植物特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林暗多样性的影响

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2022.0041

植物生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 656-666.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0041

植物特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林暗多样性的影响

彭鑫¹, 金光泽¹^,²^,^*()

¹东北林业大学生态研究中心, 哈尔滨 150040
²东北林业大学森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室, 东北亚生物多样性研究中心, 哈尔滨 150040

收稿日期:2022-01-25 接受日期:2022-04-21 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-04-27
通讯作者: 金光泽
作者简介:*(taxus@126.com) ORCID:金光泽: 0000-0002-9852-0965
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32071533);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2572022DS13)

Effects of plant characteristics and environmental factors on the dark diversity in a broadleaved Korean pine forest

PENG Xin¹, JIN Guang-Ze¹^,²^,^*()

¹Center for Ecological Research, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
²Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Northeast Asia Biodiversity Research Center, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China

Received:2022-01-25 Accepted:2022-04-21 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-04-27
Contact: JIN Guang-Ze
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32071533);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2572022DS13)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

可能栖息在局域群落但在局部地区不存在的物种集合构成了暗多样性。为探究物种特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林内暗多样性的影响, 该研究利用比尔指数模型估计了黑龙江凉水国家级自然保护区的9 hm²阔叶红松(Pinus koraiensis)林动态监测样地内的主要组成物种的暗多样性概率。基于物种水平, 评估了耐阴性指数、重要值和暗多样性概率之间的相关性, 并分析了生活型和耐阴性对暗多样性概率的影响; 基于样方水平, 分析了群落完整性与环境因子、物种多样性的相关性。结果表明: (1)该样地物种的暗多样性概率平均值为77.79%, 对于乔木, 胡桃楸(Juglans mandshurica)的暗多样性概率最高, 为97.21%; 对于灌木, 暗多样性概率最高的是鸡树条(Viburnum opulus subsp. calvescens)和鼠李(Rhamnus davurica), 为98.01%。(2)暗多样性概率与重要值呈显著负相关关系, 耐阴性指数与重要值呈显著正相关关系。(3)乔木和灌木的暗多样性概率无显著差异, 喜光物种的暗多样性概率显著高于耐阴物种。(4)坡度和地面凹凸度均与群落完整性呈显著正相关关系; 土壤有机质含量、土壤速效钾(K)含量、土壤密度、土壤质量含水率、土壤pH、土壤有效氮(N)含量和土壤全N含量均与群落完整性无显著相关关系, 土壤体积含水率、土壤速效磷(P)含量、土壤全P含量均与群落完整性呈显著的负相关关系。物种多样性指数与群落完整性呈正相关关系。综上, 在阔叶红松林内喜光物种和稀有种的暗多样性概率较高, 坡度、地面凹凸度、土壤体积含水率、土壤速效P含量、土壤全P含量是导致群落完整性差异的主要环境因素; 群落完整性越高, 群落物种多样性越高。

关键词: 暗多样性, 群落完整性, 物种多样性, 耐阴性, 生活型, 环境因子

Abstract:

Aims A particular set of species that have the potential to inhabit a local community but are locally absent is called dark diversity. Our aim was to investigate the impacts of plant characteristics and environmental factors on the dark diversity in a broadleaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest.

Methods The study was conducted based on survey data of a 9-hm² broadleaved Korean pine forest in the Liangshui National Nature Reserve of Heilongjiang Province. We estimated the dark diversity probability of main species by using the Beals index. The correlations between the shade tolerance index, importance value and dark diversity probability were evaluated, and the effects of life form and shade tolerance on dark diversity probability were analyzed at the individual level. The correlations between community completeness and environmental factors, and community completeness and species diversity were investigated at the plot level.

Important findings The results showed that: (1) Average dark diversity probability for these species in this plot was 77.79%. For arbors, Juglans mandshurica had the highest dark diversity probability of 97.21%; however, for shrubs, the dark diversity probability of Viburnum opulus subsp. calvescens and Rhamnus davuricawere the highest, at 98.01%. (2) The dark diversity probability was negatively correlated with the importance value. However, the shade tolerance index was positively correlated with the importance value. (3) There was no significant difference in the dark diversity probability between arbors and shrubs, but the dark diversity probability of shade-intolerant species was significantly higher than that of shade-tolerant species. (4) Slope and convexity were both significantly positively correlated with community completeness. Soil organic matter, soil available potassium, soil bulk density, mass moisture content, soil pH, soil available nitrogen, and soil total nitrogen were not significantly related to community completeness; however, soil available phosphorus, soil total phosphorus and volumetric moisture content were all significantly negatively correlated with community completeness. The correlations between the species diversity indices and community completeness were significantly positive. In short, the dark diversity probability of shade-intolerant species and rare species in the broadleaved Korean pine forest was relatively high. Slope, convexity, soil available phosphorus, soil total phosphorus and volumetric moisture content were the main environmental factors that significantly influenced community completeness. The higher the community completeness was, the higher the species diversity of the community.

Key words: dark diversity, community completeness, species diversity, shade tolerance, life form, environmental factor

彭鑫, 金光泽. 植物特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林暗多样性的影响. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 656-666. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0041

PENG Xin, JIN Guang-Ze. Effects of plant characteristics and environmental factors on the dark diversity in a broadleaved Korean pine forest. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2022, 46(6): 656-666. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0041

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2022.0041

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2022/V46/I6/656

图/表 1

参考文献 46

[1]	Addo-Fordjour P, Rahmad ZB (2015). Environmental factors associated with liana community assemblages in a tropical forest reserve, Ghana. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 31, 69-79. DOI URL
[2]	Anselin L (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
[3]	Beals EW (1984). Bray-Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Advances in Ecological Research, 14, 1-55.
[4]	Belinchón R, Hemrová L, Münzbergová Z (2020). Functional traits determine why species belong to the dark diversity in a dry grassland fragmented landscape. Oikos, 129, 1468-1480. DOI URL
[5]	Botta-Dukát Z (2012). Co-occurrence-based measure of species' habitat specialization: robust, unbiased estimation in saturated communities. Journal of Vegetation Science, 23, 201-207. DOI URL
[6]	Boussarie G, Bakker J, Wangensteen OS, Mariani S, Bonnin L, Juhel JB, Kiszka JJ, Kulbicki M, Manel S, Robbins WD, Vigliola L, Mouillot D (2018). Environmental DNA illuminates the dark diversity of sharks. Science Advances, 4, eaap9661. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aap9661. DOI URL
[7]	Brown JH (1984). On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. The American Naturalist, 124, 255-279. DOI URL
[8]	Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998). Principle of Geographic Information Systems. Oxford University Press, New York.
[9]	Carmona CP, Pärtel M (2020). DarkDiv: Estimating dark diversity and site-specific species pools. [2021-10-18]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DarkDiv.
[10]	Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1951). An upland forest continuum in the prairie-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology, 32, 476-496. DOI URL
[11]	Dixon P (2003). VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 927-930. DOI URL
[12]	Fløjgaard C, Valdez JW, Dalby L, Moeslund JE, Clausen KK, Ejrnæs R, Pärtel M, Brunbjerg AK (2020). Dark diversity reveals importance of biotic resources and competition for plant diversity across habitats. Ecology and Evolution, 10, 6078-6088. DOI PMID
[13]	Jucker T, Bongalov B, Burslem DFRP, Nilus R, Dalponte M, Lewis SL, Phillips OL, Qie L, Coomes DA (2018). Topography shapes the structure, composition and function of tropical forest landscapes. Ecology Letters, 21, 989-1000. DOI URL
[14]	Käber Y, Meyer P, Stillhard J, de Lombaerde E, Zell J, Stadelmann G, Bugmann H, Bigler C (2021). Tree recruitment is determined by stand structure and shade tolerance with uncertain role of climate and water relations. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 12182-12203. DOI URL
[15]	Körner C (2007). The use of “altitude” in ecological research. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 569-574. DOI URL
[16]	Lewis RJ, de Bello F, Bennett JA, Fibich P, Finerty GE, Götzenberger L, Hiiesalu I, Kasari L, Lepš J, Májeková M, Mudrák O, Riibak K, Ronk A, Rychtecká T, Vitová A, Pärtel M (2017). Applying the dark diversity concept to nature conservation. Conservation Biology, 31, 40-47. DOI PMID
[17]	Lewis RJ, Szava-Kovats R, Pärtel M (2016). Estimating dark diversity and species pools: an empirical assessment of two methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 104-113. DOI URL
[18]	Mahdavi P, Akhani H, van der Maarel E,(2013). Species diversity and life form patterns in steppe vegetation along a 3000 m altitudinal gradient in the Alborz Mountains, Iran. Folia Geobotanica, 48, 7-22. DOI URL
[19]	Moeslund JE, Arge L, Bøcher PK, Dalgaard T, Svenning JC (2013). Topography as a driver of local terrestrial vascular plant diversity patterns. Nordic Journal of Botany, 31, 129-144. DOI URL
[20]	Moeslund JE, Brunbjerg AK, Clausen KK, Dalby L, Fløjgaard C, Juel A, Lenoir J (2017). Using dark diversity and plant characteristics to guide conservation and restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 1730-1741. DOI URL
[21]	Münzbergová Z, Herben T (2004). Identification of suitable unoccupied habitats in metapopulation studies using co-occurrence of species. Oikos, 105, 408-414. DOI URL
[22]	Niinemets Ü, Valladares F (2006). Tolerance to shade, drought, and waterlogging of temperate northern hemisphere trees and shrubs. Ecological Monographs, 76, 521-547. DOI URL
[23]	Noreika N, Pärtel M, Öckinger E (2020). Community completeness as a measure of restoration success: multiple-study comparisons across ecosystems and ecological groups. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29, 3807-3827. DOI URL
[24]	Nuñez CI, Raffaele E, Nuñez MA, Cuassolo F (2009). When do nurse plants stop nursing? Temporal changes in water stress levels in Austrocedrus chilensis growing within and outside shrubs. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 1064-1071. DOI URL
[25]	Odland A (2009). Interpretation of altitudinal gradients in South Central Norway based on vascular plants as environmental indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9, 409-421. DOI URL
[26]	Pärtel M, Szava-Kovats R, Zobel M (2011). Dark diversity: shedding light on absent species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26, 124-128. DOI URL
[27]	Pärtel M, Szava-Kovats R, Zobel M (2013). Community completeness: linking local and dark diversity within the species pool concept. Folia Geobotanica, 48, 307-317. DOI URL
[28]	Riibak K, Bennett JA, Kook E, Reier Ü, Tamme R, Bueno CG, Pärtel M (2020). Drivers of plant community completeness differ at regional and landscape scales. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 301, 107004. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107004. DOI URL
[29]	Riibak K, Reitalu T, Tamme R, Helm A, Gerhold P, Znamenskiy S, Bengtsson K, Rosén E, Prentice HC, Pärtel M (2015). Dark diversity in dry calcareous grasslands is determined by dispersal ability and stress-tolerance. Ecography, 38, 713-721. DOI URL
[30]	Riibak K, Ronk A, Kattge J, Pärtel M (2017). Dispersal limitation determines large-scale dark diversity in Central and Northern Europe. Journal of Biogeography, 44, 1770-1780. DOI URL
[31]	Ronk A, Szava-Kovats R, Pärtel M (2015). Applying the dark diversity concept to plants at the European scale. Ecography, 38, 1015-1025. DOI URL
[32]	Ronk A, Szava-Kovats R, Zobel M, Pärtel M (2017). Observed and dark diversity of alien plant species in Europe: estimating future invasion risk. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26, 899-916. DOI URL
[33]	Seddon PJ (2010). From reintroduction to assisted colonization: moving along the conservation translocation spectrum. Restoration Ecology, 18, 796-802. DOI URL
[34]	Shi BK, Gao WF, Cai HY, Jin GZ (2016). Spatial variation of soil respiration is linked to the forest structure and soil parameters in an old-growth mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest in northeastern China. Plant and Soil, 400, 263-274. DOI URL
[35]	Tang LL, Wang RX, He KS, Shi C, Yang T, Huang YP, Zheng PF, Shi FC (2019). Throwing light on dark diversity of vascular plants in China: predicting the distribution of dark and threatened species under global climate change. PeerJ, 7, e6731. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6731. DOI URL
[36]	Trindade DPF, Carmona CP, Pärtel M (2020). Temporal lags in observed and dark diversity in the Anthropocene. Global Change Biology, 26, 3193-3201. DOI PMID
[37]	Valencia R, Foster RB, Villa G, Condit R, Svenning JC, Hernández C, Romoleroux K, Losos E, Magård E, Balslev H (2004). Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador. Journal of Ecology, 92, 214-229. DOI URL
[38]	Valladares F, Niinemets Ü (2008). Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 237-257. DOI URL
[39]	Veech JA (2013). A probabilistic model for analysing species co-occurrence. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22, 252-260. DOI URL
[40]	Wang XG, Ye J, Li BH, Zhang J, Lin F, Hao ZQ (2010). Spatial distributions of species in an old-growth temperate forest, northeastern China. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 40, 1011-1019. DOI URL
[41]	Wang YQ (1995). The Mixed Broadleaved-Korean Pine Forest. Northeast Forestry University Press, Harbin.
	[王业蘧 (1995). 阔叶红松林. 东北林业大学出版社, 哈尔滨.]
[42]	Wen PY, Jin GZ (2019). Effects of topography on species diversity in a typical mixed broadleaved-Korean pine forest. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39, 945-956.
	[温佩颖, 金光泽 (2019). 地形对阔叶红松林物种多样性的影响. 生态学报, 39, 945-956.]
[43]	Xu LN, Jin GZ (2012). Species composition and community structure of a typical mixed broadleaved-Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forest plot in Liangshui Nature Reserve, Northeast China. Biodiversity Science, 20, 470-481. DOI
	[徐丽娜, 金光泽 (2012). 小兴安岭凉水典型阔叶红松林动态监测样地: 物种组成与群落结构. 生物多样性, 20, 470-481.] DOI
[44]	Xie J, Yan QL, Zhang T (2020). Temporal effects of thinning on the composition and growth of regenerated woody plants in Larix kaempferi plantations. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 2481-2490.
	[谢锦, 闫巧玲, 张婷 (2020). 间伐对日本落叶松人工林林下更新木本植物组成和生长影响的时间效应. 应用生态学报, 31, 2481-2490.] DOI
[45]	Zhou YL, Dong SL, Nie SQ (1986). Ligneous Flora of Heilongjiang. Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press, Harbin.
	[周以良, 董世林, 聂绍荃 (1986). 黑龙江树木志. 黑龙江省科学技术出版社, 哈尔滨.]
[46]	Zhu Y, Cai HY, Jiang F, Jin GZ (2017). Variation of the biotic neighbourhood and topographic effects on tree survival in an old-growth temperate forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 28, 1166-1177. DOI URL

植物特性和环境因子对阔叶红松林暗多样性的影响

Effects of plant characteristics and environmental factors on the dark diversity in a broadleaved Korean pine forest

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨元合张典业魏斌刘洋冯雪徽毛超徐玮婕贺美王璐郑志虎王媛媛陈蕾伊彭云峰. 草地群落多样性和生态系统碳氮循环对氮输入的非线性响应及其机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 0-0.
[2]	郑宁, 李素英, 王鑫厅, 吕世海, 赵鹏程, 臧琛, 许玉珑, 何静, 秦文昊, 高恒睿. 基于环境因子对叶绿素影响的典型草原植物生活型优势研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 951-960.
[3]	董六文, 任正炜, 张蕊, 谢晨笛, 周小龙. 功能多样性比物种多样性更好解释氮添加对高寒草地生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(8): 871-881.
[4]	曾凯娜, 孙浩然, 申益春, 任明迅. 海南羊山湿地的传粉网络及其季节动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(7): 775-784.
[5]	翟江维, 林馨慧, 武瑞哲, 徐义昕, 靳豪豪, 金光泽, 刘志理. 小兴安岭不同功能型阔叶植物的柄叶权衡[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(6): 700-711.
[6]	王子龙, 胡斌, 包维楷, 李芳兰, 胡慧, 韦丹丹, 杨婷惠, 黎小娟. 西南干旱河谷植物群落组分生物量的纬度格局及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(5): 539-551.
[7]	师斌, 窦建德, 黄维, 李小伟. 宁夏贺兰山斑子麻黄荒漠群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 362-367.
[8]	陈丽, 田新民, 任正炜, 董六文, 谢晨笛, 周小龙. 养分添加对天山高寒草地植物多样性和地上生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(3): 280-289.
[9]	张义, 程杰, 苏纪帅, 程积民. 长期封育演替下典型草原植物群落生产力与多样性关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 176-187.
[10]	郝建锋, 周润惠, 姚小兰, 喻静, 陈聪琳, 向琳, 王姚瑶, 苏天成, 齐锦秋. 二代野猪放牧对夹金山针阔混交林物种多样性与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(2): 197-207.
[11]	王俐爽同小娟孟平张劲松刘沛荣李俊张静茹周宇. 辽西半干旱地区两种典型人工林生态系统能量通量及蒸散特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(12): 1508-1522.
[12]	宋语涵, 张鹏, 金光泽. 阔叶红松林不同演替阶段灌木叶片碳氮磷化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(9): 952-960.
[13]	黄杰, 李晓玲, 王雪松, 杨进, 黄成名. 三峡库区不同消落带下中华蚊母树群落特征及其与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(8): 844-859.
[14]	罗明没, 陈悦, 杨刚, 胡斌, 李玮, 陈槐. 若尔盖退化泥炭地土壤原核微生物群落结构对水位恢复的短期响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(5): 552-561.
[15]	汪子微, 万松泽, 蒋洪毛, 胡扬, 马书琴, 陈有超, 鲁旭阳. 青藏高原不同高寒草地类型土壤酶活性及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(5): 528-538.