于光能利用率模型的模拟研究中, 最大LUE的年际变异需要在参数反演和优化中给予重要考虑。

关键词: 生态系统碳交换, 光能利用率, 最大光能利用率, 年际变异, 植被指数

Abstract:

Aims Ecosystem light use efficiency (LUE) reflects the ability of CO₂ uptake and light utilization via photosynthesis, which is a key parameter in ecosystem models to evaluate ecosystem productivity. The objectives of this study were to: (1) compare the differences of LUE derived from different methods; (2) elucidate the seasonal dynamics of LUE and its regulatory factors; and (3) evaluate the maximum LUE (LUE_max) and its variability based on eddy-covariance (EC) flux.Methods Using the flux data from an EC tower during 2003-2005 at a broad-leaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) mixed forest, Changbai Mountain, two types of LUE indicators were generated from: 1) the apparent quantum yield (ε) estimated with rectangular hyperbolic curve, and 2) the ecological light use efficiency (LUE_eco) calculated as the ratio between gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) and photosynthetically-active radiation (Q).Important findings The seasonal variation of ε and LUE_eco appeared a unimodal pattern within a year, with the variations significantly dominated by soil surface temperature and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). A positive correlation between GEP and LUE was found for both ε and LUE_eco, with the effect of Q on LUE relatively weak. The increase in diffusion radiation appeared favorable for enhanced LUE. Generally, there was a significant positive relationship between ε and LUE_eco, while ε was higher than LUE_eco, especially during the mid-season. The annual maximum value of ε and LUE_eco was (0.087 ± 0.003) and (0.040 ± 0.002) μmol CO₂·μmol photon^-1 over the three years, respectively. The interannual variability of LUE_max for ε and LUE_eco was 4.17% and 4.25%, respectively, with a maximum difference of >8%, likely resulted from considerable uncertainty in model simulations. Our results indicated that the inversion and optimization of maximum LUE should be taken seriously in the application of LUE models.

Key words: ecosystem carbon exchange, light use efficiency, ecosystem maximum light use efficiency, interannual variability, vegetation index

张雷明, 曹沛雨, 朱亚平, 李庆康, 张军辉, 王晓凌, 戴冠华, 李金功. 长白山阔叶红松林生态系统光能利用率的动态变化及其主控因子. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(12): 1156-1165. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0112

ZHANG Lei-Ming,CAO Pei-Yu,ZHU Ya-Ping,LI Qing-Kang,ZHANG Jun-Hui,WANG Xiao-Ling,DAI Guan-Hua,LI Jin-Gong. Dynamics and regulations of ecosystem light use efficiency in a broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest, Changbai Mountain. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(12): 1156-1165. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0112

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2015.0112

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2015/V39/I12/1156

图/表 6

图1 2003-2005年8天尺度长白山阔叶红松林环境条件和植被生长的季节和年际变化。A, 气温、5 cm土壤温度、归一化植被指数和空气饱和水汽压差。B, 光合有效辐射和晴空指数。C, 降水量、5 cm土壤水分含量和10 cm土壤水分含量。

Fig. 1 Seasonal and interannual variations of environmental factors and canopy dynamics at 8-days interval in a broad- leaved Korean pine mixed forest, Changbai Mountain. A, Air temperature, soil temperature at 5 cm depth, normalized difference vegetation index and atmospheric vapor pressure deficit. B, Photosynthetically-active radiation and clearness index. C, Precipitation, soil volume water content at 5 cm and 10 cm depth.

图2 总生态系统生产力和光能利用率的季节和年际变化。

Fig. 2 Seasonal and interannual variations of gross ecosystem productivity and light use efficiency.

图3 光能利用率与土壤温度和归一化植被指数的关系。A, 生态系统表观量子效率和生态光能利用率与土壤温度的关系。B, 生态系统表观量子效率和生态光能利用率与归一化植被指数的关系。

Fig. 3 Relationships between soil temperature, normalized difference vegetation index and light use efficiency. A, Ecosystem apparent quantum yield and ecological light use efficiency vs soil temperature. B, Ecosystem apparent quantum yield and ecological light use efficiency vs normalized difference vegetation index.

图4 生态系统表观量子效率和生态光能利用率之间的相关关系。

Fig. 4 Relationships between ecosystem apparent quantum yield and ecological light use efficiency.

图5 光能利用率(LUE)与总生态系统生产力(GEP)和光合有效辐射(Q)的关系。A, 生态系统表观量子效率(ε)和生态光能利用率(LUEeco)与GEP。B, ε和LUEeco与Q。

Fig. 5 Relationships between gross ecosystem productivity (GEP), photosynthetically-active radiation (Q), and light use efficiency (LUE). A, Ecosystem apparent quantum yield (ε) and ecological light use efficiency (LUEeco) v.s. GEP. B, ε and LUEeco v.s. Q.

图6 散射辐射与生态系统表观量子效率和生态光能利用率。

Fig. 6 Relationship between diffusion radiation and ecosystem apparent quantum yield and ecological light use efficiency.

参考文献 37

[1]	Baldocchi D (2014). Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between ecosystems and the atmosphere—The state and future of the eddy covariance method.Global Change Biology, 20, 3600-3609.
[2]	Barr JG, Engel V, Fuentes JD, Fuller DO, Kwon H (2013). Modeling light use efficiency in a subtropical mangrove forest equipped with CO2 eddy covariance.Biogeosciences, 10, 2145-2158.
[3]	Chen J, Shen MG, Kato T (2009). Diurnal and seasonal variations in light-use efficiency in an alpine meadow ecosystem: Causes and implications for remote sensing.Journal of Plant Ecology, 2, 173-185.
[4]	Chen TX, van der Werf GR, Dolman AJ, Groenendijk M (2011). Evaluation of cropland maximum light use efficiency using eddy flux measurements in North America and Europe.Geophysical Research Letters, 38, doi: 10.1029/2011GL047533.
[5]	Clement RJ, Jarvis PG, Moncrieff JB (2012). Carbon dioxide exchange of a Sitka spruce plantation in Scotland over five years.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 153, 106-123.
[6]	Dengel S, Grace J (2010). Carbon dioxide exchange and canopy conductance of two coniferous forests under various sky conditions.Oecologia, 164, 797-808.
[7]	Falge E, Baldocchi D, Olson R, Anthoni P, Aubinet M, Bernhofer C, Burba G, Ceulemans R, Clement R, Dolman H, Granier A, Gross P, Grünwald T, Hollinger D, Jensen NO, Katul G, Keronen P, Kowalski A, Lai CT, Law BE, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Moors E, Munger JW, Pilegaard K, Rannik Ü, Rebmann C, Suyker A, Tenhunen J, Tu K, Verma S, Vesala T (2001). Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 107, 43-69.
[8]	Garbulsky MF, Peñuelas J, Papale D, Ardö J, Goulden ML, Kiely G, Richardson AD, Rotenberg E, Veenendaal EM, Filella I (2010). Patterns and controls of the variability of radiation use efficiency and primary productivity across terrestrial ecosystems.Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 253-267.
[9]	Gilmanov TG, Aires L, Barcza Z, Baron VS, Belelli L, Beringer J, Billesbach D, Bonal D, Bradford J, Ceschia E, Cook D, Corradi C, Frank A, Gianelle D, Gimeno C, Gruenwald T, Guo HQ, Hanan N, Haszpra L, Heilman J, Jacobs A, Jones MB, Johnson DA, Kiely G, Li SG, Magliulo V, Moors E, Nagy Z, Nasyrov M, Owensby C, Pinter K, Pio C, Reichstein M, Sanz MJ, Scott R, Soussana JF, Stoy PC, Svejcar T, Tuba Z, Zhou GS (2010). Productivity, respiration, and light-response parameters of world grassland and agroecosystems derived from flux-tower measurements.Rangeland Ecology & Management, 63, 16-39.
[10]	Gu LH, Fuentes JD, Shugart HH, Staebler RM, Black TA (1999). Responses of net ecosystem exchanges of carbon dioxide to changes in cloudiness: Results from two North American deciduous forests.Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 104, 31421-31434.
[11]	Guan DX, Wu JB, Zhao XS, Han SJ, Yu GR, Sun XM, Jin CJ (2006). CO2 fluxes over an old, temperate mixed forest in northeastern China.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 137, 138-149.
[12]	Hao ZQ, Li BH, Zhang J, Wang XG, Ye J, Yao XL (2008). Broad-leaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) mixed forest plot in Changbaishan (CBS) of China: Community composition and structure. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 32, 238-250.
	(in Chinese with English abstract) [郝占庆, 李步杭, 张健, 王绪高, 叶吉, 姚晓琳 (2008). 长白山阔叶红松林样地(CBS): 群落组成与结构. 植物生态学报, 32, 238-250.]
[13]	Jenkins JP, Richardson AD, Braswell BH, Ollinger SV, Hollinger DY, Smith ML (2007). Refining light-use efficiency calculations for a deciduous forest canopy using simultaneous tower-based carbon flux and radiometric measurements.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 143, 64-79.
[14]	Kanniah KD, Beringer J, North P, Hutley L (2012). Control of atmospheric particles on diffuse radiation and terrestrial plant productivity: A review.Progress in Physical Geography, 36, 209-237.
[15]	Li HQ, Zhang FW, Li YN, Cao GM, Zhao L, Zhao XQ (2014). Seasonal and interannual variations of ecosystem photosynthetic features in an alpine dwarf shrubland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China.Photosynthetica, 52, 321-331.
[16]	Lasslop G, Reichstein M, Papale D, Richardson AD, Arneth A, Barr A, Stoy P, Wohlfahrt G. (2010). Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: Critical issues and global evaluation.Global Change Biology, 16, 187-208.
[17]	Mercado LM, Bellouin N, Sitch S, Boucher O, Huntingford C, Wild M, Cox PM (2009). Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink.Nature, 458, 1014-1017.
[18]	Monteith JL (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 281, 277-294
[19]	Papale D, Reichstein M, Aubinet M, Canfora E, Bernhofer C, Kutsch W, Longdoz B, Rambal S, Valentini R, Vesala T, Yakir D (2006). Towards a standardized processing of net ecosystem exchange measured with eddy covariance technique: Algorithms and uncertainty estimation.Biogeosciences, 3, 571-583.
[20]	Polley HW, Phillips RL, Frank AB, Bradford JA, Sims PL, Morgan JA, Kiniry JR (2011). Variability in light-use efficiency for gross primary productivity on Great Plains grasslands.Ecosystems, 14, 15-27.
[21]	Reichstein M, Fagle E, Baldocchi D, Palale D, Aubinet M, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Buchmann N, Gilmanov T, Granier A, Grünwald T, Havránková K, Ilvesniemi H, Janous D, Knohl A, Laurila T, Lohila A, Loustau D, Matteucci G, Meyers T, Miglietta F, Ourcival JM, Pumpanen J, Rambal S, Rotenberg E, Sanz M, Tenhunen J, Seufert G, Vaccari F, Vesala T, Yakir D, Valentini R (2005). On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: Review and improved algorithm.Global Change Biology, 11, 1424-1439.
[22]	Reindl DT, Beckman WA, Duffie JA (1990). Diffuse fraction correlations.Solar Energy, 45, 1-7.
[23]	Ruimy A, Jarvis PG, Baldocchi DD, Saugier B (1995). CO2 fluxes over plant canopies and solar radiation: A review.Advances in Ecological Research, 26, 1-68.
[24]	Schwalm CR, Black TA, Amiro BD, Arain MA, Barr AG, Bourque CPA, Dunn AL, Flanagan LB, Giasson MA, Lafleur PM, Margolis HA, McCaughey JH, Orchansky AL, Wofsy SC (2006). Photosynthetic light use efficiency of three biomes across an eastwest continental-scale transect in Canada.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 140, 269-286.
[25]	Turner DP, Urbanski S, Bremer D, Wofsy SC, Meyers T, Gower ST, Gregory M (2003). A cross-biome comparison of daily light use efficiency for gross primary production.Global Change Biology, 9, 383-395.
[26]	Wang HS, Jia GS, Fu CB, Feng JM, Zhao TB, Ma ZG (2010). Deriving maximal light use efficiency from coordinated flux measurements and satellite data for regional gross primary production modeling.Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 2248-2258.
[27]	Wu JB, Xiao XM, Guan DX, Shi TT, Jin CJ, Han SJ (2009). Estimation of the gross primary production of an old-growth temperate mixed forest using eddy covariance and remote sensing.International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30, 463-479.
[28]	Xiao XM, Boles S, Liu JY, Zhuang DF, Liu ML (2002). Characterization of forest types in Northeastern China, using multi-temporal SPOT-4 VEGETATION sensor data.Remote Sensing of Environment, 82, 335-348.
[29]	Xiao XM, Hollinger D, Aber J, Goltz M, Davidson EA, Zhang QY, Moore III B (2004). Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest.Remote Sensing of Environment, 89, 519-534.
[30]	Yu GR, Wen XF, Sun XM, Tanner BD, Lee X, Chen JY (2006). Overview of ChinaFLUX and evaluation of its eddy covariance measurement.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 137, 125-137.
[31]	Yu GR, Zhang LM, Sun XM, Fu YL, Wen XF, Wang QF, Li SG, Ren CY, Song X, Liu YF, Han SJ, Yan JH (2008). Environmental controls over carbon exchange of three forest ecosystems in eastern China.Global Change Biology, 14, 2555-2571.
[32]	Yuan WP, Cai WW, Xia JZ, Chen JQ, Liu SG, Dong WJ, Merbold L, Law B, Arain A, Beringer J, Bernhofer C, Black A, Blanken PD, Cescatti A, Chen Y, Francois L, Gianelle D, Janssens IA, Jung M, Kato T, Kiely G, Liu D, Marcolla B, Montagnani L, Raschi A, Roupsard O, Varlagin A, Wohlfahrt G (2014). Global comparison of light use efficiency models for simulating terrestrial vegetation gross primary production based on the LaThuile database. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 192-193, 108-120.
[33]	Yuan WP, Liu SG, Zhou GS, Zhou GY, Tieszen LL, Baldocchi D, Bernhofer C, Gholz H, Goldstein AH, Goulden ML, Hollinger DY, Hu YM, Law BE, Stoy PC, Vesala T, Wofsy SC (2007). Deriving a light use efficiency model from eddy covariance flux data for predicting daily gross primary production across biomes.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 143, 189-207.
[34]	Zhang LM, Yu GR, Sun XM, Wen XF, Ren CY, Fu YL, Li QK, Li ZQ, Liu YF, Guan DX, Yan JH (2006). Seasonal variations of ecosystem apparent quantum yield (α) and maximum photosynthesis rate (Pmax) of different forest ecosystems in China.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 137, 176-187.
[35]	Zhang M, Yu GR, Zhang LM, Sun XM, Wen XF, Han SJ (2009). Effects of solar radiation on net ecosystem exchange of broadleaved-Korean pine mixed forest in Changbai Mountain, China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 33, 270-282.
	(in Chinese with English abstract) [张弥, 于贵瑞, 张雷明, 孙晓敏, 温学发, 韩士杰 (2009). 太阳辐射对长白山阔叶红松林净生态系统碳交换的影响. 植物生态学报, 33, 270-282.]
[36]	Zhang M, Yu GR, Zhang LM, Sun XM, Wen XF, Han SJ, Yan JH (2010). Impact of cloudiness on net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in different types of forest ecosystems in China.Biogeosciences, 7, 711-722.
[37]	Zhang Q, Zhang L, He HL, Han SJ, Li YN, Ouyang Z, Shi PL, Wang HM, Hao YB, Zhang YP, Yan JH (2014). Inversion of the maximum light use efficiency using eddy covariance flux observations.Quaternary Science, 34, 743-751.
	(in Chinese with English abstract) [张强, 张黎, 何洪林, 韩士杰, 李英年, 欧阳竹, 石培礼, 王辉民, 郝彦宾, 张一平, 闫俊华 (2014). 基于涡度相关通量数据的植被最大光能利用率反演研究. 第四纪研究, 34, 743-751.]

长白山阔叶红松林生态系统光能利用率的动态变化及其主控因子

Dynamics and regulations of ecosystem light use efficiency in a broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest, Changbai Mountain

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈雪萍, 赵学勇, 张晶, 王瑞雄, 卢建男. 基于地理探测器的科尔沁沙地植被NDVI时空变化特征及其驱动因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(8): 1082-1093.
[2]	缪丽娟, 张宇阳, 揣小伟, 包刚, 何昱, 朱敬雯. 亚洲旱区草地NDVI对气候变化的响应及滞后效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10): 1375-1385.
[3]	朱玉英, 张华敏, 丁明军, 余紫萍. 青藏高原植被绿度变化及其对干湿变化的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 51-64.
[4]	文可, 姚焕玫, 龚祝清, 纳泽林, 韦毅明, 黄以, 陈华权, 廖鹏任, 唐丽萍. 水淹频率变化对鄱阳湖增强型植被指数的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 148-161.
[5]	原媛, 母艳梅, 邓钰洁, 李鑫豪, 姜晓燕, 高圣杰, 查天山, 贾昕. 植被覆盖度和物候变化对典型黑沙蒿灌丛生态系统总初级生产力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 162-175.
[6]	王彦兵, 游翠海, 谭星儒, 陈波宇, 许梦真, 陈世苹. 中国北方干旱半干旱区草原生态系统能量平衡闭合的季节和年际变异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1448-1460.
[7]	刘宁, 彭守璋, 陈云明. 气候因子对青藏高原植被生长的时间效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(1): 18-26.
[8]	倪铭, 张曦月, 姜超, 王鹤松. 中国西南部地区植被对极端气候事件的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(6): 626-640.
[9]	汲玉河, 周广胜, 王树东, 王丽霞, 周梦子. 2000-2019年秦岭地区植被生态质量演变特征及驱动力分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(6): 617-625.
[10]	陈哲, 汪浩, 王金洲, 石慧瑾, 刘慧颖, 贺金生. 基于物候相机归一化植被指数估算高寒草地植物地上生物量的季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(5): 487-495.
[11]	周明星, 李登秋, 邹建军. 基于稠密Landsat数据的邛崃山大熊猫栖息地植被变化研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(4): 355-369.
[12]	徐光来, 李爱娟, 徐晓华, 杨先成, 杨强强. 中国生态功能保护区归一化植被指数动态及气候因子驱动[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(3): 213-223.
[13]	张文强, 罗格平, 郑宏伟, 王浩, HAMDI Rafiq, 何惠丽, 蔡鹏, 陈春波. 基于随机森林模型的内陆干旱区植被指数变化与驱动力分析: 以北天山北坡中段为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(11): 1113-1126.
[14]	史娜娜, 肖能文, 王琦, 韩煜, 高晓奇, 冯瑾, 全占军. 锡林郭勒植被NDVI时空变化及其驱动力定量分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(4): 331-341.
[15]	胡毅, 朱新萍, 贾宏涛, 韩东亮, 胡保安, 李典鹏. 围栏封育对天山北坡草甸草原生态系统碳交换的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 372-381.