[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]超强台风“摩羯”登陆点海南东寨港红树林受损状况研究
收稿日期: 2024-10-10
录用日期: 2025-01-14
网络出版日期: 2025-01-15
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(42076176);国家自然科学基金(U22A20584);国家博士后研究人员计划(GZB20230376)
Damage to the mangrove forests in Dongzhaigang of Hainan caused by super typhoon “Yagi”
Received date: 2024-10-10
Accepted date: 2025-01-14
Online published: 2025-01-15
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42076176);National Natural Science Foundation of China(U22A20584);Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF(GZB20230376)
乔沛阳 , 顾肖璇 , 刘昌鑫 , 曹泽宇 , 张婷婷 , 林晨 , 陈钦常 , 彭修凡 , 陈菲菲 , 李华亮 , 陈伟 , 陈鹭真 . 超强台风“摩羯”登陆点海南东寨港红树林受损状况研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025 , 49(4) : 540 -551 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0354
Aims On September 6, 2024, super typhoon “Yagi” made landfall in Hainan Province, China, causing severe damage to mangrove forests in the region.
Methods A systematic field survey was conducted in the Dongzhaigang Mangrove Nature Reserve one week after the typhoon, selecting four representative locations, encompassing nine mangrove communities and seven typical mangrove species in total, to assess the extent of damage caused by the typhoon.
Important findings The results revealed that 1) the mangrove forests at Yanfeng, situated 4.5 km from the typhoon’s path, and Sanjiang, situated 6.5 km away, incurred severe damage, with the non-native populations of Laguncularia racemosa and Sonneratia apetala being the most severely affected. In contrast, the mangrove forests at Tashi, 2 km from the path, experienced moderate damage, while those at Bodu, a mere 0.3 km away, sustained only light damage. Field survey, complemented by UAV imagery, found that mangrove communities along tidal creek edges were more severely impacted than those in contiguous areas. 2) Among the six species surveyed, mechanical damage to the native species Bruguiera sexangula, Kandelia obovata, Aegiceras corniculatum, and Ceriops tagal was primarily characterized by branch breakage and partial defloration. The non-native Sonneratia apetala and Laguncularia racemosa populations suffered greater damage than the native communities, with nearly complete canopy defoliation and 96.62%-99.70% of individuals sustaining damage. Approximately 9.64% of individuals experienced trunk breakage or complete uprooting. 3) With the exception of the short Ceriops tagal community at Bodu, which had a maximum tree height of 2 m, mangrove communities with same species closer to the typhoon’s pathway exhibited more severe damage. Tree height, diameter at breast height, and crown size were significantly and positively correlated with damage severity; the taller the trees, the more severe the impact. Based on these damage assessments, it is anticipated that native communities will recover much more rapidly than non-native populations. The typhoon caused considerable short-term damage to the mangrove forests. Therefore, future mangrove restoration efforts should consider species-specific wind resistance, and mixed-species planting strategies are recommended to enhance the stability and wind resilience of mangrove communities.
Key words: typhoon; extreme climate; catastrophe; mangrove; recovery
[1] | Alongi DM (2008). Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 76, 1-13. |
[2] | Brown JK, Roussopoulos PJ (1974). Eliminating biases in the planar intersect method for estimating volumes of small fuels. Forest Science, 20, 350-356. |
[3] | Cahoon DR, Hensel P, Rybczyk J, McKee KL, Proffitt CE, Perez BC (2003). Mass tree mortality leads to mangrove peat collapse at Bay Islands, Honduras after Hurricane Mitch. Journal of Ecology, 91, 1093-1105. |
[4] | Chen LZ, Gu XX, Zhong CR, Huang LH (2019). Haikou Wetland: Mangrove Forests. Xiamen University Press, Xiamen. |
[陈鹭真, 顾肖璇, 钟才荣, 黄黎晗 (2019). 海口湿地: 红树林篇. 厦门大学出版社, 厦门.] | |
[5] | Chen LZ, Yang SC, Lin GH (2021). Mangrove Forests in China Under Global Change. Xiamen University Press, Xiamen. |
[陈鹭真, 杨盛昌, 林光辉 (2021). 全球变化下的中国红树林. 厦门大学出版社, 厦门.] | |
[6] | Chianucci F, Macek M (2023). hemispheR: an R package for fisheye canopy image analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 336, 109470. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109470. |
[7] | Dahdouh-Guebas F, Pulukkuttige JL (2009). A bibliometrical review on pre- and posttsunami assumptions and facts about mangroves and other coastal vegetation as protective buffers. Ruhuna Journal of Science, 4, 28-50. |
[8] | Fluet-Chouinard E, Stocker BD, Zhang Z, Malhotra A, Melton JR, Poulter B, Kaplan JO, Goldewijk KK, Siebert S, Minayeva T, Hugelius G, Joosten H, Barthelmes A, Prigent C, Aires F, et al. (2023). Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries. Nature, 614, 281-286. |
[9] | He YX, Guan W, Xue D, Liu LF, Peng CH, Liao BW, Hu J, Zhu QA, Yang YZ, Wang X, Zhou GY, Wu ZM, Chen H (2019). Comparison of methane emissions among invasive and native mangrove species in Dongzhaigang, Hainan Island. Science of the Total Environment, 697, 133945. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133945. |
[10] | Hochard JP, Hamilton S, Barbier EB (2019). Mangroves shelter coastal economic activity from cyclones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 12232-12237. |
[11] | Howard J, Hoyt S, Isensee K, Telszewski M, Pidgeon E (2014). Coastal Blue Carbon: Methods for Assessing Carbon Stocks and Emissions Factors in Mangroves, Tidal Salt Marshes, and Seagrasses. Conservation International, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, International Union for Conservation of Nature. Arlington, Virginia, USA. |
[12] | Jia HS, Li DQ, Han YQ (2000). Advances in studies on photoinhibition in photosynthesis of higher plants. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 17(3), 218-224. |
[贾虎森, 李德全, 韩亚琴 (2000). 高等植物光合作用的光抑制研究进展. 植物学通报, 17(3), 218-224.] | |
[13] | Jiang X, Choat B, Zhang YJ, Guan XY, Shi W, Cao KF (2021). Variation in xylem hydraulic structure and function of two mangrove species across a latitudinal gradient in eastern Australia. Water, 13, 850. DOI: 10.3390/w13060850. |
[14] | Krauss KW, Osland MJ (2020). Tropical cyclones and the organization of mangrove forests: a review. Annals of Botany, 125, 213-234. |
[15] | Li YC (2021). Xylem Anatomical Structure and Response to Environment of Mangrove. Master degree dissertation, Guangxi University, Nanning. 18. |
[李艺蝉 (2021). 红树植物木质部结构特征及其对环境因子的响应. 硕士学位论文, 广西大学, 南宁. 18.] | |
[16] | McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR, Johnson D, Meshaka WE (1996). Mangrove damage caused by hurricane andrew on the southwestern coast of Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science, 59, 1-8. |
[17] | Paling EI, Kobryn HT, Humphreys G (2008). Assessing the extent of mangrove change caused by Cyclone Vance in the eastern Exmouth Gulf, northwestern Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 77, 603-613. |
[18] | Qiu MH, Wang RL, Ding DJ, Mao J, Liao BW (2016). Impact of “Rammasun” on mangrove communities in Dongzhaigang, Hainan. Ecological Science, 35(2), 118-122. |
[邱明红, 王荣丽, 丁冬静, 毛静, 廖宝文 (2016). 台风“威马逊”对东寨港红树林灾害程度影响因子分析. 生态科学, 35(2), 118-122.] | |
[19] | Sippo JZ, Lovelock CE, Santos IR, Sanders CJ, Maher DT (2018). Mangrove mortality in a changing climate: an overview. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 215, 241-249. |
[20] | Snedaker S (2002). Mangrove Ecology, Silviculture, and Conservation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. |
[21] | Villamayor BMR, Rollon RN, Samson MS, Albano GMG, Primavera JH (2016). Impact of Haiyan on Philippine mangroves: implications to the fate of the widespread monospecific Rhizophora plantations against strong typhoons. Ocean & Coastal Management, 132, 1-14. |
[22] | Ye Y, Tan FY, Lu CY (2001). Effects of soil texture and light on growth and physiology parameters in Kandelia candel. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 25, 42-49. |
[叶勇, 谭凤仪, 卢昌义 (2001). 土壤结构与光照水平对秋茄某些生长和生理参数的影响. 植物生态学报, 25, 42-49.] | |
[23] | Zhang XX, Lin PZ, Chen XP (2022). Coastal protection by planted mangrove forest during typhoon mangkhut. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10, 1288. DOI: 10.3390/jmse10091288. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |