Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2008, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 189-196.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.01.022
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Xue-Hong, ZHOU Zhi-Chun*(), ZHANG Yi, JIN Guo-Qing
Received:
2007-05-10
Accepted:
2006-08-27
Online:
2008-05-10
Published:
2008-01-30
Contact:
ZHOU Zhi-Chun
MA Xue-Hong, ZHOU Zhi-Chun, ZHANG Yi, JIN Guo-Qing. DIFFERENCES OF ADAPTABILITY AMONG CUNNINGHAMIA LANCEOLATA VARIETIES TO HETEROGENEOUS NUTRIENT ENVIRONMENT[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(1): 189-196.
养分环境 Nutrient environment | 家系 Family | 苗高 Seedling height (cm) | 干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation (g) | 根冠比 Root-shoot ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
异质Heterogeneity | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 20.8(2.7) | 2.809 1(0.931 3) | 0.520 0(0.144 8) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 17.3(3.0) | 2.737 1(0.763 1) | 0.353 4(0.156 9) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 14.7(3.7) | 2.699 1(0.753 3) | 0.518 5(0.178 8) | |
显著性水平Probability (p) | 0.000 3 | <0.000 1 | 0.052 7 | |
同质Homogeneity | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 24.0(3.6) | 4.107 7(0.418 0) | 0.411 7(0.086 3) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 12.1(3.4) | 1.900 8(0.836 4) | 0.470 3(0.240 8) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 15.3(3.9) | 3.459 3(0.650 2) | 0.341 6(0.119 3) | |
显著性水平Probability (p) | 0.000 2 | 0.011 8 | 0.123 9 | |
显著性水平Probability (p) | 0.655 4 | 0.655 4 | 0.001 8 | |
异质Heterogeneity | 马尾松Pinus massoniana | 19.7(4.9) | 1.713 5(0.519 9) | 0.311 6(0.127 8) |
同质Homogeneity | 12.0(2.9) | 0.744 1(0.413 5) | 0.496 0(0.267 3) |
Table 1 Differences in growth and dry matter accumulation between the heterogeneous and homogeneous environments
养分环境 Nutrient environment | 家系 Family | 苗高 Seedling height (cm) | 干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation (g) | 根冠比 Root-shoot ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
异质Heterogeneity | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 20.8(2.7) | 2.809 1(0.931 3) | 0.520 0(0.144 8) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 17.3(3.0) | 2.737 1(0.763 1) | 0.353 4(0.156 9) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 14.7(3.7) | 2.699 1(0.753 3) | 0.518 5(0.178 8) | |
显著性水平Probability (p) | 0.000 3 | <0.000 1 | 0.052 7 | |
同质Homogeneity | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 24.0(3.6) | 4.107 7(0.418 0) | 0.411 7(0.086 3) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 12.1(3.4) | 1.900 8(0.836 4) | 0.470 3(0.240 8) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 15.3(3.9) | 3.459 3(0.650 2) | 0.341 6(0.119 3) | |
显著性水平Probability (p) | 0.000 2 | 0.011 8 | 0.123 9 | |
显著性水平Probability (p) | 0.655 4 | 0.655 4 | 0.001 8 | |
异质Heterogeneity | 马尾松Pinus massoniana | 19.7(4.9) | 1.713 5(0.519 9) | 0.311 6(0.127 8) |
同质Homogeneity | 12.0(2.9) | 0.744 1(0.413 5) | 0.496 0(0.267 3) |
养分环境 Nutrient environment | 家系 Family | 总根长 Total length (cm) | 表面积 Surface area (cm2) | 平均直径 Average diameter (cm) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | 根系干物质量 Root dry matter accumulation (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
异质 Heterogeneity | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 1 673.20 (354.936 2) | 312.571 7 (65.766 2) | 1.50 (1.06) | 4.695 4 (0.278 6) | 0.791 8 (0.278 4) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 1 154.89 (515.600 5) | 194.760 7 (93.606 0) | 1.03 (1.39) | 2.658 9 (0.343 4) | 0.452 7 (0.213 9) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 1 476.04 (584.437 1) | 245.034 5 (92.949 5) | 1.32 (1.20) | 3.282 4 (0.242 1) | 0.563 8 (0.233 5) | |
显著性水平 Probability (p) | 0.054 0 | 0.011 0 | 0.017 6 | 0.002 2 | 0.008 8 | |
同质 Homogeneity | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 1 609.83 (563.496 5) | 303.971 9 (106.859 3) | 1.39 (1.73) | 4.617 9 (0.438 6) | 0.816 8 (0.407 2) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 794.80 (266.191 1) | 114.700 3 (44.808 9) | 0.89 (0.60) | 1.329 2 (0.078 8) | 0.399 8 (0.174 0) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 1 278.68 (641.315 6) | 244.680 3 (106.859 3) | 1.32 (1.73) | 3.759 8 (0.293 5) | 0.599 5 (0.407 2) | |
显著性水平 Probability (p) | 0.013 5 | 0.003 4 | 0.005 6 | 0.001 7 | 0.008 8 | |
显著性水平Probability Probability (p) | 0.113 4 | 0.113 4 | 0.219 9 | 0.319 0 | 0.411 2 | |
异质 Heterogeneity | 马尾松Pinus massoniana | 614.80 (9.833 8) | 98.135 2 (0.041 8) | 1.02 (0.35) | 0.793 4 (1.542 1) | 0.407 1 (0.141 1) |
同质 Homorogeneity | 478.95 (7.220 1) | 69.927 8 (167.722 1) | 0.93 (0.40) | 0.815 6 (0.557 8) | 0.246 7 (0.143 1) |
Table 2 Difference of root morphological parameters between the heterogeneous and homogeneous environments
养分环境 Nutrient environment | 家系 Family | 总根长 Total length (cm) | 表面积 Surface area (cm2) | 平均直径 Average diameter (cm) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | 根系干物质量 Root dry matter accumulation (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
异质 Heterogeneity | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 1 673.20 (354.936 2) | 312.571 7 (65.766 2) | 1.50 (1.06) | 4.695 4 (0.278 6) | 0.791 8 (0.278 4) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 1 154.89 (515.600 5) | 194.760 7 (93.606 0) | 1.03 (1.39) | 2.658 9 (0.343 4) | 0.452 7 (0.213 9) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 1 476.04 (584.437 1) | 245.034 5 (92.949 5) | 1.32 (1.20) | 3.282 4 (0.242 1) | 0.563 8 (0.233 5) | |
显著性水平 Probability (p) | 0.054 0 | 0.011 0 | 0.017 6 | 0.002 2 | 0.008 8 | |
同质 Homogeneity | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 1 609.83 (563.496 5) | 303.971 9 (106.859 3) | 1.39 (1.73) | 4.617 9 (0.438 6) | 0.816 8 (0.407 2) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 794.80 (266.191 1) | 114.700 3 (44.808 9) | 0.89 (0.60) | 1.329 2 (0.078 8) | 0.399 8 (0.174 0) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 1 278.68 (641.315 6) | 244.680 3 (106.859 3) | 1.32 (1.73) | 3.759 8 (0.293 5) | 0.599 5 (0.407 2) | |
显著性水平 Probability (p) | 0.013 5 | 0.003 4 | 0.005 6 | 0.001 7 | 0.008 8 | |
显著性水平Probability Probability (p) | 0.113 4 | 0.113 4 | 0.219 9 | 0.319 0 | 0.411 2 | |
异质 Heterogeneity | 马尾松Pinus massoniana | 614.80 (9.833 8) | 98.135 2 (0.041 8) | 1.02 (0.35) | 0.793 4 (1.542 1) | 0.407 1 (0.141 1) |
同质 Homorogeneity | 478.95 (7.220 1) | 69.927 8 (167.722 1) | 0.93 (0.40) | 0.815 6 (0.557 8) | 0.246 7 (0.143 1) |
养分斑块 Nutrient patch | 家系 Family | 总根长 Total length (cm) | 表面积 Surface area (cm2) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | 根系干物质量 Root dry matter accumulation (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
富养斑块Rich patch | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 673.72(250.425 3) | 132.422 8(38.278 4) | 2.093 5(0.548 9) | 0.373 4(0.153 9) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 415.47(110.930 6) | 28.395 4(26.788 2) | 0.456 0(0.500 6) | 0.148 6(0.145 7) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 447.44(231.954 6) | 85.645 4(42.307 6) | 1.314 0(0.635 5) | 0.193 6(0.099 2) | |
