论文

黔中山地喀斯特森林的水文学过程和养分动态

展开
  • 1 贵州省林业科学研究院,贵阳 550011
    2 南京林业大学,南京 210037
    3 东京农工大学,东京 183-8509 日本
    4 贵州大学,贵阳 550001

收稿日期: 2006-09-04

  录用日期: 2007-01-11

  网络出版日期: 2007-09-30

基金资助

国家科技攻关计划(201BA510RO305);国家科技攻关计划(204BA510B3305);国家林业局重点项目(201-13);贵州省科技攻关项目(22-1120);贵州省“十·五”林业攻关项目(2001-18)

NUTRIENT DYNAMICS AND HYDROLOGICAL PROCESS OF KARST FORESTS IN MOUNTAINOUS AREA OF CENTRAL GUIZHOU PROVINCE, CHINA

Expand
  • 1Guizhou Provincial Academy of Forestry, Guiyang 550011, China
    2Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    3Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan
    4Guizhou University, Guiyang 550001, China

Received date: 2006-09-04

  Accepted date: 2007-01-11

  Online published: 2007-09-30

摘要

采用不同林分类型固定样地的定位研究方法,研究了黔中山地喀斯特森林对降水量的分配和随降水流动的主要离子的影响。结果表明,林内外年降水量的变化趋势为:空旷地>林隙>乔木层>灌草层>地表和壤中流量>树干径流量。年降水在林内不同层次分配量的变化趋势为:林地蒸发等量>灌草层降水截留总量>林冠层降水截留总量。相关水量的月动态趋势以夏季较高,冬季较低。森林最大持水量的变化趋势为土壤层>植被层。植被层最大持水量的变化趋势为乔木层>枯落物层>灌木层>草本层。喀斯特原生林植被层地上部分最大持水量为28.20 mm,是喀斯特次生林的194.48%。喀斯特原生林土壤层最大持水量加权值为19.24 mm,是喀斯特次生林的187.89%。喀斯特原生林冠层降水截留总量、灌草层降水截留总量、地表蒸发等量总值占空旷地降水量的比例为97.93%,喀斯特次生林的相应值为97.89%。喀斯特原生林的调水能力大于喀斯特次生林。土壤层最大持水量占植被-土壤系统的95.88%~96.11%,保土可增加蓄水。合理调整森林植被层结构既可防治土壤侵蚀,又可提高森林的最大持水潜力。随降水流动的 S O 4 2 - 、Ca2+、Mg2+ N H 4 + 、K+ N O 3 - 、Cl-、Na+ 月均浓度在不同喀斯特森林类型的林隙、林内和树干径流中的年变化规律明显,夏季浓度较低,冬季浓度较高。固定样地集水区溪流中相关离子月均浓度变化趋势与林隙、林内和树干径流中的不同。喀斯特原生林年随降水输入的相关离子量为430.951 kg·hm-2·a-1,随地表径流和90 cm壤中流的输出量为49.789 kg·hm-2·a-1,年随降水净增的相关离子量为381.162 kg·hm-2·a-1;而喀斯特次生林的相应值为304.101、39.216和264.885 kg·hm-2·a-1。喀斯特原生林N3-、K+、Ca2+、Mg2+储量高于喀斯特次生林,土壤层储量>植被层储量,植被层储量中乔木层>枯落物层>灌木层>草本层。年随降水输入喀斯特森林的相关离子量占植被-土壤系统的总量较小、有效性较高,对森林的生长和养分循环有重要的生态学意义。

本文引用格式

张喜, 薛建辉, 生原喜久雄, 许笑天, 田野, 户田诰夫, 刘延惠 . 黔中山地喀斯特森林的水文学过程和养分动态[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007 , 31(5) : 757 -768 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0097

Abstract

Aims Karst forest occurs with limestone soil and humid climate. China's southern karst region is subtropical and centered in Guizhou Province. Precipitation is high and unequally distributed seasonally. Soil drought is frequent as a result of climatic and edaphic factors. Our objectives were to enhance understanding of karst forest ecology and methods of controlling loss of soil and water as a means of managing karst desertification.

Methods For five years, we observed karst natural forest and secondary natural forest in 20 m×20 m plots and analyzed major precipitation ions by ion chromatography. Main indicators were analyzed by Forest Soil Analyzed Methods and observed by Meteorological Observational at Ground Standards.

Important findings Rankings of annual precipitation value regularity were openland > outside karst forest > inside karst forest > under tree and herbaceous layer > runoff at surface and in 90 cm soil > stemflow, and transpiration at forestland and another > total interception in arbuscular and herbaceous layer > total interception in arboreal layer. Annual dynamics of these variables were higher in summer and lower in winter. Maximum water holding capacity ranked soil layer>vegetation, and that in arboreal layer > litter layer > tree layer > herbaceous layer. Ion contents in precipitation had obvious month regularity and decreased in spring and increased in autumn and were high in winter and low in summer. Along precipitation flows (outside forest → in forest → surface runoff → runoff in soil → stream), eight ions were divided into three types: a sustainable rich type included Ca2+ and Mg2+; a surface rich type included K+, Na+, Cl-, N O 3 - and N H 4 + ; and another type included S O 4 2 - . Ions input by precipitation, output by runoff and retained in karst natural forest were higher than that in karst secondary natural forest.

参考文献

[1] Bonell M (1993). Progress in the understanding of runoff generation dynamics in forest. Journal of Hydrology, 150,217-275.
[2] Dunkerley DL (2000). Measuring interception loss and canopy storage in dry land vegetation: a brief review and evaluation of available research strategies. Hydrological Processes, 14,669-678.
[3] Dunne T (1991). Effects of rainfall, vegetation and microtopography on infiltration and runoff. Water Resources Research, 27,2271-2285.
[4] Feng ZW (冯宗炜), Wang XK (王效科), Wu G (吴刚) (1999). Biomass and Productivity of Forest Ecosystem in China (中国森林生态系统的生物量和生产力). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[5] Gupta VK, Mesa OJ (1988). Runoff generation and hydrologic responses via channel network geomorphology: recent progress and open problems. Journal of Hydrology, 102,3-28.
[6] Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1982). Estimation of potential evapotranspiration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Diversion, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineering, 108,223-230.
[7] Henderson GS, Harris CF, Todd DE (1977). Quality and chemistry of throughfall as influenced by forest type and season. Journal of Ecology, 65,365-374.
[8] Henny AJ (1999). Waterflow and nitrate transport to a groundwater-fed stream in the Belgian-Dutch chalk region. Hydrological Processes, 13,295-307.
[9] Jin XQ (金小麒) (2000). Eco-economic function of main forest stand types in Wujiang river watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 14,64-68. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Kelliher FM (1989). Evaporation and canopy characteristics of coniferous forests and grasslands. Oecologia, 95,153-163.
[11] Liu SR (刘世荣), Wen YG (温远光), Wang B (王兵), Zhou GY (周光益) (1996). Ecohydrological Functions of Forest Ecosystems in China (中国森林生态系统水文生态功能规律). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Liu YL (刘映良) (2005). A Study on the Vegetation Restoration of Degraded Ecosystem in Typical Karst Mountainous Area (喀斯特典型山地退化生态系统植被恢复研究). PhD dissertation, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Lu RK (鲁如坤) (2000). Analysis Methods of Soil Agricultural Chemistry (土壤农业化学分析方法). Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[14] Mei ZM (梅再美), Xiong KN (熊康宁) (2003). A study on the dynamic characteristics of soil erosion and eco-benefit evaluation in karst region—a case study on Qingzhen demonstrating site of returning farmland to wood (grass), Guizhou. Carsologica Sinica (中国岩溶), 22,136-143. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] Neary AJ, Gizyn WI (1994). Throughfall and stemflow chemistry under deciduous and coniferous forest canopy in south-central Ontario. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24,1089-1100.
[16] Oyarzún C, Godoy R, Sepúlveda A (1998). Water and nutrient fluxes in a cool temperate rainforest at the Cordillera de la Costa in Southern Chile. Hydrological Processes, 12,1067-1077.
[17] Parker GG (1983). Throughfall and stemflow in the forest nutrient cycle. Advances in Ecological Research, 13,58-135.
[18] Peter DL (1995). Runoff production in a forested, shallow soil, Canadian shield basin. Water Resources Research, 31,1291-1304.
[19] Putuhena WM, Cordery I (1996). Estimation of interception capacity of the forest floor. Journal of Hydrology, 180,283-299.
[20] Ran DC (冉顶丞), He SY (何师意), Cao JH (曹建华), Xiong ZB (熊志斌), Chen HM (陈会明) (2003). A study on hydrological benefit of karst forest in Maolan. In: Zhu SQ 朱守谦ed. Ecological Research on Karst Forest (喀斯特森林生态研究)(Ⅲ). Guizhou Science and Technology Press, Guiyang,135-140. (in Chinese)
[21] Schaap MG, Bouten W (1997). Forest floor evaporation in a dense Douglas fir stand. Journal of Hydrology, 193,97-113.
[22] Stednick JD (1996). Monitoring the effects of timber harvest on annual water yield. Journal of Hydrology, 176,79-95.
[23] State Forestry Administration of China (国家林业局) (1999) Forest Soil Analysis MethodsForestry Professional Standards of China, LY/T 1210-1275 (中华人民共和国林业行业标准——森林土壤分析方法). Standards Press of China, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[24] State Weather Administration of China (中央气象局) (1979). Meteorological Observation at Ground Standards (地面气象观测规范). China Meteorological Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[25] Thornthwaite CW (1948). An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review, 38,55-94.
[26] Viville D (1993). Interception on a mountainous declining spruce stands in the Strengbach catchment (Voges, France). Journal of Hydrology, 144,892-898.
[27] Wei QF (韦启番) (1996). Erosion characteristics and prevention of karst area in the southern of China. Research of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持研究), 3(4),72-76. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] Yu LF (喻理飞), Zhu SQ (朱守谦), Ye JZ (叶镜中), Wei LM (魏鲁明), Chen ZR (陈正仁) (2002). Dynamics of a degraded karst forest in the process of natural restoration. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 38(1),1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] Yu XX (余新晓), Zhang ZQ (张志强), Chen LH (陈丽华), Xie BY (谢宝元), Wang LX (王礼先) (2004). Forest Ecological Hydrology (森林生态水文). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[30] Zhu SQ (朱守谦) (1997). Ecological Research on Karst Forest (喀斯特森林生态研究)(Ⅱ). Guizhou Science and Technology Press, Guiyang. (in Chinese)
[31] Zhou ZX (周政贤) (1987). Scientific Survey of the Maolan Karst Forest (茂兰喀斯特森林科学考察集). Guizhou People's Publishing House, Guiyang. (in Chinese)
文章导航

/