Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 355-362.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.02.012
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2006-12-19
Accepted:
2007-07-03
Online:
2008-12-19
Published:
2008-03-30
Contact:
WANG Ya-Li,LI Yi
WANG Ya-Li, LI Yi. STUDY ON PHENOTYPIC DIVERSITY OF CONE AND SEED IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF PICEA CRASSIFOLIA IN QILIAN MOUNTAIN, CHINA[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(2): 355-362.
群体 Population | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 经度 Longitude (E) | 海拔(m) Altitude | 年均温 Ta(℃) | 1月均温 T1(℃) | 7月均温 T7(℃) | 年降水(mm) Precipitation | 坡度(°) Slope | 坡向 Aspect | 土壤 Soil |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SN1 | 38°51' | 99°31' | 2 651 | 3.6 | -10.4 | 15.9 | 253 | 15 | NW | 山地棕褐土 Mountain brown earth |
SN2 | 38°51' | 99°34' | 2 684 | 3.6 | -10.4 | 15.9 | 253 | 10 | N | 山地棕褐土 Mountain brown earth |
SN3 | 38°51' | 99°32' | 2 587 | 3.6 | -10.4 | 15.9 | 253 | 15 | SW | 山地棕褐土 Mountain brown earth |
TZ1 | 37°30' | 102°20' | 2 807 | 1.8 | -10.9 | 23.2 | 350 | 28 | SW | 山地灰褐土 Mountain grey earth |
TZ2 | 37°22' | 102°32' | 2 805 | 1.8 | -10.9 | 23.2 | 350 | 28 | NW | 山地灰褐土 Mountain grey earth |
SD | 38°32' | 100°16' | 2 684 | 1.2 | -11.3 | 20.3 | 400 | 30 | N | 山地灰褐土 Mountain grey earth |
ML | 38°21' | 100°37' | 2 783 | 2.8 | -12.3 | 15.9 | 328 | 18 | SW | 山地灰褐土 Mountain grey earth |
DT1 | 37°01' | 101°50' | 2 947 | 2.7 | -11.8 | 14.2 | 552.2 | 10 | S | 山地褐土 Mountain grey earth |
DT2 | 37°02' | 101°49' | 2 705 | 2.7 | -11.8 | 14.2 | 552.2 | 15 | SE | 山地棕褐土 Mountain brown earth |
MY | 37°16' | 102°00' | 2 809 | 0.6 | -13.8 | 12.8 | 393.3 | 25 | NW | 山地棕褐土 Mountain brown earth |
Table 1 Locations and releated ecological factors of the sampled populations in Picea crassifolia
群体 Population | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 经度 Longitude (E) | 海拔(m) Altitude | 年均温 Ta(℃) | 1月均温 T1(℃) | 7月均温 T7(℃) | 年降水(mm) Precipitation | 坡度(°) Slope | 坡向 Aspect | 土壤 Soil |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SN1 | 38°51' | 99°31' | 2 651 | 3.6 | -10.4 | 15.9 | 253 | 15 | NW | 山地棕褐土 Mountain brown earth |
SN2 | 38°51' | 99°34' | 2 684 | 3.6 | -10.4 | 15.9 | 253 | 10 | N | 山地棕褐土 Mountain brown earth |
SN3 | 38°51' | 99°32' | 2 587 | 3.6 | -10.4 | 15.9 | 253 | 15 | SW | 山地棕褐土 Mountain brown earth |
TZ1 | 37°30' | 102°20' | 2 807 | 1.8 | -10.9 | 23.2 | 350 | 28 | SW | 山地灰褐土 Mountain grey earth |
TZ2 | 37°22' | 102°32' | 2 805 | 1.8 | -10.9 | 23.2 | 350 | 28 | NW | 山地灰褐土 Mountain grey earth |
SD | 38°32' | 100°16' | 2 684 | 1.2 | -11.3 | 20.3 | 400 | 30 | N | 山地灰褐土 Mountain grey earth |
ML | 38°21' | 100°37' | 2 783 | 2.8 | -12.3 | 15.9 | 328 | 18 | SW | 山地灰褐土 Mountain grey earth |
DT1 | 37°01' | 101°50' | 2 947 | 2.7 | -11.8 | 14.2 | 552.2 | 10 | S | 山地褐土 Mountain grey earth |
DT2 | 37°02' | 101°49' | 2 705 | 2.7 | -11.8 | 14.2 | 552.2 | 15 | SE | 山地棕褐土 Mountain brown earth |
MY | 37°16' | 102°00' | 2 809 | 0.6 | -13.8 | 12.8 | 393.3 | 25 | NW | 山地棕褐土 Mountain brown earth |
性状 Traits | 均方自由度 df | F值 F value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
群体间 Among populations | 群体内 Within population | 机误 Random errors | 群体间 Among populations | 群体内 Within population | ||
QSW | 36.397 800 | 2.699 400 | 0.182 600 | 199.192 500** | 14.780 340 | |
CL | 82.616 190 | 12.030 620 | 0.849 659 | 97.234 570** | 14.159 360 | |
CW | 2.841 628 | 0.797 694 | 0.010 011 | 283.851 500** | 79.680 240 | |
CDW | 302.202 300 | 89.579 850 | 49.226 900 | 6.138 967 0** | 1.817 702 | |
SL | 0.139 593 | 0.030 083 | 0.001 093 | 127.703 500** | 27.529 300** | |
SW | 0.063 347 | 0.019 211 | 0.001 155 | 54.837 990** | 16.630 530** | |
CL/CW | 7.636 824 | 1.685 556 | 1.592 643 | 4.795 064** | 1.058 339 | |
SL/SW | 2.989 119 | 2.329 227 | 0.077 664 | 38.487 690** | 29.990 960** |
Table 2 Variance analysis of cone and seed phenotypic traits among populations/within population in Picea crassifolia
性状 Traits | 均方自由度 df | F值 F value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
群体间 Among populations | 群体内 Within population | 机误 Random errors | 群体间 Among populations | 群体内 Within population | ||
QSW | 36.397 800 | 2.699 400 | 0.182 600 | 199.192 500** | 14.780 340 | |
CL | 82.616 190 | 12.030 620 | 0.849 659 | 97.234 570** | 14.159 360 | |
CW | 2.841 628 | 0.797 694 | 0.010 011 | 283.851 500** | 79.680 240 | |
CDW | 302.202 300 | 89.579 850 | 49.226 900 | 6.138 967 0** | 1.817 702 | |
SL | 0.139 593 | 0.030 083 | 0.001 093 | 127.703 500** | 27.529 300** | |
SW | 0.063 347 | 0.019 211 | 0.001 155 | 54.837 990** | 16.630 530** | |
CL/CW | 7.636 824 | 1.685 556 | 1.592 643 | 4.795 064** | 1.058 339 | |
SL/SW | 2.989 119 | 2.329 227 | 0.077 664 | 38.487 690** | 29.990 960** |
群体 Population | 样本数 Sample number | 平均值±标准差 Mean±SD | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL (cm) | CW (cm) | CDW (g) | CLW | SL (cm) | SW (cm) | QSW (g) | SLW | ||
SN1 | 150 | 10.11±0.869a | 2.45±0.130a | 17.25±3.160a | 4.14±0.340a | 0.40±0.030ab | 0.20±0.023abc | 6.35±0.116a | 2.05±0.258a |
SN2 | 150 | 9.28±0.950ab | 2.20±0.129bc | 13.56±2.363bcd | 4.23±0.398a | 0.39±0.035abc | 0.22±0.029ab | 5.77±0.041ab | 1.84±0.208ab |
SN3 | 150 | 9.84±0.974a | 2.47±0.226a | 14.89±2.895ab | 4.05±0.494a | 0.41±0.048a | 0.22±0.032ab | 6.47±0.184a | 1.97±0.279ab |
TZ1 | 150 | 8.37±1.266bcd | 2.26±0.102b | 12.03±2.477cde | 3.71±0.536bc | 0.36±0.031cde | 0.20±0.049abc | 4.51±0.125cd | 1.88±0.351ab |
TZ2 | 150 | 7.90±0.970d | 2.21±0.183b | 11.07±2.485de | 3.57±0.313c | 0.35±0.034de | 0.19±0.030c | 3.71±0.052de | 1.95±0.313ab |
SD | 150 | 9.14±1.181ab | 2.11±0.139bc | 12.87±2.771bcde | 4.16±0.671a | 0.40±0.025ab | 0.23±0.020a | 6.21±0.234ab | 1.77±0.200ab |
ML | 150 | 9.05±0.872abc | 2.25±0.097b | 10.94±2.308de | 4.02±0.359a | 0.37±0.033bcde | 0.22±0.020ab | 5.31±0.112bc | 1.73±0.226b |
DT1 | 150 | 9.27±0.755abc | 2.18±0.100bc | 13.45±2.425bcde | 4.17±0.266a | 0.38±0.030abcd | 0.19±0.023bc | 4.21±0.103de | 1.98±0.349ab |
DT2 | 150 | 9.53±0.694ab | 2.25±0.109b | 14.19±2.722bc | 4.24±0.277a | 0.38±0.027bcd | 0.20±0.019abc | 5.31±0.126bc | 1.86±0.170ab |
MY | 150 | 7.99±0.534cd | 2.02±0.093c | 10.65±1.581e | 3.95±0.221ab | 0.35±0.025e | 0.18±0.063c | 3.47±0.022e | 1.95±0.303ab |
总计 Total | 1 500 | 9.03±0.930 | 2.24±0.137 | 13.09±2.550 | 4.02±0.410 | 9.03±0.930 | 2.24±0.137 | 13.09±2.550 | 4.02±0.410 |
Table 3 The mean value and standard deviation of cone and seed phenotypic traits of 10 populations in Picea crassifolia
群体 Population | 样本数 Sample number | 平均值±标准差 Mean±SD | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL (cm) | CW (cm) | CDW (g) | CLW | SL (cm) | SW (cm) | QSW (g) | SLW | ||
SN1 | 150 | 10.11±0.869a | 2.45±0.130a | 17.25±3.160a | 4.14±0.340a | 0.40±0.030ab | 0.20±0.023abc | 6.35±0.116a | 2.05±0.258a |
SN2 | 150 | 9.28±0.950ab | 2.20±0.129bc | 13.56±2.363bcd | 4.23±0.398a | 0.39±0.035abc | 0.22±0.029ab | 5.77±0.041ab | 1.84±0.208ab |
SN3 | 150 | 9.84±0.974a | 2.47±0.226a | 14.89±2.895ab | 4.05±0.494a | 0.41±0.048a | 0.22±0.032ab | 6.47±0.184a | 1.97±0.279ab |
TZ1 | 150 | 8.37±1.266bcd | 2.26±0.102b | 12.03±2.477cde | 3.71±0.536bc | 0.36±0.031cde | 0.20±0.049abc | 4.51±0.125cd | 1.88±0.351ab |
TZ2 | 150 | 7.90±0.970d | 2.21±0.183b | 11.07±2.485de | 3.57±0.313c | 0.35±0.034de | 0.19±0.030c | 3.71±0.052de | 1.95±0.313ab |
SD | 150 | 9.14±1.181ab | 2.11±0.139bc | 12.87±2.771bcde | 4.16±0.671a | 0.40±0.025ab | 0.23±0.020a | 6.21±0.234ab | 1.77±0.200ab |
ML | 150 | 9.05±0.872abc | 2.25±0.097b | 10.94±2.308de | 4.02±0.359a | 0.37±0.033bcde | 0.22±0.020ab | 5.31±0.112bc | 1.73±0.226b |
DT1 | 150 | 9.27±0.755abc | 2.18±0.100bc | 13.45±2.425bcde | 4.17±0.266a | 0.38±0.030abcd | 0.19±0.023bc | 4.21±0.103de | 1.98±0.349ab |
DT2 | 150 | 9.53±0.694ab | 2.25±0.109b | 14.19±2.722bc | 4.24±0.277a | 0.38±0.027bcd | 0.20±0.019abc | 5.31±0.126bc | 1.86±0.170ab |
MY | 150 | 7.99±0.534cd | 2.02±0.093c | 10.65±1.581e | 3.95±0.221ab | 0.35±0.025e | 0.18±0.063c | 3.47±0.022e | 1.95±0.303ab |
总计 Total | 1 500 | 9.03±0.930 | 2.24±0.137 | 13.09±2.550 | 4.02±0.410 | 9.03±0.930 | 2.24±0.137 | 13.09±2.550 | 4.02±0.410 |
性状 Traits | 方差分量 Variance portion | 方差分量百分比 Percentage of variance portion (%) | 表型分化系数Vst Differentitation coefficient of phenotypic traits (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
群体间 Among populations | 群体内 Within population | 机误 Random errors | 群体间 Among populations | 群体内 Within population | 机误 Random errors | |||
CL | 0.470 57 | 0.745 40 | 0.849 66 | 22.780 98 | 36.085 80 | 41.133 21 | 38.699 21 | |
CW | 0.013 63 | 0.052 51 | 0.010 01 | 17.893 87 | 68.959 54 | 13.146 59 | 20.602 38 | |
CDW | 1.418 15 | 2.683 53 | 49.226 90 | 2.659 27 | 5.032 07 | 92.308 66 | 34.574 86 | |
SL | 0.000 37 | 0.000 97 | 0.001 09 | 15.057 76 | 39.851 49 | 45.090 76 | 27.422 99 | |
SW | 0.000 15 | 0.000 60 | 0.001 16 | 7.720 59 | 31.617 65 | 60.661 76 | 19.626 17 | |
CLW | 0.019 84 | 0.101 75 | 0.159 26 | 7.063 29 | 36.229 69 | 56.707 01 | 16.315 01 | |
SLW | 0.002 20 | 0.075 05 | 0.077 66 | 1.420 12 | 48.446 90 | 50.132 98 | 2.847 82 | |
QSW | 1.123 30 | 0.838 91 | 0.182 60 | 52.373 20 | 39.113 20 | 8.513 64 | 57.246 97 |
Table 4 Variance portions and differentiation coefficients of cone and seed phenotypic traits among /within populations in Picea crassifolia
性状 Traits | 方差分量 Variance portion | 方差分量百分比 Percentage of variance portion (%) | 表型分化系数Vst Differentitation coefficient of phenotypic traits (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
群体间 Among populations | 群体内 Within population | 机误 Random errors | 群体间 Among populations | 群体内 Within population | 机误 Random errors | |||
CL | 0.470 57 | 0.745 40 | 0.849 66 | 22.780 98 | 36.085 80 | 41.133 21 | 38.699 21 | |
CW | 0.013 63 | 0.052 51 | 0.010 01 | 17.893 87 | 68.959 54 | 13.146 59 | 20.602 38 | |
CDW | 1.418 15 | 2.683 53 | 49.226 90 | 2.659 27 | 5.032 07 | 92.308 66 | 34.574 86 | |
SL | 0.000 37 | 0.000 97 | 0.001 09 | 15.057 76 | 39.851 49 | 45.090 76 | 27.422 99 | |
SW | 0.000 15 | 0.000 60 | 0.001 16 | 7.720 59 | 31.617 65 | 60.661 76 | 19.626 17 | |
CLW | 0.019 84 | 0.101 75 | 0.159 26 | 7.063 29 | 36.229 69 | 56.707 01 | 16.315 01 | |
SLW | 0.002 20 | 0.075 05 | 0.077 66 | 1.420 12 | 48.446 90 | 50.132 98 | 2.847 82 | |
QSW | 1.123 30 | 0.838 91 | 0.182 60 | 52.373 20 | 39.113 20 | 8.513 64 | 57.246 97 |
性状 Traits | SN1 | SN2 | SN3 | TZ1 | TZ2 | SD | ML | DT1 | DT2 | MY | 总计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL | 8.60/35.01 | 10.24/38.11 | 9.90/44.92 | 15.13/90.13 | 12.28/51.12 | 12.92/47.00 | 9.64/48.02 | 8.14/31.92 | 7.28/30.90 | 6.68/32.00 | 10.08/45.13 |
CW | 5.31/36.11 | 5.86/23.92 | 9.15/85.03 | 4.51/32.12 | 8.28/44.01 | 6.59/31.90 | 4.31/34.89 | 4.59/27.12 | 4.84/35.09 | 4.60/27.10 | 5.80/38.03 |
CDW | 18.32/72.98 | 17.43/71.03 | 19.44/93.95 | 20.59/62.92 | 22.45/73.12 | 21.53/78.03 | 21.10/67.14 | 18.03/64.05 | 19.18/80.96 | 14.85/46.06 | 19.29/71.01 |
SL | 7.50/52.88 | 8.97/66.03 | 11.71/71.89 | 8.61/72.93 | 9.71/63.05 | 6.25/66.79 | 8.92/53.96 | 7.89/69.38 | 7.11/62.13 | 7.14/50.03 | 8.38/63.12 |
SW | 11.50/16.32 | 13.18/25.87 | 14.55/23.96 | 24.50/71.02 | 15.79/26.96 | 8.70/15.88 | 9.09/15.32 | 11.63/20.13 | 9.50/15.12 | 35.00/43.87 | 15.34/32.99 |
CLW | 8.21/50.97 | 9.41/44.79 | 12.20/68.13 | 14.45/86.32 | 8.77/38.26 | 16.13/66.96 | 8.93/48.03 | 6.38/39.84 | 6.53/45.32 | 5.59/27.16 | 9.66/51.12 |
SLW | 12.59/54.89 | 11.30/49.86 | 14.16/72.98 | 18.67/96.89 | 16.05/68.96 | 11.30/69.12 | 13.06/63.23 | 17.63/79.03 | 9.14/28.11 | 15.54/82.99 | 13.94/66.89 |
QSW | 5.35/45.21 | 3.47/54.12 | 6.65/63.34 | 7.53/80.79 | 8.63/44.85 | 7.73/46.93 | 6.40/45.01 | 7.60/40.09 | 6.78/24.98 | 4.32/52.13 | 6.52/50.09 |
平均 Mean | 9.23/46.28 | 9.64/46.72 | 11.75/66.31 | 13.67/74.65 | 11.84/50.81 | 10.90/53.46 | 9.65/47.34 | 9.59/47.17 | 8.24/39.87 | 11.25/51.19 | 10.58/52.18 |
Table 5 Coefficient of variation (%)/relative extreme value differences (%) of cone and seed phenotypic traits of 10 populations in Picea crassifolia
性状 Traits | SN1 | SN2 | SN3 | TZ1 | TZ2 | SD | ML | DT1 | DT2 | MY | 总计 Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL | 8.60/35.01 | 10.24/38.11 | 9.90/44.92 | 15.13/90.13 | 12.28/51.12 | 12.92/47.00 | 9.64/48.02 | 8.14/31.92 | 7.28/30.90 | 6.68/32.00 | 10.08/45.13 |
CW | 5.31/36.11 | 5.86/23.92 | 9.15/85.03 | 4.51/32.12 | 8.28/44.01 | 6.59/31.90 | 4.31/34.89 | 4.59/27.12 | 4.84/35.09 | 4.60/27.10 | 5.80/38.03 |
CDW | 18.32/72.98 | 17.43/71.03 | 19.44/93.95 | 20.59/62.92 | 22.45/73.12 | 21.53/78.03 | 21.10/67.14 | 18.03/64.05 | 19.18/80.96 | 14.85/46.06 | 19.29/71.01 |
SL | 7.50/52.88 | 8.97/66.03 | 11.71/71.89 | 8.61/72.93 | 9.71/63.05 | 6.25/66.79 | 8.92/53.96 | 7.89/69.38 | 7.11/62.13 | 7.14/50.03 | 8.38/63.12 |
SW | 11.50/16.32 | 13.18/25.87 | 14.55/23.96 | 24.50/71.02 | 15.79/26.96 | 8.70/15.88 | 9.09/15.32 | 11.63/20.13 | 9.50/15.12 | 35.00/43.87 | 15.34/32.99 |
CLW | 8.21/50.97 | 9.41/44.79 | 12.20/68.13 | 14.45/86.32 | 8.77/38.26 | 16.13/66.96 | 8.93/48.03 | 6.38/39.84 | 6.53/45.32 | 5.59/27.16 | 9.66/51.12 |
SLW | 12.59/54.89 | 11.30/49.86 | 14.16/72.98 | 18.67/96.89 | 16.05/68.96 | 11.30/69.12 | 13.06/63.23 | 17.63/79.03 | 9.14/28.11 | 15.54/82.99 | 13.94/66.89 |
QSW | 5.35/45.21 | 3.47/54.12 | 6.65/63.34 | 7.53/80.79 | 8.63/44.85 | 7.73/46.93 | 6.40/45.01 | 7.60/40.09 | 6.78/24.98 | 4.32/52.13 | 6.52/50.09 |
平均 Mean | 9.23/46.28 | 9.64/46.72 | 11.75/66.31 | 13.67/74.65 | 11.84/50.81 | 10.90/53.46 | 9.65/47.34 | 9.59/47.17 | 8.24/39.87 | 11.25/51.19 | 10.58/52.18 |
性状 Traits | CL | CW | CDW | SL | SW | CLW | SLW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW | 0.62** | CDW | 0.72** | 0.61** | |||
SL | 0.50** | 0.31** | 0.44** | ||||
SW | 0.19 | 0.27** | 0.29** | 0.33** | |||
CLW | 0.73** | -0.03 | 0.37** | 0.32** | -0.02 | ||
SLW | 0.17 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.17 | -0.79** | 0.22* | |
SQW | 0.64** | 0.49** | 0.46** | 0.59** | 0.38** | 0.37** | 0.07 |
Table 6 Correlation coefficients matrix among cone and seed phenotypic traits in Picea crassifolia
