不同去趋势方法对基于Dendrometer数据的茎干水分动态分析的影响——以白扦为例
薛峰, 江源*(
), 董满宇, 王明昌, 丁新原, 杨显基, 崔明皓, 康慕谊
), 董满宇, 王明昌, 丁新原, 杨显基, 崔明皓, 康慕谊
Influence of different de-trending methods on stem water relations of Picea meyeri derived from Dendrometer measurements
XUE Feng, JIANG Yuan*(), DONG Man-Yu, WANG Ming-Chang, DING Xin-Yuan, YANG Xian-Ji, CUI Ming-Hao, KANG Mu-Yi
), DONG Man-Yu, WANG Ming-Chang, DING Xin-Yuan, YANG Xian-Ji, CUI Ming-Hao, KANG Mu-Yi
图3. 不同去趋势方法计算的山西芦芽山白扦茎干水分亏缺(TWD)。D, 日值法; GPZ, Gompertz生长模型; LG, 线性生长模型; SC, 茎干循环法; ZG, 零生长模型。虚线为平均值。
Fig. 3. Tree water deficit-induced stem shrinkage (TWD) of Picea meyeri on Luya Mountain, Shanxi Province, China, calculated by different detrending approaches. D, daily approach; GPZ, Gompertz model; LG, linear growth model; SC, stem cycle approach; ZG, zero growth model. Dashed lines indicate the average. DOY, day of the year.
