中国北方温带灌丛生物量的分布及其与环境的关系

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2016.0199

植物生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 22-30.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0199

所属专题：中国灌丛生态系统碳储量的研究

中国北方温带灌丛生物量的分布及其与环境的关系

杨弦¹, 郭焱培¹, 安尼瓦尔·买买提², 刘鸿雁¹, 马文红³, 于顺利⁴, 唐志尧^1,^*()

¹北京大学城市与环境学院, 北京 100871
²中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所, 乌鲁木齐 830011
³内蒙古大学生命科学学院, 呼和浩特 010021
⁴中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2016-06-13 接受日期:2016-06-23 出版日期:2017-01-10 发布日期:2017-01-23
通讯作者: 唐志尧
作者简介:* 通信作者Author for correspondence (E-mail:sunzhiqiang1956@sina.com)
基金资助:
中国科学院战略先导性科技专项(XDA05050301和XDA05050700)和科技部科技基础性工作专项(2011FY110300)

Distribution of biomass in relation to environments in shrublands of temperate China

Xian YANG¹, Yan-Pei GUO¹, Anwar MOHHAMOT², Hong-Yan LIU¹, Wen-Hong MA³, Shun-Li YU⁴, Zhi-Yao TANG^1,^*()

¹College of Urban and Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

²Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ürümqi 830011, China;

³College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China

⁴State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

Received:2016-06-13 Accepted:2016-06-23 Online:2017-01-10 Published:2017-01-23
Contact: Zhi-Yao TANG
About author:KANG Jing-yao(1991-), E-mail: kangjingyao_nj@163.com。

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目前对植物生物量分布格局和分配的研究多集中在森林和草地生态系统, 对灌丛的相关研究较少。灌丛是中国北方广泛分布的植被。研究灌丛生物量分布格局及其分配是对估算我国陆地生态系统碳库的重要补充。该文通过对中国北方温带灌丛的大范围野外调查和采样, 计算中国北方433个典型灌丛样地的生物量及其在各器官间的分配, 并研究它们与气候和土壤营养等环境因子的关系。结果表明: 中国北方温带灌丛平均生物量为12.5 t·hm^-2, 其中灌木层地上、地下生物量分别为4.5和5.4 t·hm^-2, 草本层地上、地下生物量分别为0.8和1.8 t·hm^-2; 凋落物量为2.5 t·hm^-2。不同类型中, 温带落叶灌丛、亚高山落叶阔叶灌丛、荒漠灌丛平均生物量分别为14.4、28.8和5.0 t·hm^-2。东西部生物量分布差异较大, 东部温带落叶灌丛总生物量高于西部的荒漠灌丛。东部温带落叶灌丛中, 东北地区的灌丛生物量稍低于华北地区。灌木的地下-地上生物量比不随水分和土壤养分变化, 而叶-枝生物量比受水分影响, 在干旱区域叶-枝生物量比较低。

关键词: 灌丛, 生物量密度, 地下-地上生物量比, 叶-枝生物量比

Abstract:

Aims Shrubland is one of the most widely distributed vegetation types in northern China. Previous studies on pattern and dynamics of plant biomass have been focused on forest and grassland ecosystems, while relevant knowledge on shrubland ecosystems is lacking. It is important to include shrublands in northern China to improve the accuracy in estimating the terrestrial ecosystem biomass in China.
Methods Based on investigations and samplings from 433 shrubland sites, we explored the distribution and allocation patterns of biomass in relation to climatic and soil nutrient factors of shrublands of temperate China.
Important findings The average shrubland biomass density in northern China is 12.5 t·hm^-2. It decreases significantly from temperate deciduous shrubland in northeast to desert shrubland in northwest. The average biomass density of temperate deciduous shrubland, alpine shrubland, and desert shrubland is 14.4, 28.8, and 5.0 t·hm^-2, respectively. Within temperate deciduous shrublands, plant biomass is lower in North China than in Northeast China. The average aboveground and belowground biomass density of shrub layer is 4.5 and 5.4 t·hm^-2, respectively; while that of grass layer is 0.8 and 1.8 t·hm^-2, respectively. Environmental factors affect biomass allocation across different plant organs. The belowground-aboveground biomass ratio of shrub exhibits no significant changes with environmental variables. The leaf-stem ratio increases with annual precipitation, and leaf biomass is low in arid region.

Key words: shrubland biome, biomass density, belowground-aboveground biomass ratio, leaf-stem biomass ratio

杨弦, 郭焱培, 安尼瓦尔·买买提, 刘鸿雁, 马文红, 于顺利, 唐志尧. 中国北方温带灌丛生物量的分布及其与环境的关系. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(1): 22-30. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0199

Xian YANG, Yan-Pei GUO, Anwar MOHHAMOT, Hong-Yan LIU, Wen-Hong MA, Shun-Li YU, Zhi-Yao TANG. Distribution of biomass in relation to environments in shrublands of temperate China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41(1): 22-30. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0199

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2016.0199

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2017/V41/I1/22

图/表 6

图1 样地分布图。

Fig. 1 Distribution of sampling sites.

表1 中国北方主要灌丛植被型的生物量密度

Table 1 Biomass density of major shrubland types of Northern China

灌丛类型 Shrubland type	温带落叶灌丛 Temperate deciduous shrublands (mean ± SE)	亚高山落叶灌丛 Alpine shrublands (mean ± SE)	荒漠灌丛 Desert shrublands (mean ± SE)	所有 Overall (mean ± SE)
样地数 No. of study site	321	4	108	433
生物量 Biomass (t·hm^-2)	14.4	28.8	5.0	12.5
地上生物量 Aboveground biomass	6.0	13.0	2.5	5.3
灌木层 Shrub layer	5.2 ± 0.3	12.2 ± 4.3	2.0 ± 0.3	4.5 ± 0.3
草本层 Herb layer	0.8 ± 0.0	0.8 ± 0.2	0.4 ± 0.1	0.8 ± 0.0
地下生物量 Belowground biomass	8.4	15.8	2.5	7.2
灌木层 Shrub layer	6.5 ± 0.4	13.2 ± 6.4	2.0 ± 0.5	5.4 ± 0.4
草本层 Herb layer	1.9 ± 0.1	2.6 ± 0.3	0.5 ± 0.1	1.8 ± 0.1
凋落物量 Litterfall (t·hm^-2)	2.6 ± 0.2	2.2 ± 0.5	1.4 ± 0.2	2.5 ± 0.2

图2 中国北方温带灌丛植被总生物量空间分布格局。

Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of vegetation biomass in shrubland of the northern China.

图3 中国北方灌丛不同组分生物量分布。A, 灌木层地上生物量。B, 灌木层地下生物量。C, 草本层地上生物量。D, 草本层地下生物量。E, 总地上生物量。F, 总地下生物量。

Fig. 3 Spatial distributions of above and belowground biomass in shrubland of the northern China. A, Aboveground biomass of shrub layer. B, Belowground biomass of shrub layer. C, Aboveground biomass of herb layer. D, Belowground biomass of herb layer. E, Total aboveground biomass. F, Total belowground biomass.

图4 中国北方温带落叶灌丛和荒漠灌丛灌木地下-地上生物量比和叶-枝生物量比频度分布, A, 温带落叶灌丛地下-地上生物量比。B, 温带落叶灌丛叶-枝生物量比。C, 荒漠灌丛地下-地上生物量比。D, 荒漠灌丛叶-枝生物量比。

Fig. 4 Frequency distributions of belowground:aboveground biomass ratio (BGB:AGB) and leaf:stem biomass ratio of shrubs in the temperate deciduous shrubland and dessert shrubland of the northern China. A, Belowground:aboveground biomass ratio in the temperate deciduous shrubland. B, Leaf:stem biomass ratio in the temperate deciduous shrubland. C, Belowground: aboveground biomass ratio in the dessert shrubland. D, Leaf:stem biomass ratio in the dessert shrubland.

图5 中国北方灌丛地下-地上生物量比(A-D)和叶-枝生物量比(E-H)与环境的关系。点线: p > 0.01; 短划线: 0.001< p < 0.01; 实线: p < 0.001。

Fig. 5 Distribution of belowground:aboveground biomass ratio (A-D) and leaf:stem biomass ratio (E-H) in shrubland of the northern China in relation to environmental variables. Fitted lines show significant relationships (dotted line: p > 0.01; dashed line: 0.001< p < 0.01; solid line: p < 0.001). AGB, aboveground biomass; BGB, belowground biomass. MAT, mean annual temperature; AP, annual precipitation; STN, soil total nitrogen concentration; STP, soil total phosphorus concentration.

参考文献 26

[1]	Bai Y, Wu J, Xing Q, Pan Q, Huang J, Yang D, Han X (2008). Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia plateau.Ecology, 89, 2140-2153.
[2]	Bloom AJ, Chapin FS, Mooney HA (1985). Resource limitation in plants—An economic analogy. Annual review of Ecology and Systematics, 363-392.
[3]	Chapin FS, Bloom AJ, Field CB, Waring RH (1987). Plant responses to multiple environmental factors.Bioscience, 37, 49-57.
[4]	Chen XL, Ma QY, Kang FF, Cao WQ, Zhang GH, Chen ZW (2002). Studies on the biomass and productivity of typical shrubs in Taiyue Mountain, Shanxi Province.Forest Research, 15, 304-309. (in Chinese with English abstract)[陈遐林, 马钦彦, 康峰峰, 曹文强, 张国华, 陈宗伟 (2002). 山西太岳山典型灌木林生物量及生产力研究. 林业科学研究, 15, 304-309.]
[5]	Gao Q, Yang XC, Yin CY, Liu Q (2014). Estimation of biomass allocation and carbon density in alpine dwarf shrubs in Garzê Zangzu Autonomous Prefecture of Sichuan Province, China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 38, 355-365. (in Chinese with English abstract)[高巧, 阳小成, 尹春英, 刘庆 (2014). 四川省甘孜藏族自治州高寒矮灌丛生物量分配及其碳密度的估算. 植物生态学报, 38, 355-365.]
[6]	He JS, Wang QB, Hu D (1997). Studies on the biomass of typical shrubland and their regeneration capacity after cutting.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 21, 512-520. (in Chinese with English abstract)[贺金生, 王其兵, 胡东 (1997). 长江三峡地区典型灌丛的生物量及其再生能力. 植物生态学报, 21, 512-520.]
[7]	Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas.International Journal of Climatology, 25, 1965-1978.
[8]	Hu HF, Wang ZH, Liu GH, Fu BJ (2006). Vegetation carbon storage of major shrublands in China.Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 30, 539-544. (in Chinese with English abstract)[胡会峰, 王志恒, 刘国华, 傅伯杰 (2006). 中国主要灌丛植被碳储量. 植物生态学报, 30, 539-544.]
[9]	Jiang FQ, Lu FY (1982). The model of estimating above-ground biomass of Caragana microphylla brush. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2, 103-110. (in Chinese with English abstract)[姜凤岐, 卢凤勇 (1982). 小叶锦鸡儿灌丛地上生物量的预测模式. 生态学报, 2, 103-110.]
[10]	Lei L, Liu XD, Wang SL, Li Y, Zhang XL (2011). Assignment rule of alpine shrubs biomass and its relationships to environmental factors in Qilian Mountains.Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 20, 1602-1607. (in Chinese with English abstract)[雷蕾, 刘贤德, 王顺利, 李毅, 张学龙 (2011). 祁连山高山灌丛生物量分配规律及其与环境因子的关系. 生态环境学报, 20, 1602-1607.]
[11]	Liu GH, Zhang JY, Zhang YX, Zhou JY, Guan WB, Ma KM, Fu BJ (2003a). Distribution regulation of aboveground biomass of three main shrub types in the dry valley of Minjiang River.Journal of Mountain Science, 21, 24-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)[刘国华, 张洁瑜, 张育新, 周建云, 关文彬, 马克明, 傅伯杰 (2003a). 岷江干旱河谷三种主要灌丛地上生物量的分布规律. 山地学报, 21, 24-32.]
[12]	Liu GH, Ma KM, Fu BJ, Guan WB, Kang YX, Zhou JY, Liu SL (2003b). Aboveground biomass of main shrubs in dry valley of Minjiang River.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23, 1757-1764. (in Chinese with English abstract)[刘国华, 马克明, 傅伯杰, 关文彬, 康永祥, 周建云, 刘世梁 (2003b). 岷江干旱河谷主要灌丛类型地上生物量研究. 生态学报, 23, 1757-1764.]
[13]	Luo TX, Li WH, Luo J, Wang QJ (1999). A comparative study on biological production of major vegetation types on the Tibetan Plateau.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 19, 823-831. (in Chinese with English abstract)[罗天祥, 李文华, 罗辑, 王启基 (1999). 青藏高原主要植被类型生物生产量的比较研究. 生态学报, 19, 823-831.]
[14]	Markesteijn L, Poorter L (2009). Seedling root morphology and biomass allocation of 62 tropical tree species in relation to drought- and shade-tolerance.Journal of Ecology, 97, 311-325.
[15]	McCarthy MC, Enquist BJ (2007). Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation.Functional Ecology, 21, 713-720.
[16]	Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L (2012). Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control.New Phytologist, 193, 30-50.
[17]	R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. . Cited by 2015-12-10.
[18]	Subbarao GV, Johansen C, Slinkard AE, Nageswara Rao RC, Saxena NP, Chauhan YS, Lawn RJ (1995). Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 14, 469-523.
[19]	The Editorial Committee of Vegetation Map of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2007). Vegetation Map of the People’s Republic of China 1:1000000. Geological Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)[中国科学院中国植被图编辑委员会 (2007). 中华人民共和国植被图1:1000000. 地质出版社, 北京.]
[20]	Turner BL, Haygarth PM (2001). Biogeochemistry: Phosphorus solubilization in rewetted soils.Nature, 411, 258.
[21]	Wang W, Peng SS, Fang JY (2008). Biomass distribution of natural grasslands and it response to climate change in north China.Arid Zone Research, 25, 90-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)[王娓, 彭书时, 方精云 (2008). 中国北方天然草地的生物量分配及其对气候的响应. 干旱区研究, 25, 90-97.]
[22]	Wang YJ, Huang CD, Zhang J, Yang WQ, Wang XS (2010). Species diversity biomass and their relationship of shrubberies in an arid valley of the Minjiang River.Arid Zone Research, 27, 567-572. (in Chinese with English abstract)[王勇军, 黄从德, 张健, 杨万勤, 王宪帅 (2010). 岷江干旱河谷灌丛物种多样性, 生物量及其关系. 干旱区研究, 27, 567-572.]
[23]	Yang Y, Fang J, Ji C, Han W (2009). Above- and belowground biomass allocation in Tibetan grasslands.Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 177-184.
[24]	Yang Y, Fang J, Ma W, Guo D, Mohammat A (2010). Large- scale pattern of biomass partitioning across China’s grassland.Global Ecology & Biogeography, 19, 268-277.
[25]	Yang X, Tang Z, Ji C, Liu H, Ma W, Mohhamot A, Shi Z, Sun W, Wang T, Wang X (2014). Scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus across plant organs in shrubland biomes across Northern China.Scientific Reports, 4, 5448.
[26]	Zhong ZB, Yang LC, Liu HC, Song WZ, Li F, Zhou GY (2014). The main shrubs aboveground biomass and effect factors in Yushu, Qinghai, China.Mountain Research, 32, 678-684. (in Chinese with English abstract)[钟泽兵, 杨路存, 刘何春, 宋文珠, 李璠, 周国英 (2014). 青海玉树地区主要灌丛类型地上生物量及其影响因素. 山地学报, 32, 678-684.]

中国北方温带灌丛生物量的分布及其与环境的关系

Distribution of biomass in relation to environments in shrublands of temperate China

全文

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	韩聪, 母艳梅, 查天山, 秦树高, 刘鹏, 田赟, 贾昕. 2012-2016年宁夏盐池毛乌素沙地黑沙蒿灌丛生态系统通量观测数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(9): 1322-1332.
[2]	张琦, 冯可, 常智慧, 何双辉, 徐维启. 灌丛化对林草交错带植物和土壤微生物的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(6): 770-781.
[3]	李红琴, 张亚茹, 张法伟, 马文婧, 罗方林, 王春雨, 杨永胜, 张雷明, 李英年. 增强回归树模型在青藏高原高寒灌丛通量数据插补中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1437-1447.
[4]	高璐鑫, 兰天元, 赵志霞, 邓舒雨, 熊高明, 谢宗强, 申国珍. 中国中亚热带北部灌丛群落植物空间周转及其驱动因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1411-1421.
[5]	刘秋蓉, 李丽, 罗垚, 陈冬东, 黄鑫, 胡君, 刘庆. 四川巴塘海子山高寒灌丛群落的基本特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1334-1341.
[6]	要振宇, 史亚博, 马文红, 赵利清, 菊花, 浩仁塔本, 苏闯, 张芯毓, 梁存柱. 内蒙古地区虎榛子群系的群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1342-1349.
[7]	张零念, 朱贵青, 杨宽, 刘星月, 巩合德, 郑丽. 滇中云南杨梅灌丛主要木本植物生态位与种间联结[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(11): 1400-1410.
[8]	马龙龙, 杜灵通, 丹杨, 王乐, 乔成龙, 吴宏玥. 基于茎流-蒸渗仪法的荒漠草原带人工灌丛群落蒸散特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(8): 807-818.
[9]	曹嘉瑜, 刘建峰, 袁泉, 徐德宇, 樊海东, 陈海燕, 谭斌, 刘立斌, 叶铎, 倪健. 森林与灌丛的灌木性状揭示不同的生活策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(7): 715-729.
[10]	陈国鹏, 杨克彤, 王立, 王飞, 曹秀文, 陈林生. 甘肃南部7种高寒杜鹃生物量分配的异速生长关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(10): 1040-1049.
[11]	丁威,王玉冰,向官海,迟永刚,鲁顺保,郑淑霞. 小叶锦鸡儿灌丛化对典型草原群落结构与生态系统功能的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(1): 33-43.
[12]	柴永福, 许金石, 刘鸿雁, 刘全儒, 郑成洋, 康慕谊, 梁存柱, 王仁卿, 高贤明, 张峰, 福臣, 刘晓, 岳明. 华北地区主要灌丛群落物种组成及系统发育结构特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(9): 793-805.
[13]	唐丽丽, 杨彤, 刘鸿雁, 康慕谊, 王仁卿, 张峰, 高贤明, 岳明, 张梅, 郑璞帆, 石福臣. 华北地区荆条灌丛分布及物种多样性空间分异规律[J]. 植物生态学报, 2019, 43(9): 825-833.
[14]	苏闯, 马文红, 张芯毓, 苏云, 闵永恩, 张晋元, 赵利清, 梁存柱. 贺兰山西坡主要山地灌丛群落的基本特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(10): 1050-1054.
[15]	马志良, 赵文强, 赵春章, 刘美, 朱攀, 刘庆. 青藏高原东缘窄叶鲜卑花灌丛生长季土壤无机氮对增温和植物去除的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(1): 86-94.