性状 Traits | CL | CW | CDW | SL | SW | CLW | SLW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW | 0.62** | CDW | 0.72** | 0.61** | |||
SL | 0.50** | 0.31** | 0.44** | ||||
SW | 0.19 | 0.27** | 0.29** | 0.33** | |||
CLW | 0.73** | -0.03 | 0.37** | 0.32** | -0.02 | ||
SLW | 0.17 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.17 | -0.79** | 0.22* | |
SQW | 0.64** | 0.49** | 0.46** | 0.59** | 0.38** | 0.37** | 0.07 |
性状 Traits | 纬度 Latitude | 经度 Longtitude | 海拔 Altitude | 年均温 Ta (℃) | 1月均温 T1 (℃) | 7月均温 T7 (℃) | 年降雨量 Precipatation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL | 0.594 | -0.798** | -0.572 | 0.791** | 0.477 | -0.433 | -0.136 |
CW | 0.501 | -0.537 | -0.567 | 0.788** | 0.695* | 0.026 | -0.475 |
CDW | 0.461 | -0.650* | -0.567 | 0.707* | 0.608 | -0.266 | -0.194 |
SL | 0.726** | -0.869** | -0.693* | 0.634* | 0.572 | -0.239 | -0.268 |
SW | 0.771** | -0.716* | -0.612 | 0.363 | 0.451 | 0.136 | -0.401 |
CLW | 0.373 | -0.632 | -0.318 | 0.448 | 0.006 | -0.715* | 0.192 |
SLW | -0.152 | 0.045 | 0.029 | 0.194 | 0.185 | -0.164 | -0.076 |
SQW | -0.106 | -0.196 | -0.094 | 0.449 | 0.129 | -0.442 | 0.588 |
Table 7 Correlation coefficients between cone and seed phenotypic traits and ecological factors
性状 Traits | 纬度 Latitude | 经度 Longtitude | 海拔 Altitude | 年均温 Ta (℃) | 1月均温 T1 (℃) | 7月均温 T7 (℃) | 年降雨量 Precipatation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL | 0.594 | -0.798** | -0.572 | 0.791** | 0.477 | -0.433 | -0.136 |
CW | 0.501 | -0.537 | -0.567 | 0.788** | 0.695* | 0.026 | -0.475 |
CDW | 0.461 | -0.650* | -0.567 | 0.707* | 0.608 | -0.266 | -0.194 |
SL | 0.726** | -0.869** | -0.693* | 0.634* | 0.572 | -0.239 | -0.268 |
SW | 0.771** | -0.716* | -0.612 | 0.363 | 0.451 | 0.136 | -0.401 |
CLW | 0.373 | -0.632 | -0.318 | 0.448 | 0.006 | -0.715* | 0.192 |
SLW | -0.152 | 0.045 | 0.029 | 0.194 | 0.185 | -0.164 | -0.076 |
SQW | -0.106 | -0.196 | -0.094 | 0.449 | 0.129 | -0.442 | 0.588 |
[1] | Barzdajn W (1996). An assessment of diagnostic value of morphological traits of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) cones for discrimination of spruce provenances. Sylwan, 140, 61-75. |
[2] | Ge S (葛颂), Wang MX (王明庥), Chen YW (陈岳武) (1988). Study on genetic structure of Pinus massoniana use isozyme. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 24, 399-409. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Jiang H (江洪) (1992). The Population of Picea asperata Ecology (云杉种群生态学). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. 20-143. (in Chinese) |
[4] | Jiang JM (姜景民), Yu MK (虞沫奎), Hu SC (胡世才), Luo XZ (罗训志), Tang JD (唐金娣), Cao ZR (曹志荣) (1996). Effect of seed sorting on germination and seedling quality of slash pine. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 9, 290-295. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] |
Khalil MAK (1985). Genetic variation in eastern white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) population. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 15, 444-452.
DOI URL |
[6] | Khalil MAK (1984). Genetic of cone morphology of black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill). B. S. P.) in Newfoundland, Canada. Silvae Genetica, 33, 101-109. |
[7] | Li B (李斌), Gu WC (顾万春), Lu BM (卢宝明) (2002). Study on phenotypic diversity of seeds and cones characteristic in Pinus bungeana. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 10, 181-188. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Li M (李梅), Han HR (韩海荣), Kang FF (康峰峰), Ma QY (马钦彦) (2005). Morphologic variation of leaves of Quercus liaotungensis Koidz. in Lingkong Mountain, Shanxi Province. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (北京林业大学学报), 27(5), 10-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] |
Li P, Beaulieu J, Bousquet J (1997). Genetic structure and patterns of genetic variation among populations in eastern white spruce (Picea glauca). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 189-198.
DOI URL |
[10] | Li P (李萍), Li Y (李毅) (2005). Genetic structure of Picea crassifolia populations. Journal of Gansu Agriculture University (甘肃农业大学学报), 40, 363-367. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] |
Li WY (李文英), Gu WC (顾万春) (2005). Study on phenotypic diversity of natural population in Quercus mongolica. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 41(1), 49-56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[12] | Luo JX (罗建勋), Gu WC (顾万春) (2004). Cone and seed variation of natural population in Picea asperata. Journal of Northwest Science Technology University of Agriculture and Forestry (Natural Science Edition) (西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)), 32, 60-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] |
Luo JX (罗建勋), Gu WC (顾万春) (2005). Study on phenotypic diversity of natural population in Picea asperata. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 41(2), 66-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[14] | Luo JX (罗建勋), Li XQ (李晓清), Sun P (孙鹏), Huang XJ (黄晓江), Li SQ (李树全), Huang CL (黄春力), Yang Y (扬毅) (2003). Phenotypic variation in natural population of Picea asperata. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 31(1), 9-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Pang GC (庞广昌), Jiang DM (姜冬梅) (1995). Population genetic diversity and data analysis. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 31, 543-550. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] |
Simons AM, Johnston MO (2000). Variation in seed of Lobelia inflata (Campanulaceace): sources and fitness consequence. American Journal of Botany, 87, 124-132.
URL PMID |
[17] | Zhang HG (张含国), Sun LF (孙立夫), Han JF (韩继凤), Feng BL (丰宝林) (2003). Study on the genetic diversity of Picea koraiensis. Bulletin of Botanical Research (植物研究), 25, 224-229. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Zhang HQ (张恒庆), An LJ (安利佳), Zu YG (祖元刚) (1999). Geographical variation of morphology characters for natural population of Pinus koraiensis. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19, 932-938. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[19] | Zhou LD (周连第), Lan YP (兰彦平), Cao QC (曹庆昌), Li SY (李淑英), Lan WZ (兰卫宗) (2005). Geographical variation of morphological characteristic of Castanea mollissima seeds and legumes. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin (中国农学通报), 21(9), 136-139. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | QIN Hui-Jun, JIAO Liang, ZHOU Yi, XUE Ru-Hong, QI Chang-Liang, DU Da-Shi. Effects of altitudes on non-structural carbohydrate allocation in different dominate trees in Qilian Mountains, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(2): 208-219. |
[2] | DU Jun, WANG Wen, HE Zhi-Bin, CHEN Long-Fei, LIN Peng-Fei, ZHU Xi, TIAN Quan-Yan. Spatial variability of phenological phenotype of Picea crassifolia in Qilian Mountains and its internal mechanism [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2021, 45(8): 834-843. |
[3] | YE Xue-Hua, XUE Jian-Guo, XIE Xiu-Fang, HUANG Zhen-Ying. Effects of different disturbances on plant growth and content of main medicinal ingredients of rhizomatous clonal plant Glycyrrhiza uralensis in a natural population [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(9): 951-961. |
[4] | YANG Jun-Jun, FENG Jian-Min, HE Zhi-Bin. Estimating whole-tree water use of Picea crassifolia based on heat ratio method [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(2): 195-201. |
[5] | ZHU Hong, ZHU Shu-Xia, LI Yong-Fu, YI Xian-Gui, DUAN Yi-Fan, WANG Xian-Rong. Leaf phenotypic variation in natural populations of Cerasus dielsiana [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(12): 1168-1178. |
[6] | Jiang-Qun LIU, Ming-Yu YIN, Si-Yu ZUO, Shao-Bing YANG, Tana WUYUN. Phenotypic variations in natural populations of Amygdalus pedunculata [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(10): 1091-1102. |
[7] | LI Wei, LIN Fu-Rong, ZHENG Yong-Qi, LI Bin. Phenotypic diversity of pods and seeds in natural populations of Gleditsia sinensis in southern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(1): 61-69. |
[8] | PENG Shou-Zhang, ZHAO Chuan-Yan, XU Zhong-Lin, WANG Chao, LIU Yi-Yue. Potential distribution of Qinghai spruce and assessment of its growth status in the upper reaches of the Heihe River in the Qilian Mountains of China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(6): 605-614. |
[9] | ZHANG Peng, WANG Gang, ZHANG Tao, CHEN Nian-Lai. Responses of foliar δ13C in Sabina przewalskii and Picea crassifolia to altitude and its mechanism in the Qilian Mountains, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(2): 125-133. |
[10] | ZHAO Chuan-Yan, SHEN Wei-Hua, PENG Huan-Hua. METHODS FOR DETERMINING CANOPY LEAF AREA INDEX OF PICEA CRASSIFOLIA FOREST IN QILIAN MOUNTAINS, CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(5): 860-869. |
[11] | ZHANG Tao, AN Li-Zhe, CHEN Tuo, DAI Chun-Yan, CHEN Nian-Lai. ANTIOXIDATIVE SYSTEM IN LEAVES OF PICEA CRASSIFOLIA AND SABINA PRZEWALSKII ALONG AN ALTITUDINAL GRADIENT [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(4): 802-811. |
[12] | GU Yun-Jie, LUO Jian-Xun, WU Yuan-Wei, CAO Xiao-Jun. PHENOTYPIC DIVERSITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF PICEA BALFOURIANAIN SICHUAN, CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(2): 291-301. |
[13] | LUO Jian-Xun, GU Wan-Chun, CHEN Shao-Yu. ALLOZYME VARIATION IN 10 NATURAL POPULATIONS OF PICEA ASPERATA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(1): 165-173. |
[14] | ZENG Jie, WANG Zhong-Ren, ZHOU Shi-Liang, ZHENG Hai-Shui, BAI Jia-Yu. Allozyme Diversity in Natural Populations of Betula Alnoides from Guangxi, China [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2003, 27(1): 66-72. |
[15] | HUANG Jiu-Xiang, ZHUANG Xue-Ying. A Study of Genetic Diversity of the Populations of Tsoongiodendron odorum [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2002, 26(4): 413-419. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn