梭梭和骆驼刺对干旱的适应策略差异
周洁, 杨晓东, 王雅芸, 隆彦昕, 王妍, 李浡睿, 孙启兴, 孙楠

Difference in adaptation strategy between Haloxylon ammodendron and Alhagi sparsifolia to drought
ZHOU Jie, YANG Xiao-Dong, WANG Ya-Yun, LONG Yan-Xin, WANG Yan, LI Bo-Rui, SUN Qi-Xing, SUN Nan
图5 骆驼刺(As)和梭梭(Ha)的性状之间的相关性。Cond, 气孔导度; Ks, 枝比导率; LA, 叶面积; LD, 叶直径; LDMC, 叶干物质含量; LP, 叶水势; LT, 叶厚; Pn, 净光合速率; SLA, 比叶面积; TP, 枝水势; Tr, 蒸腾速率; WUE, 水分利用效率。
Fig. 5 Correlation among functional traits of Alhagi sparsifolia (As) and Haloxylon ammodendron (Ha). Cond, stomatal conductance; Ks, twig specific hydraulic conductance; LA, leaf area; LD, leaf diameter; LDMC, leaf dry matter content; LP, leaf water potential; LT, leaf thickness; Pn, net photosynthetic rate; SLA, specific leaf area; TP, twig water potential; Tr, transpiration rate; WUE, water use efficiency.