八个树种叶水力性状对水分条件的响应及其驱动因素
任金培, 李俊鹏, 王卫锋, 代永欣, 王林(
)
)
Responses of leaf hydraulic traits to water conditions in eight tree species and the driving factors
REN Jin-Pei, LI Jun-Peng, WANG Wei-Feng, DAI Yong-Xin, WANG Lin()
)
图2. 关帝山和黑茶山青杨、蒙古栎、榆树、山杏、山杨、落叶松、油松和云杉叶膨压丧失点水势(TLP)的比较(平均值±标准误)。G表示关帝山树种, H表示黑茶山树种。不同大写字母代表同一树种在不同地区的差异显著, 不同小写字母代表不同树种在同一地区的差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 2. Comparisons of water potential at turgor loss points (TLP) among Populus cathayana (Pc), Quercus mongolica (Qm), Ulmus pumila (Up), Armeniaca sibirica (As), Populus davidiana (Pd), Larix gmelinii (Lg), Pinus tabuliformis (Pt) and Picea asperata (Pa) in Guandi Mountain and Heicha Mountain (mean ± SE). G, trees in Guandi Mountain; H, trees in Heicha Mountain. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between the study areas within the same tree species; different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among tree species within the same area (p < 0.05).
