树种菌根类型与根系性状对根际微生物网络复杂性的影响 |
郭李琦, 闫晓蕾, 曹磊, 高景, 刘瑞强, 周旭辉 |
Effects of mycorrhizal types and root traits of tree species on rhizosphere microbial network complexity |
GUO Li-Qi, YAN Xiao-Lei, CAO Lei, GAO Jing, LIU Rui-Qiang, ZHOU Xu-Hui |
图3 不同菌根类型树种根际微生物群落多样性(平均值±标准误)。AM, 丛枝菌根; EcM, 外生菌根。Am, 色木槭; AT, 青楷槭; BP, 白桦; EA, 卫矛; FM, 水曲柳; JM, 胡桃楸; LG, 落叶松; PA, 黄檗; PD, 山杨; PK, 红松; QM, 蒙古栎; UD, 春榆。不同小写字母代表不同树种间差异显著(p < 0.05)。 |
Fig. 3 Microbial diversity between different mycorrhizal types of tree species (mean ± SE). AM, arbuscular mycorrhiza; EcM, ectomycorrhiza. Am, Acer mono; AT, Acer tegmentosum; BP, Betula platyphylla; EA, Euonymus alatus; FM, Fraxinus mandshurica; JM, Juglans mandshurica; LG, Larix gmelinii; PA, Phellodendron amurense; PD, Populus davidiana; PK, Pinus koraiensis; UD, Ulmus davidiana var. japonica; QM, Quercus mongolica. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different tree species (p < 0.05). |
![]() |