[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

牛筋草(Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.)对棉花的密度竞争和防治临界期

  • 李淑英 ,
  • 朱加保 ,
  • 马艳 ,
  • 徐道青 ,
  • 阚画春 ,
  • 陈敏 ,
  • 刘小玲 ,
  • 郑曙峰 ,
  • 马小艳
展开
  • 安徽省农业科学院经济作物研究所, 230031

收稿日期: 2025-01-24

  修回日期: 2025-03-11

Influence of goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.) density and critical period for its control on cotton

  • LI Shu-Ying ,
  • Zhu Jia-Bao ,
  • Ma Yan ,
  • Xu Dao-Qing ,
  • Kan Hua-Chun ,
  • Chen Min ,
  • LIU Xiao-Ling ,
  • ZHENG Shu-Feng ,
  • MA Xiao-Yan
Expand
  • , Institute of Industrial Crops, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences 230031,

Received date: 2025-01-24

  Revised date: 2025-03-11

摘要

【目的】牛筋草是世界性恶性杂草之一,为安徽省沿江棉区优势杂草,而棉花对杂草竞争十分敏感。本文旨在明确牛筋草对棉花的密度竞争作用及其防治临界期,为棉田牛筋草的综合防治提供理论依据。【方法】2010-2012年在安徽省安庆市试验地,密度竞争试验采用添加系列试验方法,棉花密度保持不变,设置8 个牛筋草密度(0、0.125、0.25、0.5、1、2、3、4 株/m)与棉花全生育期竞争,防治临界期试验分别设置不同的牛筋草与棉花的共生竞争期和无杂草期(0、2、4、6、8、10、12、14周),研究不同牛筋草密度、以及2.5株m-1密度下不同竞争期和无草期对棉花生长、子棉产量及其构成因素、纤维品质的影响。【主要结果】随着牛筋草密度增加,牛筋草株高逐渐降低,分别在牛筋草密度为3株m-1(2011年)和0.25株m-1(2012)较0.125株m-1显著降低。3 年数据平均,单位面积牛筋草生物量由715 kg ha-1(0.125 株m-1)逐渐增加到4148 kg ha-1(4 株m-1);在较高密度,牛筋草种内竞争明显。2012年随着牛筋草与棉花共生时间延长,牛筋草单株分蘖数和生物量逐渐增加;在共同竞争12w之前,牛筋草株高均大于棉花的。随着牛筋草密度增加,棉花株高和茎直径呈减少趋势,单株果枝数、铃数显著减少,较高密度牛筋草降低单铃重,衣分没有明显变化。其中2012年2株m-1及以上密度显著降低棉花株高;2011年3株m-1及以上密度和2012年4株m-1显著降低棉花茎直径。1 株m-1的杂草密度导致棉花单株果枝数减少8.7%—11.6%,铃数减少18.6%—35.2%,单铃重减少0.1%—4.6%。引起子棉产量显著减产的牛筋草密度分别是0.125 株m-1(2010 年和2012年)和0.25 株m-1(2011 年),导致子棉减产10%—18%;单株铃数及子棉产量损失率与牛筋草密度符合双曲线模型,由此预测导致单株铃数减少50%的牛筋草密度为2.3-3.7株m-1,致使子棉减产率达5%的牛筋草密度为0.05-0.09株m-1。随着牛筋草与棉花竞争时间的延长,棉花株高、茎直径逐渐减少,单株果枝数、铃数显著降低,子棉产量显著降低;杂草竞争时间与子棉相对产量高度拟合logistic模型。无草时间延长则棉花株高、茎直径增加,单株果枝数、铃数和子棉产量显著增加;子棉相对产量随无杂草时间的变化趋势高度拟合Gompertz模型。当设定子棉产量损失临界值5%时,2.5株m-1密度下牛筋草防治临界期在棉花播种后35天-83天。

本文引用格式

李淑英 , 朱加保 , 马艳 , 徐道青 , 阚画春 , 陈敏 , 刘小玲 , 郑曙峰 , 马小艳 . 牛筋草(Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.)对棉花的密度竞争和防治临界期[J]. 植物生态学报, 0 : 0 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2025.0035

Abstract

Aim Goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.) is one of the world's malignant weeds, a dominant weed in the cotton fields along the Yangtze River in Anhui Province. Cotton is highly sensitive to weed competition. This article aims to clarify the density competition effect of goosegrass on cotton and identifies its critical period for control, providing a theoretical basis for the integrated weed management of goosegrass in cotton fields. Methods From 2010 to 2012, two experiments were conducted at an experimental site in Anqing City, Anhui Province: the goosegrass density competition experiment and the critical control period experiment. In the density competition experiment, the cotton density was kept constant while eight different densities of goosegrass (0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 plants per meter) were tested to evaluate their competition with cotton throughout its growth period. This aimed to determine the effects of varying goosegrass densities on cotton growth and yield. The critical control period experiment involved different durations of weed interference and weed-free periods (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 weeks after crop emergence) to gather information on how goosegrass affects cotton. Important findings As the density of goosegrass increased, the plant height gradually decreased. Compared to 0.125 plants m-1 goosegrass, the plant height of goosegrass at densities of 3 plant m-1 and 0.25 plant m-1 was significantly decreased. On average over three years, the biomass of goosegrass per unit area increased from 715 kg ha-1 (0.125 plants m-1) to 4148 kg ha-1 (4 plants m-1). This indicates that intraspecific competition among goosegrass becomes more pronounced at higher densities. In 2012, the number of tillers and biomass per plant of goosegrass gradually increased, and the height of goosegrass exceeded that of cotton during the first 12 weeks after crop emergence. With the increasing weed density, the plant height and stem diameter of cotton decreased, while the number of fruit branches and bolls per plant was significantly reduced. The single boll weight was also reduced at high densities of goosegrass, however, there is no significant change in the lint percentage. In 2012, the plant height of cotton significantly decreased at densities of 2 plant m-1 or more. The cotton stem diameter was remarkably reduced at densities of 3 plant m-1 or more in 2011 and 4 plant m-1 in 2012, respectively. Specifically, at the density of 1 plant m-1, the fruit branch numbers, the boll number per plant and single boll weight was reduced by 8.7% to 11.6%, 18.6% to 35.2% and 0.1% to 4.6%, respectively. The seed cotton yields were significantly reduced at density of 0.125 plant m-1 (2010 and 2012) and 0.25 plant m-1 (2011), with reductions ranging from 10% to 18%. The boll number per plant of cotton and the loss rate of seed cotton yields were affected by the goosegrass densities, following a hyperbolic model. It is predicted that goosegrass densities of 2.3 to 3.7 plants m-1 would result in a 50% reduction in the number of bolls per plant, while densities of 0.05 to 0.09 plants m-1 would lead to a 5% reduction in seed cotton yield. As weed infestation increased, the experiment demonstrated a gradual decline in the height and stem diameter of cotton plants. Additionally, there was a significant reduction in the number of fruit branches and bolls per plant, which led to a marked decrease in seed cotton yields, fitting well with a logistic model. Conversely, With an increasing weed-free duration, cotton plants exhibited greater height and stem diameter, along with a notable rise in the number of fruit branches, bolls per plant, and seed cotton yield. The increase in seed cotton yield with prolonged weed-free duration followed a Gompertz model. The critical period for controlling goosegrass at a density of 2.5 plants m-1 is between 35 and 83 days after cotton planting, based on a 5% yield-loss threshold.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Options
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]