梭梭和骆驼刺对干旱的适应策略差异
|
|
周洁, 杨晓东, 王雅芸, 隆彦昕, 王妍, 李浡睿, 孙启兴, 孙楠
|
Difference in adaptation strategy between Haloxylon ammodendron and Alhagi sparsifolia to drought
|
|
ZHOU Jie, YANG Xiao-Dong, WANG Ya-Yun, LONG Yan-Xin, WANG Yan, LI Bo-Rui, SUN Qi-Xing, SUN Nan
|
|
表2 干旱程度和物种对骆驼刺和梭梭功能性状的协同影响
|
Table 2 Collaborative influences of drought level and species on functional traits of Alhagi sparsifolia and Haloxylon ammodendron tested using two-way ANOVA
|
|
| 功能性状 Functional trait | 干旱程度×物种 Drought level × species | | F | p | 叶性状 Leaf trait | 叶厚或嫩枝叶直径 Leaf thickness or shoot diameter | 0.43 | 0.81 | | 叶面积 Leaf area | 0.30 | 0.75 | | 比叶面积 Specific leaf area | 8.91 | <0.01 | | 干物质含量 Dry matter content | 1.22 | 0.54 | 光合性状 Photosynthetic trait | 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate | 0.85 | 0.66 | | 气孔导度 Stomatal conductance | 1.89 | 0.39 | | 蒸腾速率 Transpiration rate | 0.01 | 0.99 | | 水分利用效率 Water use efficiency | 14.28 | <0.01 | 水力性状 Hydraulic trait | 叶水势 Leaf water potential | 6.46 | <0.05 | | 枝水势 Twig water potential | 5.23 | <0.05 | | 枝比导率 Twig specific hydraulic conductance | 2.11 | 0.17 |
|
|
|