Chin J Plant Ecol ›› 2014, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (12): 1356-1363.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00130
Previous Articles Next Articles
KANG Hua-Jing1,2,3,4, TAO Yue-Liang5, QUAN Wei4, WANG Wei4, OUYANG Zhu2,3,4,*()
Received:
2014-03-21
Accepted:
2014-05-10
Online:
2014-03-21
Published:
2015-04-16
Contact:
OUYANG Zhu
KANG Hua-Jing, TAO Yue-Liang, QUAN Wei, WANG Wei, OUYANG Zhu. Fitting mitochondrial respiration rates under light by photosynthetic CO2 response models[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(12): 1356-1363.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plant-ecology.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00130
Fig. 1 Apparent photorespiration rate (Rpa) in response to CO2 concentration (Ca) at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in flag leaves of wheat (mean ± SD).
Fig. 2 Recovery (Re-i) or inhibition (Ii) of photorespiratory CO2 in response to CO2 concentration (Ca) at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) (mean ± SD).
PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | |
光下呼吸速率 Pn0-21% | 6.843 ± 0.341a | 6.343 ± 0.762a | 6.536 ± 0.408a | 5.729 ± 0.499a |
光下暗呼吸速率 Pn0-2% | 1.934 ± 0.190c | 2.064 ± 0.091c | 2.164 ± 0.112c | 2.539 ± 0.285c |
表观光呼吸 Rpa0 | 5.035 ± 0.194b | 4.222 ± 0.832b | 4.330 ± 0.394b | 3.263 ± 0.544b |
Table 1 Measured values of photosynthetic rate in flag leaves of wheat at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) when CO2 concentration was 0 (μmol CO2·m-2·s-1) (mean ± SD)
PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | |
光下呼吸速率 Pn0-21% | 6.843 ± 0.341a | 6.343 ± 0.762a | 6.536 ± 0.408a | 5.729 ± 0.499a |
光下暗呼吸速率 Pn0-2% | 1.934 ± 0.190c | 2.064 ± 0.091c | 2.164 ± 0.112c | 2.539 ± 0.285c |
表观光呼吸 Rpa0 | 5.035 ± 0.194b | 4.222 ± 0.832b | 4.330 ± 0.394b | 3.263 ± 0.544b |
PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
A-Ci | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
B | 17.924 ± 1.250*# | 16.947 ± 0.908*# | 15.754 ± 1.200*# | 12.780 ± 0.905*# | |
C | 14.809 ± 0.279*# | 13.745 ± 1.117*# | 13.412 ± 0.744*# | 11.655 ± 1.154*# | |
A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
B | 8.745 ± 1.340*# | 8.335 ± 0.695*# | 8.769 ± 0.931*# | 7.245 ± 0.589*# | |
C | 7.743 ± 0.556*# | 6.907 ± 0.528* | 7.579 ± 0.570*# | 6.491 ± 0.616*# |
Table 2 Fitted values of mitochondrial respiration in flag leaves of wheat under light at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and 21% O2 (mean ± SD)
PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
A-Ci | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
B | 17.924 ± 1.250*# | 16.947 ± 0.908*# | 15.754 ± 1.200*# | 12.780 ± 0.905*# | |
C | 14.809 ± 0.279*# | 13.745 ± 1.117*# | 13.412 ± 0.744*# | 11.655 ± 1.154*# | |
A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577*# | 21.857 ± 0.378*# | 21.750 ± 0.500*# | 20.850 ± 1.226*# |
B | 8.745 ± 1.340*# | 8.335 ± 0.695*# | 8.769 ± 0.931*# | 7.245 ± 0.589*# | |
C | 7.743 ± 0.556*# | 6.907 ± 0.528* | 7.579 ± 0.570*# | 6.491 ± 0.616*# |
PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
A-Ci | A | 12.067 ± 0.808* | 12.286 ± 0.445* | 12.400 ± 0.783* | 11.350 ± 0.823* |
B | 8.293 ± 1.500* | 9.245 ± 1.093* | 9.320 ± 0.843* | 9.416 ± 1.475* | |
C | 6.099 ± 0.730* | 6.507 ± 0.913* | 6.609 ± 0.515* | 7.264 ± 0.561* | |
A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577* | 21.857 ± 0.378* | 21.750 ± 0.500* | 20.850 ± 1.226* |
B | 4.520 ± 1.118* | 5.022 ± 1.306* | 5.345 ± 0.828* | 4.919 ± 0.244* | |
C | 2.766 ± 0.564* | 3.323 ± 0.977* | 3.326 ± 0.554* | 3.798 ± 0.251* |
Table 3 Fitted values of mitochondrial respiration in flag leaves of wheat under light at different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and 2% O2 (mean ± SD)
PAR (μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 000 | 1 500 | 1 000 | 500 | ||
A-Ci | A | 12.067 ± 0.808* | 12.286 ± 0.445* | 12.400 ± 0.783* | 11.350 ± 0.823* |
B | 8.293 ± 1.500* | 9.245 ± 1.093* | 9.320 ± 0.843* | 9.416 ± 1.475* | |
C | 6.099 ± 0.730* | 6.507 ± 0.913* | 6.609 ± 0.515* | 7.264 ± 0.561* | |
A-Ca | A | 21.667 ± 0.577* | 21.857 ± 0.378* | 21.750 ± 0.500* | 20.850 ± 1.226* |
B | 4.520 ± 1.118* | 5.022 ± 1.306* | 5.345 ± 0.828* | 4.919 ± 0.244* | |
C | 2.766 ± 0.564* | 3.323 ± 0.977* | 3.326 ± 0.554* | 3.798 ± 0.251* |
1 | Bernacchi CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimentel C, Portis AR, Long SP (2001). Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment, 24, 253-259. |
2 | Berry JA, Downton WJ (1982). Environmental regulation of photosynthesis. In: Govindjee ed. Photosynthesis. Academic Press, New York. |
3 | Cai SQ, Xu DQ (2000). Relationship between the CO2 compensation point and photorespiration in soybean leaves. Acta Phytophysiol Sinica, 26, 545-550.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[蔡时青, 许大全 (2000). 大豆叶片CO2补偿点和光呼吸的关系. 植物生理学报, 26, 545-550.] | |
4 | Ethier GJ, Livingston NJ (2004). On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar- von Caemmerer-Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant, Cell & Environment, 27, 137-153. |
5 | Farquhar GD, Caemmerers S, Berry JA (1980). A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149, 78-90. |
6 | Guan XQ, Zhao SJ, Li DQ, Zhao XJ (2003). Photorespiration of C3 plant and its physiological function. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 23, 1849-1854.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[管雪强, 赵世杰, 李德全, 赵新节 (2003). C3植物光呼吸及其生理功能. 西北植物学报,23, 1849-1854.] | |
7 |
Harley PC, Sharkey TD (1991). An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2: reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast. Photosynthesis Research, 27, 169-178.
DOI URL PMID |
8 | Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1992). Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2 . Plant,Cell & Environment, 15, 271-282. |
9 | Kang HJ, Tao YL, Quan W, Ouyang Z (2013). Response of photorespiration of wheat flag leaf to light intensities and CO2 concentrations. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 33, 1252-1257.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[康华靖, 陶月良, 权伟, 王伟, 欧阳竹 (2013). 小麦旗叶光呼吸对光强和CO2浓度的响应. 麦类作物学报,33, 1252-1257.] | |
10 |
Long SP, Bernacchi CJ (2003). Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 2393-2401.
DOI URL PMID |
11 | Loreto F, Delfine S, Di-marco G (1999). Estimation of photorespiratory carbon dioxide recycling during photosynthesis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 26, 733-736. |
12 | Loreto F, Velikova VB, Marco GDA (2001). Respiration in the light measured by 12CO2 emission in 13CO2 atmosphere in maize leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 28, 1103-1108. |
13 | Peng CL, Lin ZF, Sun ZJ, Lin GZ, Chen YZ (1998). Response of rice photosynthesis to CO2 enrichment. Acta Photophysiologica Sinica, 24, 272-278.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[彭长连, 林植芳, 孙梓健, 林桂珠, 陈贻竹 (1998). 水稻光合作用对加富CO2的响应. 植物生理学报, 24, 272-278.] | |
14 |
von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981). Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta, 153, 376-387.
URL PMID |
15 | Ye ZP (2010). A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO2. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 727-740.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[叶子飘 (2010). 光合作用对光和CO2响应模型的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 34, 727-740.] | |
16 | Ye ZP, Yu Q (2009). A comparison of response curves of winter wheat photosynthesis to flag leaf intercellular and air CO2 concentrations. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 28, 2233-2238.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[叶子飘, 于强 (2009). 光合作用对胞间和大气CO2响应曲线的比较. 生态学杂志, 28, 2233-2238.] | |
17 |
Yin XY, Sun ZP, Struik PC, Gu JF (2011). Evaluating a new method to estimate the rate of leaf respiration in the light by analysis of combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 3489-3499.
DOI URL PMID |
[1] | Kangwei Jiang Qing-Qing QINGZHANG Wang Yafei Li Hong Ding Yu Yang Yongqiang Tuerxunnayi Reyimu. Characteristics of plant functional groups and the relationships with soil environmental factors in the middle part of the northern slope of Tianshan Mountain under different grazing intensities [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[2] | Zhiyang Zhang Yinghui Zhao Zhen Zhen. Dynamic monitoring of carbon storage of the terrestrial ecosystem in Songhua River Basin from 1986 to 2022 [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(预发表): 0-0. |
[3] | ZHANG Ji-Shen, SHI Xin-Jie, LIU Yu-Nuo, WU Yang, PENG Shou-Zhang. Dynamics of ecosystem carbon storage of potential natural vegetation in China under climate change [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(4): 428-444. |
[4] | PAN Yuan-Fang, PAN Liang-Hao, QIU Si-Ting, QIU Guang-Long, SU Zhi-Nan, SHI Xiao-Fang, FAN Hang-Qing. Variations in tree height among mangroves and their environmental adaptive mechanisms in China’s coastal areas [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(4): 483-495. |
[5] | WU Ru-Ru, LIU Mei-Zhen, GU Xian, CHANG Xin-Yue, GUO Li-Yue, JIANG Gao-Ming, QI Ru-Yi. Prediction of suitable habitat distribution and potential impact of climate change on distribution patterns of Cupressus gigantea [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(4): 445-458. |
[6] | WANG Fu-Biao, YE Zi-Piao. A review on light response models of electron transport rates of plant [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(3): 287-305. |
[7] | Zumureti YUSUFUJANG, DONG Zheng-Wu, CHENG Peng, YE Mao, LIU Sui-Yun-Hao, LI Sheng-Yu, ZHAO Xiao-Ying. Response of water use strategies of Tamarix ramosissima to nebkhas accumulation process [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2024, 48(1): 113-126. |
[8] | LI Bo-Xin, JIANG Chao, SUN Osbert Jianxin. Comprehensive assessment of vegetation carbon use efficiency in southwestern China simulated by CMIP6 models [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(9): 1211-1224. |
[9] | LI Wei-Bin, ZHANG Hong-Xia, ZHANG Yu-Shu, CHEN Ni-Na. Influence of diurnal asymmetric warming on carbon sink capacity in a broadleaf Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountains, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(9): 1225-1233. |
[10] | LI An-Yan, HUANG Xian-Fei, TIAN Yuan-Bin, DONG Ji-Xing, ZHENG Fei-Fei, XIA Pin-Hua. Chlorophyll a variation and its driving factors during phase shift from macrophyte- to phytoplankton-dominated states in Caohai Lake, Guizhou, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1171-1181. |
[11] | CHEN Xue-Ping, ZHAO Xue-Yong, ZHANG Jing, WANG Rui-Xiong, LU Jian-Nan. Variation of NDVI spatio-temporal characteristics and its driving factors based on geodetector model in Horqin Sandy Land, China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(8): 1082-1093. |
[12] | ZHONG Jiao, JIANG Chao, LIU Shi-Rong, LONG Wen-Xing, SUN Osbert Jianxin. Spatial distribution patterns in potential species richness of foraging plants for Hainan gibbons [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2023, 47(4): 491-505. |
[13] | SU Qi-Tao, DU Zhi-Xuan, ZHOU Bing, LIAO Yong-Hui, WANG Cheng-Cheng, XIAO Yi-An. Potential distribution of Impatiens davidii and its pollinator in China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(7): 785-796. |
[14] | CHEN Yi-Zhu, LANG Wei-Guang, CHEN Xiao-Qiu. Process-based simulation of autumn phenology of trees and the regional differentiation attribution in northern China [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(7): 753-765. |
[15] | XIONG Bo-Wen, LI Tong, HUANG Ying, YAN Chun-Hua, QIU Guo-Yu. Effects of different reference temperature values on the accuracy of vegetation transpiration estimation by three-temperature model [J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2022, 46(4): 383-393. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
Tel: 010-62836134, 62836138, E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn