·荒漠草地植物多样性对草食动物采食的响应机制

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2015.0421

植物生态学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 564-573.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0421

·荒漠草地植物多样性对草食动物采食的响应机制

刘文亭¹, 卫智军^1,,A;^*(), 吕世杰², 孙世贤³, 贾利娟⁴, 张爽¹, 王天乐¹, 代景忠¹, 卢志宏¹

¹内蒙古农业大学生态环境学院, 呼和浩特 010019
²内蒙古农业大学理学院, 呼和浩特 010018
³中国农业科学院草原研究所, 呼和浩特 010010
⁴苏尼特右旗草原工作站, 内蒙古锡林郭勒 011200

收稿日期:2015-11-23 接受日期:2016-05-12 出版日期:2016-06-10 发布日期:2016-06-15
通讯作者: 卫智军
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31460126)、国家重点基础研究发展计划(2014CB138805)、国家科技支撑计划(2012BAD13B00)和内蒙古自然科学基金(2015MS0349)

Response mechanism of plant diversity to herbivore foraging in desert grassland

Wen-Ting LIU¹, Zhi-Jun WEI^1,^*(), Shi-Jie LÜ², Shi-Xian SUN³, Li-Juan JIA⁴, Shuang ZHANG¹, Tian-Le WANG¹, Jing-Zhong DAI¹, Zhi-Hong LU¹

¹College of Ecology and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China

²College of Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China

³Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Hohhot 010010, China
and
⁴Sonid Right Banner Station of Grassland Management, Xilingol, Nei Mongol 011200, China

Received:2015-11-23 Accepted:2016-05-12 Online:2016-06-10 Published:2016-06-15
Contact: Zhi-Jun WEI

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

草食动物采食对草地植物多样性和生态系统功能的影响机制是放牧生态学研究的核心问题。该研究以内蒙古锡林郭勒盟苏尼特右旗荒漠草原的长期放牧控制实验为平台, 从既有草地植物多样性和动物偏食性两个层面系统地研究了荒漠草地植物多样性对草食动物采食的响应机制。结果显示: 1)荒漠草地植物对草食动物采食呈现4种响应模式: 放牧“隐没种”、放牧“敏感种”、放牧“无感种”、“绝对优势种”; 2)在群落尺度上, 物种多样性指数随放牧强度增加而减少, 与不放牧小区相比, 重度放牧(HG)与适度放牧(MG)小区植物多样性均下降, 且这一规律同样适用于功能群多样性, 灌木半灌木这一功能群内物种多样性对放牧干扰较敏感; 3)在草地既有植物的基础上, 以不放牧小区为参考系, 草食动物对植物功能群偏食性的排序为: 一二年生草本(AB) >多年生杂类草(PF) >灌木半灌木(SS) >多年生禾草(PG), 且偏食性物种主要分布于AB和PF中; 4)植物多样性与动物偏食性基本呈显著负相关关系(p < 0.05)。

关键词: 植物多样性, 偏食性, 草食动物, 荒漠草地, 组织尺度

Abstract:

Aims The mechanism of herbivore foraging effect on plant diversity and ecosystem functions of grasslands is the core issue of grazing ecology research. This study is aimed to examine 1) how species respond to different grazing intensity in grassland, and how plant diversity responds to different grazing intensity within different organization scales and whether there are cascade effects across multiple organization scales? 2) How herbivore foraging affects plant diversity.Methods Based on a six-year grazing experiment in Sonid Right Banner, Xilingol, the study attempted to explain the relationships between plant diversity and herbivore foraging from two perspectives, i.e. plant diversity index and herbivore preference index.Important findings Results showed that there were four modes for desert grassland plant in response to herbivore: grazing-hidden species, grazing-sensitive species, grazing-non inductive species and absolute dominant species. At the community scale, species diversity index decreased with an increased grazing intensity. Compared with no grazing, heavy grazing and moderate grazing treatments decreased community plant diversity, and the same principle is applicable to the functional group diversity. Further analysis found that differences of grazing species diversity within a functional group were mainly caused by shrubs and semi-shrubs. Compared to plots without grazing, the herbivore preference degree on the whole species was lower for moderate grazing plots than heavy grazing ones. The foraging preference order on the plant functional groups was annual and biennial forbs (AB), perennial forbs (PF), shrubs and semi-shrubs (SS) and perennial grasses (PG). The preferred species were mainly distributed in AB and PF. The diversity index of plant and preference index of herbivore were basically significant and negatively correlated (p < 0.05).

Key words: plant diversity, preference species, herbivore, desert grassland, organization scale

刘文亭, 卫智军, 吕世杰, 孙世贤, 贾利娟, 张爽, 王天乐, 代景忠, 卢志宏. ·荒漠草地植物多样性对草食动物采食的响应机制. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(6): 564-573. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0421

Wen-Ting LIU, Zhi-Jun WEI, Shi-Jie LÜ, Shi-Xian SUN, Li-Juan JIA, Shuang ZHANG, Tian-Le WANG, Jing-Zhong DAI, Zhi-Hong LU. Response mechanism of plant diversity to herbivore foraging in desert grassland. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(6): 564-573. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0421

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2015.0421

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2016/V40/I6/564

图/表 8

参考文献 37

[1]	Bai YF, Wu JG, Clark CM, Pan QM, Zhang LX, Chen SP, Wang QB, Han XG (2012). Grazing alters ecosystem functioning and C:N:P stoichiometry of grasslands along a regional precipitation gradient.Journal of Applied Ecology, 49, 1204-1215.
[2]	Chapin FS III, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack MC, Diaz S (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity.Nature, 405, 234-242.
[3]	Chen DM, Zheng SX, Shan YM, Taube F, Bai YF (2013). Vertebrate herbivore-induced changes in plants and soils: Linkages to ecosystem functioning in a semi-arid steppe.Functional Ecology, 27, 273-281.
[4]	Deng RG (2012). Analysis on Soundscape Quality of Forest. PhD dissertation, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang. 63-84. (in Chinese)[邓荣根 (2012). 森林声景观品质分析. 博士学位论文, 江西农业大学, 南昌. 63-84.]
[5]	Gibson DJ (2009). Grasses and Grassland Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
[6]	Gillson L, Hoffman MT (2007). Rangeland ecology in a changing world.Science, 315, 53-54.
[7]	Hector A, Schmid B (1999). Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands.Science, 286, 1123-1127.
[8]	Hodgson J, Illius A (1996). The Ecology and Management of Grazing Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
[9]	Jared JB, Daniel L, Hernandez, Jae RP, Erika SZ (2015). Grazing maintains native plant diversity and promotes community stability in an annual grassland.Ecological Applications, 25, 1259-1270.
[10]	Kraft NJB, Comita LS, Chase JM, Sanders NJ, Swenson NG, Crist TO, Stegen JC, Vellend M, Boyle B, Anderson MJ, Cornell HV, Davies KF, Freestone AL, Inouye BD, Harrison SP, Myers JA (2011). Disentangling the drivers of β-diversity along latitudinal and elevational gradients.Science, 333, 1755-1758.
[11]	Liu J, Feng C, Wang D, Wang L, Wilsey BJ, Zhong Z (2015). Impacts of grazing by different large herbivores in grassland depend on plant species diversity.Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 1053-1062.
[12]	Liu WT, Wei ZJ, Lü SJ, Sun SX, Dai JZ, Yan BL (2015). Above-ground biomass in Stipa breviflora desert grassland at different organizational scales.Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 21, 912-918. (in Chinese with English abstract)[刘文亭, 卫智军, 吕世杰, 孙世贤, 代景忠, 闫宝龙 (2015). 短花针茅荒漠草原不同组织尺度地上生物量. 应用与环境生物学报, 21, 912-918.]
[13]	Louault F, Pillar VD, Aufrère J, Garnier E, Soussana JF (2005). Plant traits and functional types in response to reduced disturbance in a semi-natural grassland.Journal of Vegetation Science, 16, 151-160.
[14]	Lü SJ, Liu HM, Wu YL, Wei ZJ, Nie YQ (2014). Effects of grazing on spatial distribution relationships between constructive and dominant species in Stipa breviflora desert steppe.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 3469-3474. (in Chinese with English abstract)[吕世杰, 刘红梅, 吴艳玲, 卫智军, 聂雨芊 (2014). 放牧对短花针茅荒漠草原建群种与优势种空间分布关系的影响. 应用生态学报, 25, 3469-3474.]
[15]	Lyons KG, Brigham CA, Traut BH, Schwartz MW (2005). Rare species and ecosystem functioning.Conservation Biology, 19, 1019-1024.
[16]	Ma KP (1993). Try theory the concept of biodiversity.Biodiversity Science, 1, 20-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)[马克平 (1993). 试论生物多样性的概念. 生物多样性, 1, 20-22.]
[17]	Ma YS, Zhang ST (2009). Responses of plant from individual to community level to grazing: A review.Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 113-121. (in Chinese with English abstract)[马银山, 张世挺 (2009). 植物从个体到群落水平对放牧的响应. 生态学杂志, 28, 113-121.]
[18]	Milchunas DG, Sala OE, Lauenroth WK (1988). A generalized model of the effects of grazing by large herbivores on grassland community structure.American Naturalist, 132, 87-106.
[19]	Mouillot D, Bellwood DR, Baraloto C, Chave J, Galzin R, Harmelin-Vivien M, Kulbicki M, Lavergne S, Lavorel S, Mouquet N (2013). Rare species support vulnerable functions in high-diversity ecosystems.PLoS Biology, 11, 1-11.
[20]	Olff H, Ritchie ME (1998). Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity.Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 261-265.
[21]	Proulx M, Mazumder A (1998). Reversal of grazing impact on plant species richness in nutrient-poor vs. nutrient-rich ecosystems.Ecology, 79, 2581-2592.
[22]	Provenza FD (1995). Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants.Journal of Range Management, 48, 2-17.
[23]	Rossignol N, Bonis A, Bouzille JB (2006). Consequence of grazing pattern and vegetation structure on the spatial variations of N mineralization in a wet grassland.Applied Soil Ecology, 31, 62-70.
[24]	Simpson SJ, Sibly RM, Lee KP, Behmer ST, Raubenheimer D (2004). Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients.Animal Behaviour, 68, 1299-1311.
[25]	Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986). Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
[26]	Storkey J, Macdonald AJ, Poulton PR, Scott T, Köhler IH, Schnyder H, Goulding KWT, Crawley MJ (2015). Grassland biodiversity bounces back from long-term nitrogen addition.Nature, 528, 401-404.
[27]	Sun RY, Li B, Zhuge Y, Shang YC (1993). General Ecology. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)[孙儒泳, 李博, 诸葛阳, 尚玉昌 (1993). 普通生态学. 高等教育出版社, 北京.]
[28]	Sun SX, Wei ZJ, Lü SJ, Lu ZH, Chen LB, Li XZ, Wu YL, Li JR (2013). Characteristics of plant community and its functional groups in desert grassland under effects of seasonal regulation of grazing intensity.Chinese Journal of Ecology, 32, 2703-2710. (in Chinese with English abstract)[孙世贤, 卫智军, 吕世杰, 卢志宏, 陈立波, 李夏子, 吴艳玲, 李建茹 (2013). 放牧强度季节调控下荒漠草原植物群落与功能群特征. 生态学杂志, 32, 2703-2710.]
[29]	Tilman D, Isbell F (2015). Biodiversity: Recovery as nitrogen declines.Nature, 528, 336-337.
[30]	Villalba JJ, Provenza FD (2000). Discriminating among novel foods: Effects of energy provision on preferences of lambs for poor-quality foods.Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 66, 87-106.
[31]	Wan HW, Bai YF, Schönbach P, Gierus M, Taube F (2011). Effects of grazing management system on plant community structure and functioning in a semiarid steppe: Scaling from species to community.The Plant Soil, 340, 215-226.
[32]	Wang L (2010). Behavioral Adaptive Mechanisms of Large Herbivore Foraging in Response to Diversity and Spatial Pattern of Plants. PhD dissertation, Northeast Normal University, Changchun. 39-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)[王岭 (2010). 大型草食动物采食对植物多样性与空间格局的响应及行为适应机制. 博士学位论文, 东北师范大学, 长春. 39-49.]
[33]	Wang L, Wang D, Bai Y, Huang Y, Fan M, Liu J, Li Y (2010). Spatially complex neighboring relationships among grassland plant species as an effective mechanism of defense against herbivory.Oecologia, 164, 193-200.
[34]	Wei ZJ, Han GD, Zhang G, Li DX (2013). Research of Chinese Desert Grassland Ecosystem. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)[卫智军, 韩国栋, 赵钢, 李德新 (2013). 中国荒漠草原生态系统研究. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[35]	Xu YF, Yixicuomu, Fu JJ, Chen H, Miao YJ, Chen J, Hu TM, Zhong JG (2012). Response of plant diversity and soil nutrient to grazing intensity in Kobresia pygmaea Meadow of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 20, 1026-1032. (in Chinese with English abstract)[许岳飞, 益西措姆, 付娟娟, 陈浩, 苗彦军, 陈俊, 呼天明, 镡建国 (2012). 青藏高原高山嵩草草甸植物多样性和土壤养分对放牧的响应机制. 草地学报, 20, 1026-1032.]
[36]	Yang J, Chu PF, Chen DM, Wang MJ, Bai YF (2014). Mechanisms underlying the impacts of grazing on plant α, β and γ diversity in a typical steppe of the Inner Mongolia grassland.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 38, 188-200. (in Chinese with English abstract)[杨婧, 褚鹏飞, 陈迪马, 王明玖, 白永飞 (2014). 放牧对内蒙古典型草原α、β和γ多样性的影响机制. 植物生态学报, 38, 188-200.]
[37]	Zheng SX, Lan ZC, Li WH, Shao RX, Shan YM, Wan HW, Taube F, Bai YF (2011). Differential responses of plant functional trait to grazing between two contrasting dominant C3 and C4 species in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, China.Plant and Soil, 340, 141-155.

物种 Species	植物功能群 Plant functional groups	物种代码 Species code	植物功能群代码 Plant functional group code
短花针茅 Stipa breviflora	多年生草本 Perennial grasses	S1	PG
无芒隐子草 Cleistogenes songorica	多年生草本 Perennial grasses	S2	PG
寸草 Carex duriuscula	多年生草本 Perennial grasses	S3	PG
木地肤 Kochia prostrata	灌木半灌木 Shrubs and semi-shrubs	S4	SS
狭叶锦鸡儿 Caragana stenophylla	灌木半灌木 Shrubs and semi-shrubs	S5	SS
戈壁天门冬 Asparagus gobicus	灌木半灌木 Shrubs and semi-shrubs	S6	SS
茵陈蒿 Artemisia capillaris	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S7	PF
阿尔泰狗娃花 Heteropappus altaicus	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S8	PF
碱韭 Allium polyrhizum	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S9	PF
二刺叶兔唇花 Lagochilus diacanthophyllus	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S10	PF
银灰旋花 Convolvulus ammannii	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S11	PF
二型叶棘豆 Oxytropis diversifolia	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S12	PF
乳白黄耆 Astragalus galactites	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S13	PF
拐轴鸦葱 Scorzonera divaricata	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S14	PF
冷蒿 Artemisia frigida	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S15	PF
蒙古韭 Allium mongolicum	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S16	PF
韭 Allium tuberosum	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S17	PF
细叶韭 Allium tenuissimum	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S18	PF
二裂委陵菜 Potentilla bifurca	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S19	PF
栉叶蒿 Neopallasia pectinata	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	S20	AB
猪毛菜 Salsola collina	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	S21	AB
牻牛儿苗 Erodium stephanianum	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	S22	AB
狗尾草 Setaria viridis	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	S23	AB
画眉草 Eragrostis pilosa	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	S24	AB

物种 Species	植物功能群 Plant functional groups	物种代码 Species code	植物功能群代码 Plant functional group code
短花针茅 Stipa breviflora	多年生草本 Perennial grasses	S1	PG
无芒隐子草 Cleistogenes songorica	多年生草本 Perennial grasses	S2	PG
寸草 Carex duriuscula	多年生草本 Perennial grasses	S3	PG
木地肤 Kochia prostrata	灌木半灌木 Shrubs and semi-shrubs	S4	SS
狭叶锦鸡儿 Caragana stenophylla	灌木半灌木 Shrubs and semi-shrubs	S5	SS
戈壁天门冬 Asparagus gobicus	灌木半灌木 Shrubs and semi-shrubs	S6	SS
茵陈蒿 Artemisia capillaris	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S7	PF
阿尔泰狗娃花 Heteropappus altaicus	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S8	PF
碱韭 Allium polyrhizum	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S9	PF
二刺叶兔唇花 Lagochilus diacanthophyllus	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S10	PF
银灰旋花 Convolvulus ammannii	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S11	PF
二型叶棘豆 Oxytropis diversifolia	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S12	PF
乳白黄耆 Astragalus galactites	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S13	PF
拐轴鸦葱 Scorzonera divaricata	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S14	PF
冷蒿 Artemisia frigida	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S15	PF
蒙古韭 Allium mongolicum	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S16	PF
韭 Allium tuberosum	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S17	PF
细叶韭 Allium tenuissimum	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S18	PF
二裂委陵菜 Potentilla bifurca	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	S19	PF
栉叶蒿 Neopallasia pectinata	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	S20	AB
猪毛菜 Salsola collina	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	S21	AB
牻牛儿苗 Erodium stephanianum	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	S22	AB
狗尾草 Setaria viridis	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	S23	AB
画眉草 Eragrostis pilosa	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	S24	AB

年份 Year	1月 Jan.	2月 Feb.	3月 Mar.	4月 Apr.	5月 May	6月 June	7月 July	8月 Aug.	9月 Sept.	10月 Oct.	11月 Nov.	12月 Dec.
2012	0	0.1	10.2	7.5	18.7	42.7	166.6	17.3	33.2	6.6	21.1	4.7
2013	1	0.8	2.6	2.7	1.2	86.9	44.9	60.9	20.8	0.1	6.6	0.5
2014	0	7.2	0	11.6	18.9	15.1	17.7	12.7	18.8	11.6	1.1	0.3

年份 Year	1月 Jan.	2月 Feb.	3月 Mar.	4月 Apr.	5月 May	6月 June	7月 July	8月 Aug.	9月 Sept.	10月 Oct.	11月 Nov.	12月 Dec.
2012	0	0.1	10.2	7.5	18.7	42.7	166.6	17.3	33.2	6.6	21.1	4.7
2013	1	0.8	2.6	2.7	1.2	86.9	44.9	60.9	20.8	0.1	6.6	0.5
2014	0	7.2	0	11.6	18.9	15.1	17.7	12.7	18.8	11.6	1.1	0.3

放牧强度 Grazing intensity	功能群内物种丰富度指数 Species richness within plant functional groups index				功能群内物种多样性指数 Species diversity within plant functional groups index
放牧强度 Grazing intensity	多年生禾草 Perennial grasses	灌木半灌木 Shrubs and semi-shrubs	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs	多年生禾草 Perennial grasses	灌木半灌木 Shrubs and semi-shrubs	多年生杂类草 Perennial forbs	一二年生草本 Annual and biennial forbs
重度放牧 Heavy grazing	2.26 ± 0.09^a	0.79 ± 0.08^b	3.23 ± 0.14^a	0.67 ± 0.12^a	0.63 ± 0.04^a	0.04 ± 0.03^b	0.72 ± 0.04^b	0.15 ± 0.05^a
适度放牧 Moderate grazing	2.23 ± 0.1^a	0.53 ± 0.09^b	3.18 ± 0.25^a	0.63 ± 0.13^a	0.67 ± 0.05^a	0.03 ± 0.03^ab	0.69 ± 0.07^b	0.13 ± 0.05^a
不放牧 No grazing	2.39 ± 0.07^a	0.93 ± 0.09^a	3.54 ± 0.18^a	0.48 ± 0.09^a	0.68 ± 0.04^a	0.13 ± 0.04^a	0.93 ± 0.05^a	0.13 ± 0.05^a

·荒漠草地植物多样性对草食动物采食的响应机制

Response mechanism of plant diversity to herbivore foraging in desert grassland

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张琦, 冯可, 常智慧, 何双辉, 徐维启. 灌丛化对林草交错带植物和土壤微生物的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6): 770-781.
[2]	王姝文, 李文怀, 李艳龙, 严慧, 李永宏. 放牧家畜类型对内蒙古典型草原植物多样性和群落结构的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 941-950.
[3]	周楷玲, 赵玉金, 白永飞. 基于Sentinel-2A数据的东北森林植物多样性监测方法研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(10): 1251-1267.
[4]	范敏, 卢奕曈, 王照华, 黄颖琪, 彭羽, 尚佳欣, 张杨. 浑善达克沙地中部斑块格局影响植物多样性及功能性状[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(1): 51-61.
[5]	姜鑫, 牛克昌. 青藏高原禾草混播对土壤微生物多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(5): 539-551.
[6]	钟志伟, 李晓菲, 王德利. 植物-植食性动物相互关系研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(10): 1036-1048.
[7]	邹东廷, 王庆刚, 罗奥, 王志恒. 中国蔷薇科植物多样性格局及其资源植物保护现状[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(1): 1-15.
[8]	杨昊天, 王增如, 贾荣亮. 腾格里沙漠东南缘荒漠草地不同群落类型土壤有机碳分布及储量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 288-296.
[9]	吴秀芝, 阎欣, 王波, 刘任涛, 安慧. 荒漠草地沙漠化对土壤-微生物-胞外酶化学计量特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 1022-1032.
[10]	崔宁洁,张丹桔,刘洋,张健,杨万勤,欧江,张捷,宋小艳,殷睿. 马尾松人工林不同大小林窗植物多样性及其季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(5): 477-490.
[11]	赵新风, 徐海量, 张鹏, 涂文霞, 张青青. 养分与水分添加对荒漠草地植物群落结构和物种多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(2): 167-177.
[12]	赵新风, 徐海量, 张鹏, 张青青. 养分与水分添加对荒漠草地植物钠猪毛菜功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(2): 134-146.
[13]	张敏,潘艳霞,杨洪晓. 山东半岛潮上带沙草地的物种多度格局及其对人为干扰的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(6): 542-550.
[14]	王敏, 苏永中, 杨荣, 杨晓. 黑河中游荒漠草地地上和地下生物量的分配格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(3): 209-219.
[15]	刘聪, 项文化, 田大伦, 方晰, 彭长辉. 中亚热带森林植物多样性增加导致细根生物量“超产”[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(5): 539-550.