森林与灌丛的灌木性状揭示不同的生活策略
曹嘉瑜1, 刘建峰1, 袁泉1, 徐德宇1, 樊海东1, 陈海燕1, 谭斌1, 刘立斌1,2, 叶铎1,2, 倪健1,2,*(
)
)
Traits of shrubs in forests and bushes reveal different life strategies
CAO Jia-Yu1, LIU Jian-Feng1, YUAN Quan1, XU De-Yu1, FAN Hai-Dong1, CHEN Hai-Yan1, TAN Bin1, LIU Li-Bin1,2, YE Duo1,2, NI Jian1,2,*()
)
图1. 金华北山3种不同生境灌木的功能性状(平均值±标准误差)。
lmb, 低山灌丛; mtb, 山顶灌丛; uss, 林下灌木层。LA, 叶面积; LDMC, 叶干物质含量; LT, 叶厚度; LTD, 叶组织密度; SLA, 比叶面积; TBT, 小枝树皮厚度; TD, 小枝直径; TDMC, 小枝干物质含量; TTD, 小枝组织密度。不同小写字母代表差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 1. Shrub functional traits (mean ± SE) for three different habitats in Beishan Mountain of Jinhua, Zhejiang Province.
lmb, low mountain bushes; mtb, mountaintop bushes; uss, understory shrub layer. LA, leaf area; LDMC, leaf dry-matter content; LT, leaf thickness; LTD, leaf tissue density; SLA, specific leaf area; TBT, twig bark thickness; TD, twig diameter; TDMC, twig dry-matter content; TTD, twig tissue density. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
