不同去趋势方法对基于Dendrometer数据的茎干水分动态分析的影响——以白扦为例
薛峰, 江源*(
), 董满宇, 王明昌, 丁新原, 杨显基, 崔明皓, 康慕谊
), 董满宇, 王明昌, 丁新原, 杨显基, 崔明皓, 康慕谊
Influence of different de-trending methods on stem water relations of Picea meyeri derived from Dendrometer measurements
XUE Feng, JIANG Yuan*(), DONG Man-Yu, WANG Ming-Chang, DING Xin-Yuan, YANG Xian-Ji, CUI Ming-Hao, KANG Mu-Yi
), DONG Man-Yu, WANG Ming-Chang, DING Xin-Yuan, YANG Xian-Ji, CUI Ming-Hao, KANG Mu-Yi
图5. 山西芦芽山白扦不同去趋势茎干水分亏缺(TWD)在不同月份的相关系数矩阵。D, 日值法; GPZ, Gompertz生长模型; LG, 线性生长模型; SC, 茎干循环法; ZG, 零生长模型。*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001。
Fig. 5. Correlation matrix of tree water deficit-induced stem shrinkage (TWD) relations of Picea meyeri on Luya Mountain, Shanxi Province, China, developed from different detrending approaches in different months. D, daily approach; GPZ, Gompertz model; LG, linear growth model; SC, stem cycle approach; ZG, zero growth model. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
