[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]花对称性与植物花大小的变异性: 在高寒草甸植物群落检验Berg的假说
收稿日期: 2013-11-14
录用日期: 2013-12-26
网络出版日期: 2014-05-13
基金资助
国家自然科学基金青年项目(30900- 162);面上项目(31370402);中央高校基本科研自由探索项目(lzujbky-2013-102);甘肃省青年科技基金(1007RJYA006)
Flower symmetry and flower size variability: an examination of Berg’s hypotheses in an alpine meadow
Received date: 2013-11-14
Accepted date: 2013-12-26
Online published: 2014-05-13
植物花对称性与传粉系统密切相关, 花特征的变异性受到传粉者的选择作用。由于特化的传粉者对两侧对称的花的稳定选择, Berg假说认为两侧对称植物花大小的变异性比辐射对称植物的更低; 而且, 在传粉者的选择作用下花特征比植物营养特征明显有更低的变异性, 因为后者更易受环境影响。该文对青藏高原东部高山草甸植物群落的50种开花植物(包括19种两侧对称植物和31种辐射对称植物)的花和叶特征进行了测定和分析。结果表明不论是两侧对称植物还是辐射对称植物, 花大小的变异性都显著低于叶片大小的变异性, 表明传粉者对花施加的稳定选择有利于花的稳定性。但是, 辐射对称物种花大小的变异程度和两侧对称物种的相似, 即使在控制物种系统发育的影响后, 也没有发现显著的差异, 这与Berg假说不一致。高山生态系统中传粉者种类相对较少, 以熊蜂和蝇类为主, 传粉者的活动受局域气候环境影响较大, 因此传粉昆虫对植物花的选择作用强度可能有较大的变异性。
路宁娜,赵志刚 . 花对称性与植物花大小的变异性: 在高寒草甸植物群落检验Berg的假说[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014 , 38(5) : 460 -467 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00042
Aims Flower symmetry is closely related to pollination system and variations in flower traits are under the selection role of pollinators. Berg predicted that flower size varies much less in bilateral species than in radial species because of the stable and/or directional selection by pollinators, and that it should also show lower variability than vegetative organs which have relatively higher sensitivity to environments. We examined these so-called Berg’s hypotheses in an alpine meadow.
Methods By measuring the traits of flowers and leaves in 50 flowering plants in an alpine meadow in the eastern Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, we compared the coefficients of variations (CV) in flower size and leaf size between 31 radial and 19 bilateral species and also performed phylogenetically independent comparisons.
Important findings Our results were not completely consistent with the Berg’s hypotheses. The CV of flower size was significantly smaller than that of leaf size in both radial and bilateral species as predicted by Berg, indicating that pollinator-mediated stabilizing selection would benefit flower stability. But the CV of flower size did not differ between the bilateral and the radial species, which is inconsistent with the Berg’s hypothesis even if we controlled confounding effects of phylogenetic relatedness. The role of pollinators in alpine ecosystem where bumble bees and flies predominate is likely more affected by local climatic environments, which leads to considerable variability in the selection of pollinators on flowers.
Key words: Berg’ hypothesis; bilateral symmetry; flower symmetry; phylogeny; radial symmetry
[1] | Armbruster WS, Stilio VSD, Tuxill JD, Flores TC, Runk JLV (1999). Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine neotropical plants: a re-evaluation of Berg’s correlation-pleiades concept. American Journal of Botany, 86, 39-55. |
[2] | Berg RL (1960). The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution, 14, 171-180. |
[3] | Bradshaw AD (1965). Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics, 13, 115-155. |
[4] | Campbell DR, Waser NM, Price MV, Lynch EA, Mitchell RJ (1991). Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corrolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution, 45, 1458-1467. |
[5] | Chase MW, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG, Morgan D, Les Donald H, Mishler BD, Duvall MR, Price RA, Hills HG, Qiu YL, Kron KA, Rettig JH, Conti E, Palmer JD, Manhart JR, Sytsma KJ, Michaels HJ, Kress WJ, Karol KG, Clark WD, Hedren M, Gaut BS, Jansen RK, Kim KJ, Wimpee CF, Smith JF, Furnier GR, Strauss SH, Xiang QY, Plunkett GM, Soltis PS, Swensen SM, Williams SE, Gadek PA, Quinn CJ, Eguiarte LE, Golenberg E, Learn GH, Graham SW, Barrett SCH, Dayanandan S, Albert VA (1993). Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 80, 528-580. |
[6] | Conner JK, Rush S (1996). Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia, 105, 509-516. |
[7] | Cronk Q, M?ller M (1997). Genetics of floral symmetry revealed. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 12, 85-86. |
[8] | Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979). The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford. |
[9] | Fenster CB (1991). Selection on floral morphology by hummingbirds. Biotropica, 23, 98-101. |
[10] | Gong YB, Huang SQ (2009). Floral symmetry: pollinator- mediated stabilizing selection on flower size in bilateral species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 4013-4020. |
[11] | Harder LD, Barrett SCH (1993). Pollen removal from tristylous Pontederia cordata: effects of anther position and pollinator specialization. Ecology, 74, 1059-1072. |
[12] | Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991). The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford. |
[13] | Healy S, Guilford T (1990). Olfactory-bulb size and nocturnality in birds. Evolution, 44, 339-346. |
[14] | Herrera J, Arista M, Ortiz PL (2008). Perianth organization and intra-specific floral variability. Plant Biology, 10, 704-710. |
[15] | Ingrouille M (1992). Diversity and Evolution of Land Plants. Chapman & Hall, London. |
[16] | Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983). The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37, 1210-1226. |
[17] | Li JK, Tang LL (2012). Progress in the study of floral symmetry. Biodiversity Science, 20, 280-285. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | [ 李交昆, 唐璐璐 (2012). 花对称性的研究进展. 生物多样性, 20, 280-285.] |
[18] | Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copscy L, Coen ES (1996). Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature, 383, 794-799. |
[19] | Meng JL, Zhou XH, Zhao ZG, Du GZ (2008). Covariance of floral and vegetative traits in four species of Ranunculaceae: a comparison between specialized and generalized pollination systems. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50, 1161-1170. |
[20] | M?ller AP, Birkhead TR (1992). A pairwise comparative method as illustrated by copulation frequency in birds. The American Naturalist, 139, 644-656. |
[21] | M?ller AP, Eriksson M (1994). Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in flowers: implications for sexual selection in plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 7, 97-113. |
[22] | Neal PR, Dafni A, Giurfa M (1998). Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems: terminology, distribution, and hypotheses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 345-373. |
[23] | Pélabon C, Osler NC, Diekmann M, Graae BJ (2013). Decoupled phenotypic variation between floral and vegetative traits: distinguishing between developmental and environmental correlations. Annals of Botany, 111, 935-944. |
[24] | Pérez-Barrales R, Arroyo J, Scott Armbruster W (2007). Differences in pollinator faunas may generate geographic differences in floral morphology and integration in Narcissus papyraceus(Amaryllidaceae). Oikos, 116, 1904-1918. |
[25] | Read AF (1991). Passerine polygyny: a role for parasites? The American Naturalist, 138, 434-459. |
[26] | Richards AJ (1997). Plant Breeding Systems. Chapman & Hall, London. |
[27] | Ridley M (1983). The Explanation of Organic Diversity: the Comparative Method and Adaptations for Mating. Oxford University Press, Oxford. |
[28] | Schemske DW, Horvitz CC (1989). Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. Evolution, 43, 461-465. |
[29] | Stebbins GL (1950). Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press, Cambridge, USA. |
[30] | Stebbins GL (1974). Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level. Belknap Press, Cambridge, USA. |
[31] | The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2009). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 105-121. |
[32] | Ushimaru A, Hyodo F (2005). Why do bilaterally symmetrical flowers orient vertically? Flower orientation influences pollinator landing behaviour. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 7, 151-160. |
[33] | van Kleunen M, Meier A, Saxenhofer M, Fischer M (2008). Support for the predictions of the pollinator-mediated stabilizing selection hypothesis. Journal of Plant Ecology, 1, 173-178. |
[34] | Wolfe LM (1992). Why does the size of reproductive structures decline through time in Hydrophyllum appendiculatum(Hydrophyllaceae)? Developmental constraints vs. resource limitation. American Journal of Botany, 79, 1286-1290. |
[35] | Wolfe LM, Barrett SCH (1989). Patterns of pollen removal and deposition in tristylous Pontederia cordata L.(Pontederiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 36, 317-329. |
[36] | Wolfe LM, Kristolic JL (1999). Floral symmetry and its influence on variance in flower size. The American Naturalist, 154, 484-488. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |