科尔沁沙地封育恢复过程中植物群落特征变化及影响因素

王明明,刘新平,何玉惠,张铜会,魏静,车力木格,孙姗姗

How enclosure influences restored plant community changes of different initial types in Horqin Sandy Land

WANG Ming-Ming,LIU Xin-Ping,HE Yu-Hui,ZHANG Tong-Hui,WEI Jing,Chelmge ,SUN Shan-Shan

表2 科尔沁沙地不同类型封育沙地植物群落功能群重要值之间的Pearson相关系数

Table 2 Pearson’s correlation coefficient between important values of community functional groups in different types enclosed sandy land in Horqin Sandy Land

沙地 Sandy land 功能群 Functional group R p 沙地 Sandy land 功能群 Functional group R p MD AF vs AG -0.28 0.35 FD PL vs SH 0.33 0.28 MD AF vs SH -0.21 0.49 SG AF vs AG -0.72 <0.01 MD AG vs SH -0.11 0.72 SG AF vs PF -0.23 0.44 FD AF vs AG -0.28 0.36 SG AF vs PG -0.81 <0.01 FD AF vs PF -0.13 0.67 SG AF vs PL -0.17 0.58 FD AF vs PL -0.65 <0.05 SG AG vs PF 0.37 0.21 FD AF vs SH -0.71 <0.01 SG AG vs PG 0.22 0.47 FD AG vs PF -0.20 0.51 SG AG vs PL -0.14 0.64 FD AG vs PL -0.03 0.93 SG PF vs PG 0.14 0.64 FD AG vs SH -0.17 0.57 SG PF vs PL -0.04 0.90 FD PF vs PL -0.14 0.65 SG PG vs PL 0.53 0.14 FD PF vs SH -0.18 0.57 SG