退化程度对高寒草甸不同优势植物根系形态性状和生物量的影响

doi:10.17521/cjpe.2024.0019

植物生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (12): 1666-1682.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0019 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2024.0019

所属专题：草原与草业

退化程度对高寒草甸不同优势植物根系形态性状和生物量的影响

刘位会¹, 宋小艳¹, 才仁多杰², 丁路明¹, 王长庭¹^,^*()

¹青藏高原高寒草地生态保护与利用四川林业草原重点实验室, 西南民族大学草地资源学院, 青藏高原研究院, 成都 610041
²澜沧江源园区国家公园管理委员会, 西宁 810003

收稿日期:2024-01-23 接受日期:2024-09-28 出版日期:2024-12-20 发布日期:2024-12-20
通讯作者: *王长庭(wangct@swun.edu.cn)
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究(2019QZKK0302-02);国家自然科学基金(U20A2008);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(ZYN2023083)

Effects of degradation degree on the root morphological traits and biomass of dominant plant species in alpine meadows

LIU Wei-Hui¹, SONG Xiao-Yan¹, CAIRENDUOJIE ², DING Lu-Ming¹, WANG Chang-Ting¹^,^*()

¹Sichuan Provincial Forest and Grassland Key Laboratory of Alpine Grassland Conservation and Utilization of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Institute of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Research, College of Grassland Resources, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China
²Administrative Committee of Lancang River Source National Park, Xining 810003, China

Received:2024-01-23 Accepted:2024-09-28 Online:2024-12-20 Published:2024-12-20
Contact: *WANG Chang-Ting(wangct@swun.edu.cn)
Supported by:
Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP)(2019QZKK0302-02);National Natural Science Foundation of China(U20A2008);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(ZYN2023083)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 了解高寒草甸植物根系形态性状和生物量分配对退化生境的适应性策略, 有助于探索植物根系形态可塑性机制与生物量分配的协同关系, 对深入了解退化高寒草甸植物的生境耐逆性策略具有重要意义。该研究以不同退化程度(未退化、轻度、中度和重度退化)高寒草甸为研究对象, 分析了禾本科(草地早熟禾(Poa pratensis)和垂穗披碱草(Elymus nutans))、莎草科(矮生嵩草(Carex alatauensis)和青藏薹草(Carex moorcroftii))和杂类草(草玉梅(Anemone rivularis)和钝苞雪莲(Saussurea nigrescens))的生物量、根系形态性状以及生物量与根系形态性状之间的关联性。结果表明: 1)与其他物种相比, 矮生嵩草地上生物量在中度退化下降幅最大(71.44%), 根冠比在轻度退化下增幅最大(216.92%)。草地早熟禾和草玉梅地上和地下生物量在中度退化下增加, 根冠比随退化程度增加无显著变化。草玉梅相对地上生物量和垂穗披碱草相对地下生物量在重度退化下增幅最大(384.90%和299.57%)。2)重度退化下矮生嵩草的总根长降幅最大(72.81%), 青藏薹草总根长在轻度退化下增幅最大(14.81%); 退化增加了草地早熟禾、矮生嵩草、青藏薹草和草玉梅的根平均直径, 降低了其比根长。草地早熟禾、垂穗披碱草、矮生嵩草、草玉梅和钝苞雪莲根尖数和分叉数随退化程度增加而降低。3)草地早熟禾相对地下生物量与根尖数显著相关。垂穗披碱草和矮生嵩草相对地下生物量取决于总根长和分叉数。青藏薹草相对地上生物量与总根表面积显著相关, 相对地下生物量取决于根体积和比根长。草玉梅和钝苞雪莲相对地上生物量与总根长显著相关, 相对地下生物量取决于比根长的变化。总之, 不同优势植物通过调整其生物量分配和根系形态特征来适应退化引起的土壤微环境, 且这种适应性策略在不同物种间是不同的, 体现了高寒草甸植物对逆境响应策略的多样性。

关键词: 高寒草甸, 退化, 地上生物量, 地下生物量, 根系形态性状, 优势种

Abstract:

Aims Understanding the adaptive strategies of plant root morphological traits and biomass allocation in alpine meadows under degradation is crucial for exploring the synergistic relationship between root morphological plasticity and biomass distribution. This knowledge is essential for deepening our insight into the stress tolerance strategies of plants in degraded alpine meadows.

Methods In this study, we investigated the aboveground and belowground biomass, root morphological traits, and their interrelationships in grasses (Poa pratensis and Elymus nutans), sedges (Carex alatauensis and C. moorcroftii), and forbs (Anemone rivularis and Saussurea nigrescens) across alpine meadows with varying degrees of degradation (nondegraded, lightly degraded, moderately degraded, and severely degraded).

Important findings The results show that: 1) Carex alatauensis exhibited the greatest reduction in aboveground biomass under moderate degradation (71.44%) while its root-to-shoot ratio increased the most under light degradation (216.92%) among all species examined. Both Poa pratensis and Anemone rivularis showed increased aboveground and belowground biomass under moderate degradation, and their root-to-shoot ratios showed no significant change with increasing degradation. The relative abundance of aboveground biomass in Anemone rivularis and the relative abundance of belowground biomass in Elymus nutans increased the most under severe degradation (384.90% and 299.57%, respectively). 2) Carex alatauensis showed the greatest decrease in total root length under severe degradation (72.81%), whereas Carex moorcroftii had the greatest increase in total root length under light degradation (14.81%). Degradation increased the average root diameter of Poa pratensis, Carex alatauensis, Carex moorcroftii, and Anemone rivularis while recuding their specific root length. The number of root tips and branching in Poa pratensis, Elymus nutans, Carex alatauensis, Anemone rivularis and Saussurea nigrescens decreased as degradation intensified. 3) The relative abundance of Poa pratensis belowground biomass was significantly correlated with the number of root tips. The relative abundance of belowground biomass in both Elymus nutans and Carex alatauensis depended on the total root length and the number of branching. For Carex moorcroftii, the relative abundance of aboveground biomass was mainly correlated with total root surface area, while the relative abundance of belowground biomass depended on root volume and specific root length. The relative abundance of aboveground biomass in both Anemone rivularis and Saussurea nigrescens was significantly associated with total root length, while their relative abundance of belowground biomass was influenced by specific root length. In conclusion, different dominant plant species adapt to the soil microenvironments caused by degradation by adjusting their biomass allocation and root morphological traits, and these adaptive strategies vary among species, reflecting the diversity of stress tolerance strategies in alpine meadow plants.

Key words: alpine meadow, degradation, aboveground biomass, belowground biomass, root morphological traits, dominant species

刘位会, 宋小艳, 才仁多杰, 丁路明, 王长庭. 退化程度对高寒草甸不同优势植物根系形态性状和生物量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(12): 1666-1682. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0019

LIU Wei-Hui, SONG Xiao-Yan, CAIRENDUOJIE , DING Lu-Ming, WANG Chang-Ting. Effects of degradation degree on the root morphological traits and biomass of dominant plant species in alpine meadows. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2024, 48(12): 1666-1682. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0019

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/10.17521/cjpe.2024.0019

https://www.plant-ecology.com/CN/Y2024/V48/I12/1666

图/表 8

表1 青藏高原不同退化程度高寒草甸植被特征(平均值±标准误)

Table 1 Vegetation characteristics of alpine meadow at varying degrees of degradation on the Qingzang Plateau (mean ± SE)

退化梯度 Degradation degree	群落盖度 Coverage (%)	平均高度 Average height (cm)	地上生物量 Aboveground biomass (g·m^-2)	地下生物量 Belowground biomass (g·m^-2)	物种丰富度 Species richness
未退化 ND	0.87 ± 0.01^a	31.00 ± 2.33^a	457.93 ± 68.18^a	519.96 ± 69.59^ab	20.80 ± 0.63^a
轻度退化 LD	0.76 ± 0.01^b	14.17 ± 1.42^b	364.56 ± 93.09^ab	627.41 ± 113.33^ab	19.27 ± 0.50^ab
中度退化 MD	0.65 ± 0.01^c	16.63 ± 4.10^b	206.25 ± 23.78^b	908.18 ± 192.67^a	16.40 ± 0.05^c
重度退化 SD	0.62 ± 0.01^c	3.26 ± 0.24^c	127.04 ± 9.06^b	248.42 ± 35.03^b	17.43 ± 0.73^bc

表2 青藏高原不同退化程度高寒草甸优势植物生物量占各功能群的比例(平均值±标准误)

Table 2 Proportion of dominant plant biomass of each functional group of alpine meadow at varying degrees of degradation on the Qingzang Plateau (mean ± SE)

退化梯度 Degradation degree	禾本科 Poaceae		莎草科 Cyperaceae		杂类草 Forb
退化梯度 Degradation degree	草地早熟禾 Poa pratensis (%)	垂穗披碱草 Elymus nutans (%)	矮生嵩草 Carex alatauensis (%)	青藏薹草 Carex moorcroftii (%)	草玉梅 Anemone rivularis (%)	钝苞雪莲 Saussurea nigrescens (%)
未退化 ND	20.85 ± 2.89^a	31.00 ± 1.44^a	24.73 ± 1.21^c	61.02 ± 0.71^a	32.63 ± 1.05^ab	26.69 ± 1.79^a
轻度退化 LD	12.45 ± 8.68^ab	21.13 ± 0.27^b	46.96 ± 1.35^b	30.57 ± 0.88^b	34.91 ± 0.73^a	13.26 ± 0.56^b
中度退化 MD	8.90 ± 1.70^b	10.56 ± 1.77^c	58.65 ± 2.61^a	23.68 ± 2.96^b	26.38 ± 1.96^b	25.71 ± 1.67^a
重度退化 SD	14.62 ± 1.68^ab	21.28 ± 3.03^b	46.63 ± 0.87^b	28.04 ± 4.72^b	25.43 ±3.69^b	26.96± 3.19^a

图1 青藏高原高寒草甸不同退化程度对土壤理化性质的影响(平均值±标准误, n = 3)。不同小写字母表示不同退化程度间差异显著(p < 0.05)。LD, 轻度退化; MD, 中度退化; ND, 未退化; SD, 重度退化。

Fig. 1 Effects of degradation degree on soil physicochemical properties in alpine meadows on the Qingzang Plateau (mean ± SE, n = 3). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different degradation degrees (p < 0.05). LD, light degradation; MD, moderate degradation; ND, non-degradation; SD, severe degradation.

图2 青藏高原高寒草甸优势植物的地上、地下生物量和根冠比对不同退化程度的响应(平均值± 95%置信区间)。AGB, 地上生物量; BGB, 地下生物量; RAGB, 相对地上生物量; RBGB, 相对地下生物量; RSR, 根冠比。LD, 轻度退化; MD, 中度退化; SD, 重度退化。RR, 响应比。

Fig. 2 Responses of aboveground and belowground biomass and root-to-shoot ratios of alpine meadow dominant species to different degradation degrees on the Qingzang Plateau (mean ± 95% CI). AGB, aboveground biomass; BGB, belowground biomass; RAGB, relative abundance of aboveground biomass; RBGB, relative abundance of belowground biomass; RSR, root-shoot ratio. LD, light degradation; MD, moderate degradation; SD, severe degradation. RR, response ratio.

图3 青藏高原高寒草甸优势植物根系形态性状对不同退化程度的响应(平均值± 95%置信区间)。Forks, 分叉数; RAD, 根平均直径; RSA, 总根表面积; RV, 根系体积; SRL, 比根长; Tips, 根尖数; TRL, 总根长。LD, 轻度退化; MD, 中度退化; SD, 重度退化。RR, 响应比。

Fig. 3 Responses of root morphological traits of alpine meadow dominant species to different degradation degrees on the Qingzang Plateau (mean ± 95% CI). Forks, number of forks; RAD, root average diameter; RSA, root surface area; RV, root volume; SRL, specific root length; Tips, root tips; TRL, total root length. LD, light degradation; MD, moderate degradation; SD, severe degradation. RR, response ratio.

图4 青藏高原高寒草甸优势植物根系形态性状和生物量与环境因子之间的关系。AGB, 地上生物量; BGB, 地下生物量; BD, 土壤密度; Forks, 分叉数; RAD, 根平均直径; RAGB, 相对地上生物量; RBGB, 相对地下生物量; RSA, 根表面积; RSR, 根冠比; RV, 根体积; SAN, 土壤铵态氮含量; SNN, 土壤硝态氮含量; SOC, 土壤有机碳含量; SRL, 比根长; STN, 土壤全氮含量; STP, 土壤全磷含量; SWC, 土壤含水量; Tips, 根尖数; TRL, 总根长。*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001。

Fig. 4 Relationship between root morphological traits and biomass of alpine meadow dominant species and environmental factors on the Qingzang Plateau. AGB, aboveground biomass; BGB, belowground biomass; BD, soil density; Forks, number of forks; RAD, root average diameter; RAGB, relative abundance of aboveground biomass; RBGB, relative abundance of belowground biomass; RSA, root surface area; RSR, root-to-shoot ratio; RV, root volume; SAN, soil ammonium nitrogen content; SNN, soil nitrate nitrogen content; SOC, soil organic carbon content; SRL, specific root length; STN, soil total nitrogen content; STP, soil total phosphorus; SWC, soil water content; Tips, root tips; TRL, total root length. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.

表3 青藏高原高寒草甸不同优势植物相对地上生物量与根系形态性状的逐步回归分析

Table 3 Stepwise regression analysis of the relative abundance of aboveground biomass of different dominant plant species influenced by the root morphological traits in alpine meadow on the Qingzang Plateau

优势种 Dominant species	最优模型 Optimal model	校正R² Correction R²	p
草地早熟禾 Poa pratensis	RAGB = 0.00006TRL^* - 0.008RV + 0.01RAD - 0.003	0.07	>0.05
垂穗披碱草 Elymus nutans	RAGB = -0.000008TRL^* - 0.02	0.04	>0.05
矮生嵩草 Carex alatauensis	RAGB = 0.0013TRL^*** -0.004	0.03	>0.05
青藏薹草 Carex moorcroftii	RAGB = 0.0004RSA^*** - 0.000003Forks^* - 0.003	0.39	<0.001
草玉梅 Anemone rivularis	RAGB = -0.0004SRL^** + 0.0005TRL^* + 0.01RV^* - 0.003RSA + 0.00003Tips + 0.04	0.34	<0.01
钝苞雪莲 Saussurea nigrescens	RAGB = 0.00005TRL^* + 0.009RAD^* - 1.7344	0.48	<0.001

表4 青藏高原高寒草甸不同优势植物相对地下生物量与根系形态性状的逐步回归分析

Table 4 Stepwise regression analysis of the relative abundance of belowground biomass of different dominant plant species influenced by the root morphological traits in alpine meadow on the Qingzang Plateau

优势种 Dominant species	最优模型 Optimal model	校正R²Correction R²	p
草地早熟禾 Poa pratensis	RBGB = 0.000004Tips^**- 0.000001SRL - 0.0002	0.19	<0.01
垂穗披碱草 Elymus nutans	RBGB = -0.00009TRL^* - 0.03RAD^+ 0.0004RSA^ - 0.000002SRL^* + 0.000003Forks^* + 0.000004Tips + 0.02	0.69	<0.001
矮生嵩草 Carex alatauensis	RBGB = 0.00002TRL^* - 0.00001Forks^* + 0.01RV + 0.003	0.20	<0.05
青藏薹草 Carex moorcroftii	RBGB = 0.02RV^*** - 0.00007SRL^* + 0.006	0.54	<0.001
草玉梅 Anemone rivularis	RBGB= -0.00009SRL^*+0.00002Forks^* + 0.00001Tips^* - 0.0003RSA^ + 0.003RV^** - 0.0007RAD + 0.02	0.82	<0.001
钝苞雪莲 Saussurea nigrescens	RBGB = 0.0001RSA^*** - 0.000008SRL^* - 0.001	0.53	<0.001

参考文献 73

[1]	Ade LJ, He B, Wang CT, Hu L, Zi HB (2015). Effects of Chenopodium ambrosioides on soil enzyme activity, microorganism quantity and soil nutrient content of three cultivated pastures of rhizosphere soil in northwestern Sichuan. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 28, 815-821.
	[ 阿的鲁骥, 何兵, 王长庭, 胡雷, 字洪标 (2015). 入侵植物土荆芥对川西北高寒草甸3种培育牧草根际土壤酶活性、微生物数量及土壤养分的影响. 西南农业学报, 28, 815-821.]
[2]	Ban ZH, Wang Q (2015). Response of drought-loving lotus grass and elderberry competition to simulated warming. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 43-51.
	[ 班芷桦, 王琼 (2015). 喜旱莲子草和接骨草竞争对模拟增温的响应. 植物生态学报, 39, 43-51.] DOI
[3]	Bergmann J, Weigelt A, van der Plas F, Laughlin DC, Kuyper TW, Guerrero-Ramirez N, Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Bruelheide H, Freschet GT, Iversen CM, Kattge J, McCormack ML, Meier IC, Rillig MC, Roumet C, et al. (2020). The fungal collaboration gradient dominates the root economics space in plants. Science Advances, 6, eaba3756. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aba3756.
[4]	Bouma TJ, Nielsen KL, van Hal J, Koutstaal B (2001). Root system topology and diameter distribution of species from habitats differing in inundation frequency. Functional Ecology, 15, 360-369.
[5]	Cao J, Adamowski JF, Deo RC, Xu X, Gong Y, Feng Q (2019). Grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: reevaluation of causative factors. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 72, 988-995.
[6]	Cao J, Wei C, Adamowski JF, Biswas A, Li Y, Zhu G, Liu C, Feng Q (2021). On China’s Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, duration of grazing exclosure alters R:S ratio, root morphology and attending root biomass. Soil and Tillage Research, 209, 104969. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2021.104969.
[7]	Caruso T, Mafrica R, Bruno M, Vescio R, Sorgonà A (2021). Root architectural traits of rooted cuttings of two fig cultivars: treatments with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi formulation. Scientia Horticulturae, 283, 110083. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110083.
[8]	Chen XX, Shi FX, Sun FD, Li F(2019). Spatial Distribution Characteristics of the Number and Structure of Grazing Livestock in Typical Pastoral Counties in Northwest Sichuan. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 25, 63-69.
	[ 陈晓霞, 石福孙, 孙飞达, 李飞(2019). 川西北典型牧业县放牧家畜数量及结构的空间分布特征. 应用与环境生物学报, 25, 63-69.]
[9]	Cheng D, Niklas K (2007). Above- and below-ground biomass relationships across 1534 forested communities. Annals of Botany, 99, 95-102.
[10]	Dong S, Shang Z, Gao J, Boone RB (2020). Enhancing sustainability of grassland ecosystems through ecological restoration and grazing management in an era of climate change on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 287, 106684. DOI: 10.1016/j. agee.2019.106684.
[11]	Dong SK, Wen L, Li YY, Wang XX, Zhu L, Li XY (2012). Soil-quality effects of grassland degradation and restoration on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 76, 2256-2264.
[12]	Du JH, Liu AL, Dong YX, Hu MY, Liang J, Li W (2014). Architectural characteristics of roots in typical coastal psammophytes of South China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 38, 888-895.
	[ 杜建会, 刘安隆, 董玉祥, 胡绵友, 梁杰, 李薇 (2014). 华南海岸典型沙生植物根系构型特征. 植物生态学报, 38, 888-895.] DOI
[13]	Du ZY, Cong N (2024). Response of vegetation and soil characteristics to different levels of degraded grassland on the Tibetan Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44, 2504-2516.
	[ 杜志勇, 丛楠 (2024). 植被与土壤特征对青藏高原不同程度退化草地的响应研究. 生态学报, 44, 2504-2516.]
[14]	Enquist BJ, Niklas KJ (2002). Global allocation rules for patterns of biomass partitioning in seed plants. Science, 295, 1517-1520. PMID
[15]	Fitter AH, Stickland TR (1991). Architectural analysis of plant root systems. 2. Influence of nutrient supply on architecture in contrasting plant species. New Phytologist, 118, 383-389.
[16]	Fort F, Cruz P, Jouany C (2014). Hierarchy of root functional trait values and plasticity drive early-stage competition for water and phosphorus among grasses. Functional Ecology, 28, 1030-1040.
[17]	Freschet GT, Kichenin E, Wardle DA (2015). Explaining within-community variation in plant biomass allocation: a balance between organ biomass and morphology above vs below ground? Journal of Vegetation Science, 26, 431-440.
[18]	Ge ZC, Xu WZ, Wu ZX, Liu Y, Shi L, Qiao Y, Geng JC (2022). Root morphological characteristics of different alfalfa varieties in sandy grass bottomland of Yulin. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 50(8), 54-63.
	[ 葛志超, 徐伟洲, 武治兴, 刘阳, 史雷, 乔雨, 耿金才 (2022). 榆林风沙草滩地不同品种紫花苜蓿的根系形态特征. 贵州农业科学, 50(8), 54-63.]
[19]	Guo X, Hu ZM, Li SG, Guo Q (2021). Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on belowground biomass of temperate typical steppe in Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 40, 929-939.
	[ 郭旋, 胡中民, 李胜功, 郭群 (2021). 氮磷添加对内蒙古温带典型草原地下生物量的影响. 生态学杂志, 40, 929-939.]
[20]	Hawkes CV, Sullivan JJ (2001). The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: a meta-analysis. Ecology, 82, 2045-2058.
[21]	Hector A, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris R, Hogberg P, Huss-Danell K, Joshi J, Jumpponen A, et al. (1999). Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science, 286, 1123-1127. DOI PMID
[22]	Hou LL, Yan RR, Zhang Y, Xin XP (2020). Effects of grazing intensity on functional traits of Leymus chinensis in meadow steppe. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 53, 2562-2572.
	[ 侯路路, 闫瑞瑞, 张宇, 辛晓平 (2020). 放牧强度对草甸草原羊草功能性状的影响. 中国农业科学, 53, 2562-2572.] DOI
[23]	Kong D, Wang J, Kardol P, Wu H, Zeng H, Deng X, Deng Y (2015). The root economics spectrum: divergence of absorptive root strategies with root diameter. Biogeosciences Discussions, 12, 13041-13067.
[24]	Laliberté E (2017). Below-ground frontiers in trait-based plant ecology. New Phytologist, 213, 1597-1603. DOI PMID
[25]	Li Q, Zhao CZ, Kang MP, Li XY (2021). The relationship of the main root-shoot morphological characteristics and biomass allocation of Saussurea salsa under different habitat conditions in Sugan Lake wetland on the northern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Ecological Indicators, 128, 107836. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021. 107836.
[26]	Li TL, Huo GW, Wu YN (2022). Comparison of root traits of Stipa krylovii and Allium polyrhizum under grazing in typical steppe. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 360-368.
	[ 李天良, 霍光伟, 乌云娜 (2022). 放牧影响下典型草原克氏针茅和多根葱根系属性比较. 应用生态学报, 33, 360-368.] DOI
[27]	Li XL, Feng YH (2015). Research advance on relation of aerial part and root traits of rice. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 31(6), 1-6. DOI
	[ 李香玲, 冯跃华 (2015). 水稻根系生长特性及其与地上部分关系的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 31(6), 1-6.] DOI
[28]	Li XP, Zhao CZ, Ren Y, Zhang J, Lei L (2018). Fractal root systems of Elymus nutans under different density conditions in Gahai Wetland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 1176-1182.
	[ 李雪萍, 赵成章, 任悦, 张晶, 雷蕾 (2018). 尕海湿地不同密度条件下垂穗披碱草根系分形结构. 生态学报, 38, 1176-1182.]
[29]	Li YH, Luo T, Lu Q (2008). Plant height as a simple predictor of the root to shoot ratio: evidence from alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Vegetation Science, 19, 245-252.
[30]	Li YY, Dong SK, Li XY, Wen L (2012). Effect of enclosure on vegetation photosynthesis and biomass of degraded grasslands in headwater area of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 20, 621-625.
	[ 李媛媛, 董世魁, 李小艳, 温璐 (2012). 围栏封育对三江源区退化高寒草地植物光合作用及生物量的影响. 草地学报, 20, 621-625.] DOI
[31]	Liu H, Mi Z, Lin LI, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang F, Wang H, Liu L, Zhu B, Cao G, Zhao X (2018). Shifting plant species composition in response to climate change stabilizes grassland primary production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 4051-4056. DOI PMID
[32]	Liu SL, Wang CT, Zhang CB, Hu L, Tang LT, Pan P (2021). A comparative study of root characteristics of three gramineous herbage species in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 30(3), 41-53. DOI
	[ 刘斯莉, 王长庭, 张昌兵, 胡雷, 唐立涛, 潘攀 (2021). 川西北高原3种禾本科牧草根系特征比较研究. 草业学报, 30(3), 41-53.] DOI
[33]	Liu Y, Wang GL, Liu GB, Qu QL, Yuan ZC (2010). Difference and inherent linkage of root characteristics in different root classification of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 1386-1393.
	[ 刘莹, 王国梁, 刘国彬, 曲秋玲, 袁子成 (2010). 不同分类系统下油松幼苗根系特征的差异与联系. 植物生态学报, 34, 1386-1393.] DOI
[34]	Luo FL, Zhang FW, Zhang GR, Wang CY, Zhu JB, Yang YS, Li YN (2021). Effects of grazing intensity on community characteristics and vegetation living states in alpine meadows. Pratacultural Science, 38, 2097-2105.
	[ 罗方林, 张法伟, 张光茹, 王春雨, 祝景彬, 杨永胜, 李英年 (2021). 放牧强度对高寒草甸群落特征及植被生存状态的影响. 草业科学, 38, 2097-2105.]
[35]	Ma XZ, Wang XP (2021). Aboveground and belowground biomass and its’ allometry for Salsola passerina shrub in degraded steppe desert in Northwestern China. Land Degradation & Development, 32, 714-722.
[36]	Mensah S, Glèlè Kakaï R, Seifert T (2016). Patterns of biomass allocation between foliage and woody structure: the effects of tree size and specific functional traits. Annals of Forest Research, 59, 49-60.
[37]	Nicotra AB, Atkin OK, Bonser SP, Davidson AM, Finnegan EJ, Mathesius U, Poot P, Purugganan MD, Richards CL, Valladares F, van Kleunen M (2010). Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science, 15, 684-692. DOI PMID
[38]	Ostonen I, Püttsepp Ü, Biel C, Alberton O, Bakker MR, Lõhmus K, Majdi H, Metcalfe D, Olsthoorn AFM, Pronk A, Vanguelova E, Weih M, Brunner I (2007). Specific root length as an indicator of environmental change. Plant Biosystems, 141, 426-442.
[39]	Peng F, Xue X, You Q, Huang C, Dong S, Liao J, Duan H, Tsunekawa A, Wang T (2018). Changes of soil properties regulate the soil organic carbon loss with grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Ecological Indicators, 93, 572-580.
[40]	Peng Y, Yang Y (2016). Allometric biomass partitioning under nitrogen enrichment: evidence from manipulative experiments around the world. Scientific Reports, 6, 28918. DOI: 10.1038/srep28918.
[41]	Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L (2012). Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist, 193, 30-50. DOI PMID
[42]	Reich PB (2014). The world-wide ‘fast-slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology, 102, 275-301.
[43]	Roa-Fuentes LL, Campo J, Parra-Tabla V (2012). Plant biomass allocation across a precipitation gradient: an approach to seasonally dry tropical forest at Yucatán, Mexico. Ecosystems, 15, 1234-1244.
[44]	Shipley B, Meziane D (2002). The balanced-growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation. Functional Ecology, 16, 326-331.
[45]	Song WJ, Su JS, Zhang MD, Zhao YJ, Wang ZW, Jia YS, Bai YF (2023). Compensatory growth of grassland plants and optimal grazing intensity in northern China: an integrated analysis based on grazing experiments. Chinese Science Bulletin, 68, 1330-1342.
	[ 宋伟江, 苏纪帅, 张梦迪, 赵玉金, 王忠武, 贾玉山, 白永飞 (2023). 中国北方草地植物补偿性生长与合理放牧强度: 基于放牧实验的整合分析. 科学通报, 68, 1330-1342.]
[46]	Su JS, Zhao J, Jing GH, Wei L, Liu J, Cheng JM, Zhang JE (2017). Root pattern of Stipa plants in semiarid grassland after long-term grazing exclusion. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 6571-6580.
[47]	Sun GJ, Zhang R, Zhou L (2003). Trends and advances in researches on plant functional diversity and functional groups. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23, 1430-1435.
	[ 孙国钧, 张荣, 周立 (2003). 植物功能多样性与功能群研究进展. 生态学报, 23, 1430-1435.]
[48]	Sun JH, Shi HL, Chen KY, Ji BM, Zhang J (2023). Research advances on trade-off relationships of plant fine root functional traits. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 47, 1055-1070.
	[ 孙佳慧, 史海兰, 陈科宇, 纪宝明, 张静 (2023). 植物细根功能性状的权衡关系研究进展. 植物生态学报, 47, 1055-1070.] DOI
[49]	Suo CX, Fei X, Liu YZ, Xiang S, Sun SC (2023). Functional group characteristics of plant community at different grazing intensities in alpine grassland of northwestern Sichuan. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 29, 109-116.
	[ 锁才序, 费璇, 刘银占, 向双, 孙书存 (2023). 不同放牧强度下川西北高寒草地植物功能群特征变化. 应用与环境生物学报, 29, 109-116.]
[50]	Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997). The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science, 277, 1300-1302.
[51]	Wang CT, Long RJ, Ding LM (2004). The effects of differences in functional group diversity and composition on plant community productivity in four types of alpine meadow communities. Chinese Biodiversity, 12, 403-409.
	[ 王长庭, 龙瑞军, 丁路明 (2004). 高寒草甸不同草地类型功能群多样性及组成对植物群落生产力的影响. 生物多样性, 12, 403-409.] DOI
[52]	Wang CT, Long RJ, Wang QL, Jing ZC, Shi JJ (2009). Changes in plant diversity, biomass and soil C, in alpine meadows at different degradation stages in the headwater region of three rivers, China. Land Degradation & Development, 20, 187-198.
[53]	Wang CT, Long RJ, Wang QL, Jing ZC, Shi JJ, Du YG, Cao GM (2008). Changes in soil organic carbon and microbial biomass carbon at different degradation successional stages of alpine meadows in the headwater region of three rivers in China. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 14, 225-230.
	[ 王长庭, 龙瑞军, 王启兰, 景增春, 施建军, 杜岩功, 曹广民 (2008). 三江源区高寒草甸不同退化演替阶段土壤有机碳和微生物量碳的变化. 应用与环境生物学报, 14, 225-230.]
[54]	Wang JW, Zhao CZ, Zhao LC, Wang XP, Li Q (2018). Response of root morphology and biomass of Phragmites australis to soil salinity in inland salt marsh. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 4843-4851.
	[ 王继伟, 赵成章, 赵连春, 王小鹏, 李群 (2018). 内陆盐沼芦苇根系形态及生物量分配对土壤盐分因子的响应. 生态学报, 38, 4843-4851.]
[55]	Wang N, Pan XC, Bai SB, Zhang T (2020). Effects of acid rain on root morphology and distribution pattern in the buffer zone of broad-leaved forest invaded by Moso bamboo. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40, 4670-4678.
	[ 王楠, 潘小承, 白尚斌, 张拓 (2020). 酸雨对毛竹入侵阔叶林缓冲区根系形态及分布格局的影响. 生态学报, 40, 4670-4678.]
[56]	Wang XF, Wang ZY, Liang JH, Wang LQ (2013). Study on the root architecture of cespitose plants in the grassland of Inner Mongolia. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 34(3), 77-82.
	[ 王旭峰, 王占义, 梁金华, 王立群 (2013). 内蒙古草地丛生型植物根系构型的研究. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 34(3), 77-82.]
[57]	Wang XX, Dong SK, Yang B, Li YY, Su XK (2014). The effects of grassland degradation on plant diversity, primary productivity, and soil fertility in the alpine region of Asia’s headwaters. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186, 6903-6917.
[58]	Weemstra M, Kiorapostolou N, van Ruijven J, Mommer L, de Vries J, Sterck F (2020). The role of fine-root mass, specific root length and life span in tree performance: a whole-tree exploration. Functional Ecology, 34, 575-585.
[59]	Weemstra M, Kuyper TW, Sterck FJ, Umaña MN (2023). Incorporating belowground traits: avenues towards a whole-tree perspective on performance. Oikos, 2023, e08827. DOI: 10.1111/oik.08827.
[60]	Wen L, Dong SK, Li YY, Wang XX, Li XY, Shi JJ, Dong QM (2013). The impact of land degradation on the C pools in alpine grasslands of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Plant and Soil, 368, 329-340.
[61]	Wright IJ, Ackerly DD, Bongers F, Harms KE, Ibarra-Manriquez G, Martinez-Ramos M, Mazer SJ, Muller-Landau HC, Paz H, Pitman NCA, Poorter L, Silman MR, Vriesendorp CF, Webb CO, Westoby M, Wright SJ (2007). Relationships among ecologically important dimensions of plant trait variation in seven neotropical forests. Annals of Botany, 99, 1003-1015. DOI PMID
[62]	Wu GL, Wang D, Liu Y, Ding LM, Liu ZH (2017). Warm-season grazing benefits species diversity conservation and topsoil nutrient sequestration in alpine meadow. Land Degradation & Development, 28, 1311-1319.
[63]	Xu TW, Zhao JC, Mao SJ, Geng YY, Liu HJ, Zhao XQ, Xu SX (2020). Response of plant community structure and biomass to short-term rest grazing in an alpine meadow in Haibei Autonomous Prefecture of Qinghai. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 29(4), 1-8.
	[ 徐田伟, 赵炯昌, 毛绍娟, 耿远月, 刘宏金, 赵新全, 徐世晓 (2020). 青海省海北地区高寒草甸群落特征和生物量对短期休牧的响应. 草业学报, 29(4), 1-8.] DOI
[64]	Yang YD, Ma JL, Ma HB, Zhou Y, Li C, Dong C (2023). Effects of grazing exclusion on root trait characteristics of dominant plants in the desert steppe. Pratacultural Science, 40, 1507-1517.
	[ 杨彦东, 马静利, 马红彬, 周瑶, 李成, 董川 (2023). 封育对荒漠草原优势植物根系性状特征的影响. 草业科学, 40, 1507-1517.]
[65]	Yang Y, Fang J, Ma W, Guo D, Mohammat A (2010). Large-scale pattern of biomass partitioning across China’s grasslands. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 268-277.
[66]	Yang YH, Luo YQ (2011). Isometric biomass partitioning pattern in forest ecosystems: evidence from temporal observations during stand development. Journal of Ecology, 99, 431-437.
[67]	Zhang F, Li YC, Wang X, Zhu JX (2021). Effect of rangeland degradation on biomass allocation in alpine meadows on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Pratacultural Science, 38, 1451-1458.
	[ 张帆, 李元淳, 王新, 朱剑霄 (2021). 青藏高原高寒草甸退化对草地群落生物量及其分配的影响. 草业科学, 38, 1451-1458.]
[68]	Zhang T, Zou XH, Li LX, Tao CZ, Wu PF (2023). Research progress on the cost and benefit of root acquisition metabolism from plant resources. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 38(4), 149-155.
	[ 张婷, 邹显花, 李林鑫, 陶长铸, 吴鹏飞 (2023). 根系获取资源过程中的代谢成本权衡策略研究进展. 西北林学院学报, 38(4), 149-155.]
[69]	Zhang WT, Zhao CZ, Song QH, Wang JW, Wang JL, Yao WX, Li Q (2017). The relationship between root branching number and connection length of Potentilla acaulis in alpine degraded grasslands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 8518-8525.
	[ 张伟涛, 赵成章, 宋清华, 王继伟, 王建良, 姚文秀, 李群 (2017). 高寒退化草地星毛委陵菜根系分叉数和连接长度的关系. 生态学报, 37, 8518-8525.]
[70]	Zhang Y, Zheng QZ, Gao XX, Ma YD, Liang KM, Yue HT, Huang XX, Wu KT, Wang XR (2022). Land degradation changes the role of above- and belowground competition in regulating plant biomass allocation in an alpine meadow. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 822594. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.822594.
[71]	Zhang YM, Hu HY, Bai XM, Cory M, Javier GF, Iván OP (2022). Effects of soil water restriction on root growth and root morphology of perennial ryegrass and pasture brome. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 30, 1784-1794.
	[ 张咏梅, 胡海英, 白小明, Cory M, Javier GF, Iván OP (2022). 多年生黑麦草、雀麦根系形态和生长对土壤干旱的适应性. 中国生态农业学报, 30, 1784-1794.]
[72]	Zhou YS, Wang LQ, Zhang P, Liang JH, Wang XF (2011). Responses of the root architecture of Stipa grandis to grassland degradation. Pratacultural Science, 28, 1962-1966.
	[ 周艳松, 王立群, 张鹏, 梁金华, 王旭峰 (2011). 大针茅根系构型对草地退化的响应. 草业科学, 28, 1962-1966.]
[73]	Zou S, Lv FC (2016). Two special vegetation types in Tibetan Plateau: alpine grassland and alpine meadow. Geography Teaching, 57, 4-7.

退化程度对高寒草甸不同优势植物根系形态性状和生物量的影响

Effects of degradation degree on the root morphological traits and biomass of dominant plant species in alpine meadows

全文

PDF (PC)

附录附件

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 73

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李燚, 黄欢, 赵艳超, 陈立同. 养分添加对不同海拔高寒草甸群落多样性及组成的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(预发表): 0-.
[2]	徐恩相, 周蕾, 章晓炜, 张国萍, 仲杜伟, 黄智, 刘派, 迟永刚. 基于不同生育阶段冠层光谱和碳通量的水稻产量估算[J]. 植物生态学报, 2026, 50(1): 82-93.
[3]	郑子仪, 陈江慧, 刘慧颖. 气候变暖提高青藏高原高寒草甸优势物种的根系分泌速率[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1363-1373.
[4]	宋珊珊, 唐志尧. 河北塞罕坝草甸草原根际土壤真菌与植物地上生物量的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1461-1471.
[5]	张法伟, 李红琴, 祝景彬, 樊博, 周华坤, 李英年, 梁乃申. 氮添加和降水改变对高寒草甸生态系统地上与地下碳储的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(9): 1399-1409.
[6]	刘洋, 刘傲, 宋璇紫, 杨云, 安柏衡, 韩梦姣, 班玛才格尔, 米玛旺堆. 高原鼠兔干扰对高寒草甸主要植物生态位及种间联结的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(12): 2054-2068.
[7]	牛亚平, 高晓霞, 姚世庭, 杨元合, 彭云峰. 退化高寒草地植物多样性和功能群组成与地上生产力的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 83-92.
[8]	徐嘉昕, 肖元明, 王小赟, 王雯莹, 马玉花, 李强峰, 周国英. 微生物菌肥与氮磷肥回补对退化高寒草甸土壤理化性质和酶活性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 159-172.
[9]	李天琦, 曹继容, 柳小妮, 田思惠, 兰波兰, 邱颖, 薛建国, 张倩, 褚建民, 张淑敏, 黄建辉, 李凌浩, 王其兵. 内蒙古典型草原土壤酶化学计量与限制性养分对放牧的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 19-29.
[10]	郝毅晴, 刘伟, 杨阳, 安冰儿, 范冰, 李超, 崔久辉, 程延彬, 孙佳美, 潘庆民. 有机肥和无机肥对退化草原羊草种群密度和个体生物量的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 148-158.
[11]	王雯莹, 肖元明, 王小赟, 徐嘉昕, 马玉花, 李强峰, 周国英. 多功能群物种配置模式下退化高寒草甸植物多样性与生态系统多功能性的关联[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 103-117.
[12]	张辉, 赵赟鹏, 刘晓琛, 郭增鹏, 胡国瑞, 冯彦皓, 马妙君. 高寒草甸退化过程中土壤种子库的变化及其在植物群落更新中的潜在作用[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 74-82.
[13]	孙佳美, 安冰儿, 刘伟, 王璟, 潘庆民. 草原植物繁殖体调控技术: “蘖芽岛”的培育与移植[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 129-137.
[14]	刘伟, 郝毅晴, 孙佳美, 王璟, 范冰, 郝建玺, 金那申, 潘庆民. 呼伦贝尔退化草原土壤养分调控的原理与技术[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 138-147.
[15]	房凯, 王迎新, 黄建辉, 段俊光, 张琦, 张倩, 甘红豪, 褚建民. 内蒙古典型草原不同退化阶段植被恢复的养分限制因子解析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2025, 49(1): 7-18.