高寒草甸退化过程中群落生产力和物种多样性的非线性响应机制研究
陈宁1,2,张扬建1,3,4,朱军涛1,*(
),李军祥5,刘瑶杰1,2,俎佳星1,2,丛楠1,黄珂1,王荔5
),李军祥5,刘瑶杰1,2,俎佳星1,2,丛楠1,黄珂1,王荔5
Nonlinear responses of productivity and diversity of alpine meadow communities to degradation
CHEN Ning1,2,ZHANG Yang-Jian1,3,4,ZHU Jun-Tao1,*(),LI Jun-Xiang5,LIU Yao-Jie1,2,ZU Jia-Xing1,2,CONG Nan1,HUANG Ke1,WANG Li5
),LI Jun-Xiang5,LIU Yao-Jie1,2,ZU Jia-Xing1,2,CONG Nan1,HUANG Ke1,WANG Li5
图6. 不同退化阶段高寒草甸的土壤含水量特征(平均值±标准误差)。不同字母表示处理之间有显著差异(p < 0.1)。Control, 对照, 无退化草甸; D1, 轻度退化草甸; D2, 中度退化草甸; D3, 重度退化草甸; D4, 极度退化草甸。
Fig. 6. The soil water content of alpine meadow in different degradation stages (mean ± SE). Different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.1). Control, non-degraded meadow; D1, mild degraded meadow; D2, moderate degraded meadow; D3, severe degraded meadow; D4, serious sandy meadow.
