[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Research Articles

AGGREGATION OF PLANT FUNCTIONAL TYPES BASED ON MODELS OF STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS

Expand
  • Laboratory of Integrated Landscape Analysis and Modeling, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received date: 2006-03-13

  Accepted date: 2006-06-22

  Online published: 2007-09-30

Abstract

Aims The issue of rationally classifying plant species into plant functional types at different scales has been a major challenge in ecosystem sciences, especially ecosystem simulation. A typical steppe in Inner Mongolia of China was chosen for study. We asked: 1) Can plant species be classified into several plant functional groups according to their ecophysiological characteristics of stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis? 2) Are there common ecophysiological traits of each plant functional group? 3) What are the advantages and disadvantages of this classification method in ecological modeling?

Methods Diurnal stomatal conductance and net photosynthetic rate of nine plant species were measured in the field during May, July, and late August 2005. Ecophysiological characteristics of these species were quantified by applying models of stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis to the field data. The models were fitted to the data to obtain model parameters for each species. The analysis showed that the model explained up to 55.87% and 78.19% of the variation in the stomatal conductance and net photosynthetic rate, respectively. Cluster analysis was then applied to identify plant functional types on the basis of the model parameters, which are regarded as ecophysiological traits of plant species.

Important findings Nine plant species were classified into three plant functional groups: 1) highly drought-resistant plants with moderate photosynthetic efficiencies, including Stipa krylovii, Heteropappus altaicus, Artemisia frigida, Convolvulus ammannii and Caragana microphylla; 2) medium drought-resistant plants with high photosynthetic efficiencies, including Leymus chinensis, Achnatherum splendens and Iris lacteal; 3) low drought-resistant plants with low photosynthetic efficiencies, including Phlomis mongolica. This study suggests that plant species in natural ecosystems can be classified into several plant functional groups using our methods. Therefore, the complexity of ecological models and calculation times can be reduced by substituting plant functional groups for individual species. Our approach can be an effective way to quantitatively distinguish plant traits, thus contributing to scaling up of ecosystem simulation.

Cite this article

ZHU Yu-Jie, GAO Qiong, LIU Jun-Shan, XU Xia, ZHOU Chan . AGGREGATION OF PLANT FUNCTIONAL TYPES BASED ON MODELS OF STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007 , 31(5) : 873 -882 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0110

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

References

[1] Allen TFH, King AW, Milne BT, Johnson A, Turner S (1994). The problem of scaling in ecology. Evolutionary Trends in Plants, 7,3-8.
[2] Box EO (1981). Macroclimate and Plant Forms: an Introduction to Predictive Modeling in Phytogeography. Dr.W.Junk Publishers, the Hague.
[3] Box EO (1996). Plant functional types and climate at the global scale. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7,309-320.
[4] Bugmann H (1996). Functional types of trees in temperate and boreal forests: classification and testing. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7,359-370.
[5] Campbell GS, Jungbauer JD, Shiozawa S, Hungerford RD (1993). A one-parameter equation for water sorption isotherms of soils. Soil Science, 156,302-305.
[6] Chen XD (陈旭东), Chen ZX (陈仲新), Zhao YX (赵雨兴) (1998). The determination of ecotone and the characteristics of biome on Ordos Plateau. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 22,312-318. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] Condit R, Hubbell SP, Forster RB (1996). Assessing the response of plant functional types to climatic change in tropical forests. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7,405-416.
[8] Cui XY (崔骁勇), Du ZC (杜占池), Wang YF (王艳芬) (2000). Photosynthetic characteristic of a semi-arid sandy grassland community in Inner Mongolia. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 24,541-546. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] Farquhar GD, Caemmerer SV, Berry JA (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149,78-90.
[10] Gao Q, Peng SL, Zhao P, Zeng XP, Cai X, Yu M, Shen WJ, Liu YH (2003). Explanation of vegetation succession in subtropical southern China in light of ecophysiological characteristics of plant species. Tree Physiology, 23,641-648.
[11] Gao Q, Reynolds JF (2003). Historical shrub-grass transition in the northern Chihuahuan Desert: modeling the effect of shifting rainfall seasonality and event size over a landscape gradient. Global Change Biology, 9,1475-1493.
[12] Gao Q, Yu M, Yang XS, Wu JG (2001). Scaling simulation models for spatially heterogeneous ecosystems with diffusive transportation. Landscape Ecology, 16,289-300.
[13] Gao Q, Zhang XS, Huang YM, Xu HM (2004). A comparative analysis of four models of photosynthesis for 11 plant species in the Loess Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 126,203-222.
[14] Gao Q, Zhao P, Zeng X, Cai X, Shen W (2002). A model of stomatal conductance to quantify the relationship between leaf transpiration, microclimate and soil water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25,1373-1381.
[15] Gitay H, Noble IR (1997). What are functional types and how should we seek them? In: Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FIeds. Plant Functional Types: Their Relevance to Ecosystem Properties and Global Change. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge,3-19.
[16] Haxeltine A, Prentice IC (1996). BIOME3: an equilibrium terrestrial biosphere model based on ecophysiological constraints, resource availability, and competition among plant functional types. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10,693-709.
[17] Haxeltine A, Prentice IC, Creswell ID (1996). A coupled carbon and water flux model to predict vegetation structure. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7,651-666.
[18] Holdridge LR (1947). Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science, 105,367-368.
[19] Epstein HE, Chapin FSⅢ, Walker MD, Starfield AM (2001). Analyzing the functional type concept in arctic plants using a dynamic vegetation model. Oikos, 95,239-252.
[20] Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002). Predicting the effects of environmental changes on plant community composition and ecosystem functioning: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology, 16,545-556.
[21] Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J, Forbes D (1997). Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12,474-478.
[22] Li GQ (李根前), Tang DR (唐德瑞), Zhao YQ (赵一庆) (2000). The biological property and ecological habit of Hippophae. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 20,892-897. (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] Li RP (李荣平), Liu ZM (刘志民), Jiang DM (蒋德明), Li XH (李雪华) (2004). Plant functional types and research methods. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 23(1),102-106. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] Lin ZF (林植芳), Peng CL (彭长连), Sun ZJ (孙梓健), Lin GZ (林桂珠) (2000). Effect of light intensity on the partitioning of photosynthetic electron transport to photorespiration in four subtropical forest plants. Science in China (Series C) (中国科学C辑), 30(1),72-77. (in Chinese)
[25] McGuire AD, Melillo JM, Kicklighter DW, Joyce LA (1995). Equilibrium responses of soil carbon to climate change: empirical and process-based estimates. Journal of Biogeography, 22,785-796.
[26] McKane RB, Rastetter EB, Shaver GR, Nadelhoffer KJ, Giblin AE, Laundre JA, Chapin FS (1997). Climatic effects on tundra carbon storage inferred from experimental data and a model. Ecology, 78,1170-1187.
[27] Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B Ⅲ, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993). Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature, 363,234-240.
[28] Neilson RP, King GA, DeVelice RL, Lenihan JM (1992). Regional and local vegetation patterns:the responses of vegetation diversity to subcontinental air masses. In: Hansen AJ, di Castri Feds. Landscape Boundaries. Springer-Verlag, New York.
[29] Ni J (倪健) (2001). Plant functional types and biomass of China at a regional scale. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 43,419-425. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30] Pan YD, McGuire AD, Melillo JM, Kicklighter DW, Sitch S, Prentice IC (2002). A biogeochemistry-based dynamic vegetation model and its application along a moisture gradient in the continental United States. Journal of Vegetation Science, 13,369-382.
[31] Prentice IC, Cramer W, Harrison SP, Leemans R, Monserud RA, Solomon AM (1992). A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography, 19,117-134.
[32] Ruan CJ (阮成江), Li DQ (李代琼) (2001). Stomatal conductance and influence factors of seabuckthorn in Loess Hilly Region. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 21,1078-1084. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] Shen ZH (沈泽昊), Zhang XS (张新时) (2000). A study on the classification of the plant functional types based on the topographical pattern of plant distribution. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 42,1190-1196. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] Sun GJ (孙国钧), Zhang R (张荣), Zhou L (周立) (2003). Trends and advances in researches on plant functional diversity and functional groups. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 23,1430-1435. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] Sun HZ (孙慧珍), Guo QX (国庆喜), Zhou XF (周晓峰) (2004). Classification attribute and approach of plant functional types. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 32(2),81-83. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] Tai PD (台培东), Guo SH (郭书海), Song YF (宋玉芳), Sun TH (孙铁珩), Li PJ (李培军) (2000). Comparison of physiological characteristics of different ecotype plants. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 1,53-56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[37] Tang HP (唐海萍), Jiang GM (蒋高明) (2000). Plant functional type and its significance in ecological research. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 11,461-464. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38] Thornley JM, Johnson IR (1990). Plant and Crop Modelling. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
[39] Weng ES (翁恩生), Zhou GS (周广胜) (2005). Defining plant functional types in China for global change studies. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29,81-97. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[40] Woodward FI, Cramer W (1996). Plant functional types and climatic changes: introduction. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7,306-308.
[41] Wu JG, Hobbs R (2002). Key issues and research priorities in 1andscape ecology:an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology, 17,355-365.
[42] Xu HM (许红梅), Gao Q (高琼), Huang YM (黄永梅), Jia HK (贾海坤) (2004). Photosynthetic characteristics of six plant species in a forest steppe of the Loess Plateau, China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28,157-163. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43] Yang JW (杨建伟), Han RL (韩芮莲), Wei YK (魏宇昆), Sun Q (孙群), Liang ZS (梁宗锁) (2002). Water relation and growth of seabuckthorn and poplar under different soil water content. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 22,579-586. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[44] Yu Q (于强), Xie XQ (谢贤群), Sun SF (孙菽芬), Wang TD (王天铎), Lu PL (陆佩玲) (1999). Advances in simulation of plant photosynthetic productivity and canopy evapotranspiration. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 19,744-753. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[45] Zhang SR (张守仁), Gao RF (高荣孚) (1998). Study on the stomatal ecophysiological characters of two new clones of Sect.Leuce. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 18,358-363. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[46] Zheng FY (郑凤英), Peng SL (彭少麟) (2003). Responses of plant stomatal conductance to elevated CO2 at different scales. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 22(1),26-30. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Outlines

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]