论文

小果野芭蕉种子散布和不同时空尺度上种子被捕食格局

展开
  • 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园, 云南勐腊 666303
* E-mail: biotrans@bn.yn.cninfo.net
第一联系人:

中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园李维秀女士在整个野外试验过程中给予很大帮助,思茅师范高等专科学校侯明忠先生、袁文忠先生、罗明海先生以及肖选兰女士帮助完成部分野外工作,在此一并致谢

收稿日期: 2006-11-03

  录用日期: 2007-10-09

  网络出版日期: 2008-01-30

基金资助

中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KSCX2-SW-123)

SEED DISPERSAL AND SPATIAL-TEMPORAL VARIATION OF SEED PREDATION OF MUSA ACUMINATA IN XISHUANGBANNA, SOUTHWEST CHINA

Expand
  • Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China

Received date: 2006-11-03

  Accepted date: 2007-10-09

  Online published: 2008-01-30

摘要

以分布在云南西双版纳地区的大型先锋草本植物小果野芭蕉(Musa acuminata)为研究材料,研究其种子初次散布过程和不同时空尺度上种子被捕食格局。小果野芭蕉的成熟果实有75%在夜间被取食和传播,在白天消失的果实则占25%。蝙蝠是其最主要的种子传播者,鸟类在其种子传播过程中也起到一定的作用。人工摆放种子试验结果显示小果野芭蕉种子的主要转移者是小型啮齿类(鼠类)和蚁类:在开放处理下3 d后转移率为86%,排除蚁类(鼠类可进入)处理下种子转移率为69%以及排除鼠类(蚂蚁可进入)处理下种子被转移率为56%。季节、地点和生境均显著影响人工摆放种子被转移强度:雨季显著高于旱季(p<0.001),野芭蕉生境显著高于与其相连的自然森林和荒地(p<0.001),在人为干扰较少的补蚌自然保护区显著低于西双版纳热带植物园和新山,而后两者之间并无显著差异(p>0.05)。同时,地点和生境以及季节、地点和生境都有显著的交互作用。与相邻的森林和荒地相比,野芭蕉群落中种子被鼠类捕食的强度最大且受蚁类二次转移的比例最少,森林和荒地中种子被鼠类捕食的强度相对较小且蚁类对种子的二次转移比例较高,从而更好地帮助种子逃避鼠类捕食。因此,依赖于食果动物(主要是蝙蝠, 也包括鸟类)的初次散布是小果野芭蕉种子逃避捕食的关键。

本文引用格式

孟令曾, 高秀霞, 陈进 . 小果野芭蕉种子散布和不同时空尺度上种子被捕食格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008 , 32(1) : 133 -142 . DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.01.015

Abstract

Aims Seed dispersal and seed predation are important on mechanisms of forest maintenance and degeneration. Understanding them can enable effective conservation measures, especially in Xishuangbanna tropical rainforest in China which is suffering severe pressures.
Methods Musa acuminata is a large herbaceous plant in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province. We investigated seed dispersal and spatial-temporal variation of seed predation in three habitats (wild banana communities, virgin rainforest and open habitat) in three different sites of Xishuangbanna (XTBG, Xinshan and Bubeng). We used two treatments excluding ants and rodents and surveyed community structure of ants and rodents to explore the relationship between abundance of predators and intensity of seed predation.
Important findings Bats were the most important, effective seed disperser, and birds also played an important role in seed dispersal, with approximately 75% of the mature fruits of M. acuminata dispersed at night and about 25% during daytime. After primary dispersal, seeds of M. acuminata were mainly removed by small rodents and ants. This seed predation was significantly influenced by season, site and habitat. Seed predation was significantly stronger in rainy than dry seasons (p<0.001). Seed predation in M. acuminata communities was the highest among the three habitats (p<0.001), and seed predation in Bubeng Nature Reserve, which had the least disturbance, was significantly lower than the other two sites (which were not significantly different at p>0.05). Seed removal was generally consistent with the abundance of rodents and ants in different seasons, habitats and sites. The interaction between sites and habitats and the interaction among seasons, sites and habitats had significant effects on seed predation. Compared to nearby forest and open habitats, Musa communities had the most abundant rodents and the highest seed predation and the lowest proportion of secondary seed dispersal by ants. In contrast, seed predation by rodents in forest and open habitat was relatively weak and a large proportion of post dispersal seed was removed by ants. Therefore, primary seed dispersal mostly by bats and birds is essential for M. acuminata seeds to escape seed predation.

参考文献

[1] Allmen CV, Morellato LPC, Pizo MA (2004). Seed predation under high seed density condition: the palm Euterpe edulis in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20, 471-474.
[2] Baker HG (1974). The evolution of weeds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 1-24.
[3] Basu P (1997). Seasonal and spatial patterns in ground foraging ants in a rainforest in the western Ghats, India. Biotropica, 29, 489-500.
[4] Benkman CW, Parchman TL, Favis A, Siepielski AM (2003). Reciprocal selection causes a coevolutionary arms race between crossbills and lodgepole pine. The American Naturalist, 162, 182-194.
[5] Brewer SW (2001). Predation and dispersal of large and small seeds of a tropical palm. Oikos, 92, 245-255.
[6] Chen F (陈帆), Chen J (陈进), Liu ZQ (刘志秋), Zhang L (张玲), Liu Y (刘勇), Bai ZL (白智林) (2004). The role of ants in seed dispersal of Globba lancangensis and the spatial distribution of its seedlings. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 28, 210-217. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] Connell JH (1971). On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. In: den Boer BJ, Gradwell GR eds. Dynamics of Population. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, 298-310.
[8] Davidson DW, Morton SR (1981). Myrmecochory in some plants (F. Chenopodiaceae) of the Australian arid zone. Oecologia, 50, 357-366.
[9] Díaz M (1992). Spatial and temporal patterns of granivorous ant seed predation in patchy cereal crop areas of central Spain. Oecologia, 91, 561-568.
[10] Elangovan V, Marimuthu G, Kunz TH (1999). Temporal patterns of individual and group foraging behaviour in the short-nosed fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx, in South India. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 15, 681-687.
[11] Fedriani JM, Manzaneda AJ (2005). Pre- and postdispersal seed predation by rodents: balance of food and safety. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 1018-1024.
[12] Forget PM, Milleron T (1991). Evidence for secondary seed dispersal by rodents in Panama. Oecologia, 87, 596-599.
[13] García-Casta?o JL, Kollmann J, Jordano P (2006). Spatial variation of post-dispersal seed removal by rodents in highland microhabitats of Spain and Switzerland. Seed Science Research, 16, 213-222.
[14] Howe HF, Smallwood J (1982). Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 201-228.
[15] Hulme PE (1993). Post-dispersal seed predation by small mammals. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, 65, 269-287.
[16] Hulme PE (1994). Post-dispersal seed predation in grassland: its magnitude and sources of variation. Journal of Ecology, 82, 645-652.
[17] Hulme PE, Kollmann J (2005). Seed predator guilds, spatial variation in post-dispersal seed predation and potential effects on plant demography- a temperate perspective. In: Forget PM, Lambert JE, Hulme PE, van der Wall SB eds. Seed Fate: Predation, Dispersal and Seedling Establishment. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 9-30.
[18] Janzen DH (1970). Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist, 104, 501-528.
[19] Janzen DH (1971). Seed predation by animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2, 465-492.
[20] Leal IR, Oliveira PS (1998). Interactions between fungus-growing ants (Attini), fruits and seeds in Cerrado vegetation in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica, 30, 170-178.
[21] Levey DJ, Byrne MM (1993). Complex ant-plant interactions: rain-forest ants as secondary dispersers and post-dispersal seed predators. Ecology, 74, 1802-1812.
[22] Liu AZ (刘爱忠) (2001). Phylogeny and Biogeography of Musaceae (芭蕉科植物的系统演化与生物地理学). PhD dissertation, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] Manson RH, Stiles EW (1998). Links between microhabitat preferences and seed predation by small mammals in old fields. Oikos, 82, 37-50.
[24] Medellín RA, Gaona O (1999). Seed dispersal by bats and birds in forest and disturbed habitats of Chiapas, México. Biotropica, 31, 478-485.
[25] Myster RW (2003). Effects of species, density, patch-type, and season on post-dispersal seed predation in a Puerto-Rican pasture. Biotropica, 35, 542-546.
[26] Robinson JV, Dickerson JE Jr (1987). Does invasion sequence affect community structure? Ecology, 68, 587-595.
[27] Schupp EW, Fuentes M (1995). Spatial patterns of seed dispersal and the unification of plant population ecology. Ecoscience, 2, 267-275.
[28] Shepherd VE, Chapman CA (1998). Dung beetles as secondary seed dispersers: impact on seed predation and germination. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 14, 199-215.
[29] Shugart HH (1998). Terrestrial Ecosystems in Changing Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 103-143.
[30] Simmonds NW (1962). The Evolution of the Bananas. Longmans, Green & Co. Ltd., London.
[31] Tang ZH (唐占辉), Cao M (曹敏), Sheng LX (盛连喜), Liang B (梁冰), Zhang SY (张树义) (2005). Fruit consumption and seed dispersal of wild banana Musa acuminata by short-nosed fruit bat Cynopterus sphinx. Acta Zoologica Sinica (动物学报), 51, 608-615. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32] Thomas DW, Cloutier D, Provencher M, Houle C (1988). The shape of bird- and bat-generated seed shadows around a tropical fruiting tree. Biotropica, 20, 347-348.
[33] van der Pijl L (1982). Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants 3rd eds. Springer-Verlag, New York, 214.
[34] van der Wall SB, Kuhn KM, Gworek JR (2005). Two phase seed dispersal: linking the effects of frugivorous birds and seed-caching rodents. Oecologia, 145, 282-287.
[35] van der Wall SB, Longland WS (2004). Diplochory: are two seed dispersers better than one? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 155-161.
[36] Wang BC, Smith TB (2002). Closing the seed dispersal loop. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 379-385.
[37] Whitmore TC (1984). Tropical Rain Forest of the Far East 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, London.
文章导航

/