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 403.25(154.480 9) | 64.373 9(22.593 0) | 0.823 1(0.338 8) | 0.204 6(0.045 2) | |
贫养斑块Poor patch | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 999.49(415.386 2) | 180.148 9(77.174 5) | 2.601 9(1.174 4) | 0.418 5(1.174 4) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 804.72(389.615 3) | 130.325 9(65.975 7) | 1.694 9(0.912 6) | 0.283 7(0.159 2) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 1 028.60(539.067 0) | 159.389 1(80.568 5) | 1.968 4(0.961 7) | 0.370 2(0.205 7) | |
马尾松P. massoniana | 211.56(54.043 4) | 33.761 3(7.948 0) | 0.430 8(0.100 2) | 0.101 0(0.090 9) |
Table 3 Root morphological parameter differences between rich- and poor-patch of the heterogeneous environment
养分斑块 Nutrient patch | 家系 Family | 总根长 Total length (cm) | 表面积 Surface area (cm2) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | 根系干物质量 Root dry matter accumulation (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
富养斑块Rich patch | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 673.72(250.425 3) | 132.422 8(38.278 4) | 2.093 5(0.548 9) | 0.373 4(0.153 9) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 415.47(110.930 6) | 28.395 4(26.788 2) | 0.456 0(0.500 6) | 0.148 6(0.145 7) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 447.44(231.954 6) | 85.645 4(42.307 6) | 1.314 0(0.635 5) | 0.193 6(0.099 2) | |
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 403.25(154.480 9) | 64.373 9(22.593 0) | 0.823 1(0.338 8) | 0.204 6(0.045 2) | |
贫养斑块Poor patch | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 999.49(415.386 2) | 180.148 9(77.174 5) | 2.601 9(1.174 4) | 0.418 5(1.174 4) |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 804.72(389.615 3) | 130.325 9(65.975 7) | 1.694 9(0.912 6) | 0.283 7(0.159 2) | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 1 028.60(539.067 0) | 159.389 1(80.568 5) | 1.968 4(0.961 7) | 0.370 2(0.205 7) | |
马尾松P. massoniana | 211.56(54.043 4) | 33.761 3(7.948 0) | 0.430 8(0.100 2) | 0.101 0(0.090 9) |
养分斑块 Nutrient patch | 家系 Family | 0 mm<D≤0.5 mm | 0.5 mm<D≤1 mm | D>1 mm | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总根长 Total length (cm) | 表面积 Surface area (cm2) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | 总根长 Total length (cm) | 表面积 Surface area (cm2) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | 总根长 Total length (cm) | 表面积 Surface area (cm2) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | ||||
富养斑块 Rich-patch | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 489.53 | 445.289 7 | 56.122 3 | 46.86 | 85.809 0 | 19.901 4 | 0.39 | 1.373 1 | 0.568 5 | ||
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 496.16 | 272.936 7 | 30.994 9 | 45.09 | 52.307 5 | 10.872 0 | 0.36 | 0.831 9 | 0.306 6 | |||
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 668.57 | 331.906 6 | 23.231 7 | 62.37 | 62.159 5 | 8.155 9 | 0.50 | 0.963 8 | 0.230 4 | |||
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 138.67 | 65.273 6 | 5.442 5 | 11.76 | 12.372 7 | 1.915 8 | 0.09 | 0.194 5 | 0.054 3 | |||
贫养斑块 Poor-patch | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 268.84 | 345.209 4 | 50.360 8 | 25.11 | 68.657 7 | 17.956 9 | 0.21 | 1.133 0 | 0.515 7 | ||
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 219.55 | 182.229 2 | 30.563 6 | 20.12 | 35.842 4 | 10.957 8 | 0.16 | 0.585 9 | 0.316 5 | |||
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 193.61 | 215.711 0 | 32.839 9 | 17.76 | 43.227 8 | 11.728 0 | 0.14 | 0.719 4 | 0.337 6 | |||
马尾松P. massoniana | 249.23 | 142.477 9 | 7.917 1 | 21.83 | 26.891 4 | 2.792 3 | 0.17 | 0.419 8 | 0.079 3 |
Table 4 Differences of root morphological parameters between rich- and poor-patch of the heterogeneous environment
养分斑块 Nutrient patch | 家系 Family | 0 mm<D≤0.5 mm | 0.5 mm<D≤1 mm | D>1 mm | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总根长 Total length (cm) | 表面积 Surface area (cm2) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | 总根长 Total length (cm) | 表面积 Surface area (cm2) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | 总根长 Total length (cm) | 表面积 Surface area (cm2) | 根体积 Root volume (cm3) | ||||
富养斑块 Rich-patch | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 489.53 | 445.289 7 | 56.122 3 | 46.86 | 85.809 0 | 19.901 4 | 0.39 | 1.373 1 | 0.568 5 | ||
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 496.16 | 272.936 7 | 30.994 9 | 45.09 | 52.307 5 | 10.872 0 | 0.36 | 0.831 9 | 0.306 6 | |||
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 668.57 | 331.906 6 | 23.231 7 | 62.37 | 62.159 5 | 8.155 9 | 0.50 | 0.963 8 | 0.230 4 | |||
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 138.67 | 65.273 6 | 5.442 5 | 11.76 | 12.372 7 | 1.915 8 | 0.09 | 0.194 5 | 0.054 3 | |||
贫养斑块 Poor-patch | ‘龙15’ Long15 | 268.84 | 345.209 4 | 50.360 8 | 25.11 | 68.657 7 | 17.956 9 | 0.21 | 1.133 0 | 0.515 7 | ||
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 219.55 | 182.229 2 | 30.563 6 | 20.12 | 35.842 4 | 10.957 8 | 0.16 | 0.585 9 | 0.316 5 | |||
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 193.61 | 215.711 0 | 32.839 9 | 17.76 | 43.227 8 | 11.728 0 | 0.14 | 0.719 4 | 0.337 6 | |||
马尾松P. massoniana | 249.23 | 142.477 9 | 7.917 1 | 21.83 | 26.891 4 | 2.792 3 | 0.17 | 0.419 8 | 0.079 3 |
家系 Family | 反应敏感度 Sensitivity (S) | 觅养精确性 Precision (RFRMD) |
---|---|---|
‘龙15’ Long15 | 0.683 9 | -0.035 7 |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 1.440 0 | -0.051 7 |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 0.780 2 | -0.290 5 |
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 2.302 8 | 0.254 6 |
Table 5 Differences of sensitivity to heterogeneous nutrient environments
家系 Family | 反应敏感度 Sensitivity (S) | 觅养精确性 Precision (RFRMD) |
---|---|---|
‘龙15’ Long15 | 0.683 9 | -0.035 7 |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 1.440 0 | -0.051 7 |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 0.780 2 | -0.290 5 |
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 2.302 8 | 0.254 6 |
家系 Family | 异质 Heterogeneity | 同质 Homogeneity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | N | P | K | ||
‘龙15’ Long15 | 2.151 8 | 0.180 6 | 2.119 2 | 2.277 4 | 0.394 4 | 1.676 4 | |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 0.881 6 | 0.074 3 | 0.973 2 | 1.134 7 | 0.086 7 | 1.011 0 | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 1.462 1 | 0.115 8 | 1.798 6 | 2.133 1 | 0.122 2 | 1.211 5 | |
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 1.020 2 | 0.015 8 | 0.151 5 | 0.837 8 | 0.024 6 | 0.165 1 |
Table 6 Absorption efficiency for N, P, K of root in the heterogeneous and homogeneous environments (mg·ind.-1)
家系 Family | 异质 Heterogeneity | 同质 Homogeneity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | N | P | K | ||
‘龙15’ Long15 | 2.151 8 | 0.180 6 | 2.119 2 | 2.277 4 | 0.394 4 | 1.676 4 | |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 0.881 6 | 0.074 3 | 0.973 2 | 1.134 7 | 0.086 7 | 1.011 0 | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 1.462 1 | 0.115 8 | 1.798 6 | 2.133 1 | 0.122 2 | 1.211 5 | |
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 1.020 2 | 0.015 8 | 0.151 5 | 0.837 8 | 0.024 6 | 0.165 1 |
家系 Family | 富养斑块Rich patch | 贫养斑块Poor patch | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | N | P | K | ||
‘龙15’ Long15 | 2.837 2 | 0.215 3 | 2.189 2 | 2.303 2 | 0.179 3 | 2.218 5 | |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 3.187 0 | 0.203 3 | 2.253 6 | 2.304 0 | 0.197 5 | 2.386 8 | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 3.527 8 | 0.249 1 | 2.572 3 | 3.612 1 | 0.211 2 | 1.971 9 | |
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 2.835 4 | 0.080 0 | 0.560 4 | 2.782 4 | 0.089 0 | 0.560 2 |
Table 7 Content of N, P, K of root in rich- and poor-patch of the heterogeneous environment (mg·g-1)
家系 Family | 富养斑块Rich patch | 贫养斑块Poor patch | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | N | P | K | ||
‘龙15’ Long15 | 2.837 2 | 0.215 3 | 2.189 2 | 2.303 2 | 0.179 3 | 2.218 5 | |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 3.187 0 | 0.203 3 | 2.253 6 | 2.304 0 | 0.197 5 | 2.386 8 | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 3.527 8 | 0.249 1 | 2.572 3 | 3.612 1 | 0.211 2 | 1.971 9 | |
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 2.835 4 | 0.080 0 | 0.560 4 | 2.782 4 | 0.089 0 | 0.560 2 |
家系 Family | 异质 Heterogeneity | 同质 Homogeneity | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
富养斑块Rich-patch | 贫养斑块Poor-patch | A侧 A side | B侧 B side | |||||||||||||||||
N | P | K | N | P | K | N | P | K | N | P | K | |||||||||
‘龙15’ Long15 | 1.053 0 | 0.081 4 | 0.870 2 | 1.224 4 | 0.313 0 | 0.806 2 | 1.022 6 | 0.080 2 | 0.916 8 | 1.129 2 | 0.100 4 | 1.202 4 | ||||||||
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 0.443 8 | 0.029 9 | 0.342 8 | 0.690 9 | 0.056 8 | 0.668 2 | 0.438 8 | 0.034 6 | 0.449 4 | 0.442 8 | 0.039 8 | 0.523 7 | ||||||||
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 0.721 3 | 0.046 1 | 0.509 1 | 1.411 8 | 0.076 1 | 0.702 4 | 0.692 5 | 0.053 7 | 0.873 2 | 0.769 6 | 0.062 1 | 0.925 4 | ||||||||
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 0.561 2 | 0.015 6 | 0.107 4 | 0.276 6 | 0.009 1 | 0.057 7 | 0.592 5 | 0.006 4 | 0.066 8 | 0.427 7 | 0.009 5 | 0.084 7 |
Table 8 Absorption efficiency of N, P, K of root in rich- and poor-patch of the heterogeneous environment (mg·ind.-1)
家系 Family | 异质 Heterogeneity | 同质 Homogeneity | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
富养斑块Rich-patch | 贫养斑块Poor-patch | A侧 A side | B侧 B side | |||||||||||||||||
N | P | K | N | P | K | N | P | K | N | P | K | |||||||||
‘龙15’ Long15 | 1.053 0 | 0.081 4 | 0.870 2 | 1.224 4 | 0.313 0 | 0.806 2 | 1.022 6 | 0.080 2 | 0.916 8 | 1.129 2 | 0.100 4 | 1.202 4 | ||||||||
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 0.443 8 | 0.029 9 | 0.342 8 | 0.690 9 | 0.056 8 | 0.668 2 | 0.438 8 | 0.034 6 | 0.449 4 | 0.442 8 | 0.039 8 | 0.523 7 | ||||||||
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 0.721 3 | 0.046 1 | 0.509 1 | 1.411 8 | 0.076 1 | 0.702 4 | 0.692 5 | 0.053 7 | 0.873 2 | 0.769 6 | 0.062 1 | 0.925 4 | ||||||||
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 0.561 2 | 0.015 6 | 0.107 4 | 0.276 6 | 0.009 1 | 0.057 7 | 0.592 5 | 0.006 4 | 0.066 8 | 0.427 7 | 0.009 5 | 0.084 7 |
家系 Family | 异质 Heterogeneity | 同质 Homogeneity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | N | P | K | ||
‘龙15’ Long15 | 2.188 6 | 0.251 8 | 1.577 2 | 3.719 4 | 0.228 1 | 1.343 7 | |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 3.385 2 | 0.254 7 | 1.462 0 | 2.044 3 | 0.269 1 | 2.047 7 | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 3.228 3 | 0.286 6 | 2.050 3 | 3.860 5 | 0.233 1 | 1.811 1 | |
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 3.306 4 | 0.133 1 | 1.361 8 | 3.140 6 | 0.093 2 | 1.059 8 |
Table 9 Content of N, P, K in leaf of the heterogeneous and homogeneous environments (mg·g-1)
家系 Family | 异质 Heterogeneity | 同质 Homogeneity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P | K | N | P | K | ||
‘龙15’ Long15 | 2.188 6 | 0.251 8 | 1.577 2 | 3.719 4 | 0.228 1 | 1.343 7 | |
‘锦屏45’ Jinping45 | 3.385 2 | 0.254 7 | 1.462 0 | 2.044 3 | 0.269 1 | 2.047 7 | |
‘靖398’ Jing398 | 3.228 3 | 0.286 6 | 2.050 3 | 3.860 5 | 0.233 1 | 1.811 1 | |
马尾松Pinus massoniana | 3.306 4 | 0.133 1 | 1.361 8 | 3.140 6 | 0.093 2 | 1.059 8 |
[1] | Chemistry Committee of Chinese Soil Academy (中国土壤学会农业化学专业委员会) (1984). Conventional Analysis Methods of Soil and Agricultural Chemistry (土壤农业化学常规分析方法). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[2] | Chen CY (陈楚莹), Zhang JW (张家武), Zhou CL (周崇莲) (1990). Researchers on improving the quality of forest land and the productivity of artificial Cunninghamia lanceolata stands. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 1, 97-106. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Dong M (董鸣)(1996). Clonal growth in plants in relation to resource heterogeneity: foraging behavior. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 38, 828-835. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Farley RA, Fitter AH (1999). Temporal and spatial variation in soil resources in a deciduous woodland. Journal of Ecology, 87, 688-696. |
[5] | George E, Bettina S, Christoph S, Horst M (1997). Response of Picea, Pinus and Pseudotsuga roots to heterogeneous nutrient distribution in soil. Tree Physiology, 17, 39-45. |
[6] | Hodge A (2004). The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients. New Phytologist, 162, 9-24. |
[7] | Huante P, Rincón E, Chapin FS Ⅲ (1998). Foraging for nutrients, responses to changes in light, and competition in tropical deciduous tree seedlings. Oecologia, 117, 209-216. |
[8] | Liang X (梁霞), Liu AQ (刘爱琴), Feng LZ (冯丽珍) (2006). Comparision of the phosphors characteristic of different Chinese fir clones. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (formerly Acta Phytoecologica Sinica) (植物生态学报), 30, 1005-1011. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Ma XQ (马祥庆), Liu AQ (刘爱琴), Huang BL (黄宝龙) (2002). Study on selection of high-nitrogen-efficiency-genotypes of Chinese fir clones. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 38(6), 53-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Mou P, Mitchell RJ, Jones RH (1997). Root distribution of two tree species under a heterogeneous nutrient environment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 645-656. |
[11] | State Forestry Administration (国家林业局) (1999). Forest Soil Analysis Methods (森林土壤分析方法). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[12] | Wang QC (王庆成), Cheng YH (程云环) (2004). Response of fine roots to soil nutrient spatial heterogeneity. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15, 1063-1068. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Wang J (王剑), Zhou ZC (周志春), Jin GQ (金国庆) (2007). Differences of foraging behavior between genealogies of Pinus massoniana in heterogeneous nutrient environment. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 27, 1350-1358. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | XIE Huan, ZHANG Qiu-Fang, ZENG Quan-Xin, ZHOU Jia-Cong, MA Ya-Pei, WU Yue, LIU Yuan-Yuan, LIN Hui-Ying, YIN Yun-Feng, CHEN Yue-Min. Effects of nitrogen addition on phosphorus transformation and decomposition fungi in seedling stage of Cunninghamia lanceolata [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(2): 220-231. |
[2] | MENG Qing-Jing, FAN Wei-Guo. Calcium-tolerance type and adaptability to high-calcium habitats of Rosa roxburghii [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(12): 1562-1572. |
[3] | LÜ Zhong-Cheng, KANG Wen-Xing, HUANG Zhi-Hong, ZHAO Zhong-Hui, DENG Xiang-Wen. Reuse of retranslocated nutrients in tissues of Chinese fir in plantations of different ages [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2019, 43(5): 458-470. |
[4] | SHEN Fang-Fang, LI Yan-Yan, LIU Wen-Fei, DUAN Hong-Lang, FAN Hou-Bao, HU Liang, MENG Qing-Yin. Responses of nitrogen and phosphorus resorption from leaves and branches to long-term nitrogen deposition in a Chinese fir plantation [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(9): 926-937. |
[5] | CHEN Ri-Sheng, KANG Wen-Xing, ZHOU Yu-Quan, TIAN Da-Lun, XIANG Wen-Hua . Changes in nutrient cycling with age in a Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation forest [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2018, 42(2): 173-184. |
[6] | PENG Xi, YAN Wen-De, WANG Feng-Qi, WANG Guang-Jun, YU Fang-Yong, ZHAO Mei-Fang. Specific leaf area estimation model building based on leaf dry matter content of Cunninghamia lanceolata [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(2): 209-219. |
[7] | CHEN Si-Tong, ZOU Xian-Hua, CAI Yi-Bing, WEI Dan, LI Tao, WU Peng-Fei, MA Xiang-Qing. Phosphorus distribution inside Chinese fir seedlings under different P supplies based on 32P tracer [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2018, 42(11): 1103-1112. |
[8] | Shun-Zeng SHI, De-Cheng XIONG, Fei DENG, Jian-Xin FENG, Chen-Sen XU, Bo-Yuan ZHONG, Yun-Yu CHEN, Guang-Shui CHEN, Yu-Sheng YANG. Interactive effects of soil warming and nitrogen addition on fine root production of Chinese fir seedlings [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(2): 186-195. |
[9] | Zhi-Yu CHEN, Qi LI, Xian-Hua ZOU, Xiang-Qing MA, Peng-Fei WU. Effect of neighboring competition on photosynthetic characteristics and biomass allocation of Chinese fir seedlings under low phosphorus stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(2): 177-. |
[10] | Xiang GU, Shi-Ji ZHANG, Wen-Hua XIANG, Lei-Da LI, Zhao-Dan LIU, Wei-Jun SUN, Xi FANG. Seasonal dynamics of active soil organic carbon in four subtropical forests in Southern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(10): 1064-1076. |
[11] | WAN Jing-Juan,GUO Jian-Fen,JI Shu-Rong,REN Wei-Ling,SI You-Tao,YANG Yu-Sheng. Effects of different sources of dissolved organic matter on soil CO2 emission in subtropical forests [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(7): 674-681. |
[12] | GONG Rong,GAO Qiong. Research progress in the effects of leaf hydraulic characteristics on plant physiological functions [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(3): 300-308. |
[13] | WANG Qing-Kui,LI Yan-Peng,ZHANG Fang-Yue,HE Tong-Xin. Short-term nitrogen fertilization decreased root and microbial respiration in a young Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(12): 1166-1175. |
[14] | ZHANG Kai, MU Xiao-Qian, SUN Xiao-Yu, WANG Meng-Zhu, HU Sheng-Wu. Effects of temperature change on seed germination, seedling growth and physiological characteristics in rape and companion weeds [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(12): 1132-1141. |
[15] | LIU Rong-Jie, WU Ya-Cong, ZHANG Ying, LI Zheng-Cai, MA Shao-Jie, WANG Bin, GERI Le-Tu. Comparison of soil labile organic carbon in Chinese fir plantations and natural secondary forests in north subtropical areas of China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2012, 36(5): 431-437. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn