亚高寒草甸群落结构决定群落生产力实例验证
李伟, 张荣*(
)
)
Case verification of community structure determining community productivity in subalpine meadow
LI Wei, ZHANG Rong*()
)
图3. 不同物种组合的群落地上生物量间的比较(平均值±标准误)。A, 单播群落。B, 2物种混播群落。C, 3物种混播群落。D, 各组合群落。DG, 鸭茅; EN, 垂穗披碱草; FS, 中华羊茅; MS, 紫花苜蓿。不同小写字母表示差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 3. Comparison between aboveground biomass of communities with different species combinations (mean ± SE). A, Monoculture community. B, Mixed sowing community of two species. C, Mixed sowing community of three species. D, Mixed sowing community of four species. DG, Dactylis glomerata; EN, Elymus nutans; FS, Festuca sinensis; MS, Medicago sativa. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
