[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

植物生态学报 >

2022 , Vol. 46 >Issue 6: 656 - 666

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17521/cjpe.2022.0041

研究论文

植物特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林暗多样性的影响

展开
  • 1东北林业大学生态研究中心, 哈尔滨 150040
    2东北林业大学森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室, 东北亚生物多样性研究中心, 哈尔滨 150040
*(taxus@126.com) ORCID:金光泽: 0000-0002-9852-0965

收稿日期: 2022-01-25

  录用日期: 2022-04-21

  网络出版日期: 2022-04-27

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(32071533);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2572022DS13)

收起

Effects of plant characteristics and environmental factors on the dark diversity in a broadleaved Korean pine forest

Expand
  • 1Center for Ecological Research, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    2Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Northeast Asia Biodiversity Research Center, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China

Received date: 2022-01-25

  Accepted date: 2022-04-21

  Online published: 2022-04-27

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(32071533);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2572022DS13)

Fold

摘要

可能栖息��局域群落但在局部地区不存在的物种集合构成了暗多样性。为探究物种特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林内暗多样性的影响, 该研究利用比尔指数模型估计了黑龙江凉水国家级自然保护区的9 hm2阔叶红松(Pinus koraiensis)林动态监测样地内的主要组成物种的暗多样性概率。基于物种水平, 评估了耐阴性指数、重要值和暗多样性概率之间的相关性, 并分析了生活型和耐阴性对暗多样性概率的影响; 基于样方水平, 分析了群落完整性与环境因子、物种多样性的相关性。结果表明: (1)该样地物种的暗多样性概率平均值为77.79%, 对于乔木, 胡桃楸(Juglans mandshurica)的暗多样性概率最高, 为97.21%; 对于灌木, 暗多样性概率最高的是鸡树条(Viburnum opulus subsp. calvescens)和鼠李(Rhamnus davurica), 为98.01%。(2)暗多样性概率与重要值呈显著负相关关系, 耐阴性指数与重要值呈显著正相关关系。(3)乔木和灌木的暗多样性概率无显著差异, 喜光物种的暗多样性概率显著高于耐阴物种。(4)坡度和地面凹凸度均与群落完整性呈显著正相关关系; 土壤有机质含量、土壤速效钾(K)含量、土壤密度、土壤质量含水率、土壤pH、土壤有效氮(N)含量和土壤全N含量均与群落完整性无显著相关关系, 土壤体积含水率、土壤速效磷(P)含量、土壤全P含量均与群落完整性呈显著的负相关关系。物种多样性指数与群落完整性呈正相关关系。综上, 在阔叶红松林内喜光物种和稀有种的暗多样性概率较高, 坡度、地面凹凸度、土壤体积含水率、土壤速效P含量、土壤全P含量是导致群落完整性差异的主要环境因素; 群落完整性越高, 群落物种多样性越高。

关键词： 暗多样性; 群落完整性; 物种多样性; 耐阴性; 生活型; 环境因子

本文引用格式

彭鑫, 金光泽 . 植物特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林暗多样性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022 , 46(6) : 656 -666 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0041

Abstract

Aims A particular set of species that have the potential to inhabit a local community but are locally absent is called dark diversity. Our aim was to investigate the impacts of plant characteristics and environmental factors on the dark diversity in a broadleaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest.

Methods The study was conducted based on survey data of a 9-hm2 broadleaved Korean pine forest in the Liangshui National Nature Reserve of Heilongjiang Province. We estimated the dark diversity probability of main species by using the Beals index. The correlations between the shade tolerance index, importance value and dark diversity probability were evaluated, and the effects of life form and shade tolerance on dark diversity probability were analyzed at the individual level. The correlations between community completeness and environmental factors, and community completeness and species diversity were investigated at the plot level.

Important findings The results showed that: (1) Average dark diversity probability for these species in this plot was 77.79%. For arbors, Juglans mandshurica had the highest dark diversity probability of 97.21%; however, for shrubs, the dark diversity probability of Viburnum opulus subsp. calvescens and Rhamnus davuricawere the highest, at 98.01%. (2) The dark diversity probability was negatively correlated with the importance value. However, the shade tolerance index was positively correlated with the importance value. (3) There was no significant difference in the dark diversity probability between arbors and shrubs, but the dark diversity probability of shade-intolerant species was significantly higher than that of shade-tolerant species. (4) Slope and convexity were both significantly positively correlated with community completeness. Soil organic matter, soil available potassium, soil bulk density, mass moisture content, soil pH, soil available nitrogen, and soil total nitrogen were not significantly related to community completeness; however, soil available phosphorus, soil total phosphorus and volumetric moisture content were all significantly negatively correlated with community completeness. The correlations between the species diversity indices and community completeness were significantly positive. In short, the dark diversity probability of shade-intolerant species and rare species in the broadleaved Korean pine forest was relatively high. Slope, convexity, soil available phosphorus, soil total phosphorus and volumetric moisture content were the main environmental factors that significantly influenced community completeness. The higher the community completeness was, the higher the species diversity of the community.

Key words： dark diversity; community completeness; species diversity; shade tolerance; life form; environmental factor

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

[1] Addo-Fordjour P, Rahmad ZB (2015). Environmental factors associated with liana community assemblages in a tropical forest reserve, Ghana. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 31, 69-79.
[2] Anselin L (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
[3] Beals EW (1984). Bray-Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Advances in Ecological Research, 14, 1-55.
[4] Belinchón R, Hemrová L, Münzbergová Z (2020). Functional traits determine why species belong to the dark diversity in a dry grassland fragmented landscape. Oikos, 129, 1468-1480.
[5] Botta-Dukát Z (2012). Co-occurrence-based measure of species' habitat specialization: robust, unbiased estimation in saturated communities. Journal of Vegetation Science, 23, 201-207.
[6] Boussarie G, Bakker J, Wangensteen OS, Mariani S, Bonnin L, Juhel JB, Kiszka JJ, Kulbicki M, Manel S, Robbins WD, Vigliola L, Mouillot D (2018). Environmental DNA illuminates the dark diversity of sharks. Science Advances, 4, eaap9661. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aap9661.
[7] Brown JH (1984). On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. The American Naturalist, 124, 255-279.
[8] Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998). Principle of Geographic Information Systems. Oxford University Press, New York.
[9] Carmona CP, Pärtel M (2020). DarkDiv: Estimating dark diversity and site-specific species pools. [2021-10-18]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DarkDiv.
[10] Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1951). An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology, 32, 476-496.
[11] Dixon P (2003). VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 927-930.
[12] Fløjgaard C, Valdez JW, Dalby L, Moeslund JE, Clausen KK, Ejrnæs R, Pärtel M, Brunbjerg AK (2020). Dark diversity reveals importance of biotic resources and competition for plant diversity across habitats. Ecology and Evolution, 10, 6078-6088.
[13] Jucker T, Bongalov B, Burslem DFRP, Nilus R, Dalponte M, Lewis SL, Phillips OL, Qie L, Coomes DA (2018). Topography shapes the structure, composition and function of tropical forest landscapes. Ecology Letters, 21, 989-1000.
[14] Käber Y, Meyer P, Stillhard J, de Lombaerde E, Zell J, Stadelmann G, Bugmann H, Bigler C (2021). Tree recruitment is determined by stand structure and shade tolerance with uncertain role of climate and water relations. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 12182-12203.
[15] Körner C (2007). The use of “altitude” in ecological research. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 569-574.
[16] Lewis RJ, de Bello F, Bennett JA, Fibich P, Finerty GE, Götzenberger L, Hiiesalu I, Kasari L, Lepš J, Májeková M, Mudrák O, Riibak K, Ronk A, Rychtecká T, Vitová A, Pärtel M (2017). Applying the dark diversity concept to nature conservation. Conservation Biology, 31, 40-47.
[17] Lewis RJ, Szava-Kovats R, Pärtel M (2016). Estimating dark diversity and species pools: an empirical assessment of two methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 104-113.
[18] Mahdavi P, Akhani H, van der Maarel E,(2013). Species diversity and life form patterns in steppe vegetation along a 3000 m altitudinal gradient in the Alborz Mountains, Iran. Folia Geobotanica, 48, 7-22.
[19] Moeslund JE, Arge L, Bøcher PK, Dalgaard T, Svenning JC (2013). Topography as a driver of local terrestrial vascular plant diversity patterns. Nordic Journal of Botany, 31, 129-144.
[20] Moeslund JE, Brunbjerg AK, Clausen KK, Dalby L, Fløjgaard C, Juel A, Lenoir J (2017). Using dark diversity and plant characteristics to guide conservation and restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 1730-1741.
[21] Münzbergová Z, Herben T (2004). Identification of suitable unoccupied habitats in metapopulation studies using co-occurrence of species. Oikos, 105, 408-414.
[22] Niinemhts Ü, Valladares F (2006). Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecological Monographs, 76, 521-547.
[23] Noreika N, Pärtel M, Öckinger E (2020). Community completeness as a measure of restoration success: multiple-study comparisons across ecosystems and ecological groups. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29, 3807-3827.
[24] Nuñez CI, Raffaele E, Nuñez MA, Cuassolo F (2009). When do nurse plants stop nursing? Temporal changes in water stress levels in Austrocedrus chilensis growing within and outside shrubs. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 1064-1071.
[25] Odland A (2009). Interpretation of altitudinal gradients in South Central Norway based on vascular plants as environmental indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9, 409-421.
[26] Pärtel M, Szava-Kovats R, Zobel M (2011). Dark diversity: shedding light on absent species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26, 124-128.
[27] Pärtel M, Szava-Kovats R, Zobel M (2013). Community completeness: linking local and dark diversity within the species pool concept. Folia Geobotanica, 48, 307-317.
[28] Riibak K, Bennett JA, Kook E, Reier Ü, Tamme R, Bueno CG, Pärtel M (2020). Drivers of plant community completeness differ at regional and landscape scales. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 301, 107004. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107004.
[29] Riibak K, Reitalu T, Tamme R, Helm A, Gerhold P, Znamenskiy S, Bengtsson K, Rosén E, Prentice HC, Pärtel M (2015). Dark diversity in dry calcareous grasslands is determined by dispersal ability and stress-tolerance. Ecography, 38, 713-721.
[30] Riibak K, Ronk A, Kattge J, Pärtel M (2017). Dispersal limitation determines large-scale dark diversity in Central and Northern Europe. Journal of Biogeography, 44, 1770-1780.
[31] Ronk A, Szava-Kovats R, Pärtel M (2015). Applying the dark diversity concept to plants at the European scale. Ecography, 38, 1015-1025.
[32] Ronk A, Szava-Kovats R, Zobel M, Pärtel M (2017). Observed and dark diversity of alien plant species in Europe: estimating future invasion risk. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 899-916.
[33] Seddon PJ (2010). From reintroduction to assisted colonization: moving along the conservation translocation spectrum. Restoration Ecology, 18, 796-802.
[34] Shi BK, Gao WF, Cai HY, Jin GZ (2016). Spatial variation of soil respiration is linked to the forest structure and soil parameters in an old-growth mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest in northeastern China. Plant and Soil, 400, 263-274.
[35] Tang LL, Wang RX, He KS, Shi C, Yang T, Huang YP, Zheng PF, Shi FC (2019). Throwing light on dark diversity of vascular plants in China: predicting the distribution of dark and threatened species under global climate change. PeerJ, 7, e6731. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6731.
[36] Trindade DPF, Carmona CP, Pärtel M (2020). Temporal lags in observed and dark diversity in the Anthropocene. Global Change Biology, 26, 3193-3201.
[37] Valencia R, Foster RB, Villa G, Condit R, Svenning JC, Hernández C, Romoleroux K, Losos E, Magård E, Balslev H (2004). Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador. Journal of Ecology, 92, 214-229.
[38] Valladares F, Niinemets Ü (2008). Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 237-257.
[39] Veech JA (2013). A probabilistic model for analysing species co-occurrence. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22, 252-260.
[40] Wang XG, Ye J, Li BH, Zhang J, Lin F, Hao ZQ (2010). Spatial distributions of species in an old-growth temperate forest, northeastern China. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 40, 1011-1019.
[41] Wang YQ (1995). The Mixed Broadleaved-Korean Pine Forest. Northeast Forestry University Press, Harbin.
[41] [王业蘧 (1995). 阔叶红松林. 东北林业大学出版社, 哈尔滨.]
[42] Wen PY, Jin GZ (2019). Effects of topography on species diversity in a typical mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39, 945-956.
[42] [温佩颖, 金光泽 (2019). 地形对阔叶红松林物种多样性的影响. 生态学报, 39, 945-956.]
[43] Xu LN, Jin GZ (2012). Species composition and community structure of a typical mixed broadleaved-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest plot in Liangshui Nature Reserve, Northeast China. Biodiversity Science, 20, 470-481.
[43] [徐丽娜, 金光泽 (2012). 小兴安岭凉水典型阔叶红松林动态监测样地: 物种组成与群落结构. 生物多样性, 20, 470-481.]
[44] Xie J, Yan QL, Zhang T (2020). Temporal effects of thinning on the composition and growth of regenerated woody plants in Larix kaempferi plantations. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 2481-2490.
[44] [谢锦, 闫巧玲, 张婷 (2020). 间伐对日本落叶松人工林林下更新木本植物组成和生长影响的时间效应. 应用生态学报, 31, 2481-2490.]
[45] Zhou YL, Dong SL, Nie SQ (1986). Ligneous Flora of Heilongjiang. Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press, Harbin.
[45] [周以良, 董世林, 聂绍荃 (1986). 黑龙江树木志. 黑龙江省科学技术出版社, 哈尔滨.]
[46] Zhu Y, Cai HY, Jiang F, Jin GZ (2017). Variation of the biotic neighbourhood and topographic effects on tree survival in an old-growth temperate forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 28, 1166-1177.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]