Chin J Plan Ecolo ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 622-631.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0260
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Ping SONG1, Rui ZHANG1,*(), Zhi-Chun ZHOU1, Jian-She TONG2, Hui WANG2
Received:
2017-01-03
Accepted:
2016-08-09
Online:
2017-06-10
Published:
2017-07-19
Contact:
Rui ZHANG
About author:
KANG Jing-yao(1991-), E-mail:
Ping SONG, Rui ZHANG, Zhi-Chun ZHOU, Jian-She TONG, Hui WANG. Effects of localized nitrogen supply treatments on growth and root parameters in Pinus massoniana families under phosphorus deficiency[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(6): 622-631.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.17521/cjpe.2016.0260
土壤类型 Soil type | 全氮 Total N (g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total P (g·kg-1) | 水解氮 Hydrolysable N (mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K (mg·kg-1) | 有机质 Organic matter (g·kg-1) | pH值 pH value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
酸性红壤 Acid red soil | 0.41 | 0.34 | 46.35 | 0.99 | 37.78 | 6.68 | 5.06 |
Table 1 Soil physical and chemical properties of the substrate in the pot experiment
土壤类型 Soil type | 全氮 Total N (g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total P (g·kg-1) | 水解氮 Hydrolysable N (mg·kg-1) | 速效磷 Available P (mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K (mg·kg-1) | 有机质 Organic matter (g·kg-1) | pH值 pH value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
酸性红壤 Acid red soil | 0.41 | 0.34 | 46.35 | 0.99 | 37.78 | 6.68 | 5.06 |
Fig. 1 The patterns of N added under two P deficiency conditions. HHH, homogeneously high N along the soil profile; HHL, high N-high N-low N; LLH, low N-low N-high N; LLH/L, low N-low N-on side with N addition and the other side without N supply.
磷环境 P level | 性状 Trait | 氮处理 N supply treatment | 变异来源 Source of variation (F值 F value) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHH | HHL | LLH | LLH/L | 家系 Family | 氮处理 N | 家系&×氮处理 Family &× N | ||
同质低磷 Homo low P | SH (cm) | 14.42 &± 0.52b | 16.92 &± 0.54a | 14.90 &± 0.65b | 14.66 &± 0.65b | 47.73*** | 6.34*** | 2.13* |
SBD (mm) | 2.39 &± 0.10b | 2.99 &± 0.07a | 2.61 &± 0.09b | 2.61 &± 0.09b | 23.96*** | 12.50*** | 2.24* | |
SDW (g) | 1.32 &± 0.12b | 1.87 &± 0.10a | 1.44 &± 0.13b | 1.63 &± 0.12ab | 19.21*** | 6.11** | 2.74* | |
RDW (g) | 0.26 &± 0.02b | 0.37 &± 0.03a | 0.27 &± 0.02b | 0.35 &± 0.02a | 12.02*** | 7.49*** | 1.54 | |
R/S | 0.36 &± 0.03a | 0.17 &± 0.03b | 0.23 &± 0.03ab | 0.18 &± 0.03b | 12.23*** | 2.75* | 2.55* | |
RL (cm) | 192.36 &± 9.72a | 186.38 &± 11.93a | 210.54 &± 14.45a | 199.73 &± 11.92a | 12.28*** | 2.92* | 1.20 | |
RSA (cm2) | 47.37 &± 3.00b | 46.50 &± 2.56b | 61.96 &± 4.38a | 59.90 &± 3.65a | 13.14*** | 7.02*** | 1.47 | |
PC (mg&·g-1) | 0.75 &± 0.03b | 1.14 &± 0.04a | 0.87 &± 0.08ab | 0.95 &± 0.11ab | 1.02 | 0.96 | 1.02 | |
NC (mg&·g-1) | 17.02 &± 0.39b | 21.68 &± 2.64a | 18.89 &± 0.34ab | 16.18 &± 0.59b | 3.44** | 3.37* | 1.47 | |
异质低磷 Hetero low P | SH (cm) | 17.51 &± 0.74a | 13.62 &± 0.52b | 16.72 &± 0.67a | 16.13 &± 0.67a | 43.10*** | 12.58*** | 2.54* |
SBD (mm) | 3.18 &± 0.11a | 2.61 &± 0.11c | 3.11 &± 0.10ab | 2.82 &± 0.12bc | 17.46*** | 8.22*** | 2.06* | |
SDW (g) | 2.25 &± 0.19a | 1.42 &± 0.13b | 2.01 &± 0.14a | 1.96 &± 0.16a | 15.53*** | 6.34*** | 2.32* | |
RDW (g) | 0.47 &± 0.04a | 0.36 &± 0.03a | 0.42 &± 0.04a | 0.47 &± 0.06a | 13.33*** | 1.97 | 1.04 | |
R/S | 0.26 &± 0.03a | 0.34 &± 0.05a | 0.26 &± 0.02a | 0.31 &± 0.04a | 7.30*** | 0.65 | 0.49 | |
RL (cm) | 368.77 &± 27.72ab | 296.81 &± 21.57b | 399.17 &± 31.82ab | 476.60 &± 61.51a | 6.70*** | 4.13** | 1.09 | |
RSA (cm2) | 105.77 &± 7.81b | 94.15 &± 7.77b | 115.78 &± 9.16ab | 139.34 &± 18.01a | 8.22*** | 3.23* | 1.04 | |
PC (mg&·g-1) | 0.90 &± 0.03a | 1.18 &± 0.04a | 1.02 &± 0.03a | 1.11 &± 0.08a | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.04 | |
NC (mg&·g-1) | 17.33 &± 0.39b | 18.46 &± 0.34a | 15.23 &± 0.41c | 15.17 &± 0.39c | 15.77*** | 23.80*** | 1.36 |
Table 2 Effects of localized N supply treatments on growth traits, root parameters and N and P concentration of Pinus massoniana (mean ± SE)
磷环境 P level | 性状 Trait | 氮处理 N supply treatment | 变异来源 Source of variation (F值 F value) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HHH | HHL | LLH | LLH/L | 家系 Family | 氮处理 N | 家系&×氮处理 Family &× N | ||
同质低磷 Homo low P | SH (cm) | 14.42 &± 0.52b | 16.92 &± 0.54a | 14.90 &± 0.65b | 14.66 &± 0.65b | 47.73*** | 6.34*** | 2.13* |
SBD (mm) | 2.39 &± 0.10b | 2.99 &± 0.07a | 2.61 &± 0.09b | 2.61 &± 0.09b | 23.96*** | 12.50*** | 2.24* | |
SDW (g) | 1.32 &± 0.12b | 1.87 &± 0.10a | 1.44 &± 0.13b | 1.63 &± 0.12ab | 19.21*** | 6.11** | 2.74* | |
RDW (g) | 0.26 &± 0.02b | 0.37 &± 0.03a | 0.27 &± 0.02b | 0.35 &± 0.02a | 12.02*** | 7.49*** | 1.54 | |
R/S | 0.36 &± 0.03a | 0.17 &± 0.03b | 0.23 &± 0.03ab | 0.18 &± 0.03b | 12.23*** | 2.75* | 2.55* | |
RL (cm) | 192.36 &± 9.72a | 186.38 &± 11.93a | 210.54 &± 14.45a | 199.73 &± 11.92a | 12.28*** | 2.92* | 1.20 | |
RSA (cm2) | 47.37 &± 3.00b | 46.50 &± 2.56b | 61.96 &± 4.38a | 59.90 &± 3.65a | 13.14*** | 7.02*** | 1.47 | |
PC (mg&·g-1) | 0.75 &± 0.03b | 1.14 &± 0.04a | 0.87 &± 0.08ab | 0.95 &± 0.11ab | 1.02 | 0.96 | 1.02 | |
NC (mg&·g-1) | 17.02 &± 0.39b | 21.68 &± 2.64a | 18.89 &± 0.34ab | 16.18 &± 0.59b | 3.44** | 3.37* | 1.47 | |
异质低磷 Hetero low P | SH (cm) | 17.51 &± 0.74a | 13.62 &± 0.52b | 16.72 &± 0.67a | 16.13 &± 0.67a | 43.10*** | 12.58*** | 2.54* |
SBD (mm) | 3.18 &± 0.11a | 2.61 &± 0.11c | 3.11 &± 0.10ab | 2.82 &± 0.12bc | 17.46*** | 8.22*** | 2.06* | |
SDW (g) | 2.25 &± 0.19a | 1.42 &± 0.13b | 2.01 &± 0.14a | 1.96 &± 0.16a | 15.53*** | 6.34*** | 2.32* | |
RDW (g) | 0.47 &± 0.04a | 0.36 &± 0.03a | 0.42 &± 0.04a | 0.47 &± 0.06a | 13.33*** | 1.97 | 1.04 | |
R/S | 0.26 &± 0.03a | 0.34 &± 0.05a | 0.26 &± 0.02a | 0.31 &± 0.04a | 7.30*** | 0.65 | 0.49 | |
RL (cm) | 368.77 &± 27.72ab | 296.81 &± 21.57b | 399.17 &± 31.82ab | 476.60 &± 61.51a | 6.70*** | 4.13** | 1.09 | |
RSA (cm2) | 105.77 &± 7.81b | 94.15 &± 7.77b | 115.78 &± 9.16ab | 139.34 &± 18.01a | 8.22*** | 3.23* | 1.04 | |
PC (mg&·g-1) | 0.90 &± 0.03a | 1.18 &± 0.04a | 1.02 &± 0.03a | 1.11 &± 0.08a | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.04 | |
NC (mg&·g-1) | 17.33 &± 0.39b | 18.46 &± 0.34a | 15.23 &± 0.41c | 15.17 &± 0.39c | 15.77*** | 23.80*** | 1.36 |
Fig. 2 The seedling growth traits of Pinus massoniana families in different local N supply treatments (mean ± SE). HHH, homogeneously high N along the soil profile; HHL, high N-high N-low N; LLH, low N-low N-high N; LLH/L, low N-low N-on side with N addition and the other side without N supply. Different lower letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Fig. 3 The root parameters of Pinus massoniana families in different local N supply treatments (mean ± SE). HHH, homogeneously high N along the soil profile; HHL, high N-high N-low N; LLH, low N-low N-high N; LLH/L, low N-low N-on side with N addition and the other side without N supply. Different lower letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
Fig. 4 N concentration and P concentration of P. massoniana families in different local N supply treatments (mean ± SE). HHH, homogeneously high N along the soil profile; HHL, high N-high N-low N; LLH, low N-low N-high N; LLH/L, low N-low N-on side with N addition and the other side without N supply. Different lower letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).
[1] | Bilss KM, Jones RH, Mitchell RJ, Mou PP (2002). Are competitive interactions influenced by spatial nutrient heterogeneity and root foraging behavior?New Phytologist, 154, 409-417. |
[2] | Drew MC (1975). Comparison of effects of a localized supply of phosphate, nitrate, ammonium and potassium on growth of seminal root system and shoot in barley.New Phytologist, 75, 479-490. |
[3] | Duan HL, Liu JX, Deng Q, Chen XM, Zhang DQ (2009). Effects of elevated CO2 and N deposition on plant biomass accumulation and allocation in subtropical forest ecosystems: A mesocosm study. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,33, 570-579.(in Chinese with English abstract) )[段洪浪, 刘菊秀, 邓琦, 陈小梅, 张德强 (2009). CO2浓度升高与氮沉降对南亚热带森林生态系统植物生物量积累及分配格局的影响.植物生态学报, 33, 570-579.] |
[4] | Einsmann JC, Jones RH, Pu M, Mitchell RJ (1999). Nutrient forging traits in 10 co-occurring plant species of contrasting life forms.Journal of Ecology, 87, 609-619. |
[5] | Fransen B, de Kroon H (2001). Long-term disadvantages of selective root placement: Root proliferation and shoot biomass of two perennial grass species in a 2-year experiment.Journal of Ecology, 89, 711-722. |
[6] | Graciano C, Tanbussi EA, Castan E, Guiamet JJ (2009). Dry mass partitioning and nitrogen uptake byEucalyptus grandis plants in response to localized or mixed application of phosphorus. Plant and Soil, 319, 175-184. |
[7] | Guo DL, Mou P, Jones RH, Mitchell RJ (2002). Temporal changes in spatial patterns of soil moisture following disturbance: An experimental approach.Journal of Ecology, 90, 338-347. |
[8] | He Y, Liao H, Yan XL (2003). Localized supply of phosphorus induces root morphological and architectural changes of rice in split and stratified soil cultures.Plant and Soil, 248, 247-256. |
[9] | Hodge A (2004). The plastic plant: Root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients.New Phytologist, 162, 9-24. |
[10] | Hutchings MJ, John EA (2004). The effects of environmental heterogeneity on root growth and root/shoot partitioning.Annals of Botany, 94, 1-8. |
[11] | Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1996). Integrating resource heterogeneity and plant plasticity: Modelling nitrate and phosphate uptake in a patchy soil environment.Journal of Ecologist, 84, 891-904. |
[12] | Jing JY, Rui YK, Zhang FD, Rengel Z, Shen JB (2010). Localized application of phosphorus and ammonium improves growth of maize seedlings by stimulating root proliferation and rhizosphere acidification.Field Crops Research, 119, 355-364. |
[13] | Kanno S, Arrighi JF, Chiarenza S, Bayle V, Berthom R, Peret B, Javot H, Delannoy E, Marin E, Nakanishi TM, Thibaud MC, Nussanme L (2016). A novel role for the root cap in phosphate uptake and homeostasis. eLife, 5, e14577. doi: 10.7554/eLife.14577. |
[14] | Kronzucker HJ, Britto DT, Davenport RJ, Tester M (2001). Ammonium toxicity and the real cost of transport.Trends in Plant Science, 6, 335-337. |
[15] | Li HB, Ma QH, Li HG, Zhang FS, Rengel Z, Shen JB (2014). Root morphological responses to localized nutrient supply differ among crop species with contrasting root traits.Plant and Soil, 376, 151-163. |
[16] | Li HB, Xue MY, Lin YR, Shen JB (2013). Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and root forging: Form individual to community.Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 19, 995-1004. (in Chinese with English abstract) )[李洪波, 薛慕瑶, 林雅茹, 申建波 (2013). 土壤养分空间异质性与根系觅食作用: 从个体到群落. 植物营养与肥料学报, 19, 995-1004.] |
[17] | Linkohr BI, Williamson LC, Fitter AH, Leyser HM (2002). Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture ofArabidopsis. Plant Journal for Cell & Molecular Biology, 29, 751-760. |
[18] | Liu SE, Li YY, Fang X, Huang WJ, Long FL, Liu JX (2015). Effects of the level and regime of nitrogen addition on seedling growth of four major tree species in subtropical China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 950-961. (in Chinese with English abstract) )[刘双娥, 李义勇, 方熊, 黄文娟, 龙凤玲, 刘菊秀 (2015). 不同氮添加量和添加方式对南亚热带4个主要树种幼苗生长的影响. 植物生态学报, 39, 950-961.] |
[19] | Lü CQ, Tian HQ, Huang Y (2007). Ecological effects of increased nitrogen deposition in terrestrial ecosystems.Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 31, 205-218. (in Chinese with English abstract) )[吕超群, 田汉勤, 黄耀 (2007). 陆地生态系统氮沉降增加的生态效应. 植物生态学报, 31, 205-218.] |
[20] | Mei L, Wang ZQ, Han YZ, Gu JC, Wang XR, Cheng YH, Zhang XJ (2006). Distribution patterns of Fraxinus mandshurica root biomass, specific root length and root length density. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 17, 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) )[梅莉, 王政权, 韩有志, 谷加存, 王向荣, 程云环, 张秀娟 (2006). 水曲柳根系生物量、比根长和根长密度的分布格局. 应用生态学报, 17, 1-4. |
[21] | Mommer L, van Ruijven J, Jansen C, van de Steeg HM, de Kroon H (2012). Interactive effects of nutrient heterogeneity and competition: Implications for root foraging theory?Functional Ecology, 26, 66-73. |
[22] | Mou P, Mitchell RJ, Jones RH (1997). Root distribution of two tree species under a heterogeneous nutrient environment.Journal Applied Ecology, 34, 645-656. |
[23] | Officer SJ, Dunbabin VM, Armstrong RD, Norton RM, Kearney GA (2009). Wheat roots proliferate in response to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilisers in Sodosol and Vertosol soils of south-eastern Australia.Australian Journal of Soil Research, 47, 91-102. |
[24] | Pang L, Zhang Y, Zhou ZC, Feng ZP, Chu DY (2014). Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on growth and phosphorus efficiency of Pinus massoniana under low phosphorus stress. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 1275-1282. (in Chinese with English abstract) )[庞丽, 张一, 周志春, 丰忠平, 储徳裕 (2014). 模拟氮沉降对低磷胁迫下马尾松生长和磷效率的影响. 应用生态学报, 25, 1275-1282.] |
[25] | Qin GF, Zhou ZC (2012). Germplasm Resources of Chinese Masson Pine. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) )[秦国峰, 周志春 (2012). 中国马尾松优良种质资源. 中国林业出版社, 北京.] |
[26] | Richardson SJ, Peltzer DA, Allen RB, McGlone MS, Parfitt RL (2004). Rapid development of phosphorus limitation in temperate rainforest along the Franz Josef soil chronosequence.Oecologia, 139, 267-276. |
[27] | Robinson D (1994). The response of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients.New Phytologist, 127, 635-674. |
[28] | Shen J, Li H, Neumann G, Zhang F (2005). Nutrient uptake, cluster root formation and exudation of protons and citrate in Lupinus albus as affected by localized supply of phosphorus in a split-root system. Plant Science, 168, 837-845. |
[29] | Tinker PB, Nye PH (2000). Solute Movement in the Rhizosphere. Oxford University Press, Oxford. |
[30] | Vance CP, Uhde-stone C, Allan DL (2003). Phosphorus acquisition and use: Critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource.New Phytologist, 57, 423-427. |
[31] | Verma S, Subehia SK, Sharma SP (2005). Phosphorus fractions in an acid soil continuously fertilized with mineral and organic fertilizers.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 41, 295-300. |
[32] | Weligama C, Tang C, Sale PWG, Conyers MK, Liu DL (2008). Localized nitrate and phosphate application enhances root proliferation by wheat and maximises rhizosphere alkalization in acid subsoil.Plant and Soil, 312, 101-115. |
[33] | Wu Q, Ding J, Yan H, Zhang SR, Fang T, Ma KP (2011). Effects of simulated precipitation and nitrogen addition on seedling growth and biomass in five tree species in Gutian Mountain, Zhejiang Province, China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 256-267. (in Chinese with English abstract) )[吴茜, 丁佳, 闫慧, 张守仁, 方腾, 马克平 (2011). 模拟降水变化和土壤施氮对浙江古田山5个树种幼苗生长和生物量的影响. 植物生态学报, 35, 256-267. |
[34] | Xu XK, Han L, Luo XB (2012). Effects of stimulated nitrogen deposition on soil net nitrogen mineralization under a temperate Korean pine and broadleaf mixed forest.Climatic and Environmental Research, 17, 628-638. (in Chinese with English abstract) )[徐星凯, 韩林, 罗献宝 (2012). 模拟氮沉降对温带阔叶红松林地氮素净矿化量的影响. 气候与环境研究, 17, 628-638.] |
[35] | Yang Q, Zhang Y, Zhou ZC, Ma XH, Liu WH, Feng ZP (2011). Genetic variation in root architecture and phosphorus efficiency in response to heterogeneous phosphorus deficiency in Pinus massoniana families. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 1226-1235. (in Chinese with English abstract) )[杨青, 张一, 周志春, 马雪红, 刘伟宏, 丰忠平 (2011). 异质低磷胁迫下马尾松家系根构型和磷效率的遗传变异. 植物生态学报, 35, 1226-1235.] |
[36] | Zhang H, Forde BG (2000). Regulation of Arabidopsis root development by nitrate availability.Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 51-59. |
[37] | Zhang Y, Zhou ZC, Yang Q (2013). Genetic variations in root morphology and phosphorus efficiency of Pinus massoniana under heterogeneous and homogeneous low phosphorus conditions.Plant and Soil, 364, 93-104. |
[38] | Zhou ZC, Shangguan ZP (2007). Vertical distribution of fine roots in relation to soil factors in Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. forest of the Loess Plateau of China. Plant and Soil, 291, 119-129. |
[1] | LUO Si-Sheng, LUO Bi-Zhen, WEI Shu-Jing, HU Hai-Qing, LI Xiao-Chuan, WU Ze-Peng, WANG Zhen-Shi, ZHOU Yu-Fei, ZHONG Ying-Xia. Effects of moderate forest fires on soil organic carbon density in secondary forests of Pinus massoniana [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2020, 44(10): 1073-1086. |
[2] | Li-Jiao XU, Xue-Lian JIANG, Zhi-Peng HAO, Tao LI, Zhao-Xiang WU, Bao-Dong CHEN. Arbuscular mycorrhiza improves plant adaptation to phosphorus deficiency through regulating the expression of genes relevant to carbon and phosphorus metabolism [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(8): 815-825. |
[3] | Qin WANG, Wan-Qin YANG, Fu-Zhong WU, Jian ZHANG, Bo TAN, Xi-Tao ZHANG. Characteristics of stump stock and decomposition in Pinus massoniana plantation [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(5): 458-468. |
[4] | Ping SONG, Rui ZHANG, Yi ZHANG, Zhi-Chun ZHOU, Zhong-Ping FENG. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on fine root morphology, nitrogen and phosphorus efficiency of Pinus massoniana clone under phosphorus deficiency [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(11): 1136-1144. |
[5] | CHEN Yun-Yu,XIONG De-Cheng,HUANG Jin-Xue,WANG Wei-Wei,HU Shuang-Cheng,DENG Fei,XU Chen-Sen,FENG Jian-Xin,SHI Shun-Zeng,ZHONG Bo-Yuan,CHEN Guang-Shui. Fine root production of Pinus massoniana plantation and Castanopsis carlesii plantation at different successional stages in subtropical China [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(11): 1071-1081. |
[6] | LIU Na-Na,TIAN Qiu-Ying,ZHANG Wen-Hao. Comparison of adaptive strategies to phosphorus-deficient soil between dominant species Artemisia frigida and Stipa krylovii in typical steppe of Nei Mongol [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(9): 905-915. |
[7] | CUI Ning-Jie,ZHANG Dan-Ju,LIU Yang,ZHANG Jian,YANG Wan-Qin,OU Jiang,ZHANG Jie,SONG Xiao-Yan,YIN Rui. Plant diversity and seasonal dynamics in forest gaps of varying sizes in Pinus massoniana plantations [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(5): 477-490. |
[8] | PANG Li, ZHANG Yi, ZHOU Zhi-Chun, FENG Zhong-Ping, CHU De-Yu. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on root exudates and phosphorus efficiency in Pinus massoniana families under low phosphorus stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(1): 27-35. |
[9] | GAO Yan, TIAN Qiu-Ying, SHI Feng-Ling, LI Ling-Hao, ZHANG Wen-Hao. Comparative studies on adaptive strategies of Medicago falcata and M. truncatula to phosphorus deficiency in soil [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(6): 632-640. |
[10] | YANG Qing, ZHANG Yi, ZHOU Zhi-Chun, MA Xue-Hong, LIU Wei-Hong, FENG Zhong-Ping. Genetic variation in root architecture and phosphorus efficiency in response to heterogeneous phosphorus deficiency in Pinus massoniana families [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(12): 1226-1235. |
[11] | ZHANG Lei, LIU Shi-Rong, SUN Peng-Sen, WANG Tong-Li. Comparative evaluation of multiple models of the effects of climate change on the potential distribution of Pinus massoniana [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(11): 1091-1105. |
[12] | LI Zhi-Yong, WANG Yan-Hui, YU Peng-Tao, ZHANG Zhi-Jun, DU Shi-Cai, HE Ping, WANG Xiang, DUAN Jian, LI Zhen-Hua. Soil chemical properties and growth characteristics of mixed plantation of Pinus massoniana and Cinnamomum camphora in the acid rain region of Chongqing, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(4): 387-395. |
[13] | MA Xue-Hong, ZHOU Zhi-Chun, JIN Guo-Qing, ZHANG Yi. EFFECTS OF COMPETITION ON FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF PINUS MASSONIANA AND SCHIMA SUPERBA IN A HETEROGENEOUS NUTRIENT ENVIRONMENT [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2009, 33(1): 81-88. |
[14] | LI Zhi-Yong, CHEN Jian-Jun, WANG Yan-Hui, YU Peng-Tao, DU Shi-Cai, HE Ping, DUAN Jian. EFFECTS OF SCHIMA SUPERBA PLANTATIONS ON SOIL CHEMICAL PROPERTIES IN THE ACID RAIN REGION OF CHONGQING, SOUTHWESTERN CHINA [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(3): 632-638. |
[15] | KUANG Yuan-Wen, WEN Da-Zhi, ZHOU Guo-Yi, ZHANG De-Qiang. DISTRIBUTION OF ELEMENTS ALONG THE LENGTH OF DIFFERENT-AGED NEEDLES OF PINUS MASSONIANA AT DINGHUSHAN [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2006, 30(1): 33-39. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn