干旱河谷微生境变化对乡土植物幼苗定植的影响
胡慧1,2, 杨雨1,2, 包维楷1, 刘鑫1, 李芳兰1,*(
)
)
Effects of microhabitat changes on seedling establishment of native plants in a dry valley
HU Hui1,2, YANG Yu1,2, BAO Wei-Kai1, LIU Xin1, LI Fang-Lan1,*()
)
图2. 干旱河谷不同微生境条件下二年生鞍叶羊蹄甲幼苗生物量(平均值±标准误差)。Bare, 裸地微生境; Semi-shrub, 半灌木微生境; Shrub, 灌木微生境。相同施肥条件下不同小写字母指示不同微生境之间差异显著(n = 15; p < 0.05)。*, 同一微生境类型中施肥效果显著(n = 15; p < 0.05); ns, 施肥效果不显著(n = 15; p > 0.05)。
Fig. 2. Biomass (means ± SE) of two-year old Bauhinia brachycarpa seedlings in different microhabitats in the dry valley studied. Bare, bare land microhabitats; Semi-shrub, semi-shrub microhabitats; Shrub, shrub microhabitats. Different lowercase letters within a fertile condition indicate significant differences among the microhabitats (n = 15; p < 0.05). *, significant difference between fertilized and unfertilized treatments (n = 15; p < 0.05); ns, non-significant difference between fertilized and unfertilized treatments (n = 15; p > 0.05).
