八个树种叶水力性状对水分条件的响应及其驱动因素
任金培, 李俊鹏, 王卫锋, 代永欣, 王林(
)
)
Responses of leaf hydraulic traits to water conditions in eight tree species and the driving factors
REN Jin-Pei, LI Jun-Peng, WANG Wei-Feng, DAI Yong-Xin, WANG Lin()
)
图3. 关帝山和黑茶山阔叶和针叶树种叶最大导水率(Kmax)、水力脆弱性(P50)和膨压丧失点水势(TLP)的比较(平均值±标准误)。G表示关帝山树种, H表示黑茶山树种。不同大写字母代表同一树种在不同地区的差异显著, 不同小写字母代表不同树种在同一地区的差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 3. Comparisons of maximum hydraulic conductivity (Kmax), hydraulic vulnerability (P50) and water potential at turgor loss points (TLP) between broadleaved and coniferous species and between Guandi Mountain and Heicha Mountain (mean ± SE). G, trees in Guandi Mountain; H, trees in Heicha Mountain. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between study areas within the same tree group; lowercase letters indicate significant differences between tree groups within the same study area (p < 0.05).
