[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]模拟酸雨对入侵植物豚草与伴生种鬼针草竞争关系的影响
收稿日期: 2022-04-25
录用日期: 2022-05-05
网络出版日期: 2022-05-16
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(31700326)
Effects of simulated acid rain on the competitive relationship between invasive Ambrosia artemisiifolia and its co-occurring indigenous forb Bidens bipinnata
Received date: 2022-04-25
Accepted date: 2022-05-05
Online published: 2022-05-16
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(31700326)
植物种间相互作用对物种的生存至关重要。对于入侵植物而言, 更强的种间竞争能力是其成功入侵的重要机制。然而, 环境条件的变化可能会改变种间关系并影响植物入侵的最终结果。该研究主要探索当今严重的环境问题之一——酸雨对中国入侵植物豚草(Ambrosia artemisiifolia)和伴生本地种鬼针草(Bidens bipinnata)种间相互作用的影响, 进一步了解环境扰动对生物入侵的影响。该研究于2021年3月在北京师范大学室外条件下对豚草和鬼针草开展de Wit替代竞争实验, 并施加不同浓度的酸雨模拟溶液(pH = 3、4、5、7), 记录植株在第24、34、45天的株高以及生长季结束时的株高和地上生物量, 通过计算相对邻株效应指数(RNE)并绘制取代系列图表来评估两者的竞争关系。主要结果如下: 单一种植时, 中浓度酸雨(pH = 4)促进了豚草和鬼针草的早期生长, 而高浓度酸雨(pH = 3)显著抑制了两者的早期生长, 但不影响生长季结束时的株高。混合种植时, 高浓度酸雨(pH = 3)显著降低了豚草在第34、45天时的株高, 但在生长季结束时对豚草无影响, 而鬼针草在生长季结束时株高显著降低。鬼针草相对豚草的RNE在任何酸浓度下都不显著。而豚草相对鬼针草的RNE在无酸雨条件下显著, 酸雨处理时在鬼针草比例较低时显著。取代系列实验图表显示, 低浓度酸雨(pH = 5)增加了在低豚草比例下的鬼针草的竞争优势, 而高浓度酸雨增强了豚草的竞争优势。该研究表明酸雨显著影响了豚草和鬼针草的生长及种间竞争关系, 高浓度酸雨增加了入侵植物豚草的竞争优势。
柳牧青, 杨小凤, 石钰铭, 刘雨薇, 李小蒙, 廖万金 . 模拟酸雨对入侵植物豚草与伴生种鬼针草竞争关系的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022 , 46(8) : 932 -940 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2022.0164
Aims The interspecific interactions between plants are vital for species survival. For biological invaders, stronger competitive ability allows them to invade successfully when appearing with indigenous species, which is considered as an important mechanism underlying successful invasion. However, environmental changes may alter interspecific interactions, thus impacting invasion consequences. In this study, we aimed to explore the effect of acid rain, which is a seriously environmental problem worldwide, on the interactions between a Chinese invader common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and its accompanying indigenous forb (Bidens bipinnata) to further explore the role of an environmental disturbance in biological invasions.
Methods In March 2021, we performed a de Wit replacement competitive experiment with A. artemisiifolia and B. bipinnata at the campus of Beijing Normal University; meanwhile we also simulated acid rain through providing different concentrations of solutions (pH = 3, 4, 5, 7). Plant height after 24, 34, 45 days, final plant height, and aboveground biomass were determined for each individual plant. Relative neighbor effect (RNE) and replacement diagrams were used to estimate interspecific competition.
Important findings When the two species were planted separately, the medium level of an acid solution (pH = 4) promoted their early growth, and the high level of an acid solution (pH = 3) significantly inhibited their early growth but did not affect the final plant height. When grown together, the ragweed showed a decrease in plant height in the presence of the high level of an acid solution (pH = 3) after 34 and 45 days, but this negative effect disappeared at harvest. The plant height of bidens applied with the high level of an acid solution (pH = 3) decreased significantly at harvest compared with the control treatment. The RNE of bidens on ragweed was not significant under all the treatments, while the RNE of ragweed on bidens was significant without acid application or under the condition of acid treatments at a lower proportion of bidens. Replacement diagrams showed that the bidens had an advantage over ragweed when applied with the low level of an acid solution (pH = 5) at higher proportions, and the ragweed had an enhanced advantage over bidens when applied with the high level of an acid solution (pH = 3). Our study suggests that acid rain might affect the growth of ragweed and bidens as well as their interactions, and acid rain with low pH may boost the competitive advantage of invasive ragweed.
[1] | Barnes ER, Jhala AJ, Knezevic SZ, Sikkema PH, Lindquist JL (2019). Soybean and common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) growth in monoculture and mixture. Weed Technology, 33, 481-489. |
[2] | Blossey B, Notzold R (1995). Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology, 83, 887-889. |
[3] | Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005). Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia, 144, 1-11. |
[4] | Bottollier-Curtet M, Planty-Tabacchi AM, Tabacchi E (2013). Competition between young exotic invasive and native dominant plant species: implications for invasions within riparian areas. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24, 1033-1042. |
[5] | Chen H, Chen LJ, Albright TP (2007). Predicting the potential distribution of invasive exotic species using GIS and information-theoretic approaches: a case of ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) distribution in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52, 1223-1230. |
[6] | Čuda J, Skálová H, Janovský Z, Pyšek P (2015). Competition among native and invasive Impatiens species: the roles of environmental factors, population density and life stage. AoB PLANTS, 7, plv033. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plv033. |
[7] | Deng ZZ, Bai JD, Zhao CY, Li JS (2015). Advance in invasion mechanisms of Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Pratacultural Science, 32(1), 54-63. |
[7] | [邓贞贞, 白加德, 赵彩云, 李俊生 (2015). 外来植物豚草入侵机制. 草业科学, 32(1), 54-63.] |
[8] | de Vries W, Hettelingh JP, Posch M (2015). Critical Loads and Dynamic Risk Assessments: Nitrogen, Acidity and Metals in Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. |
[9] | Diagne C, Leroy B, Vaissière AC, Gozlan RE, Roiz D, Jarić I, Salles JM, Bradshaw CJA, Courchamp F (2021). High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature, 592, 571-576. |
[10] | Du EZ, Dong D, Zeng XT, Sun ZZ, Jiang XF, de Vries W (2017). Direct effect of acid rain on leaf chlorophyll content of terrestrial plants in China. Science of the Total Environment, 605- 606, 764-769. |
[11] | Duan L, Chen X, Ma XX, Zhao B, Larssen T, Wang SX, Ye ZX (2016). Atmospheric S and N deposition relates to increasing riverine transport of S and N in southwest China: implications for soil acidification. Environmental Pollution, 218, 1191-1199. |
[12] | Ferenc V, Merkert C, Zilles F, Sheppard CS (2021). Native and alien species suffer from late arrival, while negative effects of multiple alien species on natives vary. Oecologia, 197, 271-281. |
[13] | Fu XP, Tian DL (2006). Research progress of the effect of acid rain on plant. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 21(4), 23-27. |
[13] | [付晓萍, 田大伦 (2006). 酸雨对植物的影响研究进展. 西北林学院学报, 21(4), 23-27.] |
[14] | Gioria M, Osborne BA (2014). Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 501. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00501. |
[15] | Jolliffe PA (2000). The replacement series. Journal of Ecology, 88, 371-385. |
[16] | Keddy P, Gaudet C, Fraser LH (2000). Effects of low and high nutrients on the competitive hierarchy of 26 shoreline plants. Journal of Ecology, 88, 413-423. |
[17] | King WM, Wilson JB (2006). Differentiation between native and exotic plant species from a dry grassland: fundamental responses to resource availability, and growth rates. Austral Ecology, 31, 996-1004. |
[18] | Lee Y, Park J, Im K, Kim K, Lee J, Lee K, Park JA, Lee TK, Park DS, Yang JS, Kim D, Lee S (2006). Arabidopsis leaf necrosis caused by simulated acid rain is related to the salicylic acid signaling pathway. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 44, 38-42. |
[19] | Leskovšek R, Datta A, Simončič A, Knezevic SZ (2012a). Influence of nitrogen and plant density on the growth and seed production of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.). Journal of Pest Science, 85, 527-539. |
[20] | Leskovšek R, Eler K, Batič F, Simončič A (2012b). The influence of nitrogen, water and competition on the vegetative and reproductive growth of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.). Plant Ecology, 213, 769-781. |
[21] | Liao ZY, Peng SL (2007). Effects of acid rain on the invasion of non-native plants. Ecology and Environment, 16, 639-643. |
[21] | [廖周瑜, 彭少麟 (2007). 酸雨对外来植物入侵的影响. 生态环境, 16, 639-643.] |
[22] | Liu XJ, Duan L, Mo JM, Du EZ, Shen JL, Lu XK, Zhang Y, Zhou XB, He CE, Zhang FS (2011). Nitrogen deposition and its ecological impact in China: an overview. Environmental Pollution, 159, 2251-2264. |
[23] | Liu ZQ, Yang JY, Zhang JE, Xiang HM, Wei H (2019). A bibliometric analysis of research on acid rain. Sustainability, 11, 3077. DOI: 10.3390/su11113077. |
[24] | Markham JH, Chanway CP (1996). Measuring plant neighbour effects. Functional Ecology, 10, 548-549. |
[25] | Moura RF, Queiroga D, Vilela E, Moraes AP (2021). Polyploidy and high environmental tolerance increase the invasive success of plants. Journal of Plant Research, 134, 105-114. |
[26] | Pabian SE, Ermer NM, Tzilkowski WM, Brittingham MC (2012). Effects of liming on forage availability and nutrient content in a forest impacted by acid rain. PLOS ONE, 7, e39755. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039755. |
[27] | Paudel S, Milleville A, Battaglia LL (2018). Responses of native and invasive floating aquatic plant communities to salinity and desiccation stress in the southeastern US coastal floodplain forests. Estuaries and Coasts, 41, 2331-2339. |
[28] | Pejchar L, Mooney HA (2009). Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 497-504. |
[29] | Price JN, Berney PJ, Ryder D, Whalley RDB, Gross CL (2011). Disturbance governs dominance of an invasive forb in a temporary wetland. Oecologia, 167, 759-769. |
[30] | Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2010). Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 25-55. |
[31] | Rauch BJ, Bellinder RR, Brainard DC (2007). Using common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) control as a basis for reduction of fomesafen use in snap and dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technology, 21, 623-628. |
[32] | Singh A, Agrawal M (2008). Acid rain and its ecological consequences. Journal of Environmental Biology, 29, 15-24. |
[33] | Torres C, Mimosa M, Ferreira MF, Galetto L (2013). Reproductive strategies of Datura ferox, an abundant invasive weed in agro-ecosystems from central Argentina. Flora, 208, 253-258. |
[34] | Vallano DM, Selmants PC, Zavaleta ES (2012). Simulated nitrogen deposition enhances the performance of an exotic grass relative to native serpentine grassland competitors. Plant Ecology, 213, 1015-1026. |
[35] | van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010). A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecology Letters, 13, 235-245. |
[36] | Wan FH, Xie BY, Yang GQ (2011) Invasion Biology. Science Press, Beijing. 291-311. |
[36] | [万方浩, 谢丙炎, 杨国庆 (2011). 入侵生物学. 科学出版社, 北京. 291-311.] |
[37] | Wan LY, Qi SS, Zou CB, Dai ZC, Ren GQ, Chen Q, Zhu B, Du DL (2019). Elevated nitrogen deposition may advance invasive weed, Solidago canadensis, in calcareous soils. Journal of Plant Ecology, 12, 846-856. |
[38] | Wang CY, Wu BD, Jiang K, Zhou JW (2018). Differences in functional traits between invasive and native Amaranthus species under simulated acid deposition with a gradient of pH levels. Acta Oecologica, 89, 32-37. |
[39] | Wang JP, Dong LJ, Sang WG (2012) Effects of different nitrogen regimes on competition between Ambrosia artemisiifolia, an invasive species, and two native species, Artemisia annua and Artemisia mongolica. Biodiversity Science, 20, 3-11. |
[39] | [王晋萍, 董丽佳, 桑卫国 (2012). 不同氮素水平下入侵种豚草与本地种黄花蒿、蒙古蒿的竞争关系. 生物多样性, 20, 3-11.] |
[40] | Xu RM, Ye WH (2003). Biological Invasion, Theory and Practice. Science Press, Beijing. 26-40. |
[40] | [徐汝梅, 叶万辉 (2003). 生物入侵--理论与实践. 科学出版社, 北京. 26-40.] |
[41] | Yu Q, Duan L, Hao JM (2021). Acid deposition in China: sources, effects and control. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 41, 731-746. |
[41] | [余倩, 段雷, 郝吉明 (2021). 中国酸沉降: 来源、影响与控制. 环境科学学报, 41, 731-746.] |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |