Chin J Plan Ecolo ›› 2011, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11): 1091-1105.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.01091

• Research Articles •     Next Articles

Comparative evaluation of multiple models of the effects of climate change on the potential distribution of Pinus massoniana

ZHANG Lei1, LIU Shi-Rong1*, SUN Peng-Sen1, and WANG Tong-Li2   

  1. 1Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of State ForestryAdministration, Beijing 100091, China;

    2Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, 3041-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver B.C. Canada V6T 1Z4
  • Received:2010-11-26 Revised:2011-07-28 Online:2011-11-07 Published:2011-11-01
  • Contact: LIU Shi-Rong


Aims New, powerful statistical techniques and GIS tools have resulted in a plethora of methods for modelling species distribution. However, little is known about the relative performance of different models in simulating and projecting species’ distributions under future climate. Our objective is to compare novel ensemble learning models with other conventional models by modelling the potential distribution of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) and identifying and quantifying differences in model outputs.
Methods We simulated Masson pine potential distribution (baseline 1961–1990) and projected future potential distributions for three time periods (2010–2039, 2040–2069 and 2070–2099) using three global circulation models (GCM) (MIROC32_medres, JP; CCCMA_CGCM3, CA, and BCCR-BCM2.0, NW), one pessimistic SRES emissions scenario (A2), three ensemble learning models (random forest, RF; generalized boosted model, GBM, and NeuralEnsembles) and three conventional models (generalized linear model, GLM; generalized additive models, GAM, and classification and regression model, CART). The environmental envelope method was used to select absence of species. The area under the curve (AUC) values of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, Kappa and true skill statistic (TSS) were used to objectively assess the predictive accuracy of each model. National standards for seed zone of Masson pine (GB 8822.6-1988) was employed to intuitively assess model performance. We developed ClimateChina software to downscale current and future GCM climate data and calculate seasonal and annual climate variables for specific locations based on latitude, longitude and elevation.
Important findings Ensemble learning models (GBM, NeuralEnsembles and RF) achieved a higher predictive success in simulating the distribution of Masson pine compared to other conventional models (CART, GAM and GLM). RF had the highest predictive accuracy, and CART had the lowest. Masson pine shows a globally consistent pattern in response to climate change for the three GCMs and six models, i.e., Masson pine will likely gradually shift northward and expand its distribution under altered future climate, with the magnitude of range changes dependent on model classes and GCMs. RF predicts a greater magnitude of range changes than other models. Projections of Masson pine distribution by NW are more conservative than JP and CA climate scenarios. In the case of Masson pine, range changes are mainly attributed to the colonization of newly available suitable habitat in high-latitudes and unchanging habitat suitability in the south-central part of its baseline range. Differences among 18 projections (6 models × 3 GCMs) increase with increasing time, and the greatest spatial uncertainty in projections is mainly in the north and west borders of the potential distribution range.

Barry S, Elith J (2006). Error and uncertainty in habitat models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 413-423.
Braak CJFT, Looman CWN (1986). Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model Plant Ecology, 65, 3-11.
Breiman L (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning. 45, 5–32.
Breiman L, Cutler A (2004). Random forests.
Buisson L, Thuiller W, Casajus N, Lek S, Grenouillet G (2009). Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution. Global Change Biology, 16, 1-13.
Chefaoui RM, Lobo JM (2008). Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance. Ecological Modeling, 210, 478-486.
Daly C, Gibson W, Taylor G, Johnson G, Pasteris P (2002). A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate. Climate Research, 22, 99-113.
Editorial Board of Vegetation map of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences (中国科学院中国植被图编辑委员会) (2001). 1:100 mil-lion Vegetation Atlas of China. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Duik M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton JM, Peterson AT, Phillips, S. J., Richardson K, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberon J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 29, 129-151.
Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997). A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation, 24, 38-49.
Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000). Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modeling, 135, 147-186.
Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL (2006). The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography, 773-785.
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability:Summary for Policymakers. Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report.
Iverson LR, Prasad AM, Matthews SN, Peters M (2008). Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern US tree species under six climate scenarios. Forest Ecology and Management, 254, 390-406.
Lawler JJ, White D, Neilson RP, Blaustein AR (2006). Predicting climate-induced range shifts: model differences and model reliability. Global Change Biology, 12, 1568-1584.
Lenoir J, Gégout JC, Marquet PA, Ruffray PD, Brisse H (2008). A Significant Upward Shift in Plant Species Optimum Elevation During the 20th Century. Science, 32, 1768-1771.
Mitchell T, Jones P (2005). An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 693-712.
Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003). A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature, 421, 37-42.
Penuelas J, Boada M (2003). A global change-induced biome shift in the Montseny mountains (NE Spain). Global Change Biology, 9, 131-140.
Peters J, Baets BD, Verhoest NEC, Samson R, Degroeve S, Becker PD, Huybrechts W (2007). Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling. Ecological Modeling, 207, 304-318.
Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweigk C, Pounds JA (2003). Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature, 421, 57-60.
Shoo LP, Williams SE, Hero J-M (2006). Detecting climate change induced range shifts: Where and how should we be looking? Austral Ecology, 31, 22-29.
Song M, Zhou C, Ouyang H.(2004). Distributions of Dominant Tree Species on the Tibetan Plateau under Current and Future Climate Scenarios. Mountain Research and Development, 24, 166-173.
Swets JA (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285-1293.
Wang T, Hamann A, Spittlehouse D, Aitken S (2006). Development of scale-free climate data for western Canada for use in resource management. International Journal of Climatology, 26, 383-397.
Webb III T, Bartlein P (1992). Global changes during the last 3 million years: climatic controls and biotic responses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23, 141-173.
Wisz MS, Guisan A (2009). Do pseudo-absence selection strategies influence species distribution models and their predictions ? An information-theoretic approach based on simulated data. BMC Ecology.
Xu D, Yan H (2001). A study of the impacts of climate change on the geographic distribution of Pinus koraiensis in China. Environment International, 27, 201-205.
He QT (贺庆棠), Yuan JZ (袁嘉祖), Chen ZB (陈志泊) (1996). Possible effects of the climate changes on the distribution of Pinus massoniana and Pinus yunnanensis in South China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 18, 22-28. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Liaw A, Wiener M (2002). Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News 2(3), 18-22.
Lv JJ (吕佳佳), Wu JG (吴建国) (2009). Advances in the effects of climate change on the distribution of plant species and vegetation in China. Environmental Science & Technology (环境科学与技术), 32, 85-95. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Nix HA (1986). A biogeographic analysis of Australian Elaphid snakes. In: Longmore R ed. Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 4-15.
R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL
Shao H (邵慧), Tian JQ (田佳倩), Guo K (郭柯), Sun OJ (孙建新) (2009). Effects of sample size and species traits on performance of Bioclim in predicting geographical distribution of tree species—a case study with 12 deciduous Quercus species indigenous to China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 33, 870-877. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wang J (王娟), Ni J (倪健) (2006). Review of modelling the distribution of plant species. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 30, 1040-1053. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wu JG (吴建国), Lv JJ (吕佳佳) (2009). Potential efects of climate change on the distribution of Dove Trees (Davidia Involucrata Baill) in China. Research of Environmental Science (环境科学研究), 22, 1371-1381. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Xu DY (徐德应), Guo QS (郭泉水), Yan H (闫洪) (1997). A study on the impacts of climate change on forests in China (气候变化对中国森林影响研究). China Scientific and Technical Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
No related articles found!
Full text



[1] Hu Shi-yi. Lipoid Bodies in Plant Tissues[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(04): 49 -51 .
[2] CHENG Hong-Yan. Introduction of State Key Laboratory of Biomembrane and Membrane Biotechnology[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1998, 15(04): 78 .
[3] Liu Dong-zhuo and Li Lan. The Karyotype Analysis of Solanum pseudocapsicum[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1992, 9(03): 50 .
[4] WANG Bao-Shan;LI De-Quan;ZHAO Shi-Jie;MENG Qing-Wei and ZOU Qi. Effects of Iso-osmotic NaCl and KCl Stress on Growth and Gas Exchange of Sorghum Seedlings[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1999, 16(04): 449 -453 .
[5] LI Yao-Dong WEI Yu-Ning XU Ben-Mei. Study on the ABA Content and SOD Activity in Ancient Lotus and Modern Lotus Seeds[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2000, 17(05): 439 -442 .
[6] LI Zhong-Kui HU Hong-Jun LI Ye-Guang. Advances in Molecular Phylogenetic Relationship of Volvocales[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2002, 19(04): 419 -424 .
[7] WANG Ting SU Ying-Juan ZHU Jian-Ming HUANG Chao LI Xue-Yan. PCR_RFLP Analysis of rbc L Genes in Taxaceae and Related Taxa[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2001, 18(06): 714 -721 .
[8] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(专辑): 51 .
[9] Dong Shu-ting, Hu Chang-hao, Yue Shou-song, Wang Qun-ying, Gao Rong-qi, Pan Zi-long. The Characteristics of Canopy Photosynthesis of Summer Corn (Zea mays) and its Relation with Canopy Structure and Ecological Conditions[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1992, 16(4): 372 -378 .