[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]异型花柱植物喀什补血草的传粉者功能群与花粉转移效率
收稿日期: 2020-04-13
录用日期: 2020-11-21
网络出版日期: 2021-01-14
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(31560183)
Pollinator functional groups and their pollen transfer efficiency in heterostylous Limonium kaschgaricum (Plumbaginaceae)
Received date: 2020-04-13
Accepted date: 2020-11-21
Online published: 2021-01-14
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(31560183)
异型花柱是受遗传控制的花柱多态现象, 被达尔文认为是植物通过在传粉者体表不同部位滞落花粉以促进型间花粉准确传递的一种适应。该现象虽已受到广泛关注, 但在一些花型变异较大且不稳定的传粉系统中, 不同传粉者对各花型繁殖所产生的影响仍知之甚少。该研究以分布于新疆天山南坡的一个有同长花柱共存的异型花柱植物喀什补血草(Limonium kaschgaricum)种群为研究对象, 对其花型构成及频率、传粉者及花粉转移效率等进行了调查分析。结果表明: 1)种群中除了存在雌/雄蕊长度交互对应的长(L)/短(S)花柱型花外, 还有雌/雄蕊同长的花(H型), 且各花型花的花冠口直径、花冠筒长及花粉量等参数间无差异, 但花粉纹饰和柱头乳突细胞形态具二型性。其中, H型花的花粉和柱头形态与L型花(或S型花)的一致。2)花型内和自花授粉均不亲和; 型间授粉时, 花粉和柱头形态不同的花型间亲和, 反之不亲和。3)种群内存在长/短吻两类传粉昆虫。在以短吻传粉者为主的盛花初、中期, L和H型花柱头上的异型花粉数均显著高于S型花的, 且L和S型花高位性器官间的异型花粉传递效率高于低位性器官间的; 而在以长吻传粉者为主的盛花后期, L和S型花的柱头间异型花粉数无显著差异, 且高/低位性器官间具有相同的异型花粉转移效率; 与传粉者出现时期相对应的、在花期不同阶段开放花的结实率也明显不同。4)长/短吻昆虫具明显不同的传粉功能, 短吻昆虫只能对L和H型花进行有效传粉, 且访花频率和型间花粉转移效率较低, 为低效传粉者; 而长吻昆虫对各花型均能有效传粉, 具高的访花频率和型间花粉转移效率, 为高效传粉者。因为长吻昆虫的阶段性出现所形成的不稳定传粉系统, 使低效的短吻昆虫可能会成为种群中花型变异的驱动力, 并使S型花受到更大的选择压力。H型花克服了柱头缩入的弊端, 可能会成为不稳定传粉系统下的一个替代花型而持续存在。
阿依古丽•阿卜杜热伊木, 焦芳芳, 张爱勤 . 异型花柱植物喀什补血草的传粉者功能群与花粉转移效率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021 , 45(1) : 51 -61 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2020.0101
Aims Heterostyly is a heritable style polymorphism controlled by genes, which was emphasized by Darwin as an adaptation to promote accurate pollen transfer between floral morphs by depositing two types of pollen on different parts of insect bodies. This hypothesis has received much attention, but little is known about the effects of different pollinator groups on the reproductive success of different morphs in some populations with large variation in floral morphs composition and unstable pollination system.
Methods We investigated the floral morph composition, morph ratio, pollinator types and pollination efficiencies inLimonium kaschgaricum which distributed in the south slope of Tianshan in Xinjiang, China, a heterostylous population with coexistence of homostylyous morph, in order to understand the function of different pollinator groups and their influence on the fruit set of different morphs and floral morph ratios.
Important findings Results showed that: 1) The population mainly composed of L-morph, S-morph flowers with reciprocal placement of anthers and stigmas and H-morph flowers with equal pistils and stamens height. There were no differences in corolla diameter, corolla tube length and pollen production among morphs, but the morphology of pollen ornamentation and stigma mastoid cells were dimorphic. H-morph flowers were identical with L- (or S-) morph flowers in morphology of pollen ornamentation and stigma mastoid cells. 2) The results of heteromorphic incompatibility test showed that intramorph and self-pollination were incompatible in all floral morphs. The intermorph pollination was compatible when pollen ornamentation and stigma mastoid cells were hetermorphic, otherwise it was incompatible. 3) There were two types of pollinator functional groups, long and short-tongued. But they did not appear synchronously, short-tongued insects appeared in early and medium stages of flowering, and long-tongued insects appeared in the later flowering period. When the short-tongued insects were main pollinators at the early and medium stages of flowering, the number of intermorph pollen on stigma of long- and homo-styled morphs was significantly higher than that of short-styled morphs. The intermorph pollen transfer efficiency between high-sexual organs were higher than between low sexual organs. In the later stage of flowering, when long-tongued insects were main pollinators, there were no differences in the intermorph pollen loads on stigma of long- and short-styled morphs, and the intermorph pollen transfer proficiency between high-sexual organs were symmetrical with low sexual organs. At the same time, the fruit sets in different flowering stages were obviously different. 4) Long- and short-tongued insects have significantly different pollen transfer efficiencies, the short-tongued insects only transfer pollen between high sex organs, were low efficient pollinators with low visiting frequency and intermorph pollen transfer proficiency. However, long-tongued insects were efficient pollinators for all floral morphs, and were high efficient pollinators with high visiting frequency and intermorph pollen transfer proficiency. The unstable pollination system caused by periodical appearance of long-tongued insects may make the short-tongued insects become the main driving force causing floral morphs variation and S-morph flowers may suffer greater driving force. H-morph flowers may exist as an alternative floral morph in this unstable pollination system due to overcoming the drawback of sunken stigma.
[1] | Aigner PA (2001). Optimality modeling and fitness trade-offs: When should plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos, 95,177-184. |
[2] | Al Wadi H, Richards AJ (1993). Primary homostyly in Primula L. subgenus Sphondylia (Duby) Rupr. and the evolution of distyly in Primula. New Phytologist, 124,329-338. |
[3] | Alves Dos Santos I (2002). Flower-visiting bees and the breakdown of the tristylous breeding system of Eichhornia azurea (Swartz) Kunth (Pontederiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 77,499-507. |
[4] | Armbruster WS, Pérez-Barrales R, Arroyo J, Edwards ME, Vargas P (2006). Three dimensional reciprocity of floral morphs in wild flax (Linum suffruticosum): a new twist on heterostyly. New Phytologist, 171,581-590. |
[5] | Arroyo J, Barrett SCH, Hidalgo R, Cole WW (2002). Evolutionary maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). American Journal of Botany, 89,1242-1249. |
[6] | Arroyo J, Dafni A (1995). Variations in habitat, season, flower traits and pollinators in dimorphic Narcissus tazetta L. (Amaryllidaceae) in Israel. New Phytologist, 129,135-145. |
[7] | Barrett SCH (1990). The evolution and adaptive significance of heterostyly. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 5,144-148. |
[8] | Barrett SCH (1992). Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: model systems for evolutionary analysis//Barrett SCH. Evolution and Function of Heterostyly. Springer, Berlin.1-29. |
[9] | Barrett SCH (2002a). The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3,274-284. |
[10] | Barrett SCH (2002b). Sexual interference of the floral kind. Heredity, 88,154-159. |
[11] | Barrett SCH (2019). “A most complex marriage arrangement”: recent advances on heterostyly and unresolved questions. New Phytologist, 224,1051-1067. |
[12] | Barrett SCH, Shore JS (2008). New insights on heterostyly: comparative biology, ecology and genetics//Franklin-Tong V. Self-Incompatibility in Flowering Plants: Evolution, Diversity and Mechanisms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.3-32. |
[13] | Beach JH, Bawa KS (1980). Role of pollinators in the evolution of dioecy from distyly. Evolution, 34,1138-1142. |
[14] | Brys R, Jacquemyn H (2015). Disruption of the distylous syndrome in Primula veris. Annals of Botany, 115,27-39. |
[15] | Campbell DR, Waser NM, Price MV (1996). Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology, 77,1463-1472. |
[16] | Chittka L, Thomson JD (2001). Cognitive Ecology of Pollination: Animal Behaviour and Floral Evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York. |
[17] | Cohen JI (2010). “A case to which no parallel exists”: the influence of Darwin’s Different Forms of Flowers. American Journal of Botany, 97,701-716. |
[18] | Cruden RW (1977). Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding system in flowering plants. Evolution, 31,32-46. |
[19] | Darwin C (1877). The Different forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. John Murray, London. |
[20] | Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD (2004). Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35,375-403. |
[21] | Grant V, Grant KA (1965). Flower Pollination in the Phlox Family. Columbia University Press, New York. |
[22] | Ganders FR (1979). The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 17,607-635. |
[23] | Haddadchi A, Fatemi M (2015). Self-compatibility and floral traits adapted for self-pollination allow homostylous Nymphoides geminat (Menyanthaceae) to persist in marginal habitats. Plant Systematics & Evolution, 301,239-250. |
[24] | Huang SQ (2006). Debates enrich our understanding of pollination biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21,233-234. |
[25] | Huang SQ (2007). Studies on plant-pollinator interaction and its significances. Biodiversity Science, 15,569-575. |
[25] | [ 黄双全 (2007). 植物与传粉者相互作用的研究及其意义. 生物多样性, 15,569-575.] |
[26] | Hudabardi M Xu JG (2000). Claves Plantarum Xinjiangensis. 3rd ed. Xinjiang University Press, ürümqi. |
[26] | [ 米吉提?胡达拜尔地, 徐建国 (2000). 新疆高等植物检索表. 3版. 新疆大学出版社, 乌鲁木齐.] |
[27] | Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1992a). The evolution of heterostyly// Barrett SCH. Evolution and Function of Heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.151-178. |
[28] | Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1992b). The selection of heterostyly// Barrett SCH. Evolution and Function of Heterostyly. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.179-207. |
[29] | Maruyama PK, Amorim FW, Oliveira PE (2010). Night and day service: distyly and mixed pollination system in Faramea cyanea (Rubiaceae). Flora, 205,818-824. |
[30] | Naiki A (2012). Heterostyly and the possibility of its breakdown by polyploidization. Plant Species Biology, 27,3-29. |
[31] | Nilsson LA (1988). The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature, 334,147-149. |
[32] | Nishihiro J, Washitani I, Thomson JD, Thomson BA (2000). Patterns and consequences of stigma height variation in a natural population of a distylous plant Primula sieboldii. Functional Ecology, 14,502-512. |
[33] | Pérez-Barrale R, Arroyo J (2010). Pollinator shifts and the loss of style polymorphism in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23,1117-1128. |
[34] | Pérez-Barrales R, Arroyo J, Scott Armbruster W (2007). Differences in pollinator faunas may generate geographic differences in floral morphology and integration in Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). Oikos, 116,1904-1918. |
[35] | Richards JH, Koptur S (1993). Floral variation and distyly in Guettarda scabra (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany, 80,31-40. |
[36] | Santos-Gally R, Pérez-Barrales R, Simón VI, Arroyo J (2013). The role of short-tongued insects in floral variation across the range of a style-dimorphic plant. Annals of Botany, 111,317-328. |
[37] | Simón-Porcar VI, Santos-Gally R, Arroyo J (2014). Long- tongued insects promote disassortative pollen transfer in style-dimorphic Narcissus papyraceus (Amaryllidaceae). Journal of Ecology, 102,116-125. |
[38] | Stebbins GL (1970). Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I. Pollination mechanisms. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1,307-326. |
[39] | Tamari F, Shore JS (2004). Distribution of style and pollen polygalacturonases among distylous and homostylous Turnera and Piriqueta spp. (Turneraceae). Heredity, 92,380-385. |
[40] | Traveset A, Jakobsson A (1999). Valladares F. Ecology of plant reproduction: mating systems and pollination//Pugnaire FI, Valladares F.Hand Book of Functional Plant Ecology. Marcel Dekker, New York. |
[41] | Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996). Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology, 77,1043-1060. |
[42] | Webb CJ, Lloyd DG (1986). The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms II. Herkogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 24,163-178. |
[43] | Yang CF, Guo YH (2005). Floral evolution: beyond traditional viewpoint of pollinator mediated floral design. Chinese Science Bulletin, 50,2575-2582. |
[43] | [ 杨春锋, 郭友好 (2005). 被子植物花部进化: 传粉选择作用的客观评价. 科学通报, 50,2575-2582.] |
[44] | Zhang DY (2004). Plant Life History Evolution and Reproductive Ecology. Science Press, Beijing. 302-321. |
[44] | [ 张大勇 (2004). 植物生活史进化与繁殖生态学. 科学出版社, 北京. 302-321.] |
[45] | Zhou W, Barrett SCH, Li HD, Wu ZK, Wang XJ, Wang H, Li DZ (2017). Phylogeographic insights on the evolutionary breakdown of heterostyly. New Phytologist, 214,1368-1380. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |