Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2005, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 523-529.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0070
• Research Articles • Next Articles
JIANG Xiao-Lei1(), ZHANG Wei-Guo1, DUAN Zheng-Hu2
Received:
2004-08-30
Accepted:
2005-03-15
Online:
2005-08-30
Published:
2005-07-31
JIANG Xiao-Lei, ZHANG Wei-Guo, DUAN Zheng-Hu. EFFECTS OF COMPLEMENTARITY ON DIVERSITY-PRODUCTIVITY RELATIONSHIP[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2005, 29(4): 523-529.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2005.0070
处理 Treatment | 种数 No. of species | Relative yield | RYTs | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y | D | H | S | G | C | J | M | Z | |||
MY | 2 | 2.26±0.24 | 0.27±0.05 | 1.41±0.16 | |||||||
GD | 2 | 1.72±0.41 | 0.26±0.11 | 0.99±0.04 | |||||||
YHS | 3 | 3.33±0.37 | 0.45±0.17 | 0.51±0.10 | 1.43±0.13 | ||||||
MYH | 3 | 3.13±0.37 | 0.57±0.13 | 1.25±0.15 | 1.65±0.21 | ||||||
YSDH | 4 | 3.89±0.48 | 1.31±0.14 | 0.45±0.08 | 0.15±0.02 | 1.45±0.05 | |||||
ZGJH | 4 | 1.92±0.18 | 2.63±0.24 | 0.66±0.17 | 0.88±0.19 | 1.52±0.13 | |||||
CJYMZ | 5 | 5.79±1.73 | 0.66±0.15 | 0.71±0.18 | 0.43±0.09 | 0.86±0.19 | 1.69±0.16 | ||||
ZGMSC | 5 | 1.74±0.17 | 3.58±0.38 | 0.69±0.13 | 1.24±0.19 | 0.69±0.12 | 1.59±0.14 | ||||
CMHYSZ | 6 | 5.45±1.28 | 0.48±0.05 | 0.39±0.04 | 0.87±0.19 | 0.59±0.11 | 0.56±0.10 | 1.39±0.16 | |||
CJSHDYZ | 7 | 4.96±0.72 | 0.91±0.17 | 0.66±0.08 | 0.23±0.06 | 1.22±0.16 | 0.73±0.18 | 0.39±0.05 | 1.14±0.13 | ||
ZCMDHGYS | 8 | 5.34±1.31 | 0.69±0.12 | 0.54±0.12 | 0.26±0.03 | 0.40±0.13 | 0.96±0.07 | 0.68±0.13 | 0.79±0.18 | 1.07±0.61 | |
ZCJMDHGYS | 9 | 5.21±1.09 | 0.94±0.13 | 0.76±0.23 | 0.22±0.07 | 0.51±0.11 | 0.67±0.12 | 0.81±0.17 | 0.79±0.15 | 0.31±0.07 | 1.13±0.29 |
Table 1 Relative yields (RY) of each species in mixtures and relative yield totals (RYTs) for those mixtures (mean±1SE, n=3)
处理 Treatment | 种数 No. of species | Relative yield | RYTs | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y | D | H | S | G | C | J | M | Z | |||
MY | 2 | 2.26±0.24 | 0.27±0.05 | 1.41±0.16 | |||||||
GD | 2 | 1.72±0.41 | 0.26±0.11 | 0.99±0.04 | |||||||
YHS | 3 | 3.33±0.37 | 0.45±0.17 | 0.51±0.10 | 1.43±0.13 | ||||||
MYH | 3 | 3.13±0.37 | 0.57±0.13 | 1.25±0.15 | 1.65±0.21 | ||||||
YSDH | 4 | 3.89±0.48 | 1.31±0.14 | 0.45±0.08 | 0.15±0.02 | 1.45±0.05 | |||||
ZGJH | 4 | 1.92±0.18 | 2.63±0.24 | 0.66±0.17 | 0.88±0.19 | 1.52±0.13 | |||||
CJYMZ | 5 | 5.79±1.73 | 0.66±0.15 | 0.71±0.18 | 0.43±0.09 | 0.86±0.19 | 1.69±0.16 | ||||
ZGMSC | 5 | 1.74±0.17 | 3.58±0.38 | 0.69±0.13 | 1.24±0.19 | 0.69±0.12 | 1.59±0.14 | ||||
CMHYSZ | 6 | 5.45±1.28 | 0.48±0.05 | 0.39±0.04 | 0.87±0.19 | 0.59±0.11 | 0.56±0.10 | 1.39±0.16 | |||
CJSHDYZ | 7 | 4.96±0.72 | 0.91±0.17 | 0.66±0.08 | 0.23±0.06 | 1.22±0.16 | 0.73±0.18 | 0.39±0.05 | 1.14±0.13 | ||
ZCMDHGYS | 8 | 5.34±1.31 | 0.69±0.12 | 0.54±0.12 | 0.26±0.03 | 0.40±0.13 | 0.96±0.07 | 0.68±0.13 | 0.79±0.18 | 1.07±0.61 | |
ZCJMDHGYS | 9 | 5.21±1.09 | 0.94±0.13 | 0.76±0.23 | 0.22±0.07 | 0.51±0.11 | 0.67±0.12 | 0.81±0.17 | 0.79±0.15 | 0.31±0.07 | 1.13±0.29 |
处理 Treatment | 种数 No. of species | Di | D | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y | D | H | S | G | C | J | M | Z | |||
MY | 2 | 1.03±0.06 | -0.27±0.05 | 0.38±0.07 | |||||||
GD | 2 | -0.76±0.15 | 0.91±0.19 | 0.07±0.01 | |||||||
YHS | 3 | 2.33±0.19 | -0.57±0.07 | -0.47±0.10 | 0.43±0.04 | ||||||
MYH | 3 | 2.23±0.21 | -0.43±0.08 | 0.45±0.04 | 0.7±0.14 | ||||||
YSDH | 4 | 2.89±0.31 | 0.31±0.03 | -0.55±0.09 | -0.85±0.17 | 0.4±0.06 | |||||
ZGJH | 4 | 0.92±0.18 | 1.63±0.18 | -0.34±0.05 | 0.05±0.03 | 0.5±0.03 | |||||
CJYMZ | 5 | 4.39±0.45 | -0.34±0.06 | -0.28±0.04 | -0.57±0.18 | -0.16±0.01 | 0.6±0.19 | ||||
ZGMSC | 5 | 0.44±0.07 | 2.01±0.71 | -0.31±0.03 | 0.24±0.01 | -0.31±0.02 | 0.4±0.08 | ||||
CMHYSZ | 6 | 4.45±0.51 | -0.52±0.05 | -0.61±0.13 | -0.13±0.03 | -0.41±0.18 | -0.44±0.15 | 0.39±0.06 | |||
CJSHDYZ | 7 | 4.66±0.77 | -0.09±0.03 | -0.34±0.13 | -0.77±0.17 | 0.23±0.04 | -0.26±0.06 | -0.61±0.18 | 0.40±0.13 | ||
ZCMDHGYS | 8 | 5.17±1.58 | -0.31±0.11 | -0.45±0.07 | -0.73±0.17 | -0.59±0.15 | 0.39±0.08 | -0.32±0.07 | -0.21±0.08 | 0.37±0.09 | |
ZCJMDHGYS | 9 | 5.62±1.23 | 0.02±0.08 | -0.24±0.06 | -0.77±0.09 | -0.48±0.06 | 0.48±0.19 | -0.19±0.03 | -0.21±0.03 | -0.69±0.16 | 0.39±0.12 |
Table 2 D value of each diverse communities
处理 Treatment | 种数 No. of species | Di | D | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y | D | H | S | G | C | J | M | Z | |||
MY | 2 | 1.03±0.06 | -0.27±0.05 | 0.38±0.07 | |||||||
GD | 2 | -0.76±0.15 | 0.91±0.19 | 0.07±0.01 | |||||||
YHS | 3 | 2.33±0.19 | -0.57±0.07 | -0.47±0.10 | 0.43±0.04 | ||||||
MYH | 3 | 2.23±0.21 | -0.43±0.08 | 0.45±0.04 | 0.7±0.14 | ||||||
YSDH | 4 | 2.89±0.31 | 0.31±0.03 | -0.55±0.09 | -0.85±0.17 | 0.4±0.06 | |||||
ZGJH | 4 | 0.92±0.18 | 1.63±0.18 | -0.34±0.05 | 0.05±0.03 | 0.5±0.03 | |||||
CJYMZ | 5 | 4.39±0.45 | -0.34±0.06 | -0.28±0.04 | -0.57±0.18 | -0.16±0.01 | 0.6±0.19 | ||||
ZGMSC | 5 | 0.44±0.07 | 2.01±0.71 | -0.31±0.03 | 0.24±0.01 | -0.31±0.02 | 0.4±0.08 | ||||
CMHYSZ | 6 | 4.45±0.51 | -0.52±0.05 | -0.61±0.13 | -0.13±0.03 | -0.41±0.18 | -0.44±0.15 | 0.39±0.06 | |||
CJSHDYZ | 7 | 4.66±0.77 | -0.09±0.03 | -0.34±0.13 | -0.77±0.17 | 0.23±0.04 | -0.26±0.06 | -0.61±0.18 | 0.40±0.13 | ||
ZCMDHGYS | 8 | 5.17±1.58 | -0.31±0.11 | -0.45±0.07 | -0.73±0.17 | -0.59±0.15 | 0.39±0.08 | -0.32±0.07 | -0.21±0.08 | 0.37±0.09 | |
ZCJMDHGYS | 9 | 5.62±1.23 | 0.02±0.08 | -0.24±0.06 | -0.77±0.09 | -0.48±0.06 | 0.48±0.19 | -0.19±0.03 | -0.21±0.03 | -0.69±0.16 | 0.39±0.12 |
[1] | Chapin Ⅲ FS, Moilanen L, Kielland K (1993). Preferential use of organic nitrogen for growth by a non-mycorrhizal arctic sedge. Nature, 361,150-153. |
[2] |
Diaz S, Cabido M (2001). Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16,646-655.
DOI URL |
[3] | Dukes JS (2001). Productivity and complementarity in grassland microcosms of varying diversity. Oikos, 94,468-480. |
[4] | Fridley JD (2001). The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why? Oikos, 93,514-526. |
[5] | Fridley JD (2003). Diversity effects on production in different light and fertility environments: an experiment with communities of annual plants. Journal of Ecology, 91,396-406. |
[6] | Hector A (1998). The effect of diversity on productivity: detecting the role of species complementarity. Oikos, 82,597-599. |
[7] |
Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Cldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakppoulos PG, Fimm JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Gjood J, Harris T, Høgberg P, Huss-Danell K, Joshi J, Jumpponen A, Kørner C, Leadley PW, Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, Donovan GO, Otway SJ, Pereira JS, Prinz A, Read DJ, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schulze ED, Siamantziouras ASD, Spehn EM, Terry AC, Troumdis AY, Woodward FI, Yach S, Lawton JH (1999). Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science, 286,1123-1127.
DOI URL PMID |
[8] | Hooper DU, Vitousek PM (1997). The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science, 277,1302-1305. |
[9] |
Hooper DU (1998). The role of complementarity and competition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology, 79,704-719.
DOI URL |
[10] | Hooper DU, Dukes J (2004). Overyielding among plant functional groups in a long-term experiment. Ecology Letters, 7,95-105. |
[11] |
Huston MA, Aarssen LW, Austin MP, Cade BS, Fridley JD, Garnier E, Grime JP, Larenroth WK, Thompson K, Vandermeer JH, Wardle DA (2000). No consistent effect of plant diversity on productivity. Science, 289,1255.
DOI URL PMID |
[12] |
Jonssen M, Malmqvist B (2003). Mechanisms behind positive diversity effects on ecosystem functioning: testing the facilitation and interference hypotheses. Oecologia, 134,554-559.
DOI URL PMID |
[13] | Loreau M (1998a). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95,5632-5636. |
[14] | Loreau M (1998b). Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. Oikos, 82,600-602. |
[15] | Loreau M (2000). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos, 91,3-17. |
[16] |
Loreau M, Hector A (2001). Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature, 412,72-76.
DOI URL PMID |
[17] |
Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A, Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, Tilman D, Wardle DA (2001). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294,804-808.
DOI URL PMID |
[18] | Naeem S, Häkansson K, Lawton JH, Crawley MJ, Thompson LJ (1996). Biodiversity and plant productivity in a model assemblage of plant species. Oikos, 76,259-264. |
[19] | Symstad AJ, Tilman D, Willson J, Knops JMH (1998). Species loss and ecosystem functioning: effects of species identity and community composition. Oikos, 81,389-397. |
[20] |
Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J (1996). Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature, 379,718-720.
DOI URL |
[21] |
Tilman D, Lehman CL, Thomson KT (1997). Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94,1857-1861.
URL PMID |
[22] | Tilman D (1999). The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology, 80,1455-1475. |
[23] |
Tilman D (2000). Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature, 405,208-211.
DOI URL PMID |
[24] |
Tilman D, Reich P, Knops J, Wedin D, Mielke T, Lehman C (2001). Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science, 249,843-845.
DOI URL PMID |
[25] | Vitousek PM, Hooper DU (1993). Biological diversity and terrestrial ecosystem biogeochemistry. In: Schulze ED, Mooney HA eds. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Springer-Verlag Press, Berlin, Germany,3-14. |
[26] |
Wardle DA (1999). Is “sampling effect” a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships? Oikos, 87,403-407.
DOI URL |
[1] | Lan XIAO Zhang LinTing Dong Biao Chuan-Yuan Deng Li Xia Jiang De-gang Yong-ming Lin. Characteristics of main plant communities on the uninhabited islands in Bohai region [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | Shao-Qiong Dong HOU Dong-Jie xiao-Yun QU Ke GUO. A plot-based dataset of plant community in Qaidam Basin [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[3] | Yu-Ting Wang Xu-Jing LIU Chi-Fei Tang Wei-Yu Chen Mei-Juan Wang Song-Zhu Xiang Mei Liu Lin-Sen Yang Qiang FU YAN Zhao-Gui Hong-Jie MENG. Community characteristics and population dynamics of Acer miaotaiense, an extremely small population species in Shennongjia [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[4] | Yu-Meng Yang Quan Lai Xin-Yi Liu. Quantitative analysis of climate change and human activities on vegetation GPP in Inner Mongolia [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[5] | REN Yue, GAO Guang-Lei, DING Guo-Dong, ZHANG Ying, ZHAO Pei-Shan, LIU Ye. Species composition and driving factors of the ectomycorrhizal fungal community associated with Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica at different growth periods [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(9): 1298-1309. |
[6] | LI Wei, ZHANG Rong. Case verification of community structure determining community productivity in subalpine meadow [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(5): 713-723. |
[7] | YANG Yuan-He, ZHANG Dian-Ye, WEI Bin, LIU Yang, FENG Xue-Hui, MAO Chao, XU Wei-Jie, HE Mei, WANG Lu, ZHENG Zhi-Hu, WANG Yuan-Yuan, CHEN Lei-Yi, PENG Yun-Feng. Nonlinear responses of community diversity, carbon and nitrogen cycles of grassland ecosystems to external nitrogen input [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(1): 1-24. |
[8] | FAN Fan, ZHAO Lian-Jun, MA Tian-Yi, XIONG Xin-Yu, ZHANG Yuan-Bin, SHEN Xiao-Li, LI Sheng. Community composition and structure in a 25.2 hm2 subalpine dark coniferous forest dynamics plot in Wanglang, Sichuan, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 1005-1017. |
[9] | WANG Shu-Wen, LI Wen-Huai, LI Yan-Long, YAN Hui, LI Yong-Hong. Effects of different livestock types on plant diversity and community structure of a typical steppe in Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(8): 941-950. |
[10] | LIU Pei-Rong, TONG Xiao-Juan, MENG Ping, ZHANG Jin-Song, ZHANG Jing-Ru, YU Pei-Yang, ZHOU Yu. Effect of diffuse radiation on gross primary productivity of typical planted forests in eastern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(8): 904-918. |
[11] | JIN Yi-Li, WANG Hao-Yan, WEI Lin-Feng, HOU Ying, HU Jing, WU Kai, XIA Hao-Jun, XIA Jie, ZHOU Bo-Rui, LI Kai, NI Jian. A plot-based dataset of plant community on the Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(7): 846-854. |
[12] | YU Shui-Jin, WANG Juan, ZHANG Chun-Yu, ZHAO Xiu-Hai. Impact and mechanism of maintaining biomass stability in a temperate coniferous and broadleaved mixed forest [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(6): 632-641. |
[13] | YU Qiu-Wu, YANG Jing, SHEN Guo-Chun. Relationship between canopy structure and species composition of an evergreen broadleaf forest in Tiantong region, Zhejiang, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(5): 529-538. |
[14] | YUAN Yuan, MU Yan-Mei, DENG Yu-Jie, LI Xin-Hao, JIANG Xiao-Yan, GAO Sheng-Jie, ZHA Tian- Shan, JIA Xin. Effects of land cover and phenology changes on the gross primary productivity in an Artemisia ordosica shrubland [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(2): 162-175. |
[15] | ZHANG Yi, CHENG Jie, SU Ji-Shuai, CHENG Ji-Min. Diversity-productivity relationship of plant communities in typical grassland during the long- term grazing exclusion succession [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(2): 176-187. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn