不同管理模式对茶树碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量比的影响
尹晓雷1, 刘旭阳1, 金强1, 李先德2, 林少颖1, 阳祥1, 王维奇1,*(
), 张永勋2
), 张永勋2
Effects of different management methods on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents and their stoichiometric ratios in tea plants
YIN Xiao-Lei1, LIU Xu-Yang1, JIN Qiang1, LI Xian-De2, LIN Shao-Ying1, YANG Xiang1, WANG Wei-Qi1,*(), ZHANG Yong-Xun2
), ZHANG Yong-Xun2
图2. 不同管理模式下茶园碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)生态化学计量比特征(平均值±标准误)。M1, 常规模式; M2, 间作套种模式; M3, 配套现代技术模式。不同字母表示处理间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 2. Stoichiometric characteristics of carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in tea plantations under different management modes (mean ± SE). M1, routine management mode; M2, intercropping mode; M3, modern technology mode. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between treatments (p < 0.05).
