[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology >
Fitting mitochondrial respiration rates under light by photosynthetic CO2 response models
Received date: 2014-03-21
Accepted date: 2014-05-10
Online published: 2015-04-16
Aims The objective of this study was to compare the values of respiration under light derived by fitting a photosynthetic CO2 response model and measurements, in order to provide information for model optimization.
Methods Using combined gas exchange measurements and a low O2 (2% O2) method, the responses of photosynthetic rate (Pn) to CO2 at different light intensities (2000, 1500, 1000 and 500 μmol·m-2·s-1) in the flag leaves of wheat were measured. The measured data were fitted by a biochemical model, a rectangular hyperbola model and a modified rectangular hyperbola model of the photosynthetic response to intercellular CO2 concentration (A/Ci) and air CO2 concentration (A/Ca), aiming to approach the reasonability of the fitted results obtained from the models.
Important findings The sequence of fitting effect of the three CO2 response models in descending order was as follows: modified rectangular hyperbola model > rectangular hyperbola model > biochemical model. Fitted values of A/Ca curve was more reasonable than A/Ci curve, because the photorespiration and mitochondrial respiration under light (Rd) estimated by the former better matched the measured values. However, there were significant differences in the whole between the fitted and measured values. The reason could be that the effect of CO2 concentrations on Rd and apparent photorespiration (Rpa) is neglected in all the current CO2 response models. Our results showed that CO2 concentration had a marked effect on Rpa and Rd. With increasing CO2 concentration, Rpa and Rd increased first, and then decreased sharply. Take 2000 μmol·m-2·s-1 for example, Rpa varied between 5.035 and 11.670 μmol CO2·m-2·s-1, and Rd varied between 0.491 and 2.987 μmol CO2·m-2·s-1. Regression analyses indicated that Rpa and Rd were well related to CO2 concentrations at different light intensities.
KANG Hua-Jing, TAO Yue-Liang, QUAN Wei, WANG Wei, OUYANG Zhu . Fitting mitochondrial respiration rates under light by photosynthetic CO2 response models[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2014 , 38(12) : 1356 -1363 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00130
| 1 | Bernacchi CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimentel C, Portis AR, Long SP (2001). Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment, 24, 253-259. |
| 2 | Berry JA, Downton WJ (1982). Environmental regulation of photosynthesis. In: Govindjee ed. Photosynthesis. Academic Press, New York. |
| 3 | Cai SQ, Xu DQ (2000). Relationship between the CO2 compensation point and photorespiration in soybean leaves. Acta Phytophysiol Sinica, 26, 545-550.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| 3 | [蔡时青, 许大全 (2000). 大豆叶片CO2补偿点和光呼吸的关系. 植物生理学报, 26, 545-550.] |
| 4 | Ethier GJ, Livingston NJ (2004). On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar- von Caemmerer-Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant, Cell & Environment, 27, 137-153. |
| 5 | Farquhar GD, Caemmerers S, Berry JA (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149, 78-90. |
| 6 | Guan XQ, Zhao SJ, Li DQ, Zhao XJ (2003). Photorespiration of C3 plant and its physiological function. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 23, 1849-1854.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| 6 | [管雪强, 赵世杰, 李德全, 赵新节 (2003). C3植物光呼吸及其生理功能. 西北植物学报,23, 1849-1854.] |
| 7 | Harley PC, Sharkey TD (1991). An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2: reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast. Photosynthesis Research, 27, 169-178. |
| 8 | Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1992). Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2 . Plant,Cell & Environment, 15, 271-282. |
| 9 | Kang HJ, Tao YL, Quan W, Ouyang Z (2013). Response of photorespiration of wheat flag leaf to light intensities and CO2 concentrations. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 33, 1252-1257.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| 9 | [康华靖, 陶月良, 权伟, 王伟, 欧阳竹 (2013). 小麦旗叶光呼吸对光强和CO2浓度的响应. 麦类作物学报,33, 1252-1257.] |
| 10 | Long SP, Bernacchi CJ (2003). Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 2393-2401. |
| 11 | Loreto F, Delfine S, Di-marco G (1999). Estimation of photorespiratory carbon dioxide recycling during photosynthesis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 26, 733-736. |
| 12 | Loreto F, Velikova VB, Marco GDA (2001). Respiration in the light measured by 12CO2 emission in 13CO2 atmosphere in maize leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 28, 1103-1108. |
| 13 | Peng CL, Lin ZF, Sun ZJ, Lin GZ, Chen YZ (1998). Response of rice photosynthesis to CO2 enrichment. Acta Photophysiologica Sinica, 24, 272-278.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| 13 | [彭长连, 林植芳, 孙梓健, 林桂珠, 陈贻竹 (1998). 水稻光合作用对加富CO2的响应. 植物生理学报, 24, 272-278.] |
| 14 | von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981). Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta, 153, 376-387. |
| 15 | Ye ZP (2010). A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO2. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 727-740.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| 15 | [叶子飘 (2010). 光合作用对光和CO2响应模型的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 34, 727-740.] |
| 16 | Ye ZP, Yu Q (2009). A comparison of response curves of winter wheat photosynthesis to flag leaf intercellular and air CO2 concentrations. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 2233-2238.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
| 16 | [叶子飘, 于强 (2009). 光合作用对胞间和大气CO2响应曲线的比较. 生态学杂志, 28, 2233-2238.] |
| 17 | Yin XY, Sun ZP, Struik PC, Gu JF (2011). Evaluating a new method to estimate the rate of leaf respiration in the light by analysis of combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 3489-3499. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |