植物生态学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 47-54.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00047
收稿日期:
2011-05-24
接受日期:
2011-08-01
出版日期:
2012-05-24
发布日期:
2012-01-05
作者简介:
*E-mail:jym_wm@126.com
JIANG Yang-Ming1(), CUI Wei-Hong1, DONG Qian-Lin2
Received:
2011-05-24
Accepted:
2011-08-01
Online:
2012-05-24
Published:
2012-01-05
摘要:
光照、气温、土壤类型、降水量、土壤含水量、海拔、坡度、重金属污染等自然生态环境对烤烟的分布、生长发育及品质有重要影响, 同时也是烤烟种植优化配置必不可少的基础信息。基于空间技术的烤烟种植生态环境综合评价分析的目的就是应用遥感、地理信息等空间技术, 实现烤烟种植区域生态环境信息的三维立体采集及烤烟种植生态环境适宜性空间分布信息评价。主要研究内容是分析影响烤烟种植及品质的生态因子, 应用ARCGIS空间分析功能获得海拔、坡度因子, 应用常规的遥感模型反演植被指数、地表温度、土壤含水量和太阳辐射因子, 应用Kriging插值加密地球化学数据建立烤烟种植生态环境综合评价指标体系。通过基于空间技术的烤烟种植生态环境适宜性等级空间分布优化分析结果与实验区烤烟种植示范基地和烤烟种植区域的调整结果进行对比, 可知该方法是有效的。
蒋样明, 崔伟宏, 董前林. 基于空间技术的烤烟种植生态环境综合评价分析. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(1): 47-54. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00047
JIANG Yang-Ming, CUI Wei-Hong, DONG Qian-Lin. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of tobacco planting environment based on space technology. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(1): 47-54. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2012.00047
图1 基于空间技术的烤烟种植生态环境综合分析流程。
Fig. 1 Ecological environment comprehensive evaluation process of tobacco planting based on space technology. MODIS: moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer; SRTM: Shuttle Radar Topography Mission.
A | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B1 | C1 | C2 | B2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | B3 | C6 | C7 | B4 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | C1 | 1 | 2 | C3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | C6 | 1 | 5 | C8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
B2 | 1/4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | C2 | 1/2 | 1 | C4 | 1/3 | 1 | 2 | C7 | 1/5 | 1 | C9 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
B3 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | C5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | C10 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
B4 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | C11 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 |
表1 层次分析判断矩阵
Table 1 Hierarchy analytic process matrix
A | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B1 | C1 | C2 | B2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | B3 | C6 | C7 | B4 | C8 | C9 | C10 | C11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | C1 | 1 | 2 | C3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | C6 | 1 | 5 | C8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
B2 | 1/4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | C2 | 1/2 | 1 | C4 | 1/3 | 1 | 2 | C7 | 1/5 | 1 | C9 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
B3 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 1/2 | C5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | C10 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | ||||||
B4 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | C11 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 |
图2 烤烟种植适宜性评价指标体系的层次结构。TVDI, 温度植被旱情指数。
Fig. 2 Hierarchy of tobacco planting suitability evaluation index system. TVDI, temperature/vegetation dryness index.
A-B | B1-Ci | B2-Ci | B3-Ci | B4-Ci |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bi | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci(K) | Ci (K) |
0.487 2 | 0.666 7 | 0.593 6 | 0.833 3 | 0.482 9 |
0.183 3 | 0.333 3 | 0.249 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.272 0 |
0.116 4 | 0.157 1 | 0.157 0 | ||
0.213 1 | 0.088 1 | |||
λmax = 4.096 8 | λmax = 2.000 0 | λmax = 3.053 6 | λmax=2.000 0 | λmax=4.014 5 |
表2 各层的最大特征根及其特征向量
Table 2 Largest eigenvalue and eigenvectors of Matrix
A-B | B1-Ci | B2-Ci | B3-Ci | B4-Ci |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bi | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci(K) | Ci (K) |
0.487 2 | 0.666 7 | 0.593 6 | 0.833 3 | 0.482 9 |
0.183 3 | 0.333 3 | 0.249 3 | 0.166 7 | 0.272 0 |
0.116 4 | 0.157 1 | 0.157 0 | ||
0.213 1 | 0.088 1 | |||
λmax = 4.096 8 | λmax = 2.000 0 | λmax = 3.053 6 | λmax=2.000 0 | λmax=4.014 5 |
A-B | B1-Ci | B2-Ci | B3-Ci | B4-Ci | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bi | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | |||||
CI= 0.032 3 | CI= 0 | CI= 0.026 8 | CI= 0 | CI= 0.004 8 | |||||
RI= 0.890 0 | RI= 0 | RI= 0.520 0 | RI= 0 | RI= 0.890 0 | |||||
CR= 0.036 3 | n ≤ 2 | CR= 0.051 5 | n≤ 2 | CR= 0.005 4 |
表3 各层的随机一致性比值(CR)
Table 3 Random consistency ratio (CR) of the layers
A-B | B1-Ci | B2-Ci | B3-Ci | B4-Ci | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bi | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | Ci (K) | |||||
CI= 0.032 3 | CI= 0 | CI= 0.026 8 | CI= 0 | CI= 0.004 8 | |||||
RI= 0.890 0 | RI= 0 | RI= 0.520 0 | RI= 0 | RI= 0.890 0 | |||||
CR= 0.036 3 | n ≤ 2 | CR= 0.051 5 | n≤ 2 | CR= 0.005 4 |
评价因子 Evaluation factor | 权重 Weight B1 0.487 2 | 权重 Weight B2 0.183 3 | 权重 Weight B3 0.116 4 | 权重 Weight B4 0.213 1 | 评价指标总权重 Total weight of suitability index (Ci*) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
海拔 Altitude C1 | 0.666 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.324 8 | |||||
坡度 Slope C2 | 0.333 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.162 4 | |||||
气温 Air temperature C3 | 0 | 0.593 6 | 0 | 0 | 0.108 8 | |||||
太阳辐射 Solar radiation C4 | 0 | 0.249 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.045 7 | |||||
TVDI指数 TVDI index C5 | 0 | 0.157 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.028 8 | |||||
土地利用 Land use C6 | 0 | 0 | 0.833 3 | 0 | 0.097 0 | |||||
土壤类型 Soil type C7 | 0 | 0 | 0.166 7 | 0 | 0.019 4 | |||||
砷污染 Arsenic pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.482 9 | 0.102 9 | |||||
镉污染 Cadmium pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.272 0 | 0.058 0 | |||||
汞污染 Mercury pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.157 0 | 0.033 5 | |||||
铜污染 Cu pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.088 1 | 0.018 8 | |||||
一致性指标 Consistency index (CIi) | 0 | 0.026 8 | 0 | 0.004 8 | CItotal = 0.031 6 | |||||
随机一致性指标Random consistency index (RIj) | 0 | 0.52 | 0 | 0.890 0 | RItotal = 1.410 0 |
表4 烤烟种植适宜性评价指标的总权重
Table 4 Total weight of tobacco planting suitability index
评价因子 Evaluation factor | 权重 Weight B1 0.487 2 | 权重 Weight B2 0.183 3 | 权重 Weight B3 0.116 4 | 权重 Weight B4 0.213 1 | 评价指标总权重 Total weight of suitability index (Ci*) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
海拔 Altitude C1 | 0.666 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.324 8 | |||||
坡度 Slope C2 | 0.333 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.162 4 | |||||
气温 Air temperature C3 | 0 | 0.593 6 | 0 | 0 | 0.108 8 | |||||
太阳辐射 Solar radiation C4 | 0 | 0.249 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.045 7 | |||||
TVDI指数 TVDI index C5 | 0 | 0.157 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.028 8 | |||||
土地利用 Land use C6 | 0 | 0 | 0.833 3 | 0 | 0.097 0 | |||||
土壤类型 Soil type C7 | 0 | 0 | 0.166 7 | 0 | 0.019 4 | |||||
砷污染 Arsenic pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.482 9 | 0.102 9 | |||||
镉污染 Cadmium pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.272 0 | 0.058 0 | |||||
汞污染 Mercury pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.157 0 | 0.033 5 | |||||
铜污染 Cu pollution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.088 1 | 0.018 8 | |||||
一致性指标 Consistency index (CIi) | 0 | 0.026 8 | 0 | 0.004 8 | CItotal = 0.031 6 | |||||
随机一致性指标Random consistency index (RIj) | 0 | 0.52 | 0 | 0.890 0 | RItotal = 1.410 0 |
评价指标 Evaluation index | 权重 Weight | 指标标度 Index scale | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最适宜 Most appropriate 4 | 适宜 Suitability 3 | 次适宜 Relative suitability 2 | 不适宜 Inappropriate 1 | |||||
C1 海拔 Altitude (m) | 0.324 8 | 1 400-1 800 | 1 200-1 400 1 800-2 000 | 800-1 200 2 000- 2200 | <800 >2 200 | |||
C2 坡度 Slope (°) | 0.162 4 | <15 | 15-20 | 20-25 | >25 | |||
C3 气温 Temperature (℃) | 0.108 8 | >19 | 18-19 | 17-18 | <17 | |||
C4 日均太阳辐射 Daily mean solar radiation ( kJ·m-2) | 0.045 7 | >20 000 | 18 000-20 000 | 15 000-18 000 | <15 000 | |||
C5 干旱指数 Drought index | 0.028 8 | 0.2-0.4 | 0.4-0.6 | 0.6-0.8 | >0.8 | |||
C6 土地利用类型 Land use type | 0.097 0 | 水田 Paddy field | 旱地 Nonirrigated farmland | - | - | |||
C7 土壤类型 Soil type | 0.019 4 | 红壤、紫色土 Red soil, purple soil | 水稻土、黄壤 Paddy soil, yellow soil | 黄棕壤 Yellow-brown soil | 石灰土 Limestone soil | |||
C8 砷污染 Arsenic pollution (mg·kg-1) | 0.102 9 | <15.01 | 15.01-20.00 | 20.00-22.50 | >22.50 | |||
C9 镉污染 Cadmium pollution (mg·kg-1) | 0.058 0 | <0.32 | 0.32-0.50 | 0.50-0.70 | >0.70 | |||
C10 汞污染 Mercury pollution (ng·kg-1) | 0.033 5 | <111 | 111-148 | 148-227 | >227 | |||
C11 铜污染 Cu pollution (μg·g-1) | 0.018 8 | <50 | 50-75 | 75-150 | >150 |
表5 烤烟种植适宜性的评价指标
Table 5 Tobacco planting suitability evaluation index
评价指标 Evaluation index | 权重 Weight | 指标标度 Index scale | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最适宜 Most appropriate 4 | 适宜 Suitability 3 | 次适宜 Relative suitability 2 | 不适宜 Inappropriate 1 | |||||
C1 海拔 Altitude (m) | 0.324 8 | 1 400-1 800 | 1 200-1 400 1 800-2 000 | 800-1 200 2 000- 2200 | <800 >2 200 | |||
C2 坡度 Slope (°) | 0.162 4 | <15 | 15-20 | 20-25 | >25 | |||
C3 气温 Temperature (℃) | 0.108 8 | >19 | 18-19 | 17-18 | <17 | |||
C4 日均太阳辐射 Daily mean solar radiation ( kJ·m-2) | 0.045 7 | >20 000 | 18 000-20 000 | 15 000-18 000 | <15 000 | |||
C5 干旱指数 Drought index | 0.028 8 | 0.2-0.4 | 0.4-0.6 | 0.6-0.8 | >0.8 | |||
C6 土地利用类型 Land use type | 0.097 0 | 水田 Paddy field | 旱地 Nonirrigated farmland | - | - | |||
C7 土壤类型 Soil type | 0.019 4 | 红壤、紫色土 Red soil, purple soil | 水稻土、黄壤 Paddy soil, yellow soil | 黄棕壤 Yellow-brown soil | 石灰土 Limestone soil | |||
C8 砷污染 Arsenic pollution (mg·kg-1) | 0.102 9 | <15.01 | 15.01-20.00 | 20.00-22.50 | >22.50 | |||
C9 镉污染 Cadmium pollution (mg·kg-1) | 0.058 0 | <0.32 | 0.32-0.50 | 0.50-0.70 | >0.70 | |||
C10 汞污染 Mercury pollution (ng·kg-1) | 0.033 5 | <111 | 111-148 | 148-227 | >227 | |||
C11 铜污染 Cu pollution (μg·g-1) | 0.018 8 | <50 | 50-75 | 75-150 | >150 |
区域 Region | 最适宜 Most appropriate | 适宜 Suitability | 次适宜 Relative suitability | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | ||
泸西县 Luxi County | 17 032.5 | 34.9 | 22 392.3 | 45.9 | 61 215 | 8.4 | |
弥勒县 Mile County | 26 671.7 | 24.2 | 27 864.5 | 25.3 | 96 525 | 5.8 | |
石屏县 Shiping County | 10 941.2 | 25.5 | 10 515.4 | 24.5 | 92 583 | 14.4 | |
建水县 Jianshui County | 27 042.1 | 34.2 | 19 870.6 | 25.2 | 52 483 | 4.4 | |
个旧县 Gejiu County | 2 936.2 | 15.2 | 9 079.0 | 47.0 | 48 452 | 16.7 | |
蒙自县 Mengzi County | 4 987.7 | 14.9 | 23 120.2 | 68.8 | 13 208 | 2.6 | |
开远县 Kaiyuan County | 15 909.3 | 18.4 | 15 627.8 | 18.0 | 100 554 | 7.7 |
表6 试验区各县烤烟种植适宜性等级统计
Table 6 Tobacco planting suitability level statistics of the counties in the experimental area
区域 Region | 最适宜 Most appropriate | 适宜 Suitability | 次适宜 Relative suitability | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | 占耕地率 Arable land ratio (%) | ||
泸西县 Luxi County | 17 032.5 | 34.9 | 22 392.3 | 45.9 | 61 215 | 8.4 | |
弥勒县 Mile County | 26 671.7 | 24.2 | 27 864.5 | 25.3 | 96 525 | 5.8 | |
石屏县 Shiping County | 10 941.2 | 25.5 | 10 515.4 | 24.5 | 92 583 | 14.4 | |
建水县 Jianshui County | 27 042.1 | 34.2 | 19 870.6 | 25.2 | 52 483 | 4.4 | |
个旧县 Gejiu County | 2 936.2 | 15.2 | 9 079.0 | 47.0 | 48 452 | 16.7 | |
蒙自县 Mengzi County | 4 987.7 | 14.9 | 23 120.2 | 68.8 | 13 208 | 2.6 | |
开远县 Kaiyuan County | 15 909.3 | 18.4 | 15 627.8 | 18.0 | 100 554 | 7.7 |
区域 Region | 最适宜 Most appropriate | 适宜 Suitability | 次适宜 Relative suitability | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (hm2) | A (%) | B (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | C (%) | D (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | E (%) | F (%) | ||
泸西县 Luxi County | 2 635.1 | 27.7 | 15.5 | 4 017.1 | 42.3 | 17.9 | 161.3 | 1.7 | 4.0 | |
弥勒县 Mile County | 2 963.3 | 28.4 | 11.1 | 1 947.1 | 18.7 | 7.0 | 258.2 | 2.5 | 4.0 | |
石屏县 Shiping County | 875.7 | 12.6 | 8.0 | 1 511.0 | 21.7 | 14.4 | 504.6 | 7.2 | 8.2 | |
建水县 Jianshui County | 1 918.2 | 27.8 | 7.1 | 631.3 | 9.1 | 3.2 | 173.2 | 2.5 | 5.0 | |
个旧县 Gejiu County | 338.8 | 28.7 | 11.5 | 175.5 | 14.8 | 1.9 | 44.1 | 3.7 | 1.4 | |
蒙自县 Mengzi County | 525.2 | 12.2 | 10.5 | 525.0 | 12.2 | 2.3 | 39.1 | 0.9 | 4.4 | |
开远县 Kaiyuan County | 658.6 | 25.7 | 4.1 | 322.7 | 12.6 | 2.1 | 94.0 | 3.7 | 1.4 |
表7 2010年烤烟种植空间分布适宜性统计表
Table 7 Spatial distribution suitability of tobacco planting in 2010
区域 Region | 最适宜 Most appropriate | 适宜 Suitability | 次适宜 Relative suitability | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
面积 Area (hm2) | A (%) | B (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | C (%) | D (%) | 面积 Area (hm2) | E (%) | F (%) | ||
泸西县 Luxi County | 2 635.1 | 27.7 | 15.5 | 4 017.1 | 42.3 | 17.9 | 161.3 | 1.7 | 4.0 | |
弥勒县 Mile County | 2 963.3 | 28.4 | 11.1 | 1 947.1 | 18.7 | 7.0 | 258.2 | 2.5 | 4.0 | |
石屏县 Shiping County | 875.7 | 12.6 | 8.0 | 1 511.0 | 21.7 | 14.4 | 504.6 | 7.2 | 8.2 | |
建水县 Jianshui County | 1 918.2 | 27.8 | 7.1 | 631.3 | 9.1 | 3.2 | 173.2 | 2.5 | 5.0 | |
个旧县 Gejiu County | 338.8 | 28.7 | 11.5 | 175.5 | 14.8 | 1.9 | 44.1 | 3.7 | 1.4 | |
蒙自县 Mengzi County | 525.2 | 12.2 | 10.5 | 525.0 | 12.2 | 2.3 | 39.1 | 0.9 | 4.4 | |
开远县 Kaiyuan County | 658.6 | 25.7 | 4.1 | 322.7 | 12.6 | 2.1 | 94.0 | 3.7 | 1.4 |
[1] | Dong XQ (董谢琼), Xu H (徐虹), Yang XP (杨晓鹏), Yang Y (杨勇), Zhou GC (周桂春) (2005). GIS-based study of a method of flue-cured tobacco planting suitability regionalization in Yunnan Province. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 26(1),16-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[2] | Fu P (2000). A Geometric Solar Radiation Model with Applications in Landscape Ecology. PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Kansas, Lawrence.75-82. |
[3] | Gillies RR, Carlson TN, Gui J, Kustas WP, Humes KS (1997). A verification of the ‘triangle’ method for obtaining surface soil water content and energy fluxes from remote measurements of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and surface radiant temperature. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18,3145-3166. |
[4] | Guérif M, Duke CL (2000). Adjustment procedure of a crop model to the site specific characteristics of soil and crop using remote sensing data assimilation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 81,57-69. |
[5] | Jiang YM (蒋样明), Cui WH (崔伟宏), Dong QL (董前林), Peng GX (彭光雄) (2010). Study on the 60-year’s temperature variation in China on multiple time scales. Ecology and Environment(生态环境学报), 19,2017-2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | Lu KD (陆魁东), Huang WH (黄晚华), Xiao HQ (肖汉乾), Zhang C (张超), Xie BC (谢佰承) (2008). Application of climatic factors’ gridding technology in tobacco-planting regionalization in Hunan Province. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 27,290-294. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Lü XF (吕晓芳), Wang YL (王仰麟), Zhang YL (张镱锂), Shen YC (申元村) (2007). Research on agricultural func- tions regionalization and sustainable development strategy of ecologically vulnerable environment in the west of China—a case of Yanchi County in Ningxia Hui Autono- mous region. Journal of Natural Resources(自然资源学报), 22,177-184. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Qi SH (齐述华), Wang CY (王长耀), Niu Z (牛铮) (2003). Evaluating soil moisture status in China using the temperature/vegetation dryness index (TVDI). Journal of Remote Sensing (遥感学报), 7,420-427. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] |
Saaty TL, Bennett JP (1997). A theory of analytical hierarchies applied to political candidacy. Behavioral Science, 22,237-245.
DOI URL |
[10] | Sandholt I, Rasmussen K, Andersen J (2002). A simple interpretation of the surface temperature/vegetation index space for assessment of soil moisture status. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79,213-224. |
[11] | Shao Y (邵岩) (2006). Research on Tobacco Rotation Planning in Yunnan Province(云南省烤烟轮作规划研究). Science Press, Beijing.2-6. (in Chinese) |
[12] | Wu MQ (吴孟泉), Cui WH (崔伟宏), Li JG (李景刚) (2007). Monitoring drought in mountainous area based on temperature/vegetation dryness index (TVDI). Arid Land Geography (干旱区地理), 30,30-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Xu ZC (许自成), Li YY (黎妍妍), Xiao HQ (肖汉乾), Wang L (王林) (2008). Evaluation of ecological factors and flue- cured tobacco quality in tobacco-growing areas in southern Hunan, China. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version)(植物生态学报), 32,226-234. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Yang X (杨曦), Wu JJ (武建军), Yan F (闫峰), Zhang J (张洁) (2009). Assessment of regional soil moisture status based on characteristics of surface temperature/vegetation index space. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29,1205-1216. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Zhai WX (翟文侠), Wang S (王舒), Huang XJ (黄贤金), Du WX (杜文星), Zhong TY (钟太洋) (2007). Applicability evaluation on the natural resources of organic agriculture —a case studies from Lishui County, Jiangsu Province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture (中国生态农业学报), 15,169-172. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 白娥, 薛冰. 土地利用与土地覆盖变化对生态系统的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5): 543-552. |
[2] | 常思敏, 马新明, 张贵龙, 熊淑萍, 詹克慧, 刘国顺. 砷对烤烟碳氮代谢及其产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(4): 682-688. |
[3] | 马新明, 李春明, 袁祖丽, 熊淑萍. 铅污染对烤烟光合特性、产量及其品质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(3): 472-478. |
[4] | 何恒斌, 贾昆峰, 贾桂霞, 丁琼. 沙冬青根瘤菌的抗逆性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(1): 140-146. |
[5] | 李卫国, 戴廷波, 朱艳, 曹卫星. 基于生态效应的水稻籽粒蛋白质含量预测模型研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(4): 630-635. |
[6] | 潘洁, 姜东, 戴廷波, 兰涛, 曹卫星. 不同生态环境与播种期下小麦籽粒品质变异规律的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(3): 467-473. |
[7] | 杨振京, 徐建明. 孢粉-植被-气候关系研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(增刊): 73-81. |
[8] | 潘伯荣, 余其立, 严成. 新疆沙冬青生态环境及渐危原因的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1992, 16(3): 276-282. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19