Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2005, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 610-614.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2005.0081
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Ming-Qing1(), YANG Guo-Dong1, XU Xiao-Bo2
Received:
2004-07-01
Accepted:
2005-04-05
Online:
2005-07-01
Published:
2005-07-31
ZHANG Ming-Qing, YANG Guo-Dong, XU Xiao-Bo. THE USE OF FLOWER BUD MEASUREMENTS FOR FORECASTING FLORESCENCE IN PRUNUS SARGENTII[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2005, 29(4): 610-614.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2005.0081
Yi (d) | 28 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 17 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xi (mm) | 3.39 | 3.34 | 3.21 | 3.21 | 3.36 | 3.41 | 3.28 | 3.18 | 3.26 | 3.48 | 3.61 | 3.66 | 3.62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Yi (d) | 15 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Xi (mm) | 3.72 | 3.71 | 3.83 | 3.97 | 3.98 | 4.20 | 4.03 | 4.34 | 4.29 | 4.72 | 4.88 | 5.03 |
Table 1 The relationship between the short axes (Yi) of the sprout and the days (Xi) before the first flowering day forecasted by the method of 3-day running mean (Yuyuantan Park, Beijing, 1998-2000)
Yi (d) | 28 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 22 | 21 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 17 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xi (mm) | 3.39 | 3.34 | 3.21 | 3.21 | 3.36 | 3.41 | 3.28 | 3.18 | 3.26 | 3.48 | 3.61 | 3.66 | 3.62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Yi (d) | 15 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Xi (mm) | 3.72 | 3.71 | 3.83 | 3.97 | 3.98 | 4.20 | 4.03 | 4.34 | 4.29 | 4.72 | 4.88 | 5.03 |
级别 Grade | 1株(模型1) 1 Plant (Model 1) | 1株(模型2) 1 Plant (Model 2) | 2株(模型1) 2 Plants (Model 1) | 2株(模型2) 2 Plants (Model 2) | 3株(模型1) 3 Plants (Model 1) | 3株(模型2) 3 Plants (Model 2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | 百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | 百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | 百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | 百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | 百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | |
Ⅰ | 18.8 | 75.3 | 22.4 | 89.4 | 33.3 | 133.3 | 35.7 | 142.8 | 62.5 | 250.0 | 43.8 | 175.0 |
Ⅱ | 30.6 | 91.8 | 37.6 | 112.9 | 45.2 | 135.6 | 57.1 | 171.4 | 25.0 | 75.0 | 43.8 | 131.3 |
Ⅲ | 27.1 | 54.1 | 27.1 | 54.1 | 11.9 | 23.8 | 7.1 | 14.3 | 6.3 | 12.6 | 12.5 | 25.0 |
Ⅳ | 23.5 | 23.5 | 12.9 | 12.9 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
合计Total | 100.0 | 244.7 | 100.0 | 269.3 | 99.9 | 302.2 | 99.9 | 328.5 | 100.1 | 343.9 | 100.1 | 331.3 |
满分率 Rate of full mark (%) | 64.2 | 67.3 | 75.6 | 80.1 | 85.9 | 82.8 | ||||||
平均误差 Average error (d) | 3.9 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 | ||||||
检验次数 Times of checkout | 85 | 85 | 42 | 42 | 16 | 16 |
Table 2 Forecast results of different numbers of plants (Yuyuantan Park, Beijing, 2002)
级别 Grade | 1株(模型1) 1 Plant (Model 1) | 1株(模型2) 1 Plant (Model 2) | 2株(模型1) 2 Plants (Model 1) | 2株(模型2) 2 Plants (Model 2) | 3株(模型1) 3 Plants (Model 1) | 3株(模型2) 3 Plants (Model 2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | 百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | 百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | 百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | 百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | 百分比 Percent (%) | 得分 Score | |
Ⅰ | 18.8 | 75.3 | 22.4 | 89.4 | 33.3 | 133.3 | 35.7 | 142.8 | 62.5 | 250.0 | 43.8 | 175.0 |
Ⅱ | 30.6 | 91.8 | 37.6 | 112.9 | 45.2 | 135.6 | 57.1 | 171.4 | 25.0 | 75.0 | 43.8 | 131.3 |
Ⅲ | 27.1 | 54.1 | 27.1 | 54.1 | 11.9 | 23.8 | 7.1 | 14.3 | 6.3 | 12.6 | 12.5 | 25.0 |
Ⅳ | 23.5 | 23.5 | 12.9 | 12.9 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
合计Total | 100.0 | 244.7 | 100.0 | 269.3 | 99.9 | 302.2 | 99.9 | 328.5 | 100.1 | 343.9 | 100.1 | 331.3 |
满分率 Rate of full mark (%) | 64.2 | 67.3 | 75.6 | 80.1 | 85.9 | 82.8 | ||||||
平均误差 Average error (d) | 3.9 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 | ||||||
检验次数 Times of checkout | 85 | 85 | 42 | 42 | 16 | 16 |
日期(月.日) Date(m.d) | 3.14 | 3.15 | 3.16 | 3.17 | 3.18 | 3.19 | 3.20 | 3.21 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
短轴 Short axes (mm) | 4.05 | 3.97 | 3.96 | 4.07 | 4.22 | 4.03 | 4.07 | 4.18 | |
3日滑动平均 3-day running mean (mm) | 3.99 | 4.00 | 4.08 | 4.11 | 4.11 | 4.09 | 4.14 | ||
实测始花日期(月.日) Florescence (m.d) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
模型1 Model 1 | 预报结果(月.日) Forecast results(m.d) | 3.29 | 3.30 | 3.30 | 3.30 | 3.31 | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
误差 Errors (d) | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
模型2 Model 2 | 预报结果(月.日) Forecast results (m.d) | 3.27 | 3.28 | 3.28 | 3.29 | 3.30 | 3.31 | 3.31 | |
误差 Errors (d) | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||
日期(月.日) Date (m.d) | 3.22 | 3.23 | 3.24 | 3.25 | 3.26 | 3.27 | 3.28 | 3.29 | |
短轴 Short axes (mm) | 4.16 | 4.12 | 4.51 | 4.31 | 4.65 | 4.49 | 4.77 | 5.73 | |
3日滑动平均 3-day running mean (mm) | 4.15 | 4.26 | 4.31 | 4.49 | 4.48 | 4.63 | 5.00 | ||
实测始花日期(月.日) Florescence (m.d) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | ||
模型1 Model 1 | 预报结果(月.日) Forecast results(m.d) | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.29 | |
误差 Errors (d) | -2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | +4 | ||
模型2 Model 2 | 预报结果(月.日) Forecast results (m.d) | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
误差 Errors (d) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3 The observed short axes of the Prunus sargentii and the corresponding forecast results in 2003 (Yuyuantan Park, Beijing)
日期(月.日) Date(m.d) | 3.14 | 3.15 | 3.16 | 3.17 | 3.18 | 3.19 | 3.20 | 3.21 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
短轴 Short axes (mm) | 4.05 | 3.97 | 3.96 | 4.07 | 4.22 | 4.03 | 4.07 | 4.18 | |
3日滑动平均 3-day running mean (mm) | 3.99 | 4.00 | 4.08 | 4.11 | 4.11 | 4.09 | 4.14 | ||
实测始花日期(月.日) Florescence (m.d) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
模型1 Model 1 | 预报结果(月.日) Forecast results(m.d) | 3.29 | 3.30 | 3.30 | 3.30 | 3.31 | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
误差 Errors (d) | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
模型2 Model 2 | 预报结果(月.日) Forecast results (m.d) | 3.27 | 3.28 | 3.28 | 3.29 | 3.30 | 3.31 | 3.31 | |
误差 Errors (d) | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||
日期(月.日) Date (m.d) | 3.22 | 3.23 | 3.24 | 3.25 | 3.26 | 3.27 | 3.28 | 3.29 | |
短轴 Short axes (mm) | 4.16 | 4.12 | 4.51 | 4.31 | 4.65 | 4.49 | 4.77 | 5.73 | |
3日滑动平均 3-day running mean (mm) | 4.15 | 4.26 | 4.31 | 4.49 | 4.48 | 4.63 | 5.00 | ||
实测始花日期(月.日) Florescence (m.d) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | ||
模型1 Model 1 | 预报结果(月.日) Forecast results(m.d) | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.29 | |
误差 Errors (d) | -2 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | +4 | ||
模型2 Model 2 | 预报结果(月.日) Forecast results (m.d) | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
误差 Errors (d) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[1] | Tsuboi Yaponi( Translated by Hou HS (侯宏森),Qi LF(亓来福),Wang MX(王茂新),Shi GN(史国宁),Zhang JS(张菊生),Shen DF(沈德福)) (1985). New Handbook on Agricultural Meteorology (in Japanese). China Agriculture Press,Beijing,317-318.. (in Chinese) |
[2] | Ren XW(任宪威), Liu XZ(刘秀珍), Li Z(李珍) (1983). A study on phenology of woody plants in Beijing. Journal of Beijing Forestry College (北京林学院学报), 5(1),1-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Mihara Yashiaki( Translated by Xiang S (项硕), Huang JL(黄俊来), Rong DZ (荣德珍)) (1984). Practical Agricultural Meteorology (in Japanese). Guangxi People's Press,Nanning,26. (in Chinese) |
[4] | Wei XL(魏秀兰), Kong FZ(孔凡中), Zhang ZH(张宗灏), Zhang CY(张翠英) (2001). Long time forecasting of flowering time of Paeonia suffruticosa in Heze. Meteorology (气象), 27(6),55-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Larcher W( Translated by Li B (李博)) (1980). Physiological Plant Ecology (in German). Science Press, Beijing, 275. (in Chinese) |
[6] | Yang GD(杨国栋) (1991). Forecasting-flowering-time models in forestry of oriental cherry and peach blossom in Beijing. In: Yang SZ (杨树珍) ed. Research of Economic Development and Composition in Beijing Area (首都地区经济发展与布局研究). China Workers Press,Beijing,262-268. |
[7] | Yang GD(杨国栋) (1994). Research of the very phonological regression model for seasonal forecasting. Journal of Capital Normal University (首都师范大学学报), 15(4),79-84. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Zhang CY(张翠英), Liu LF (刘了凡), Fan JH (樊景豪) (2001). Research of the forecasting blooming time model of Robinia pseudoacacia L. ShanDong Meteorology (山东气象), 21(3),30-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Zhang XY(张秀英), Hu DY(胡东燕) (1995). Prediction of peach-blossom flowering phase. Journal of Beijing Foresty University (Natural Science Edition) (北京林业大学学报(自然科学版)), 17(4),88-93. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Zhu KZ (竺可桢), Wan MW(宛敏渭) (1980). Phenology (物候学). Science Press, Beijing, 80. (in Chinese) |
[1] | REN Pei-Xin, LI Peng, PENG Chang-Hui, ZHOU Xiao-Lu, YANG Ming-Xia. Temporal and spatial variation of vegetation photosynthetic phenology in Dongting Lake basin and its response to climate change [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(3): 319-330. |
[2] | XIA Jing-Yu, ZHANG Yang-Jian, ZHENG Zhou-Tao, ZHAO Guang, ZHAO Ran, ZHU Yi-Xuan, GAO Jie, SHEN Ruo-Nan, LI Wen-Yu, ZHENG Jia-He, ZHANG Yu-Xue, ZHU Jun-Tao, SUN Osbert Jianxin. Asynchronous response of plant phenology to warming in a Kobresia pygmaea meadow in Nagqu, Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(2): 183-194. |
[3] | CHEN Xin-Yi, WU Chen, HUANG Jin-Xue, XIONG De-Cheng. Effects of warming on fine root phenology of forests: a review [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(11): 1471-1482. |
[4] | WEI Yao, MA Zhi-Yuan, ZHOU Jia-Ying, ZHANG Zhen-Hua. Experimental warming changed reproductive phenology and height of alpine plants on the Qingzang Plateau [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(9): 995-1004. |
[5] | CHEN Yi-Zhu, LANG Wei-Guang, CHEN Xiao-Qiu. Process-based simulation of autumn phenology of trees and the regional differentiation attribution in northern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(7): 753-765. |
[6] | ZHANG Di, DU Ye-Qin, WANG Lei, CHEN Xin, YAN Xing-Fu, TANG Zhan-Hui. Differences in flowering and pollination characteristics of two gender phenotypes of Lilium concolor var. megalanthum between two habitats [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(5): 580-592. |
[7] | TIAN Lei, ZHU Yi, LI Xin, HAN Guo-Dong, REN Hai-Yan. Responses of plant phenology to warming and nitrogen addition under different precipitation conditions in a desert steppe of Nei Mongol, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(3): 290-299. |
[8] | CONG Nan, ZHANG Yang-Jian, ZHU Jun-Tao. Temperature sensitivity of vegetation phenology in spring in mid- to high-latitude regions of Northern Hemisphere during the recent three decades [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(2): 125-135. |
[9] | YU Hai-Ying, YANG Li-Lin, FU Su-Jing, ZHANG Zhi-Min, YAO Qi-Fu. Response of leaf-unfolding dates of woody species to variation of chilling and heat accumulation in warm temperate forests [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(12): 1573-1584. |
[10] | WU Lin-Sheng, ZHANG Yong-Guang, ZHANG Zhao-Ying, ZHANG Xiao-Kang, WU Yun-Fei. Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and its applications in terrestrial ecosystem monitoring [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(10): 1167-1199. |
[11] | DU Jun, WANG Wen, HE Zhi-Bin, CHEN Long-Fei, LIN Peng-Fei, ZHU Xi, TIAN Quan-Yan. Spatial variability of phenological phenotype of Picea crassifolia in Qilian Mountains and its internal mechanism [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(8): 834-843. |
[12] | CHEN Zhe, WANG Hao, WANG Jin-Zhou, SHI Hui-Jin, LIU Hui-Ying, HE Jin-Sheng. Estimation on seasonal dynamics of alpine grassland aboveground biomass using phenology camera-derived NDVI [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(5): 487-495. |
[13] | ZHOU Wen, CHI Yong-Gang, ZHOU Lei. Vegetation phenology in the Northern Hemisphere based on the solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(4): 345-354. |
[14] | LI Xue-Ying, ZHU Wen-Quan, LI Pei-Xian, XIE Zhi-Ying, ZHAO Cen-Liang. Predicting phenology shifts of herbaceous plants on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau under climate warming with the space-for-time method [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(7): 742-751. |
[15] | ZHANG Yi-Ping, HAI Xu-Ying, XU Jun-Liang, WU Wen-Xia, CAO Peng-He, AN Wen-Jing. Seasonal dynamics of non-structural carbohydrate content in branch of Quercus variabilis growing in east Qinling Mountain range [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(6): 521-531. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn