[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Original article

ECOLOGICAL CAPITAL MEASUREMENT BY REMOTELY SENSED DATA FOR HUZHOU AND ITS SOCIO-ECONOMIC APPLICATION

Expand
  • College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Accepted date: 2006-01-22

  Online published: 2006-05-30

Abstract

The paper used TM and MODIS data to acquire ecosystem types and quality condition parameters. The process involved the following steps: 1) TM images were used to classify the land use/land cover of Huzhou; 2) A method was developed to decompose MODIS NDVI pixels (500 m×500 m) into the same resolution scale of classified TM image, and the observed weather data were combined to compute theNPP (Net primary productivity) of different ecosystems; 3) According to NPP and statistical data, ecological capital of different ecosystems was computed and applied into local socio-economic analysis.

The results showed that 1) the area of woodland, paddy field, shrub and bare land was about 87% of the total area of Huzhou on average in the past four years, and the proportion of grassland, water/wetland and dry land was about 13%. The area of woodland has been continuously decreasing. Bare land, shrub land, grassland and dry land have been steadily increasing, and the paddy land has been increasing in fluctuation. Water/wetland has been decreasing in fluctuation. 2) The average ecological capital of Huzhou in the past four years was 203.33 million RMB·a-1, in which woodland made the main contribution at a rate of 73.22%. Ecological capital of different counties (districts) was ordered as: Anji County (91.76 million RMB·a-1) > Changxing County (41.33 million RMB·a -1) > Wuxing District (29.31 million RMB·a -1) > Deqing County (28.27 million RMB·a -1) > Nanxun District (12.66 million RMB·a -1). 3) The percentages of ecological capital to GDP from 2001 to 2004 were ranked as Anji County >Changxing County>Deqing County>Municipal Districts, and such percentages showed a decreasing trend in general (only the percentage in Municipal Districts in 2002 was slightly higher than that in 2001, but it has generally been decreasing in the four years). Ecological capital per capita and per area during the four years were ranked as Anji County>Deqing County>Changxing County>Municipal Districts, and it showed a contrary trend of change compared to that ofGDP. That is, the regions with higher-speed economic development usually had relatively fewer ecological resources per capita and per area, and relatively low proportion of ecological capital in GDP, but the pollution level per capita and per area was relatively high. The regions with relatively lower-speed economic development were just contrary to that of the higher ones. All these observations reflected a pervasive problem of the current mode of economic development in Huzhou, that is, higher-speed development of economics has caused serious environmental problems.

Cite this article

YU De-Yong, PAN Yan-Yan, LIU Xin, WANG Yan-Yan, ZHU Wen-Quan . ECOLOGICAL CAPITAL MEASUREMENT BY REMOTELY SENSED DATA FOR HUZHOU AND ITS SOCIO-ECONOMIC APPLICATION[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006 , 30(3) : 404 -413 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0054

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

References

[1] Bjorklund J, Limburg K, Rydberg T (1999). Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: an example from Sweden. Ecological Economics, 29,269-291.
[2] Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29,293-301.
[3] Chen ZX (陈仲新), Zhang XS (张新时) (2000). The benefit value of Chinese ecosystem. Chinese Science Bulletin (科学通报), 45,17-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387,253-260.
[5] Daily GC, S?derqvist T, Aniyar S, Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Ehrlich PR, Folke C, Jansson AM, Jansson BO, Kautsky N, Levin S, Lubchenco J, M?ler KG, Simpson P, Starrett D, Tilman D, Walker B (2000). The value of nature and nature of value. Science, 289,395-396.
[6] David P (1997). Ecological accountancy. Science, 387,253-260.
[7] Dixon J, Bakkes J, Hanilton K translated by Zhang KM (张坤民)) (1998). Expanding the Measure of Wealth: Indicators of Environmental Sustainable Development, (扩展衡量财富的手段——环境可持续发展指标). China Environmental Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[8] Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P (1998). Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science, 281,237-240.
[9] Holmund CM, Hammer M (1999). Ecosystem services generated by fish population. Ecological Economics, 29,253-268.
[10] Huang XW (黄兴文), Chen BM (陈百明) (1999). The theory and application about the regionalization of Chinese ecological assets. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19,602-606. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Wang XK (王效科), Miao H (苗鸿) (1999). A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19,607-612. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Pan YZ (潘耀忠), Shi PJ (史培军), Zhu WQ (朱文泉), Gu XH (顾晓鹤), Fan YD (范一大), Li J (李京) (2004). Quantitative measured ecological capital on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem based on remote sensed data. Science in China Ser. D (中国科学D辑), 34,375-384. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Pearce D, Atkinson G (1993). Capital theory and the measure of sustainable development: an indicator of weak sustainability. Ecological Economics, 8,103-108.
[14] Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH (2003). Improving the quality of environmental assessments using the concept of natural capital: a case study from southern Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63,93-108.
[15] Potter CS, Randerson JT, Field CB, Matson PA, Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Klooster SA (1993). Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global on global satellite and surface data. Global Biochemical Cycles, 7,811-841.
[16] Shi PJ (史培军), Pan YZ (潘耀忠), Chen YH (陈云浩), Li XB (李晓兵), Li J (李京), Jing GF (景贵飞), Xian ZK (鲜祖康), Zhang SY (张淑英) (2002). Technical system of ecological capital integrated measurement using multi-scale remotely sensed data. Advance in Earth Sciences (地球科学进展), 17,169-173. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] Vitousek P, Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH, Matson P (1986). Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. BioScience, 36,368-373.
[18] Wackernagel M, Lewan L, Hansson CB (1999). Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint: application in Sweden and subregions. AMBIO, 28,604-612.
Outlines

/

005-264X/bottom_en.htm"-->