不同管理模式对茶树碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量比的影响
尹晓雷1, 刘旭阳1, 金强1, 李先德2, 林少颖1, 阳祥1, 王维奇1,*(
), 张永勋2
), 张永勋2
Effects of different management methods on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents and their stoichiometric ratios in tea plants
YIN Xiao-Lei1, LIU Xu-Yang1, JIN Qiang1, LI Xian-De2, LIN Shao-Ying1, YANG Xiang1, WANG Wei-Qi1,*(), ZHANG Yong-Xun2
), ZHANG Yong-Xun2
图5. 不同管理模式茶树碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)含量及其化学计量比与环境因子的综合相关关系。M1, 常规模式; M2, 间作套种模式; M3, 配套现代技术模式。BD, 土壤容重; Salinity, 土壤盐度; SWC, 土壤饱和含水量; TC, 土壤全碳含量; TN, 土壤全氮含量; TP, 土壤全磷含量; WC, 土壤含水量。
Fig. 5. Comprehensive correlation between carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) contents and their stoichiometry and environmental factors under three management modes. M1, routine management mode; M2, intercropping mode; M3, modern technology mode. BD, soil bulk density; SWC, soil saturated water content; TC, soil total C content; TN, soil total N content; TP, soil total P content; WC, soil water content.
