PATERNITY ANALYSIS OF OPEN- AND CONTROL-POLLINATED SEEDS COLLECTED FROM A SEED ORCHARD OF PINUS TABULAEFORMIS

doi:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.02.007

Abstract

Abstract:

Aims Our objective was to develop theory for design and reestablishment of high-generation seed orchard by discussing the relationships between pollen dispersal distances and genetic composition of seed orchard progeny under open- and control-pollinated situations.

Methods Open- and control-pollinated seeds were collected from two maternal trees. Microsatellites markers (SSRs) were used in paternity analysis. A total of 281 progenies were analyzed, of which the paternity could be accurately identified for just 126. Paternity inference was conducted using CERVUS software.

Important findings Analysis of open-pollinated seeds of two clones, Nos.11 and 24, showed the effective dispersal distance of pollen is within 30 m and the longest dispersal distance is 85 m. 11.1%-12.8% of pollen-father comes within a radius of 10 m from the seed tree, 37.0%-40.4% within 10-20 m and 17.2%-22.2% within a radius of 20-30 m. In order to discover the key factor to selection fertilization, the paternity analysis of control-pollinated seeds for two clones, Nos.11 and 24, was estimated too. Four clones. Nos. 50, 7, 25 and 33, applied 50.62% and 61.54% pollen to control-pollinated seeds collected from two mother trees, but the reason is not yet clear. We analyzed the influence of pollen size, weight and vigor on selection fertilization, but no significant correlation was found. We suggested detailed study of influence of pollen-tube growth rate on selection fertilization.

Key words: Pinus tabulaeformis, seed orchard, Microsatellites (SSR), paternity analysis

ZHANG Dong-Mei, SUN Pei-Guang, SHEN Xi-Huan, RU Guang-Xin. PATERNITY ANALYSIS OF OPEN- AND CONTROL-POLLINATED SEEDS COLLECTED FROM A SEED ORCHARD OF PINUS TABULAEFORMIS[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(2): 302-310.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.02.007

https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/Y2009/V33/I2/302

Figures/Tables 7

References 18

[1]	Ai C (艾畅), Xu LA (徐立安), Lai HL (赖焕林), Huang MR (黄敏仁), Wang ZR (王章荣) (2006). Genetic diversity and paternity analysis of a seed orchard in pinus massoniana. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 42(11),146-150. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	Chen XY (陈小勇), Song YC (宋永昌) (2000). Analysis of parentage for naturally established seedlings of Cyclobalanopsis glauca. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research(武汉植物学研究), 18,174-180. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	De la Rosa R, James CM, Tobutt KR (2004). Using microsatellites for paternity testing in olive progenies. HortScience, 39,351-354. DOI URL
[4]	Dow BD, Ashley MV (1996). Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Molecular Ecology, 5,615-627.
[5]	Dow BD, Ashley MV (1998). High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. Journal of Heredity, 89,62-70. DOI URL
[6]	Elsik CG, Williams CG (2001). Low-copy micro-satellite recovery from a conifer genome. Heoretical and Applied Genetics, 103,1189-1195.
[7]	Goto S, Miyahara F, Ide Y (2002). Identification of the male parents of half-sib progeny from Japanese black pine ( Pinus thunbergii Parl.) clonal seed orchard using RAPD markers. Breeding Science, 52,71-77. DOI URL
[8]	Grosser C, Vaillancourt R, Potts B, O'Sullivan H (2001). Paternity analysis in a Eucalyptus nitens clonal seed orchard. In:Proceedings Developing the Eucalypts of the Future. Valdivia, Chile.
[9]	He TH (何田华), Ge S (葛颂) (2001). Mating system, paternity analysis and gene flow in plant populations. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25,144-154. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	Lian CL, Miwa M, Hogetsu T (2001). Outcrossing and paternity analysis of Pinus densiflora (Japanese red pine) by microsatellite polymorphism. Heredity, 87,88-98. DOI URL PMID
[11]	Matthews FR, Bramlett DL (1986). Pollen quantity and viability affect seed yields from controlled pollinations of loblolly pine. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 10,78-80. DOI URL
[12]	Matthews FR, Bramlett DL (1981). Cyclone pollinator improves loblolly pine seed yields in controlled pollinations. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 5,42-46.
[13]	Pasonen HL, Pulkkinen P, Käpylä M, Blom A (1989). Pollen-tube growth rate and seed-siring success among Betula pendula clones. New Phytologist, 143,243-251.
[14]	Webber JE, Yeh FCH (1987). Test of the first-on, first-in pollination hypothesis in coastal Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17,63-68.
[15]	Zhang DM (张冬梅) (2001). Dynamic Studies on the Mating System and Paternity Analysis of Seeds in a Seed Orchard of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. (油松种子园交配系统及父本分析的动态研究). PhD dissertation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 10-11. (in Chinese)
[16]	Zhang DM (张冬梅), Shen XH (沈熙环), He TH (何田华) (2001). A paternity analysis of seeds from different clones in a Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. seed orchard. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 25,166-174. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Zhang DM (张冬梅), Yang Y (杨娅), Shen XH (沈熙环), Ru GX (茹广欣) (2007). Selection of primers and establishment of SSR-PCR relation system on Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. Journal of Beijing Foresty University(北京林业大学学报), 29(2),13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Ziegenhagen B, Scholz F, Madaghiele A, Vendramin GG (1998). Chloroplast microsatellites as markers for paternity analysis in Abies alba. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28,317-321.

母树 Mother	父本来源 Father		种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度 80% signifcance level)	种子数 Number of seed (<80%置信度 80% signifcance level)	花粉贡献率 Contribute rate of pollen (?80%置信度80% signifcance level)	花粉活力 Germination rate of pollen (%)	距离母树距离 Distance to the maternal tree (m)
11#母树上用于父本分析的自由授粉种子(共69粒) Paternity analysis for 69 open-pollinated seeds of clone 11#	共14个无性系 Total 14 clones	21#	1(*),5(+)	3	22.2	90.6	15
		17#	3(+)	5	11.1	91.4	7
		20#	3(+)	1	11.1	89.2	46
		40#	1(*),2(+)	1	11.1	88	16
		16#	2(+)	3	7.41	89.2	44
		23#	2(*)	0	7.41	88.8	26
		7#	1(+)	3	3.7	94.4	50、47
		14#	1(+)	2	3.7	60.8	38
		30#	1(+)	2	3.7	73	18
		12#	1(+)	1	3.7	87	5
		13#	1(+)	1	3.7	78.6	10
		6#	1(+)	0	3.7	80	45
		3#	1(+)	0	3.7	96	7
		22#	1(+)	0	3.7	87.2	23
	小计 Subtotal		23(+),4(*)	22			平均 Mean 26.47
	共8个无性系 Total 8 clones	2#		1			41、43、44
		8#		3			19
		19#		1			39
		35#		1			27、28
		36#		1			21
		38#		1			35
		44#		1			36
		45#		1			31
	小计 Subtotal			10
	不能判断来源 Unknown the father			10

母树 Mother	父本来源 Father		种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度 80% signifcance level)	种子数 Number of seed (<80%置信度 80% signifcance level)	花粉贡献率 Contribute rate of pollen (?80%置信度80% signifcance level)	花粉活力 Germination rate of pollen (%)	距离母树距离 Distance to the maternal tree (m)
11#母树上用于父本分析的自由授粉种子(共69粒) Paternity analysis for 69 open-pollinated seeds of clone 11#	共14个无性系 Total 14 clones	21#	1(*),5(+)	3	22.2	90.6	15
		17#	3(+)	5	11.1	91.4	7
		20#	3(+)	1	11.1	89.2	46
		40#	1(*),2(+)	1	11.1	88	16
		16#	2(+)	3	7.41	89.2	44
		23#	2(*)	0	7.41	88.8	26
		7#	1(+)	3	3.7	94.4	50、47
		14#	1(+)	2	3.7	60.8	38
		30#	1(+)	2	3.7	73	18
		12#	1(+)	1	3.7	87	5
		13#	1(+)	1	3.7	78.6	10
		6#	1(+)	0	3.7	80	45
		3#	1(+)	0	3.7	96	7
		22#	1(+)	0	3.7	87.2	23
	小计 Subtotal		23(+),4(*)	22			平均 Mean 26.47
	共8个无性系 Total 8 clones	2#		1			41、43、44
		8#		3			19
		19#		1			39
		35#		1			27、28
		36#		1			21
		38#		1			35
		44#		1			36
		45#		1			31
	小计 Subtotal			10
	不能判断来源 Unknown the father			10

母树 Mother	父本来源 Father		种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度80% signifcance level)	种子数 Number of seed (<80%置信度80% signifcance level)	花粉贡献率 Contribute rate of pollen (?80%置信度80% signifcance level)	花粉活力 Germination rate of pollen (%)	距离母树距离 Distance to the maternal tree (m)
24#母树上用于父本分析的自由授粉种子(共92粒) Paternity analysis for 92 open-pollinated seeds of clone 24	共22个无性系 Total 22 clones	23#	4(*),4(+)	8	17.02	88.8	40、36
		2#	5(+)	3	10.64	87.2	16
		22#	5(+)	1	10.64	87.2	10、36、45
		1#	4(+)	1	8.51	89.8	42、45、47
		3#	4(+)	0	8.51	96	15
		8#	3(+)	6	6.38	75.2	14
		5#	2(+)	2	4.26	87.8	18
		36#	2(+)	1	4.26	71.2	14
		39#	1(+)	3	2.13	79.4	32
		11#	1(+)	2	2.13	77.8	29、31、32
		37#	1(+)	1	2.13	88	26
		4#	1(+)	1	2.13	91.6	85
		19#	1(+)	1	2.13	89.4	25
		13#	1(+)	0	2.13	78.6	23
		14#	1(+)	0	2.13	60.8	21、22
		17#	1(+)	0	2.13	91.4	5
		27#	1(+)	0	2.13	89.2	14
		28#	1(+)	0	2.13	87.2	20
		38#	1(+)	0	2.13	73.4	10
		6#	1(+)	0	2.13	80	21
		7#	1(+)	0	2.13	94.4	20、21
		30#	1(+)	0	2.13	73	8
	小计 Subtotal		4(*),43(+)	30			平均 Mean 28.9
	共4个无性系 Total 4 clones	16#		1
		40#		1
		41#		2
		44#		2
		小计subtotal		6
	不能判断来源 Unknown the father			9

母树 Mother	父本来源 Father		种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度80% signifcance level)	种子数 Number of seed (<80%置信度80% signifcance level)	花粉贡献率 Contribute rate of pollen (?80%置信度80% signifcance level)	花粉活力 Germination rate of pollen (%)	距离母树距离 Distance to the maternal tree (m)
24#母树上用于父本分析的自由授粉种子(共92粒) Paternity analysis for 92 open-pollinated seeds of clone 24	共22个无性系 Total 22 clones	23#	4(*),4(+)	8	17.02	88.8	40、36
		2#	5(+)	3	10.64	87.2	16
		22#	5(+)	1	10.64	87.2	10、36、45
		1#	4(+)	1	8.51	89.8	42、45、47
		3#	4(+)	0	8.51	96	15
		8#	3(+)	6	6.38	75.2	14
		5#	2(+)	2	4.26	87.8	18
		36#	2(+)	1	4.26	71.2	14
		39#	1(+)	3	2.13	79.4	32
		11#	1(+)	2	2.13	77.8	29、31、32
		37#	1(+)	1	2.13	88	26
		4#	1(+)	1	2.13	91.6	85
		19#	1(+)	1	2.13	89.4	25
		13#	1(+)	0	2.13	78.6	23
		14#	1(+)	0	2.13	60.8	21、22
		17#	1(+)	0	2.13	91.4	5
		27#	1(+)	0	2.13	89.2	14
		28#	1(+)	0	2.13	87.2	20
		38#	1(+)	0	2.13	73.4	10
		6#	1(+)	0	2.13	80	21
		7#	1(+)	0	2.13	94.4	20、21
		30#	1(+)	0	2.13	73	8
	小计 Subtotal		4(*),43(+)	30			平均 Mean 28.9
	共4个无性系 Total 4 clones	16#		1
		40#		1
		41#		2
		44#		2
		小计subtotal		6
	不能判断来源 Unknown the father			9

clone 11#			clone 24#
候选父本 Candidate father	子代个数 Number of seed	种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度80% signifcance level)	候选父本 Candidate father	子代个数 Number of seed	种子数 Number of seed (?80%置信度80% signifcance level)
50#	17	7(+)	25#	14	5(+)
7#	13	6(+)	7#	5	5(+)
25#	4	4(+)	33#	3	3(+)
33#	7	4(+)	50#	2	1(+),1(*)
5#	4	3(+)	34#	4	1(+),1(*)
37#	5	3(+)	2#	2	2(+)
19#	4	3(+)	3#	1	2(+)
2#	3	2(+)	48#	2	1(*)
35#	5	1(+)	26#	1	1(+)
34#	2	1(*)	41#	1	1(+)
41#	2	1(+)	44#	2	1(+)
44#	2	1(+)	47#	1	1(+)
47#	1	1(+)	16#	1
16#	2	1(+)
17#	4	1(+)
48#	1
24#	2
26#	1
28#	1
3#	1
总计 Total	81	39		39	26