中亚热带同质园不同生活型树种微量元素重吸收效率的差异
|
Variations of trace-elements resorption efficiency in leaves of different tree species as affected by life forms in a mid-subtropical common garden
|
图1. 中亚热带同质园8个树种成熟叶(A、C、E、G、I)和衰老叶(B、D、F、H、J)微量元素含量(平均值±标准误, n = 3)。DBL, 落叶阔叶树种(n = 9) ; EBL, 常绿阔叶树种(n = 12); EC, 常绿针叶树种(n = 3)。PM, 马尾松; CCam, 樟; CCar, 米槠; MM, 醉香含笑; ED, 杜英; LF, 枫香树; SS, 无患子; LCh, 鹅掌楸。不同小写字母表示不同树种间元素含量差异显著(p < 0.05)。 |
Fig. 1. Content of trace elements in green (A, C, E, G, I) and senescent leaves (B, D, F, H, J) of eight tree species in the common garden in mid-subtropical region (mean ± SE, n = 3). DBL, deciduous broadleaf species (n = 9); EBL, evergreen broadleaf species (n = 12); EC, evergreen coniferous species (n = 3). PM, Pinus massoniana; CCam, Cinnamomum camphora; CCar, Castanopsis carlesii; MM, Michelia macclurei; ED, Elaeocarpus decipiens; LF, Liquidambar formosana; SS, Sapindus saponaria; LCh, Liriodendron chinense. Different lowercase letters meant significant difference among tree species (p < 0.05). |
![]() |