植物生态学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 1227-1235.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.10.012
王彬1, 肖国举2, 毛桂莲3, 岳自慧1, 许兴1,*()
收稿日期:
2009-12-09
接受日期:
2010-03-05
出版日期:
2010-12-09
发布日期:
2010-10-31
通讯作者:
许兴
作者简介:
* E-mail: xuxingscience@126.com
WANG Bin1, XIAO Guo-Ju2, MAO Gui-Lian3, YUE Zi-Hui1, XU Xing1,*()
Received:
2009-12-09
Accepted:
2010-03-05
Online:
2010-12-09
Published:
2010-10-31
Contact:
XU Xing
摘要:
采用大田和盆栽相结合的试验方法, 研究了施用燃煤烟气脱硫废弃物(简称脱硫废弃物)后对盐碱土壤的改良状况及对油用向日葵(Helianthus annuus) (油葵)生长的影响。试验地设在宁夏平罗西大滩碱化土壤上, 设置5个不同脱硫废弃物施用量: 0、11.25 × 103、22.50 × 103、33.75 × 103和45.00 × 103 kg·hm-2, 连续3年(2006-2008年)观测了土壤pH值、全盐含量及油葵根系的长度与体积、叶片细胞膜透性和抗氧化保护酶系统。试验数据显示, 施入脱硫废弃物后, 土壤pH值、全盐含量、油葵叶片细胞膜透性、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性均呈逐年下降趋势, 油葵根系的长度和体积呈逐年上升趋势, 且各处理间均差异显著(p < 0.05)。研究结果表明, 脱硫废弃物的施用能显著改良盐碱土壤, 促进油葵的生长, 综合考虑经济因素, 11.25 × 103 kg·hm-2的施用量效果最佳。
王彬, 肖国举, 毛桂莲, 岳自慧, 许兴. 燃煤烟气脱硫废弃物对盐碱土的改良效应及对向日葵生长的影响. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(10): 1227-1235. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.10.012
WANG Bin, XIAO Guo-Ju, MAO Gui-Lian, YUE Zi-Hui, XU Xing. Effects of coal-fired flue gas desulfurated waste residue application on saline-alkali soil amelioration and oil-sunflower growth. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(10): 1227-1235. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.10.012
成分 Composition | CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | MgO | TiO2 | K2O | Na2O | MnO | P2O5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
含量 Content (%) | 37.67 | 2.16 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
表1 脱硫废弃物的化学成分
Table 1 The chemical composition of desulfurated waste residue
成分 Composition | CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | MgO | TiO2 | K2O | Na2O | MnO | P2O5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
含量 Content (%) | 37.67 | 2.16 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
改良前本底值 Background value before amelioration | 2006年秋 2006 Autumn | 2007年秋 2007 Autumn | 2008年秋 2008 Autumn | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 10.35 ± 0.13a | 10.21 ± 0.06a | 10.04 ± 0.10a | 10.01 ± 0.14a |
T1 | 10.28 ± 0.09a | 9.47 ± 0.08d | 8.39 ± 0.08d | 8.02 ± 0.12c |
T2 | 10.30 ± 0.06a | 9.32 ± 0.04e | 8.18 ± 0.11e | 7.93 ± 0.10c |
T3 | 10.30 ± 0.13a | 9.61 ± 0.09c | 8.96 ± 0.12c | 8.86 ± 0.12b |
T4 | 10.36 ± 0.08a | 9.84 ± 0.13b | 9.66 ± 0.14b | 8.76 ± 0.13b |
F/p | 2.25/0.152 | 210.20/0.000 | 1252.22/0.000 | 878.63/0.000 |
表2 施用脱硫废弃物后大田种植油葵0-20 cm土壤pH值的年际变化(平均值±标准误差, n = 5)
Table 2 Annual variation of 0-20cm soil pH in oil-sunflower field trial after added desulfurated waste residue (mean ± SE, n = 5)
改良前本底值 Background value before amelioration | 2006年秋 2006 Autumn | 2007年秋 2007 Autumn | 2008年秋 2008 Autumn | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 10.35 ± 0.13a | 10.21 ± 0.06a | 10.04 ± 0.10a | 10.01 ± 0.14a |
T1 | 10.28 ± 0.09a | 9.47 ± 0.08d | 8.39 ± 0.08d | 8.02 ± 0.12c |
T2 | 10.30 ± 0.06a | 9.32 ± 0.04e | 8.18 ± 0.11e | 7.93 ± 0.10c |
T3 | 10.30 ± 0.13a | 9.61 ± 0.09c | 8.96 ± 0.12c | 8.86 ± 0.12b |
T4 | 10.36 ± 0.08a | 9.84 ± 0.13b | 9.66 ± 0.14b | 8.76 ± 0.13b |
F/p | 2.25/0.152 | 210.20/0.000 | 1252.22/0.000 | 878.63/0.000 |
图1 施用脱硫废弃物后盆栽油葵0-20 cm土壤pH值的变化(2007-2008) (平均值±标准误差, n = 3)。 CK、T1、T2、T3、T4, 同表2。
Fig. 1 Variation of 0-20 cm soil pH in oil-sunflower pot trial after added desulfurated waste residue during 2007-2008 (mean ± SE, n = 3). CK, T1, T2, T3, T4, see Table 2.
改良前本底值 Background value before amelioration | 2006年秋 2006 Autumn | 2007年秋 2007 Autumn | 2008年秋 2008 Autumn | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.08 ± 0.16a | 5.95 ± 0.15c | 5.82 ± 0.15b | 5.80 ± 0.12a |
T1 | 6.02 ± 0.15a | 5.74 ± 0.10d | 5.43 ± 0.09c | 4.23 ± 0.09c |
T2 | 5.97 ± 0.18a | 5.70 ± 0.10d | 5.45 ± 0.10c | 4.02 ± 0.05d |
T3 | 6.04 ± 0.15a | 7.99 ± 0.17b | 6.78 ± 0.13a | 5.77 ± 0.14a |
T4 | 5.96 ± 0.17a | 8.55 ± 0.09a | 6.85 ± 0.14a | 5.64 ± 0.08b |
F/p | 1.09/0.425 | 512.54/0.000 | 853.57/0.000 | 1322.17/0.000 |
表3 施用脱硫废弃物后大田种植油葵0-20 cm土壤全盐的年际变化(平均值±标准误差, n = 5)
Table 3 Annual variation of 0-20 cm soil total salt content (‰) in oil-sunflower field trial after added desulfurated waste residue (mean ± SE, n = 5)
改良前本底值 Background value before amelioration | 2006年秋 2006 Autumn | 2007年秋 2007 Autumn | 2008年秋 2008 Autumn | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 6.08 ± 0.16a | 5.95 ± 0.15c | 5.82 ± 0.15b | 5.80 ± 0.12a |
T1 | 6.02 ± 0.15a | 5.74 ± 0.10d | 5.43 ± 0.09c | 4.23 ± 0.09c |
T2 | 5.97 ± 0.18a | 5.70 ± 0.10d | 5.45 ± 0.10c | 4.02 ± 0.05d |
T3 | 6.04 ± 0.15a | 7.99 ± 0.17b | 6.78 ± 0.13a | 5.77 ± 0.14a |
T4 | 5.96 ± 0.17a | 8.55 ± 0.09a | 6.85 ± 0.14a | 5.64 ± 0.08b |
F/p | 1.09/0.425 | 512.54/0.000 | 853.57/0.000 | 1322.17/0.000 |
图2 施用脱硫废弃物后盆栽油葵0-20 cm土壤全盐的变化(2007-2008)(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)。 CK、T1、T2、T3、T4, 同表2。
Fig. 2 Variation of 0-20 cm soil total salt content in oil-sunflower pot trial after added desulfurated waste residue during 2007-2008 (mean ± SE, n = 3). CK, T1, T2, T3, T4, see Table 2.
图3 施用脱硫废弃物后盆栽油葵苗期根系长度和体积的年际变化(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)。 同一年份中不同字母表示在0.01水平上差异显著(p < 0.01); F (0.01) = 5.99。CK、T1、T2、T3、T4, 同表2。
Fig. 3 Annual variation of root length and volume in oil-sunflower pot trial after added desulfurated waste residue in seedling period (mean ± SE, n = 3). Different letters in the same year indicate significant difference at 0.01 level. F (0.01) = 5.99. CK, T1, T2, T3, T4, see Table 2.
图4 施用脱硫废弃物后大田种植油葵苗期、成熟期叶片细胞膜透性(%)的年际变化(平均值±标准误差, n = 5)。 同一年份同一生育期中不同字母表示在0.01水平上差异显著(p < 0.01); F (0.01) = 4.43。CK、T1、T2、T3、T4, 同表2。
Fig. 4 Annual variation of leaf cell membrane permeability (%) in oil-sunflower field trial after added desulfurated waste residue in seedling and maturity periods (mean ± SE, n = 5). Ma: maturity period; Se: seedling period. Different letters in the same year and period indicate significant difference at 0.01 level. F (0.01) = 4.43. CK, T1, T2, T3, T4, see Table 2.
苗期 Seedling period | 成熟期 Maturity period | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | |
CK | 381.22 ± 10.10c | 361.43 ± 8.73b | 363.42 ± 9.71a | 362.69 ± 6.95c | 362.85 ± 7.53a | 342.99 ± 7.15a |
T1 | 356.18 ± 13.31d | 305.55 ± 8.09d | 266.81 ± 8.56d | 323.51 ± 7.80d | 315.77 ± 6.90b | 184.34 ± 10.15d |
T2 | 373.81 ± 10.18c | 293.94 ± 8.09e | 273.58 ± 6.51c | 313.78 ± 6.01e | 263.54 ± 6.37d | 161.27 ± 8.00e |
T3 | 398.46 ± 7.00b | 328.67 ± 11.07c | 258.89 ± 9.26e | 384.56 ± 11.36b | 304.76 ± 8.07c | 268.60 ± 8.05b |
T4 | 431.57 ± 7.37a | 371.49 ± 8.49a | 325.52 ± 8.45b | 432.33 ± 7.52a | 365.87 ± 6.97a | 204.41 ± 6.85c |
F/p | 85.13/0.000 | 209.22/0.000 | 549.03/0.000 | 279.15/0.000 | 1234.87/0.000 | 1304.99/0.000 |
表4 施用脱硫废弃物后大田种植油葵苗期和成熟期叶片超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性(U·g-1FW)的年际变化(平均值±标准误差, n = 5)
Table 4 Annual variation of leaf superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (U·g-1FW) in oil-sunflower field trial after in seedling and maturity periods (mean ± SE, n = 5)
苗期 Seedling period | 成熟期 Maturity period | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | |
CK | 381.22 ± 10.10c | 361.43 ± 8.73b | 363.42 ± 9.71a | 362.69 ± 6.95c | 362.85 ± 7.53a | 342.99 ± 7.15a |
T1 | 356.18 ± 13.31d | 305.55 ± 8.09d | 266.81 ± 8.56d | 323.51 ± 7.80d | 315.77 ± 6.90b | 184.34 ± 10.15d |
T2 | 373.81 ± 10.18c | 293.94 ± 8.09e | 273.58 ± 6.51c | 313.78 ± 6.01e | 263.54 ± 6.37d | 161.27 ± 8.00e |
T3 | 398.46 ± 7.00b | 328.67 ± 11.07c | 258.89 ± 9.26e | 384.56 ± 11.36b | 304.76 ± 8.07c | 268.60 ± 8.05b |
T4 | 431.57 ± 7.37a | 371.49 ± 8.49a | 325.52 ± 8.45b | 432.33 ± 7.52a | 365.87 ± 6.97a | 204.41 ± 6.85c |
F/p | 85.13/0.000 | 209.22/0.000 | 549.03/0.000 | 279.15/0.000 | 1234.87/0.000 | 1304.99/0.000 |
图5 施用脱硫废弃物后盆栽油葵叶片过氧化物酶(POD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性在不同生育期的变化(2008年) (平均值±标准误差, n = 3)
Fig. 5 Variation of leaf peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) activity in oil-sunflower pot trial after in different periods during 2008 (mean ± SE, n = 3). Ma, maturity period; Se, seedling period; Sq, squaring period.
[1] | Amezketa E, Aragues R, Gazol R (2005). Efficiency of sulfuric acid, mined gypsum, and two gypsum by-products in soil crusting prevention and sodic soil reclamation. Agronomy Journal, 97, 983-989. |
[2] | An GY (安国勇), Dong FC (董发才), Hu N (胡楠), Song CP (宋纯鹏) (2002). Calcium modulate plasma membrane potential and absorbing K+ in responsive to salt stress in the cell of wheat roots. Journal of Henan University (Natural Science) 河南大学学报(自然科学版)), 32, 25-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Bai HB (白海波), Mao GL (毛桂莲), Li XH (李晓慧), Zheng GQ (郑国琦), Yang J (杨涓), Xu X (许兴) (2009). The effects of desulfurized slag on antioxidant enzyme activity and lipid peroxidation of rice seedlings on saline-alkali land. Acta Agricultural Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica (西北农业学报), 18, 122-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Chen H (陈欢), Wang SJ (王淑娟), Chen CH (陈昌和), Xu XC (徐旭常) (2005). The application and effect of desulphurized waste of flue gas in improving alkali soil. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 23, 38-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] |
Chun S, Nishiyama M, Matsumoto S (2001). Sodic soils reclaimed with by-product from flue gas desulfurization: corn production and soil quality. Environmental Pollution, 114, 453-459.
DOI URL PMID |
[6] | Clark RB (2003). Growth of forages legumes and grasses in acidic soil amended with flue gas desulfurization products. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 34, 157-180. |
[7] | Feng R (冯锐), Miao JW (苗济文), Wang PW (王平武) (2000). Reviews and prospects on improvement of saline-alkali field in Ningxia in the past 50 years. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology (宁夏农林科技), 1, 25-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Gao YS (高玉山), Zhu ZY (朱知运), Bi YL (毕业莉), Feng ZS (冯振生) (2003). Researches on application of gypsum for the improvement of soda saline and alkaline soil. Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences (吉林农业科学), 28, 26-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Li HS (李合生) (2000). Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological Biochemical Experiment (植物生理生化实验技术与方法). Higher Education Press, Beijing. 164-261. (in Chinese) |
[10] | Li HZ (李焕珍), Xu YP (徐玉佩), Yang WQ (杨伟奇), Zhang CS (张重善), Li JB (李纪柏) (1999). Study on effect of using sulfur-removal gypsum as an amendment to the heavy soda saline alkali soil. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 18, 25-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Liang YC, Yang CG, Shi HH (2001). Effects of silicon on growth and mineral composition of barley grown under toxic levels of aluminum. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 24, 229-243. |
[12] | Ma XL (马雪莲), Luo CK (罗成科), Xu Q (许强), Shen ZR (沈振荣) (2007). Effect of desulphurized waste on improving the middle saline alkaline soil and on growing and development oil sunflower in northern of Yinchuan of Ningxia Province. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science (安徽农业科学), 35, 3046-3047. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Mao GL (毛桂莲), Ma CY (马春燕), Xie YJ (谢亚军), Xu X (许兴), Liu JF (刘金凤) (2009). Influence of CaSO4 on germination of oil sunflowers seeds under saline-alkali stress. Journal of Agricultural Sciences (农业科学研究), 30, 21-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Oster JD, Frenkel H (1980). The chemistry of the reclamation of sodic soils with gypsum and lime. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 44, 41-45. |
[15] | Qadir M, Schubert S, Ghafoor A, Murtaza G (2001). Amelioration strategies for sodic soils: a review. Land Degradation Development, 12, 357-386. |
[16] | Qi CH (祁晨华), Lü ZY (吕志远), Yang PL (杨培岭), Tian CW (田存旺), Sun HY (孙海燕), Sun HL (孙海龙) (2007). Summary of improving sodic soils with desulphurization by-product. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (内蒙古农业大学学报), 28, 201-203. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Qin P (秦萍), Xiao GJ (肖国举), Luo CK (罗成科), Zhang FJ (张峰举) (2008). Study on the application amount of desulfurized gypsum from coal-fired power plant in improving alkalized soil to plant sweet sorghum. Modern Agricultural Sciences (现代农业科学), 15, 32-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Stout WL (1996). Use of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) by-product gypsum on alfalfa. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 27, 2419-2432. |
[19] | Wang FQ (王方群), Yuan YT (原永涛), Qi LQ (齐立强) (2004). The properties of comprehensive utilization of desulphurization gypsum. Fly Ash Comprehensive Utilization (粉煤灰综合利用), 1, 41-44. (in Chinese) |
[20] | Wang JM (王金满), Yang PL (杨培岭), Shi Y (石懿), Ren SM (任树梅) (2005). Effect on physical and chemical properties of soil and sunflower growth when sodic soils reclaimed with by-product from flue gas desulphurization. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 19, 34-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] |
Wang SJ, Chen CH, Xu XC, Li YJ (2008). Amelioration of alkali soil using flue gas desulfurization byproducts: productivity and environmental quality. Environmental Pollution, 151, 200-204.
URL PMID |
[22] | Wendell RR (1996). High-calcium flue gas desulfurization products reduce aluminum toxicity in an Appalachian soil. Journal of Environment Quality, 27, 1401-1410. |
[23] | Yue ZH (岳自慧), Xu X (许兴), Mao GL (毛桂莲) (2009). Effects of calcium of desulphurized coal burning residue on stress-resistant ability under saline-alkali stress of plant. Journal of Agricultural Sciences (农业科学研究), 30, 48-51. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Zhao R (赵瑞) (2006). The Study on the Alkaline Soil Improvement by Sulfur-removal Waste Residue of Coom (煤烟脱硫副产物改良碱化土壤研究), Beijing Forestry University, Beijing. 5-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[25] | Zhang WH (章文华), Liu YL (刘友良) (1993). Effects of calcium on absorption and distribution of ions and H+-ATP activity in barley and wheat under salt stress. Acta Botanica Sinica (植物学报), 35, 435-440. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[26] | Zheng QS (郑青松), Wang RL (王仁雷), Liu YL (刘友良) (2001). Effects of Ca2+ on absorption and distribution of ions in salt-treated cotton seedlings. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica (植物生理学报), 27, 325-330. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 唐奇志, 刘兆普, 刘玲, 郑青松, 陈铭达. 海侵地区不同降雨条件下海水灌溉‘油葵G101’的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(6): 1000-1006. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19