鼠尾草属不同物种的雄蕊杠杆机制对传粉者空间变异的进化响应
|
张勃, 孙杉, 方强恩, 白小明
|
Evolutionary response of staminal lever mechanism of different species in Salvia to spatial variation in pollinators
|
ZHANG Bo, SUN Shan, FANG Qiang-En, BAI Xiao-Ming
|
|
表2 鼠尾草各居群的传粉者组成、体型指标、访花模式和访花效率(平均值±标准误差)
|
Table 2 Pollinator assemblage and body morphometrics, modes and efficiency of pollination of different pollinator in each population of Salvia (mean ± SE)
|
|
居群Population | 传粉者 Pollinator assemblage | 传粉者大小 Pollinator’s body size (mm) | 相对频次 Frequency | 单花访花时间 Visit time per flower (s) | 访花率指数 Visitation rate index | 传粉方式 Pollination mode | 体长 Body length | 胸厚 Body thickness | 喙长 Tongue length | 毛地黄鼠尾草I S. digitaloides Population I | | | | | | | | Bombus friseanus ? | 15.97 ± 0.55 | 4.97 ± 0.08 | 4.33 ± 0.16 | 0.65 | 15.50 ± 1.92 | 2.36 | D/V | | B. personatus | 20.54 ± 0.91 | 5.27 ± 0.06 | 10.71 ± 1.21 | 0.09 | 2.55 ± 0.22 | 2.12 | D | | B. infrequens | 15.16 ± 0.76 | 4.40 ± 0.18 | 4.96 ± 0.82 | 0.26 | 17.1 ± 1.23 | 0.91 | D | 毛地黄鼠尾草II S. digitaloides Population II | | | | | | | | Psithyrus sp. ? | 23.11 ± 1.41 | 7.43 ± 0.27 | 5.17 ± 0.07 | 0.57 | 8.68 ± 0.90 | 3.94 | D | | B. lepidus | 13.55 ± 0.46 | 4.46 ± 0.16 | 3.70 ± 0.37 | 0.20 | 15.57 ± 1.20 | 0.77 | D/V | | B. infrequens | 14.78 | 4.46 | 3.02 | < 0.20 | - | - | D | 近掌脉鼠尾草 S. subpalmatinervis | | | | | | | | | B. friseanus ? | 16.60 ± 0.28 | 5.06 ± 0.12 | 4.49 ± 0.3 | 0.87 | 13.58 ± 0.91 | 3.84 | D/V | | B. personatus | 18.76 ± 1.32 | 5.28 ± 0.04 | 10.30 ± 1 | 0.10 | 4.21 ± 0.40 | 1.42 | D | | B. atrocinctus | 18.00 ± 0.15 | 5.96 ± 0.15 | 5.38 ± 0.09 | < 0.03 | - | - | D | 圆苞鼠尾草 S. cyclostegia | | | | | | | | B. friseanus | 14.14 ± 0.32 | 4.36 ± 0.16 | 4.44 ± 0.42 | 0.05 | 11.77 ± 0.75 | 0.24 | V/D | | B. personatus ? | 27.29 ± 0.96 | 7.22 ± 0.09 | 12.49 ± 1.01 | 0.90 | 3.53 ± 0.15 | 15.30 | D | | B. remotus | 17.61 ± 0.14 | 6.03 ± 0.08 | 6.29 ± 0.48 | 0.05 | 10.89 ± 1.54 | 0.28 | D |
|
|
|