植物生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 71-80.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0093 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2016.0093
所属专题: 中国灌丛生态系统碳储量的研究; 全球变化与生态系统; 凋落物
张建华1,2,*(
), 唐志尧3, 沈海花2, 方精云2,3
收稿日期:2016-03-11
接受日期:2016-09-21
出版日期:2017-01-10
发布日期:2017-01-23
作者简介:* 通信作者Author for correspondence (E-mail:基金资助:
Jian-Hua ZHANG1,2,*(
), Zhi-Yao TANG3, Hai-Hua SHEN2, Jing-Yun FANG2,3
Received:2016-03-11
Accepted:2016-09-21
Online:2017-01-10
Published:2017-01-23
About author:KANG Jing-yao(1991-), E-mail: 摘要:
我国北方灌丛土壤瘠薄, 近几十年来的氮沉降显著提高了北方灌丛土壤的可利用氮水平。灌木生长是灌丛碳吸存的重要组成部分, 凋落物在土壤和植物间充当着至关重要的纽带作用, 是陆地生态系统养分与能量循环的关键, 灌丛生长和凋落物生产受氮添加的影响很大。然而, 大气氮沉降对灌丛碳吸存和凋落物生产的影响人们知之甚少。该研究以荆条(Vitex negundo var. heterophylla)和绣线菊(Spiraea salicifolia)灌丛为例, 通过0 (N0)、20 (N1)、50 (N2)、100 (N3) kg N·hm-2·a-1施氮实验, 研究了短期(2012-2013年)氮添加对东灵山地区典型灌丛生长及凋落物生成的影响。研究结果显示: 在4种氮添加处理中, 荆条灌丛灌木基径年增长率分别为1.69%、2.78%、2.51%和1.80%, 相应处理中, 绣线菊灌丛灌木基径年增长率分别为1.38%、1.37%、1.59%和2.05%; 与之对应的株高年增长率分别为8.36%、8.48%、9.49%和9.83% (荆条灌丛)和2.12%、2.86、2.36%、2.52% (绣线菊灌丛)。虽然处理之间的差异没有达到显著性水平, 但N沉降在一定程度上促进了灌木的生长。不同处理间, 荆条地上生物量增加了0.19、0.23、0.14、0.15 t C·hm-2·a-1, 绣线菊灌丛地上生物量增加了0.027、0.025、0.032、0.041 t C·hm-2·a-1。在自然条件下, 荆条和绣线菊灌丛2013年凋落物的年产量分别为135.7和129.6 g·m-2。短期氮沉降对凋落物及组分的年产量有一定的促进作用, 但处理之间的差异没有达到显著性水平。研究结果表明施肥时间短、土壤含水量低等因素导致土壤可利用氮的利用效率很低, 从而使灌丛对施肥的响应比较缓慢。
张建华, 唐志尧, 沈海花, 方精云. 北京东灵山地区常见灌丛生长及凋落物生产对氮添加的响应. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(1): 71-80. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0093
Jian-Hua ZHANG, Zhi-Yao TANG, Hai-Hua SHEN, Jing-Yun FANG. Responses of growth and litterfall production to nitrogen addition treatments from common shrublands in Mt. Dongling, Beijing, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41(1): 71-80. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0093
| 项目 Item | 荆条灌丛 Vitex negundo var. heterophylla shrubland | 绣线菊灌丛 Spiraea salicifolia shrubland |
|---|---|---|
| 地形和气候 Topography and climate | ||
| 海拔 Elevation (m) | 791 | 1 170 |
| 坡向 Aspect | S | S |
| 坡度 Slope (°) | 28 | 25 |
| 年平均气温 Mean annual temperature (°C) | 12.3 | 9.2 |
| 表层土壤特征 Topsoil property | ||
| 土壤pH Soil pH | 8.7 | 8.9 |
| 总碳含量 Total carbon (mg·g -1) | 28.88 ± 2.10 | 39.50 ± 5.03 |
| 总氮含量 Total nitrogen (mg·g -1) | 2.72 ± 0.32 | 2.29 ± 0.36 |
| 总磷含量 Total phosphorous (mg·g -1) | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 0.48 ± 0.03 |
| 无机氮含量 Inorganic nitrogen (mg·kg -1) | 6.01 ± 2.38 | 2.51 ± 2.88 |
| 速效磷含量 Available phosphorous (mg·kg -1) | 1.03 ± 0.09 | 1.38 ± 0.77 |
| 群落特征 Community character | ||
| 灌木高度 Shrub height (cm) | 78.10 ± 12.37 | 79.80 ± 7.43 |
| 平均基径 Average base diameter (cm) | 0.77 ± 1.77 | 0.56 ± 0.04 |
| 灌木密度 Shrub density (stems·hm-2) | 1.6 × 105 | 3.6 × 105 |
表1 实验样地地形、土壤和植被特征(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)
Table 1 Topography, soil and vegetation characteristics of the experimental sites (mean ± SE, n = 3)
| 项目 Item | 荆条灌丛 Vitex negundo var. heterophylla shrubland | 绣线菊灌丛 Spiraea salicifolia shrubland |
|---|---|---|
| 地形和气候 Topography and climate | ||
| 海拔 Elevation (m) | 791 | 1 170 |
| 坡向 Aspect | S | S |
| 坡度 Slope (°) | 28 | 25 |
| 年平均气温 Mean annual temperature (°C) | 12.3 | 9.2 |
| 表层土壤特征 Topsoil property | ||
| 土壤pH Soil pH | 8.7 | 8.9 |
| 总碳含量 Total carbon (mg·g -1) | 28.88 ± 2.10 | 39.50 ± 5.03 |
| 总氮含量 Total nitrogen (mg·g -1) | 2.72 ± 0.32 | 2.29 ± 0.36 |
| 总磷含量 Total phosphorous (mg·g -1) | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 0.48 ± 0.03 |
| 无机氮含量 Inorganic nitrogen (mg·kg -1) | 6.01 ± 2.38 | 2.51 ± 2.88 |
| 速效磷含量 Available phosphorous (mg·kg -1) | 1.03 ± 0.09 | 1.38 ± 0.77 |
| 群落特征 Community character | ||
| 灌木高度 Shrub height (cm) | 78.10 ± 12.37 | 79.80 ± 7.43 |
| 平均基径 Average base diameter (cm) | 0.77 ± 1.77 | 0.56 ± 0.04 |
| 灌木密度 Shrub density (stems·hm-2) | 1.6 × 105 | 3.6 × 105 |
| 物种 Species | 器官 Organ | 变量 Variable | R2 | 方程 Equation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 山杏 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.81 | y = 1.26x0.77 |
| Armeniaca sibirica | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.94 | y = 1.09x0.79 |
| 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.87 | y = 1.61x0.56 | |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.95 | y = 3.53x0.74 | |
| 小叶白蜡 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.88 | y = 0.2x0.91 |
| Fraxinus bungeana | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.50 | y = 5.47x0.51 |
| 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.77 | y = 0.13x0.8 | |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.72 | y = 4.47x0.62 | |
| 小叶鼠李 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.95 | y = 0.7x0.85 |
| Rhamnus | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.96 | y = 0.74x0.91 |
| parvifolia | 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.88 | y = 0.89x0.58 |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.96 | y = 1.95x0.85 | |
| 河朔荛花 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.83 | y = 0.81x0.61 |
| Wikstroemia | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.95 | y = 0.92x0.78 |
| chamedaphne | 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.48 | y = 1.32x0.35 |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.92 | y = 2.31x0.68 | |
| 绣线菊 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.77 | y = 0.18x1.14 |
| Spiraea salicifolia | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.78 | y = 0.23x1.18 |
| 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.62 | y = 0.07x1.15 | |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.79 | y = 0.48x1.16 | |
| 荆条 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.84 | y = 0.2x1.09 |
| Vitex negundo var. | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.82 | y = 0.54x0.95 |
| heterophylla | 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.66 | y = 0.86x0.59 |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.90 | y = 1.07x0.95 | |
| 蚂蚱腿子 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.95 | y = 0.07x1.16 |
| Myripnois dioica | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.91 | y = 0.42x1.00 |
| 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.79 | y = 0.31x0.71 | |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.95 | y = 0.64x1.00 | |
| 胡枝子 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.41 | y = 0.19x1.06 |
| Lespedeza bicolor | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.87 | y = 0.15x1.5 |
| 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.84 | y = 0.29x1.25 | |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.84 | y = 0.61x1.29 |
表2 东灵山地区8种常见灌木物种生物量异速生长模型
Table 2 Biomass allometric models for eight common shrub species in Mt. Dongling
| 物种 Species | 器官 Organ | 变量 Variable | R2 | 方程 Equation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 山杏 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.81 | y = 1.26x0.77 |
| Armeniaca sibirica | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.94 | y = 1.09x0.79 |
| 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.87 | y = 1.61x0.56 | |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.95 | y = 3.53x0.74 | |
| 小叶白蜡 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.88 | y = 0.2x0.91 |
| Fraxinus bungeana | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.50 | y = 5.47x0.51 |
| 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.77 | y = 0.13x0.8 | |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.72 | y = 4.47x0.62 | |
| 小叶鼠李 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.95 | y = 0.7x0.85 |
| Rhamnus | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.96 | y = 0.74x0.91 |
| parvifolia | 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.88 | y = 0.89x0.58 |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.96 | y = 1.95x0.85 | |
| 河朔荛花 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.83 | y = 0.81x0.61 |
| Wikstroemia | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.95 | y = 0.92x0.78 |
| chamedaphne | 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.48 | y = 1.32x0.35 |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.92 | y = 2.31x0.68 | |
| 绣线菊 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.77 | y = 0.18x1.14 |
| Spiraea salicifolia | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.78 | y = 0.23x1.18 |
| 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.62 | y = 0.07x1.15 | |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.79 | y = 0.48x1.16 | |
| 荆条 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.84 | y = 0.2x1.09 |
| Vitex negundo var. | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.82 | y = 0.54x0.95 |
| heterophylla | 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.66 | y = 0.86x0.59 |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.90 | y = 1.07x0.95 | |
| 蚂蚱腿子 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.95 | y = 0.07x1.16 |
| Myripnois dioica | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.91 | y = 0.42x1.00 |
| 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.79 | y = 0.31x0.71 | |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.95 | y = 0.64x1.00 | |
| 胡枝子 | 根 Root | D2H | 0.41 | y = 0.19x1.06 |
| Lespedeza bicolor | 枝 Branch | D2H | 0.87 | y = 0.15x1.5 |
| 叶 Leaf | D2H | 0.84 | y = 0.29x1.25 | |
| 总计 Total | D2H | 0.84 | y = 0.61x1.29 |
| 物种 Species | 变量 Variable | 对照 Control (N0) | 低氮 Low-N (N1) | 中氮 Medium-N (N2) | 高氮 High-N (N3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 荆条灌丛 Vitex negundo var. heterophylla shrubland | D | 0.70 ± 0.10 | 0.90 ± 0.20 | 0.70 ± 0.00 | 0.70 ± 0.10 |
| H | 78.30 ± 7.80 | 84.20 ± 10.10 | 74.60 ± 3.00 | 75.40 ± 9.00 | |
| 绣线菊灌丛 Spiraea salicifolia shrubland | D | 0.53 ± 0.00 | 0.57 ± 0.00 | 0.57 ± 0.00 | 0.54 ± 0.00 |
| H | 76.40 ± 0.60 | 78.80 ± 4.00 | 81.40 ± 7.10 | 82.80 ± 4.70 |
表3 不同氮添加处理样地灌木的基径和株高(平均值±标准偏差)
Table 3 Shrub diameter (D, cm) and height (H, cm) of shrubland under different nitrogen addition treatments (mean ± SD)
| 物种 Species | 变量 Variable | 对照 Control (N0) | 低氮 Low-N (N1) | 中氮 Medium-N (N2) | 高氮 High-N (N3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 荆条灌丛 Vitex negundo var. heterophylla shrubland | D | 0.70 ± 0.10 | 0.90 ± 0.20 | 0.70 ± 0.00 | 0.70 ± 0.10 |
| H | 78.30 ± 7.80 | 84.20 ± 10.10 | 74.60 ± 3.00 | 75.40 ± 9.00 | |
| 绣线菊灌丛 Spiraea salicifolia shrubland | D | 0.53 ± 0.00 | 0.57 ± 0.00 | 0.57 ± 0.00 | 0.54 ± 0.00 |
| H | 76.40 ± 0.60 | 78.80 ± 4.00 | 81.40 ± 7.10 | 82.80 ± 4.70 |
图1 氮添加对灌木基径(D)和株高(H)相对生长速率的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。相同字母a和b分别表示各处理间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。N0、N1、N2、N3氮添加量分别为0、20、50、100 kg N·hm-2·a-1。
Fig. 1 Influence of nitrogen addition treatments on the relative growth rates of shrub diameter (D) and height (H) (mean ± SD). The same letters indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) among treatments. N0, N1, N2 and N3 denote 0, 20, 50 and 100 kg N·hm-2·a-1 nitrogen addition, respectively.
图2 氮添加对灌木层地上生物量(AGB)和总生物量(TB)的净增量的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。相同字母a和b分别表示各处理间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。N0、N1、N2、N3同图1。
Fig. 2 Influence of nitrogen addition treatments on above ground biomass (AGB) and total biomass (TB) (mean ± SD). The same letter indicates no significant difference (p > 0.05) among treatments. N0, N1, N2, N3 see Fig. 1.
图3 实验期间2012 (左)和2013 (右)年氮添加对荆条灌丛(V.n)和绣线菊灌丛(S.t)凋落物总量及各组分量的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。N0、N1、N2、N3同图1。
Fig. 3 Influence of nitrogen addition treatments on gross litterfall and different components of litterfall of Vitex negundo var. heterophylla (V.n) and Spiraea salicifolia (S.t) shrublands in 2012 (left) and 2013 (right) (mean ± SD). N0, N1, N2, N3 see Fig. 1.
图4 氮添加对凋落物总量及各组分的季节变化的影响(平均值±标准偏差)。左侧为荆条, 右侧为绣线菊。带星号的N2和N3处理与对照N0差异达到显著水平。N0、N1、N2、N3同图1。
Fig. 4 Influence of nitrogen addition treatments on seasonal variation of gross litterfall and its component (mean ± SD). Left for Vitex negundo var. heterophylla and right for Spiraea salicifolia shrublands, respectively. N2 and N3 marked with an asterisk have a very significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the control. N0, N1, N2, N3 see Fig. 1.
| [1] | Dray JR, Gorham E (1964). Litter production in forests of the world.Advance in Ecological Research, 2, 101-157. |
| [2] | Du EZ, Zhou Z, Li P, Hu XY, Ma YC, Wang W, Zheng CY, Zhu JX, He JS, Fang JY (2013). NEECF: A project of nutrient enrichment experiments in China’s forests.Journal of Plant Ecology, 6, 428-435. |
| [3] | Fan HB, Liu WF, Qiu XQ, Xu L, Wang Q, Chen QF (2007). Responses of litterfall production in Chinese fir plantation to increased nitrogen deposition.Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26, 1335-1338. (in Chinese with English abstract)[樊后保, 刘文飞, 裘秀群, 徐雷, 王强, 陈秋凤 (2007). 杉木人工林凋落物量对氮沉降增加的初期响应. 生态学杂志, 26, 1335-1338.] |
| [4] | Fang JY, Liu GH, Zhu B, Wang XK, Liu SH (2006). Carbon budgets of three temperate forest ecosystems in Dongling Mt., Beijing, China.Science in China (Series D: Earth Sciences), 36, 533-543. (in Chinese with English abstract)[方精云, 刘国华, 朱彪, 王效科, 刘绍辉 (2006). 北京东灵山三种温带森林生态系统的碳循环. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 36, 533-543.] |
| [5] | Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Seitzinger SP, Asner GP, Cleveland CC, Green PA, Holland EA, Karl DM, Michaels AF, Porter JH, Townsend AR (2004). Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future.Bioecochemistry, 70, 153-226. |
| [6] | Gao XM, Du XJ, Wang ZL (2003). Comparison of seedling recruitment and establishment of Quercus wutaishanica in two habitats in Dongling Mountainous area, Beijing. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 27, 404-411. (in Chinese with English abstract)[高贤明, 杜晓军, 王中磊 (2003). 北京东灵山区两种生境条件下辽东栎幼苗补充与建立的比较. 植物生态学报, 27, 404-411.] |
| [7] | Gorissen A, Tietema A, Joosten NN, Estiarte M, Peñuelas J, Sowerby A, Emmett BA, Beier C (2004). Climate change affects carbon allocation to the soil in shrublands.Ecosystems, 7, 650-661. |
| [8] | Guan LL, Zhou GY, Zhang DQ, Liu JX, Zhang QM (2004). Twenty years of litterfall dynamics in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests at the Dinghushan forest ecosystem research station. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 28, 445-456. (in Chinese with English abstract)[官丽莉, 周国逸, 张德强, 刘菊秀, 张倩媚 (2004). 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林凋落物量20年动态研究. 植物生态学报, 28, 445-456.] |
| [9] | He JS, Wang QB, Hu D (1997). Studies on the biomass of typical shrubland and their regeneration capacity after cutting. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 21, 512-520. (in Chinese with English abstract)[贺金生, 王其兵, 胡东 (1997). 长江三峡地区典型灌丛的生物量及其再生能力. 植物生态学报, 21, 512-520.] |
| [10] | Howard D, Richard B (2003). Nitrogen: The essential public enemy.Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 771-781. |
| [11] | Hu HF, Wang ZH, Liu GH, Fu BJ (2006). Vegetation carbon storage of major shrublands in China.Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 30, 539-544. (in Chinese with English abstract)[胡会峰, 王志恒, 刘国华, 傅伯杰 (2006). 中国主要灌丛植被碳储量. 植物生态学报, 30, 539-544.] |
| [12] | Kikuzawa K, Asai T, Fukuchi M (1977). Leaf litter production in a plantation of Alnus inokumae. Journal of Ecology, 72, 993-999. |
| [13] | Kira T, Shidei T (1967). Primary production and turnover of organic matter in different forest ecosystems of the western Pacific.Japanese Journal of Ecology, 17, 70-87. |
| [14] | Kozovits AR, Bustamante MMC, Garofalo CR, Bucci S, Goldstein G (2007). Nutrient resorption and patterns of litter production and decomposition in a Neotropical Savanna. Functional Ecology, 21, 1034-1043. |
| [15] | Lieth H, Whittaker RH (1975). Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. Springer-Verlag, New York. |
| [16] | Liu L, Greaver TL (2010). A global perspective on below- ground carbon dynamics under nitrogen enrichment. Ecology Letters, 13, 819-828. |
| [17] | Liu XZ, Wang GA, Li JZ, Wang Q (2009). Nitrogen isotope composition characteristics of modern plants and their variations along an altitudinal gradient in Dongling Mountain in Beijing.Science in China (Series D: Earth Sciences), 39, 1347-1359. (in Chinese with English abstract)[刘贤赵, 王国安, 李嘉竹, 王庆 (2009). 北京东灵山地区现代植物氮同位素组成及其对海拔梯度的响应. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 39, 1347-1359.] |
| [18] | Lu M, Zhou XH, Luo YQ, Yang YH, Fang CM, Chen JK, Li B (2011). Minor stimulation of soil carbon storage by nitro- gen addition: A meta-analysis.Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 140, 234-244. |
| [19] | Lü Y, Zheng ZM, Meiliban M, Lu J, Wang XH (2013). Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on litterfall production and nutrient dynamics in a Schima superba forest in Zhejiang Province of East China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 3027-3034. (in Chinese with English abstract)[吕妍, 郑泽梅, 美丽班·马木提, 陆江, 王希华 (2013). 增施氮磷肥对木荷林凋落物生产量及其养分的影响. 应用生态学报, 24, 3027-3034.] |
| [20] | Mo JM, Xue H, Fang YT (2004). Litter decomposition and its responses to simulated N deposition for the major plants of Dinghushan forest in subtropical China.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24, 1413-1420. |
| [21] | Murty D, McMurtrie RE, Ryan MG (1996). Declining forest productivity in aging forest stands: A modeling analysis of alternative hypotheses. Tree Physiology, 16, 187-200. |
| [22] | Smaill SJ, Clinton PW, Greenfield LG (2008). Nitrogen fertilizer effects on litter fall, FH layer and mineral soil characteristics in New Zealand Pinus radiate plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 564-569. |
| [23] | Spiecker H (1999). Overview of recent growth trends in Euro- pean forests.Water Air and Soil Pollution, 116, 33-46. |
| [24] | Tamm CO (1991). Nitrogen in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Questions of Productivity, Vegetational Changes, and Ecosystem Stability. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 50-97. |
| [25] | Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG (1997). Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Sources and consequences.Ecological Applications, 7, 737-750. |
| [26] | Wang FY (1989). Review on the study of forest litterfall.Advances in Ecology, 6, 82-89. (in Chinese with English abstract)[王凤友 (1989). 森林凋落量研究综述. 生态学进展, 6, 82-89.] |
| [27] | Wessel WW, Tietema A, Beier C, Emmett BA, Peñuelas J, Riis-Nielson T (2004). A qualitative ecosystem assessment for different shrublands in western Europe under impact of climate change.Ecosystems, 7, 662-671. |
| [28] | Xu XN, Hirata E, Shibata H (2004). Effect of typhoon disturbance on fine litterfall and related nutrient input in a sub-tropical forest on Okinawa Island, Japan.Basic and Applied Ecology, 5, 271-282. |
| [29] | Zhang C, Zhang L, Li P, Shi WT, Xu XN (2014). Response of litter production and its seasonality to increased nitrogen deposition in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 33, 1205-1210. (in Chinese with English abstract)[张驰, 张林, 李鹏, 施文涛, 徐小牛 (2014). 亚热带常绿阔叶林凋落物生产及季节动态对模拟氮沉降增加的响应. 生态学杂志, 33, 1205-1210.] |
| [30] | Zheng SW, Tang M (2007). Summary of research on shrub biomass in China.Journal of Chengdu University (Natural Science Edition), 26, 189-192. (in Chinese with English abstract)[郑绍伟, 唐敏 (2007). 灌木群落及生物量研究综述. 成都大学学报(自然科学版), 26, 189-192.] |
| [1] | 赵掷艺, 黄伟权, 胡婧妍, 王义越, 虞梦婕, 吴玉环. 泥炭沼泽湿地植物残体分解及微生物作用机理研究进展[J]. , 2026, 50(预发表): 0-. |
| [2] | 谭秋颜, 张清, 高程, 褚海燕, 杨腾. 外生菌根真菌: 高寒生态系统碳氮循环的关键驱动者[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 584-599. |
| [3] | 邹纪开, 吴佳怡, 谷云懿, 陈宝明. 不同形态氮添加与丛枝菌根真菌对外来入侵植物白花鬼针草竞争力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 722-730. |
| [4] | 张诚航, 卫星, 吴纯泽, 王裕尧, 李浩楠. 大气还原态氮干湿沉降下水曲柳和兴安落叶松菌根化苗木生长响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(3): 649-659. |
| [5] | 贾会丽, 王睿, 常玉良, 林茂, 栗国梁, 武帅楷, 苏原, 董宽虎, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$. 不同水平氮添加下晋北赖草叶片化学计量特征及其对光合的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 429-441. |
| [6] | 汪子轩, 邢爱军, 陈子歆, 沈海花, 方精云. 长期氮添加对北方森林林下植物功能性状的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 244-255. |
| [7] | 侯霄帆, 马辰涵, 孙语倩, 高钰涵, 李品. 臭氧胁迫下叶片与细根凋落物分解的生态化学计量特征差异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(2): 268-278. |
| [8] | 朱润铖, 蔡锡安, 黄娟. 植物防御相关挥发性有机物排放及对氮沉降的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(5): 681-696. |
| [9] | 周思琪, 艾灵, 倪祥银, 吴福忠, 吴秋霞, 朱晶晶, 张欣影. 全球植物凋落物纤维素分解速率的变化特征及其影响因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(3): 393-403. |
| [10] | 卞嘉琛, 王睿, 高阳阳, 梁雯君, 晋红, 张文轩, 张晓荣, 郝杰, $\boxed{\hbox{王常慧}}$, 董宽虎, 刁华杰. 不同水平氮添加对晋北赖草草地地上和地下净初级生产力的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(12): 2043-2053. |
| [11] | 张旭东, 刘波, 张丹, 武海涛, 潘媛, 郑皓文, 李蕊, 严硕, 申敏琰, 赖明子. 湿地植物对土壤水分变化与凋落物覆盖的差异化响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(12): 2069-2079. |
| [12] | 陈诚智, 高钰森, 罗力嘉, 王东. 川西高寒窄叶鲜卑花灌丛凋落枝和凋落叶生产与分解[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(10): 1733-1743. |
| [13] | 黄智军, 甘子莹, 祝嘉新, 丘清燕, 胡亚林. 杉木不同器官不同碳氮比对土壤激发效应的影响及其机理[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(10): 1710-1720. |
| [14] | 冉佳鑫, 张宇辉, 王云, 杨智杰, 毛超. 增温和氮磷添加对亚热带森林凋落物溶解有机碳生物可降解性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(9): 1232-1242. |
| [15] | 马煦晗, 黄菊莹, 余海龙, 韩翠, 李冰. 降水量变化及氮添加下荒漠草原土壤有机碳及其易分解组分研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(8): 1065-1077. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19