植物生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 115-125.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0131 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2016.0131
所属专题: 中国灌丛生态系统碳储量的研究
收稿日期:2016-04-11
接受日期:2016-07-23
出版日期:2017-01-10
发布日期:2017-01-23
作者简介:* 通信作者Author for correspondence (E-mail:基金资助:
Yong-Kai LUO1,2, Jing-Yun FANG1, Hui-Feng HU1,*(
)
Received:2016-04-11
Accepted:2016-07-23
Online:2017-01-10
Published:2017-01-23
About author:KANG Jing-yao(1991-), E-mail: 摘要:
灌木生物量模型是估算灌木生物量的重要方法, 而灌木生物量在各器官间的分配是其适应周围环境的重要体现。基于对山西芦芽山地区14种常见灌木的各器官(根、茎和叶)、地上和总生物量, 以及基径、树高、冠幅的测定, 建立了各器官、地上及总生物量的最优估算模型, 探究了各器官生物量与总生物量(如叶质比、茎质比及根质比)及地上-地下生物量(根冠比)的关系。结果表明: (1)总体而言, 幂函数和线性函数对这些灌木生物量的估测效果较好。(2)生长低矮、分枝数多的灌木种采用冠幅面积估测生物量效果较好; 生长直立或分枝数少的灌木种采用总基径的平方与茎干高度乘积估测生物量效果较好; 其他介于两者之间的灌木种采用冠幅体积估测生物量效果较好。(3) 14种灌木的平均根冠比是0.61, 叶质比0.17, 茎质比0.48, 根质比0.35; 此外, 带刺灌木种除叶质比显著大于不带刺灌木种外, 茎质比、根质比和根冠比都显著小于不带刺灌木种。
罗永开, 方精云, 胡会峰. 山西芦芽山14种常见灌木生物量模型及生物量分配. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(1): 115-125. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0131
Yong-Kai LUO, Jing-Yun FANG, Hui-Feng HU. Biomass estimation models and allocation patterns of 14 shrub species in Mountain Luya, Shanxi, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41(1): 115-125. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0131
| 物种 Species | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 海拔 Elevation (m) | 科 Family | 属 Genus | 是否带刺 Thorn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 沙棘 Hippophae rhamnoides | 112.01° | 38.68° | 1 499.8 | 胡颓子科 Elaeagnaceae | 沙棘属 Hippophae | 是 Yes |
| 三裂绣线菊 Spiraea trilobata | 111.99° | 38.69° | 1 535.6 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 绣线菊属 Spiraea | 否 No |
| 黄刺玫 Rosa xanthina | 111.99° | 38.69° | 1 535.6 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 蔷薇属 Rosa | 是 Yes |
| 虎榛子 Ostryopsis davidiana | 111.99° | 38.69° | 1 535.6 | 桦木科 Betulaceae | 虎榛子属 Ostryopsis | 否 No |
| 榛 Corylus heterophylla | 111.99° | 38.69° | 1 535.6 | 桦木科 Betulaceae | 榛属 Corylus | 否 No |
| 土庄绣线菊 Spiraea pubescens | 111.98° | 38.72° | 1 659.9 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 绣线菊属 Spiraea | 否 No |
| 金花忍冬 Lonicera chrysantha | 111.92° | 38.65° | 1 778.4 | 忍冬科 Caprifoliaceae | 忍冬属 Lonicera | 否 No |
| 蒙古荚蒾 Viburnum mongolicum | 111.92° | 38.65° | 1 780.0 | 忍冬科 Caprifoliaceae | 荚迷属 Viburnum | 否 No |
| 唐古特忍冬 Lonicera tangutica | 111.92° | 38.65° | 1 780.0 | 忍冬科 Caprifoliaceae | 忍冬属 Lonicera | 否 No |
| 复盆子 Rubus idaeus | 111.92° | 38.65° | 1 780.0 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 悬钩子属 Rubus | 是 Yes |
| 银露梅 Potentilla glabra | 111.96° | 38.72° | 1 812.2 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 委陵菜属 Potentilla | 否 No |
| 山刺玫 Rosa davurica | 111.95° | 38.71° | 1 874.3 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 蔷薇属 Rosa | 是 Yes |
| 刺果茶藨子 Ribes burejense | 111.95° | 38.71° | 1 891.1 | 虎耳草科 Saxifragaceae | 茶藨子属 Ribes | 是 Yes |
| 鬼箭锦鸡儿 Caragana jubata | 111.86° | 38.73° | 2 602.2 | 豆科 Leguminosae | 锦鸡儿属 Caragana | 是 Yes |
表1 芦芽山14种灌木调查基本信息表
Table 1 The basic information of 14 shrub species in Mountain Luya
| 物种 Species | 经度 Longitude (E) | 纬度 Latitude (N) | 海拔 Elevation (m) | 科 Family | 属 Genus | 是否带刺 Thorn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 沙棘 Hippophae rhamnoides | 112.01° | 38.68° | 1 499.8 | 胡颓子科 Elaeagnaceae | 沙棘属 Hippophae | 是 Yes |
| 三裂绣线菊 Spiraea trilobata | 111.99° | 38.69° | 1 535.6 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 绣线菊属 Spiraea | 否 No |
| 黄刺玫 Rosa xanthina | 111.99° | 38.69° | 1 535.6 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 蔷薇属 Rosa | 是 Yes |
| 虎榛子 Ostryopsis davidiana | 111.99° | 38.69° | 1 535.6 | 桦木科 Betulaceae | 虎榛子属 Ostryopsis | 否 No |
| 榛 Corylus heterophylla | 111.99° | 38.69° | 1 535.6 | 桦木科 Betulaceae | 榛属 Corylus | 否 No |
| 土庄绣线菊 Spiraea pubescens | 111.98° | 38.72° | 1 659.9 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 绣线菊属 Spiraea | 否 No |
| 金花忍冬 Lonicera chrysantha | 111.92° | 38.65° | 1 778.4 | 忍冬科 Caprifoliaceae | 忍冬属 Lonicera | 否 No |
| 蒙古荚蒾 Viburnum mongolicum | 111.92° | 38.65° | 1 780.0 | 忍冬科 Caprifoliaceae | 荚迷属 Viburnum | 否 No |
| 唐古特忍冬 Lonicera tangutica | 111.92° | 38.65° | 1 780.0 | 忍冬科 Caprifoliaceae | 忍冬属 Lonicera | 否 No |
| 复盆子 Rubus idaeus | 111.92° | 38.65° | 1 780.0 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 悬钩子属 Rubus | 是 Yes |
| 银露梅 Potentilla glabra | 111.96° | 38.72° | 1 812.2 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 委陵菜属 Potentilla | 否 No |
| 山刺玫 Rosa davurica | 111.95° | 38.71° | 1 874.3 | 蔷薇科 Rosaceae | 蔷薇属 Rosa | 是 Yes |
| 刺果茶藨子 Ribes burejense | 111.95° | 38.71° | 1 891.1 | 虎耳草科 Saxifragaceae | 茶藨子属 Ribes | 是 Yes |
| 鬼箭锦鸡儿 Caragana jubata | 111.86° | 38.73° | 2 602.2 | 豆科 Leguminosae | 锦鸡儿属 Caragana | 是 Yes |
| 物种名 Species | 最佳方程 Best model | 最佳变量 Best variable | 参数a Parameter variable a | 参数b Parameter variable b | 平均预估误差Mean prediction error (MPE) (%) | 估计值的标准误差 Standard error of estimate (SEE) | R2 | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 沙棘 Hippophae rhamnoides | WTotal = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.002 0 | 52.34 | 15.48 | 94.78 | 0.91 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.002 0 | 40.77 | 17.42 | 85.18 | 0.90 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.000 4 | 11.58 | 12.24 | 15.12 | 0.93 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.001 0 | 30.06 | 18.10 | 69.05 | 0.89 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.000 4 | 10.71 | 17.27 | 18.55 | 0.88 | <0.001 | |
| 三裂绣线菊 Spiraea trilobata | WTotal = aVb | V | 0.049 0 | 0.66 | 0.40 | 0.83 | 0.45 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aVb | V | 0.022 0 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.46 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aVb | V | 0.030 0 | 0.60 | 1.17 | 0.86 | 0.39 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aVb | V | 0.012 0 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.42 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.005 0 | 0.70 | 2.57 | 0.85 | 0.46 | <0.001 | |
| 黄刺玫 Rosa xanthina | WTotal = aVb | V | 0.005 0 | 0.88 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.90 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aVb | V | 0.003 0 | 0.88 | 0.11 | 0.32 | 0.93 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aVb | V | 0.005 0 | 0.77 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.80 | <0.001 | |
| WStem= aVb | V | 0.002 0 | 0.89 | 0.16 | 0.35 | 0.92 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.001 0 | 0.86 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.92 | <0.001 | |
| 虎榛子 Ostryopsis davidiana | WTotal = aV + b | V | 0.001 0 | 9.28 | 13.66 | 29.28 | 0.90 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aV + b | V | 0.000 8 | 6.25 | 12.87 | 19.43 | 0.91 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aV + b | V | 0.000 2 | 3.03 | 16.66 | 10.56 | 0.86 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aV + b | V | 0.000 6 | 2.93 | 16.70 | 17.86 | 0.87 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aV + b | V | 0.000 2 | 3.32 | 9.14 | 4.03 | 0.94 | <0.001 | |
| 榛 Corylus heterophylla | WTotal = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.145 0 | 0.64 | 0.10 | 0.32 | 0.86 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aVb | V | 0.000 1 | 1.15 | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.85 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.032 0 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.86 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.031 0 | 0.71 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.82 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.000 9 | 0.90 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.81 | <0.001 | |
| 土庄绣线菊 Spiraea pubescens | WTotal = aV + b | V | 0.001 0 | 18.90 | 13.81 | 38.03 | 0.89 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aV + b | V | 0.002 0 | 8.02 | 12.84 | 22.11 | 0.91 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aVb | V | 0.020 0 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.78 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aV + b | V | 0.002 0 | 6.18 | 12.95 | 20.92 | 0.92 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.011 0 | 0.53 | 4.33 | 0.46 | 0.71 | <0.001 | |
| 金花忍冬 Lonicera chrysantha | WTotal = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.365 0 | 0.56 | 0.08 | 0.42 | 0.82 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.233 0 | 0.53 | 0.16 | 0.40 | 0.83 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.000 5 | 43.22 | 25.05 | 67.14 | 0.76 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = a(Dt2H)b | Dt2H | 0.136 0 | 0.56 | 0.20 | 0.41 | 0.83 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.000 1 | 9.08 | 18.23 | 8.19 | 0.78 | <0.001 | |
| 蒙古荚蒾 Viburnum mongolicum | WTotal = aVb | V | 0.006 0 | 0.88 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.92 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aVb | V | 0.003 0 | 0.90 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.92 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aVb | V | 0.002 0 | 0.84 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.72 | <0.001 | |
| WStem= aVb | V | 0.001 0 | 0.91 | 0.34 | 0.47 | 0.91 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.000 3 | 0.89 | 1.94 | 0.50 | 0.85 | <0.001 | |
| 唐古特忍冬 Lonicera tangutica | WTotal = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.200 0 | 0.54 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.80 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aVb | V | 0.007 0 | 0.80 | 0.49 | 0.33 | 0.84 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot= aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.000 4 | 6.22 | 11.48 | 5.13 | 0.73 | <0.001 | |
| 物种名 Species | 最佳方程 Best model | 最佳变量 Best variable | 参数a Parameter variable a | 参数b Parameter variable b | 平均预估误差Mean prediction error (MPE) (%) | 估计值的标准误差Standard error of estimate (SEE) | R2 | p |
| 唐古特忍冬 Lonicera tangutica | WStem = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.063 0 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.41 | 0.77 | <0.001 |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.005 0 | 0.68 | 2.30 | 0.29 | 0.81 | <0.001 | |
| 复盆子 Rubus idaeus | WTotal = aV + b | V | 0.000 6 | 12.52 | 10.18 | 6.76 | 0.84 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aV + b | V | 0.000 4 | 10.71 | 10.63 | 5.59 | 0.80 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aV + b | V | 0.000 0 | 1.81 | 13.92 | 1.92 | 0.83 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aV + b | V | 0.000 2 | 4.59 | 14.17 | 3.43 | 0.73 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = alnV + b | V | 14.166 0 | -69.23 | 11.41 | 3.24 | 0.77 | <0.001 | |
| 银露梅 Potentilla glabra | WTotal = aA + b | A | 0.131 0 | -6.74 | 19.50 | 42.11 | 0.82 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aA + b | A | 0.077 0 | -2.81 | 19.75 | 25.62 | 0.81 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aA + b | A | 0.054 0 | -3.93 | 22.54 | 19.43 | 0.78 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aA + b | A | 0.068 0 | -3.26 | 20.73 | 23.16 | 0.80 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aA + b | A | 0.010 0 | 0.44 | 20.89 | 3.76 | 0.74 | <0.001 | |
| 山刺玫 Rosa davurica | WTotal = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.061 0 | 0.69 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.88 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.042 0 | 0.67 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.83 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.023 0 | 0.70 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.80 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.025 0 | 0.70 | 0.27 | 0.36 | 0.84 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aA+b | A | 0.020 0 | -0.87 | 7.35 | 1.94 | 0.95 | <0.001 | |
| 刺果茶藨子 Ribes burejense | WTotal = aVb | V | 0.550 0 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.64 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aV + b | V | 0.000 4 | 12.39 | 16.40 | 12.07 | 0.66 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aAb | A | 0.938 0 | 0.46 | 1.39 | 0.64 | 0.47 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aV + b | V | 0.000 2 | 9.22 | 15.79 | 9.06 | 0.70 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.016 0 | 0.55 | 3.89 | 0.63 | 0.60 | <0.001 | |
| 鬼箭锦鸡儿 Caragana jubata | WTotal = aA + b | A | 0.268 0 | -10.27 | 12.92 | 48.69 | 0.93 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aA + b | A | 0.159 0 | -3.65 | 16.51 | 38.04 | 0.88 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aA + b | A | 0.110 0 | -6.63 | 11.13 | 16.30 | 0.95 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aA + b | A | 0.120 0 | -2.83 | 16.74 | 29.02 | 0.88 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aA + b | A | 0.040 0 | -0.82 | 21.53 | 12.27 | 0.81 | <0.001 |
表2 14种灌木总生物量(WTotal)、地上生物量(WAboveground)、根生物量(WRoot)、茎生物量(WStem)、叶生物量(WLeaf)的最佳拟合模型(n = 30)
Table 2 The best estimation models for total biomass (WTotal), aboveground biomass (WAboveground), root biomass (WRoot) , stem biomass (WStem), and leaf biomass (WLeaf) of 14 shrub species (n = 30)
| 物种名 Species | 最佳方程 Best model | 最佳变量 Best variable | 参数a Parameter variable a | 参数b Parameter variable b | 平均预估误差Mean prediction error (MPE) (%) | 估计值的标准误差 Standard error of estimate (SEE) | R2 | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 沙棘 Hippophae rhamnoides | WTotal = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.002 0 | 52.34 | 15.48 | 94.78 | 0.91 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.002 0 | 40.77 | 17.42 | 85.18 | 0.90 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.000 4 | 11.58 | 12.24 | 15.12 | 0.93 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.001 0 | 30.06 | 18.10 | 69.05 | 0.89 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.000 4 | 10.71 | 17.27 | 18.55 | 0.88 | <0.001 | |
| 三裂绣线菊 Spiraea trilobata | WTotal = aVb | V | 0.049 0 | 0.66 | 0.40 | 0.83 | 0.45 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aVb | V | 0.022 0 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.85 | 0.46 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aVb | V | 0.030 0 | 0.60 | 1.17 | 0.86 | 0.39 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aVb | V | 0.012 0 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.42 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.005 0 | 0.70 | 2.57 | 0.85 | 0.46 | <0.001 | |
| 黄刺玫 Rosa xanthina | WTotal = aVb | V | 0.005 0 | 0.88 | 0.07 | 0.34 | 0.90 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aVb | V | 0.003 0 | 0.88 | 0.11 | 0.32 | 0.93 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aVb | V | 0.005 0 | 0.77 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.80 | <0.001 | |
| WStem= aVb | V | 0.002 0 | 0.89 | 0.16 | 0.35 | 0.92 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.001 0 | 0.86 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.92 | <0.001 | |
| 虎榛子 Ostryopsis davidiana | WTotal = aV + b | V | 0.001 0 | 9.28 | 13.66 | 29.28 | 0.90 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aV + b | V | 0.000 8 | 6.25 | 12.87 | 19.43 | 0.91 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aV + b | V | 0.000 2 | 3.03 | 16.66 | 10.56 | 0.86 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aV + b | V | 0.000 6 | 2.93 | 16.70 | 17.86 | 0.87 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aV + b | V | 0.000 2 | 3.32 | 9.14 | 4.03 | 0.94 | <0.001 | |
| 榛 Corylus heterophylla | WTotal = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.145 0 | 0.64 | 0.10 | 0.32 | 0.86 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aVb | V | 0.000 1 | 1.15 | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.85 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.032 0 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.86 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.031 0 | 0.71 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.82 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.000 9 | 0.90 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.81 | <0.001 | |
| 土庄绣线菊 Spiraea pubescens | WTotal = aV + b | V | 0.001 0 | 18.90 | 13.81 | 38.03 | 0.89 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aV + b | V | 0.002 0 | 8.02 | 12.84 | 22.11 | 0.91 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aVb | V | 0.020 0 | 0.74 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.78 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aV + b | V | 0.002 0 | 6.18 | 12.95 | 20.92 | 0.92 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.011 0 | 0.53 | 4.33 | 0.46 | 0.71 | <0.001 | |
| 金花忍冬 Lonicera chrysantha | WTotal = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.365 0 | 0.56 | 0.08 | 0.42 | 0.82 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.233 0 | 0.53 | 0.16 | 0.40 | 0.83 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.000 5 | 43.22 | 25.05 | 67.14 | 0.76 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = a(Dt2H)b | Dt2H | 0.136 0 | 0.56 | 0.20 | 0.41 | 0.83 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.000 1 | 9.08 | 18.23 | 8.19 | 0.78 | <0.001 | |
| 蒙古荚蒾 Viburnum mongolicum | WTotal = aVb | V | 0.006 0 | 0.88 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.92 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aVb | V | 0.003 0 | 0.90 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.92 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aVb | V | 0.002 0 | 0.84 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.72 | <0.001 | |
| WStem= aVb | V | 0.001 0 | 0.91 | 0.34 | 0.47 | 0.91 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.000 3 | 0.89 | 1.94 | 0.50 | 0.85 | <0.001 | |
| 唐古特忍冬 Lonicera tangutica | WTotal = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.200 0 | 0.54 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.80 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aVb | V | 0.007 0 | 0.80 | 0.49 | 0.33 | 0.84 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot= aDt2H + b | Dt2H | 0.000 4 | 6.22 | 11.48 | 5.13 | 0.73 | <0.001 | |
| 物种名 Species | 最佳方程 Best model | 最佳变量 Best variable | 参数a Parameter variable a | 参数b Parameter variable b | 平均预估误差Mean prediction error (MPE) (%) | 估计值的标准误差Standard error of estimate (SEE) | R2 | p |
| 唐古特忍冬 Lonicera tangutica | WStem = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.063 0 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.41 | 0.77 | <0.001 |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.005 0 | 0.68 | 2.30 | 0.29 | 0.81 | <0.001 | |
| 复盆子 Rubus idaeus | WTotal = aV + b | V | 0.000 6 | 12.52 | 10.18 | 6.76 | 0.84 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aV + b | V | 0.000 4 | 10.71 | 10.63 | 5.59 | 0.80 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aV + b | V | 0.000 0 | 1.81 | 13.92 | 1.92 | 0.83 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aV + b | V | 0.000 2 | 4.59 | 14.17 | 3.43 | 0.73 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = alnV + b | V | 14.166 0 | -69.23 | 11.41 | 3.24 | 0.77 | <0.001 | |
| 银露梅 Potentilla glabra | WTotal = aA + b | A | 0.131 0 | -6.74 | 19.50 | 42.11 | 0.82 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aA + b | A | 0.077 0 | -2.81 | 19.75 | 25.62 | 0.81 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aA + b | A | 0.054 0 | -3.93 | 22.54 | 19.43 | 0.78 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aA + b | A | 0.068 0 | -3.26 | 20.73 | 23.16 | 0.80 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aA + b | A | 0.010 0 | 0.44 | 20.89 | 3.76 | 0.74 | <0.001 | |
| 山刺玫 Rosa davurica | WTotal = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.061 0 | 0.69 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 0.88 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.042 0 | 0.67 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 0.83 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.023 0 | 0.70 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.80 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = a(Dt2H) b | Dt2H | 0.025 0 | 0.70 | 0.27 | 0.36 | 0.84 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aA+b | A | 0.020 0 | -0.87 | 7.35 | 1.94 | 0.95 | <0.001 | |
| 刺果茶藨子 Ribes burejense | WTotal = aVb | V | 0.550 0 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.64 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aV + b | V | 0.000 4 | 12.39 | 16.40 | 12.07 | 0.66 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aAb | A | 0.938 0 | 0.46 | 1.39 | 0.64 | 0.47 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aV + b | V | 0.000 2 | 9.22 | 15.79 | 9.06 | 0.70 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aVb | V | 0.016 0 | 0.55 | 3.89 | 0.63 | 0.60 | <0.001 | |
| 鬼箭锦鸡儿 Caragana jubata | WTotal = aA + b | A | 0.268 0 | -10.27 | 12.92 | 48.69 | 0.93 | <0.001 |
| WAboveground = aA + b | A | 0.159 0 | -3.65 | 16.51 | 38.04 | 0.88 | <0.001 | |
| WRoot = aA + b | A | 0.110 0 | -6.63 | 11.13 | 16.30 | 0.95 | <0.001 | |
| WStem = aA + b | A | 0.120 0 | -2.83 | 16.74 | 29.02 | 0.88 | <0.001 | |
| WLeaf = aA + b | A | 0.040 0 | -0.82 | 21.53 | 12.27 | 0.81 | <0.001 |
图1 芦芽山6种灌木总生物量最佳拟合模型。A, 刺玫。B, 蒙古荚蒾。C, 刺果茶藨子。D, 沙棘。E, 虎榛子。F, 鬼箭锦鸡儿。
Fig. 1 The best biomass estimation model of six shrub species in Mountain Luya. A, Rosa davurica. B, Viburnum mongolicum. C, Ribes burejense. D, Hippophae rhamnoides. E, Ostryopsis davidiana. F, Caragana jubata.
| 物种 Species | 根冠比 R/S | 叶质比 LMF | 茎质比 SMF | 根质比 RMF | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 范围 Range | 平均值± 标准偏差 Mean ± SD | 中位值 Median | 范围 Range | 平均值± 标准偏差 Mean ± SD | 中位值 Median | 范围 Range | 平均值± 标准偏差 Mean ± SD | 中位值 Median | 范围 Range | 平均值± 标准偏差 Mean ± SD | 中位值 Median | ||||
| 沙棘 Hippophae rhamnoides | 0.06-0.59 | 0.31 ± 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.07-0.30 | 0.20 ± 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.39-0.79 | 0.57 ± 0.11 | 0.54 | 0.06-0.37 | 0.23 ± 0.08 | 0.22 | |||
| 三裂绣线菊 Spiraea trilobata | 0.32-1.24 | 0.57 ± 0.21 | 0.51 | 0.04-0.33 | 0.17 ± 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.25-0.67 | 0.48 ± 0.12 | 0.48 | 0.24-0.55 | 0.35 ± 0.07 | 0.34 | |||
| 黄刺玫 Rosa xanthina | 0.19-2.00 | 0.55 ± 0.34 | 0.45 | 0.09-0.29 | 0.19 ± 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.24-0.67 | 0.48 ± 0.09 | 0.47 | 0.16-0.67 | 0.33 ± 0.11 | 0.31 | |||
| 虎榛子 Ostryopsis davidiana | 0.16-0.97 | 0.42 ± 0.15 | 0.40 | 0.09-0.45 | 0.24 ± 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.35-0.58 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.48 | 0.14-0.49 | 0.29 ± 0.07 | 0.29 | |||
| 榛 Corylus heterophylla | 0.28-1.24 | 0.53 ± 0.22 | 0.47 | 0.10-0.34 | 0.24 ± 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.26-0.56 | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.42 | 0.22-0.55 | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 0.32 | |||
| 土庄绣线菊 Spiraea pubescens | 0.45-1.42 | 0.72 ± 0.27 | 0.63 | 0.01-0.10 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.37-0.67 | 0.54 ± 0.08 | 0.57 | 0.31-0.59 | 0.41 ± 0.08 | 0.39 | |||
| 金花忍冬 Lonicera chrysantha | 0.24-2.42 | 1.05 ± 0.54 | 0.98 | 0.05-0.26 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.20-0.72 | 0.42 ± 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.19-0.71 | 0.48 ± 0.13 | 0.49 | |||
| 蒙古荚蒾 Viburnum mongolicum | 0.16-2.06 | 0.67 ± 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.04-0.23 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.28-0.76 | 0.53 ± 0.11 | 0.54 | 0.14-0.67 | 0.37 ± 0.13 | 0.35 | |||
| 唐古特忍冬 Lonicera tangutica | 0.12-1.84 | 0.67 ± 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.06-0.24 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.28-0.65 | 0.50 ± 0.10 | 0.52 | 0.11-0.65 | 0.37 ± 0.12 | 0.35 | |||
| 复盆子 Rubus idaeus | 0.11-0.54 | 0.26 ± 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.26-0.67 | 0.44 ± 0.10 | 0.43 | 0.17-0.61 | 0.36 ± 0.12 | 0.35 | 0.10-0.35 | 0.20 ± 0.06 | 0.19 | |||
| 银露梅 Potentilla glabra | 0.29-2.54 | 0.76 ± 0.46 | 0.64 | 0.04-0.21 | 0.11 ± 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.25-0.67 | 0.49 ± 0.11 | 0.51 | 0.22-0.72 | 0.41 ± 0.12 | 0.39 | |||
| 山刺玫 Rosa davurica | 0.36-1.29 | 0.71 ± 0.24 | 0.67 | 0.04-0.19 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.37-0.62 | 0.49 ± 0.07 | 0.48 | 0.26-0.56 | 0.40 ± 0.08 | 0.4 | |||
| 刺果茶藨子 Ribes burejense | 0.27-1.89 | 0.69 ± 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.02-0.35 | 0.13 ± 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.24-0.67 | 0.49 ± 0.12 | 0.52 | 0.21-0.65 | 0.38 ± 0.13 | 0.34 | |||
| 鬼箭锦鸡儿 Caragana jubata | 0.16-1.54 | 0.60 ± 0.30 | 0.58 | 0.08-0.34 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.26-0.68 | 0.47 ± 0.09 | 0.46 | 0.14-0.61 | 0.36 ± 0.10 | 0.37 | |||
| 整体 Total | 0.61 ± 0.38 | 0.17 ± 0.11 | 0.48 ± 0.11 | 0.35 ± 0.12 | |||||||||||
表3 14种灌木的根冠比、叶质比、茎质比及根质比的统计特征
Table 3 The descriptive statistics of root to shoot mass ratio (R/S), leaf to total mass ratio (LMF), stem to total mass ratio (SMF), and root to total mass ratio (RMF) of 14 shrub species
| 物种 Species | 根冠比 R/S | 叶质比 LMF | 茎质比 SMF | 根质比 RMF | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 范围 Range | 平均值± 标准偏差 Mean ± SD | 中位值 Median | 范围 Range | 平均值± 标准偏差 Mean ± SD | 中位值 Median | 范围 Range | 平均值± 标准偏差 Mean ± SD | 中位值 Median | 范围 Range | 平均值± 标准偏差 Mean ± SD | 中位值 Median | ||||
| 沙棘 Hippophae rhamnoides | 0.06-0.59 | 0.31 ± 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.07-0.30 | 0.20 ± 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.39-0.79 | 0.57 ± 0.11 | 0.54 | 0.06-0.37 | 0.23 ± 0.08 | 0.22 | |||
| 三裂绣线菊 Spiraea trilobata | 0.32-1.24 | 0.57 ± 0.21 | 0.51 | 0.04-0.33 | 0.17 ± 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.25-0.67 | 0.48 ± 0.12 | 0.48 | 0.24-0.55 | 0.35 ± 0.07 | 0.34 | |||
| 黄刺玫 Rosa xanthina | 0.19-2.00 | 0.55 ± 0.34 | 0.45 | 0.09-0.29 | 0.19 ± 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.24-0.67 | 0.48 ± 0.09 | 0.47 | 0.16-0.67 | 0.33 ± 0.11 | 0.31 | |||
| 虎榛子 Ostryopsis davidiana | 0.16-0.97 | 0.42 ± 0.15 | 0.40 | 0.09-0.45 | 0.24 ± 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.35-0.58 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.48 | 0.14-0.49 | 0.29 ± 0.07 | 0.29 | |||
| 榛 Corylus heterophylla | 0.28-1.24 | 0.53 ± 0.22 | 0.47 | 0.10-0.34 | 0.24 ± 0.07 | 0.23 | 0.26-0.56 | 0.43 ± 0.07 | 0.42 | 0.22-0.55 | 0.34 ± 0.08 | 0.32 | |||
| 土庄绣线菊 Spiraea pubescens | 0.45-1.42 | 0.72 ± 0.27 | 0.63 | 0.01-0.10 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.37-0.67 | 0.54 ± 0.08 | 0.57 | 0.31-0.59 | 0.41 ± 0.08 | 0.39 | |||
| 金花忍冬 Lonicera chrysantha | 0.24-2.42 | 1.05 ± 0.54 | 0.98 | 0.05-0.26 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.20-0.72 | 0.42 ± 0.13 | 0.39 | 0.19-0.71 | 0.48 ± 0.13 | 0.49 | |||
| 蒙古荚蒾 Viburnum mongolicum | 0.16-2.06 | 0.67 ± 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.04-0.23 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.28-0.76 | 0.53 ± 0.11 | 0.54 | 0.14-0.67 | 0.37 ± 0.13 | 0.35 | |||
| 唐古特忍冬 Lonicera tangutica | 0.12-1.84 | 0.67 ± 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.06-0.24 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.28-0.65 | 0.50 ± 0.10 | 0.52 | 0.11-0.65 | 0.37 ± 0.12 | 0.35 | |||
| 复盆子 Rubus idaeus | 0.11-0.54 | 0.26 ± 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.26-0.67 | 0.44 ± 0.10 | 0.43 | 0.17-0.61 | 0.36 ± 0.12 | 0.35 | 0.10-0.35 | 0.20 ± 0.06 | 0.19 | |||
| 银露梅 Potentilla glabra | 0.29-2.54 | 0.76 ± 0.46 | 0.64 | 0.04-0.21 | 0.11 ± 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.25-0.67 | 0.49 ± 0.11 | 0.51 | 0.22-0.72 | 0.41 ± 0.12 | 0.39 | |||
| 山刺玫 Rosa davurica | 0.36-1.29 | 0.71 ± 0.24 | 0.67 | 0.04-0.19 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.37-0.62 | 0.49 ± 0.07 | 0.48 | 0.26-0.56 | 0.40 ± 0.08 | 0.4 | |||
| 刺果茶藨子 Ribes burejense | 0.27-1.89 | 0.69 ± 0.44 | 0.52 | 0.02-0.35 | 0.13 ± 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.24-0.67 | 0.49 ± 0.12 | 0.52 | 0.21-0.65 | 0.38 ± 0.13 | 0.34 | |||
| 鬼箭锦鸡儿 Caragana jubata | 0.16-1.54 | 0.60 ± 0.30 | 0.58 | 0.08-0.34 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.26-0.68 | 0.47 ± 0.09 | 0.46 | 0.14-0.61 | 0.36 ± 0.10 | 0.37 | |||
| 整体 Total | 0.61 ± 0.38 | 0.17 ± 0.11 | 0.48 ± 0.11 | 0.35 ± 0.12 | |||||||||||
图2 带刺与不带刺灌木之间叶质比(L/T)、茎质比(S/T)、根质比(R/T)、根冠比(R/S)的比较(平均值±标准误差)。用单因素方差分析(Tukey post hoc)检验不同类别之间的差异; 显著性差异(p < 0.05)用不同字母标记。
Fig. 2 Comparisons of leaf biomass fraction (L/T), stem biomass fraction (S/T), root biomass fraction (R/T), root to shoot mass ratio (R/S) between shrubs with and without thorn (mean ± SE). Differences between each group were tested using a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test of significance; significance different at p < 0.05 was indicated by different letters.
| [1] | Bloom AJ, Chapin FS, Mooney HA (1985). Resource limitation in plants: An economic analogy.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 363-392. |
| [2] | Cai Z, Liu QJ, Ouyang QL (2006). Estimation model for biomass of shrubs in Qianyanzhou.Journal of Central South Forestry University, 26(3), 15-23. (in Chinese with English abstract)[蔡哲, 刘琪璟, 欧阳球林 (2006). 千烟洲实验区几种灌木生物量估算模型的研究. 中南林学院学报, 26(3), 15-23.] |
| [3] | Cheng DL (2007). Plant Allometric Study of Biomass Allocation Pattern and Biomass Production Rates. PhD dissertation, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou. 40-42. (in Chinese with English abstract).[程栋梁 (2007). 植物生物量分配模式与生长速率的相关规律研究. 博士学位论文, 兰州大学, 兰州. 40-42.] |
| [4] | Chen XL, Ma QY, Kang FF, Cao WQ, Zhang GH, Chen ZW (2002). Studies on biomass and productivity of typical shrubs in Taiyue Mountain, Shanxi Province.Forest Research, 15, 304-309. (in Chinese with English abstract)[陈遐林, 马钦彦, 康峰峰, 曹文强, 张国华, 陈宗伟 (2002). 山西太岳山典型灌木林生物量及生产力研究. 林业科学研究, 15, 304-309.] |
| [5] | Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ (2002). Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass portioning in seed plants.Science, 295, 1517-1520. |
| [6] | Fang JY, Liu GH, Zhu B, Wang XK, Liu SH (2006). Carbon cycling of three temperate forest ecosystems in Mountain Dongling, Beijing.Scientia Sinica Terrae, 36, 533-543. (in Chinese)[方精云, 刘国华, 朱彪, 王效科, 刘绍辉 (2006). 北京东灵山三种温带森林生态系统的碳循环. 中国科学(地球科学), 36, 533-543.] |
| [7] | He M, Mi K (2009). Study on the common plants with thorns in Shandong Province.Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 37, 1703-1705. (in Chinese with English abstract)[贺猛, 米楷 (2009). 山东省常见带刺植物研究. 安徽农业科学, 37, 1703-1705.] |
| [8] | Hilbert DW, Canadell J (1995). Biomass partitioning and resource allocation of plants from mediterranean-type ecosystems: Possible responses to elevated atmospheric CO2. In: José MM, Walter CO eds. Global Change and Mediterranean-Type Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin. 76-101. |
| [9] | Jiang FQ, Lu FY (1982). The model of aboveground biomass of Caragana microphylla brush. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2, 103-110. (in Chinese with English abstract)[姜凤歧, 卢凤勇 (1982). 小叶锦鸡儿灌丛地上生物量的预测模式. 生态学报, 2, 103-110.] |
| [10] | Lei L (2012). Distribution Character of Alpine Shrubs Biomass Along an Elevation Gradient in Qilian Mountains. Master degree dissertation, Gansu Agriculture University, Lanzhou. 12-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)[雷蕾 (2012). 祁连山高山灌丛生物量沿海拔梯度分配特征研究. 硕士学位论文, 甘肃农业大学, 兰州. 12-21.] |
| [11] | Li XD, Zhang CP, Fu H (2012). Seasonal dynamics of root-shoot ratio and the effect of factors in grazed and ungrazed grasslands of the Loess Plateau.Acta Prataculture Sinica, 21, 307-312. (in Chinese with English abstract)[李旭东, 张春平, 傅华 (2012). 黄土高原典型草原地根冠比的季节动态及其影响因素. 草业学报, 21, 307-312.] |
| [12] | Lin W, Li JS, Zheng BF, Guo JM, Hu LL (2010). Models for estimating biomass of twelve shrub species in Jinggang Mountain Nature Reserve.Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 28, 725-729. (in Chinese with English abstract)[林伟, 李俊生, 郑博福, 郭建明, 胡理乐 (2010). 井冈山自然保护区12种常见灌木生物量的估测模型. 武汉植物学研究, 28, 725-729.] |
| [13] | Liu CC, Wei YF, Liu YG, Guo K (2009). Biomass of canopy and shrub layers of karst forests in Puding, Guizhou, China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33, 698-705. (in Chinese with English abstract)[刘长成, 魏雅芬, 刘玉国, 郭柯 (2009). 贵州普定喀斯特次生林乔灌层地上生物量. 植物生态学报, 33, 698-705.] |
| [14] | Liu XL, Liu SR, Su YM, Cai XH, Ma QY (2006). Aboveground biomass of Quercus aquifolioides shrub community and its responses to altitudinal gradients in Balangshan Mountain, Sichuan Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 42(2), 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)[刘兴良, 刘世荣, 宿以明, 蔡小虎, 马钦彦 (2006). 巴郎山川滇高山栎灌丛地上生物量及其对海拔梯度的响应. 林业科学, 42(2), 1-7.] |
| [15] | Lu ZL, Gong XS (2009). Progress on the research of shrub biomass estimation.Forest Inventory and Planning, 34(4), 37-45. (in Chinese with English abstract)[卢振龙, 龚孝生 (2009). 灌木生物量测定的研究进展. 林业调查规划, 34(4), 37-45.] |
| [16] | Pooter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L (2012). Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: Meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control.New Phytologist, 193, 30-50. |
| [17] | Salis SM, Assis MA, Mattos PP, Pião ACS (2006). Estimating the aboveground biomass and wood volume of savanna woodlands in Brazil’s Pantanal wetlands based on allometric correlations.Forest Ecology and Management, 228, 61-68. |
| [18] | Whittaker RH (1982). Net production relations of shrubs in the Great Smoky Mountains.Ecology, 43, 357-377. |
| [19] | Yi HY (2010). Study on Soil Microorganism and Soil Enzyme Activity of Different Vegetation in the Mountain Forests— The Arid Valley Ecotone in the Upper Reach of Minjiang River. Master degree dissertation, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, Sichuan. 14-17. (in Chinese with English abstract))[易海燕 (2010). 岷江上游山地森林-干旱河谷交错带不同植被类型土壤微生物及土壤酶活性的研究. 硕士学位论文, 四川农业大学, 四川雅安. 14-17.] |
| [20] | Yu HS, Li BJ, Zhang BW, Yao HL (2003). The discussion of major ecological function.Inner Mongolia Forestry Science & Technology, (4), 15-18. (in Chinese)[俞海生, 李宝军, 张宝文, 姚洪林 (2003). 灌木林主要生态作用的探讨. 内蒙古林业科技, (4), 15-18.] |
| [21] | Zeng HQ, Liu QJ, Ma ZQ, Zeng ZY (2006). The regression model of Loropetalum chinense biomass based on canopy diameter and plant height. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 30(4), 101-104. (in Chinese with English abstract)[曾慧卿, 刘琪璟, 马泽清, 曾珍英 (2006). 基于冠幅及植株高度的檵木生物量回归模型. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 30(4), 101-104.] |
| [22] | Zeng HQ, Liu QJ, Feng ZW, Ma ZQ, Hu LL (2007). Estimation models of understory shrub and their applications in red soil hilly region.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 18, 2185-2190. (in Chinese with English abstract)[曾慧卿, 刘琪璟, 冯宗炜, 马泽清, 胡理乐 (2007). 红壤丘陵区林下灌木生物量估算模型的建立及其应用. 应用生态学报, 18, 2185-2190.] |
| [23] | Zeng ZY, Liu QJ, Zeng HQ (2005). Study of biomass models of some kinds of shrubs in Qianyanzhou, Jiangxi Province.Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 32(4), 68-72. (in Chinese with English abstract)[曾珍英, 刘琪璟, 曾慧卿 (2005). 江西千烟洲几种灌木生物量模型的研究. 福建林业科技, 32(4), 68-72.] |
| [24] | Zeng WS, Tang SZ (2011). Goodness evaluation and precision analysis of tree biomass equations.Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 47(11), 106-113. (in Chinese with English abstract)[曾伟生, 唐守正 (2011). 立木生物量方程的优度评价和精度分析. 林业科学, 47(11), 106-113.] |
| [25] | Zhang DY (2010). Researches on Theoretical Ecology. Higher Education Press, Beijing. 48. (in Chinese)[张大勇 (2010). 理论生态学研究. 高等教育出版社, 北京. 48.] |
| [26] | Zhang HQ, Liu QJ, Lu PL, Yu Q, Zeng HQ (2005). Biomass estimation of several common shrubs in Qianyanzhou experimental station.Forest Inventory and Planning, 30(5), 43-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)[张海清, 刘琪璟, 陆佩玲, 于强, 曾慧卿 (2005). 千烟洲试验站几种常见灌木生物量估测. 林业调查规划, 30(5), 43-49.] |
| [27] | Zhang JT (1989). Vertical zones of vegetation in Luya Mountain in Shanxi Province.Scientia Geographica Since, 9, 346-353. (in Chinese with English abstract)[张金屯 (1989). 山西芦芽山植被垂直带的划分. 地理科学, 9, 346-353.] |
| [1] | 张安宁, 肖亚宁, 赵霞, 张淼, 崔瀚文, 陈书燕, 安黎哲. 青藏高原灌木化与氮添加对土壤线虫及功能性状的交互作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-. |
| [2] | 李新貌, 金光泽, 刘志理. 毛榛“小枝系统”生长与防御策略的季节动态和器官差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 293-305. |
| [3] | 张静, 陈洁, 李艳朋, 盘李军, 许涵, 李意德, 何海生. 南亚热带针阔混交人工林植物生物量比较及其影响因子分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 400-416. |
| [4] | 徐恩相, 周蕾, 章晓炜, 张国萍, 仲杜伟, 黄智, 刘派, 迟永刚. 基于不同生育阶段冠层光谱和碳通量的水稻产量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 82-93. |
| [5] | 朱瑞德, 杨俊薇, 刘宵含, 陈冰瑞, 池秀莲, 田地, 杨光, 程蒙, 戴亚峰, 王诗文. 霍山石斛设施和林下栽培模式中养分对植物-微生物关联的调控[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1434-1447. |
| [6] | 宋珊珊, 唐志尧. 河北塞罕坝草甸草原根际土壤真菌与植物地上生物量的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1461-1471. |
| [7] | 邢强, 赵斌, 胡永红, 杨君, 秦俊, 刘何铭, 王红兵, 周鹏. 华东地区两种典型立体绿化植物根系性状特征及对新型土壤基质的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1498-1514. |
| [8] | 张法伟, 李红琴, 祝景彬, 樊博, 周华坤, 李英年, 梁乃申. 氮添加和降水改变对高寒草甸生态系统地上与地下碳储的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409. |
| [9] | 樊月玲, 蒋正德, 叶佳舒, 郑立臣, 陈欣. 2005-2015年下辽河平原农田长期观测样地主要农作物收获期性状和产量数据集[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(8): 1271-1282. |
| [10] | 张箫荻, 王晓霞, 章毓文, 侯靖雨, 石骁鹏, 和璐璐, 刘亚栋, 薛柳, 何宝华, 段劼. 北京山区三种林下灌木水力结构、叶片功能性状及其环境适应策略[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(7): 1128-1143. |
| [11] | 刘新月, 王立平, 刘春和, 孙艳丽, 刘鹏, 田赟, 贾昕, 查天山, 钱多. 北京不同林龄人工林生物量空间格局及其影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 939-951. |
| [12] | 马腾飞, 郝杰, 刁华杰, 宁亚楠, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$, 董宽虎. 晋北农牧交错带草地土壤无机氮含量的季节变化及其对放牧强度的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(6): 965-974. |
| [13] | 王世松, 曲孝云, 董劭琼, 李佳鸿, 杨琦, 侯满福, 赵利清, 郭柯, 刘长成, 胥晓. 西藏札达典型荒漠植被类型及群落特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 801-812. |
| [14] | 陈文义, 王智勇, 周梦岩, 麻文俊, 王军辉, 罗志斌, 周婧. 幼龄楸树生物量分配规律与异速生长模型[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(2): 356-366. |
| [15] | 胡妍, 李林, 魏识广, 阴宇航, 周景钢, 钟建军, 王雪. 喀斯特地区30种灌木不同序级根系性状及其根经济谱研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(12): 1991-2003. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19