综述

森林溪流倒木生态学研究进展

展开
  • 1 不列颠哥伦比亚大学地球与环境科学系,基隆拉,V1V1V7,加拿大
    2 中国科学院沈阳应用生态所,沈阳 110016
E-mail: Adam.Wei@ube.ca

收稿日期: 2006-01-26

  录用日期: 2006-05-07

  网络出版日期: 2006-11-30

基金资助

中国科学院海外留学基金项目(C13HU);国家自然科学基金项目(30470302)

REVIEW OF ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH ON IN-STREAM WOOD

Expand
  • 1 Earth and Environmental Science Department, University of British Columbia, Okanagan, British Columbia V1V1V7, Canada
    2 Institute of Applied Ecological Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China

Received date: 2006-01-26

  Accepted date: 2006-05-07

  Online published: 2006-11-30

摘要

溪流倒木是指在河流中长度大于1 m、直径大于10 cm的死木。溪流倒木在森林河流中(特别是较小的河流中)是一个常见且重要的结构成分。该文综述了近30年溪流倒木的研究成果(主要来自北美),总结溪流倒木在河流形态、碳循环、泥沙与养分拦截、水生生境的形成、水生生物多样性等方面的生态功能,倒木的时间动态性与空间变异性,以及干扰(包括自然干扰与人为干扰)与倒木存留量及分布的关系。此外,该文也探讨了溪流倒木的生态管理模式及未来研究方向。大量的研究证明,溪流倒木对森林水生生态系统具有重要的生态功能,但它的存留量、分布以及它的生态意义因所研究的森林生态系统、河流大小不同而异。随着河流宽度的增加, 倒木的存留量及它对河流的影响减少,并且倒木的分布以单个为主变为聚集体为主。单个倒木的直径则随河流宽度增加而增大。倒木也呈现十分明显的时间动态性,而这种动态往往是由大规模毁灭性的森林干扰(火、风倒等)所驱动的。研究倒木的时空变异性及自然干扰与人为干扰对倒木的不同影响对于保持倒木的生态功能是十分必要的。该文还对中国开展溪流倒木的生态研究提出一些建议。

本文引用格式

魏晓华, 代力民 . 森林溪流倒木生态学研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006 , 30(6) : 1018 -1029 . DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2006.0131

Abstract

In-stream wood is defined as dead wood (>10 cm diameter and >1 m length) in the stream channel. In-stream wood is a common, but important structural component in forest streams, particularly in relatively small creeks. Through review of research from the last 30 years (mainly from North America), we synthesize information on in-stream wood ecological functions (on channel morphology, nutrient cycling, sediment storage, aquatic habitat and biodiversity), dynamics, spatial variation and relationship between in-stream wood (loadings and distribution) and disturbance (natural and human-caused). We also present wood management paradigms and future research directions.

Much research has demonstrated that in-stream wood has important ecological functions for aquatic ecosystems. In-stream wood can significantly change channel morphology through its role in intercepting sediments and water flow as well as stabilizing stream banks. Many aquatic habitat features such as pool, cover and substrate are positively related to in-stream wood characteristics. In-stream wood also affects nutrient cycling through its decomposition and interception of fine organic materials (e.g., tree needles and branches). Because of these ecological functions, in-stream wood supports greater aquatic biodiversity and productivity. However, its ecological significance largely depends on types of forested watersheds and sizes of streams. As stream sizes increase, wood loading and its influence generally decrease. The size of individual wood pieces, however, increases with increasing stream size. In-stream wood also has large temporal variations or dynamics which are mainly driven by large-scale catastrophic forest disturbance (i.e., fire, windthrow, etc). Understanding spatial and temporal variations and differences between natural and human disturbances is important for protecting and maintaining wood ecological functions. We provide suggestions for future in-stream wood ecological research in China.

参考文献

[1] Abbe TB, Montgomery DR (1996). Large woody debris jams, channel hydraulics and habitat formation in large rivers. Regulated Rivers Research and Management, 12,210-221.
[2] Abbe TB, Montgomery DR (2003). Patterns and process of wood debris accumulation in the Queets Rivers basin, Washington. Geomorphology, 51,81-107.
[3] Adenlof KA, Wohl EE (1994). Controls on bedload movement in a subalpine stream of the Colorado Rocky-Mountains, USA. Artic and Alpine Research, 26,77-85.
[4] Andrus CW, Long BA, Froehlich HA (1988). Woody debris and its contribution to pool formation in a coastal stream 50 years after logging. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Management, 45,2080-2086.
[5] Beechie TJ, Sibley TH (1997). Relationships between channel characteristics, woody debris, and fish habitat in northwestern Washington streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 126,217-229.
[6] Benda L, Miller D, Sias J, Martin D, Buffington JM (2003). Wood recruitment processes and wood budgeting. In: Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM eds. The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 37, Bethesda, Maryland.49-73.
[7] Benke AC, Wallace JB (2003). Influence of wood on invertebrate communities in streams and rivers. In: Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM eds. The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 37,Bethesda, Maryland.149-177.
[8] Beschta RL (1979). Debris removal and its effects on sedimentation in an Oregon Coast Range stream. Northwest Science, 53,71-77.
[9] Bilby RE (2003). Decomposition and nutrient dynamics of wood in streams and rivers. In: Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM eds. The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 37, Bethesda, Maryland.135-147.
[10] Bilby RE, Fransen BR, Bisson PA, Walter JK (1998). Response of juvenile coho salmon and steelhead to the addition of salmon carcasses to two streams in southwest Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 55,1909-1918.
[11] Bilby RE (1981). Role of organic debris dams in regulating the export of dissolved organic and particulate matter from a forested watershed. Ecology, 62,1234-1243.
[12] Bilby RE (1984). Removal of woody debris may affect stream channel stability. Journal of Forestry, 82,609-613.
[13] Bilby RE (1979). The Function and Distribution of Organic Debris Dams in Forest Stream Ecosystems. PhD dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
[14] Bilby RE, Likens GE (1980). Importance of organic debris dams in the structure and function of stream ecosystems. Ecology, 61,1107-1113.
[15] Bilby RE, Ward JW (1989). Changes in characteristics and function of woody debris with increasing size of streams in western Washington. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 118,368-378.
[16] Bilby RE, Ward JW (1991). Characteristics and function of large woody debris in streams draining old growth, clear-cut, and second-growth forests in southwestern Washington. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48,2499-2508.
[17] Bisson PA, Bilby RE, Bryant MD, Dolloff CA, Grette GB, House RA, Murphy ML, Koski KV, Sedell JR (1987). Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest: past, present, and future. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW eds. Streamside Management: Forestry and Fishery Interactions. Institute of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington,143-190.
[18] Bragg DC (2000). Simulating catastrophic and individualistic large wood debris recruitment for a small riparian system. Ecology, 81,1383-1394.
[19] British Columbia Ministry of Forests (1995). Riparian Management Area Guidebook, Forest Practice Code. Victoria, British Columbia.
[20] Buffington JM (1998). The Use of Streambed Texture to Interpret Physical and Biological Conditions at Watershed, Reach and Subreach Scales. PhD dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
[21] Buffington JM, Montgomery DR (1999). Effects of hydraulic roughness on surface textures of gravelbed rivers. Water Resources Research, 35,3507-3522.
[22] Carlson JY, Andrus CW, Froehlich HA (1990). Woody debris, channel features, and macroinvertebrates of streams with logged and undisturbed riparian timber in northeastern Oregon, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 47,1103-1111.
[23] Casas JJ (1997). Invertebrate assemblages associated with plant debris in a backwater of a mountain stream: natural leaf packs vs. debris dam. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 12,39-49.
[24] Chen GK (1999). The Relationship Between Stream Habitat Complexity and Anadromous Salmonid Diversity and Habitat Selection. PhD dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
[25] Chen X, Wei X, Scherer RA, Luider C, Darlington W (2006). A watershed scale assessment of in-stream large woody debris patterns in the southern interior of British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management, 229,50-62.
[26] Chen X, Wei X, Scherer RA (2005). Influence of wildfire and harvest on biomass, carbon pool and decomposition of large woody debris in forested streams of southern interior British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management, 208,101-114.
[27] Gomi T, Sidle RC, Bryant MD, Woodsmith RD (2001). The characteristics of woody debris and sediment distribution in headwater streams, southeastern Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31,1386-1399.
[28] Gurnell AM, Piègay H, Swanson FJ, Gregory SV (2002). Large wood and fluvial processes. Freshwater Biology, 47,601-619.
[29] GuyetteRP, ColeWG, DeyDC, MuzkiaRM (2002). Perspectives on the age and distribution of large wood in riparian carbon pools. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59,578-585.
[30] Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkamper JW (1986). Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. In: MacFadyen A, Ford ED eds. Advances in Ecological Research. Academic Press, London,133-302.
[31] Harvey JW, Bencala KE (1993). The effects of streambed topography on surface-subsurface water exchange in mountain catchments. Water Resources Research, 29,89-98.
[32] Hax CL, Golladay SW (1993). Macroinvertebrate colonization and biofilm development and leaves and wood in a boreal river. Freshwater Biology, 29,79-87.
[33] Heede BH (1985a). Channel adjustments to the removal of log steps: and experiment in a mountain stream. Environmental Management, 9,427-432.
[34] Heede BH (1985b). Interactions between streamside vegetation and stream dynamics. In:Proceedings-Riparian ecosystems and their management: Reconciling contlicting uses. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, RM-120.54-58.
[35] Hicks BJ, Hall JD, Bisson PA, Sedell JR (1991). Responses of salmonids to habitat changes. In: Meehan WRed. Influence of Forest and Rangeland Management on Salmonid Fishes and Their Habitat. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 19,Bethesda, Maryland.483-518.
[36] Hogan DL, Bird SA, Hassan MA (1998). Spatial and temporal evolution of small coastal gravel-bed streams: influence of forest management on channel morphology and fish habitats. Gravel-Bed Rivers in the Environment. In: Klingeman PC, Beschta RL, Komar PD, Bradley JB eds. Highlands Ranch, Colorado. Water Resources Publications, USA. 1701-1720.
[37] Keller EA, Swanson FJ (1979). Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. Earth Surface Processes, 4,361-380.
[38] Lassettre NS, Harris RR (2001). The geomorphic and ecological influence of large woody debris in streams and rivers. Center for Forestry Report, University of California at Berkeley. http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/publications/lwd/LWD-paper.pdf.
[39] Lienkaemper GW, Swanson FJ (1987). Dynamics of large woody debris in streams in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17,150-156.
[40] Lisle TE (2002). How much dead wood in stream channels is enough? USDA Forest Service General Technology Research, PSW-GTR-181,85-93.
[41] Lisle TE (1995). Effects of coarse woody debris and its removal on a channel affected by the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. Water Resources Research, 31,1797-1808.
[42] Magoulick DD (1998). Effects of wood hardness, condition, texture and substrate type on community structure of stream invertebrates. American Midland Naturalist, 139,187-200.
[43] Manga M, Kirchner JW (2000). Stress partitioning in streams by large woody debris. Water Resources Research, 36,2373-2379.
[44] Minshall GW, Brock JT, Varley JD (1989). Wildfires and Yellowstone's stream ecosystems. BioScience, 39,707-715.
[45] Montgomery DR, Collins BD, Buffington JM, Abbe TB (2003). Geomorphic effects of wood in rivers. In: Gregory SV, Boyer KL Gurnell AM eds. The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 37, Bethesda, Maryland ,21-47.
[46] Montgomery DR, Abbe TB, Buffington JM, Peterson NP, Schmidt KM, Stock JD (1996). Distribution of bedrock and alluvial channels in forested mountain drainage basins. Nature, 381,587-589.
[47] Montgomery DR, Buffington JM, Smith RD, Schmidt KM, Pess G. (1995). Pool spacing in forest channels. Water Resources Research, 31.
[48] Murphy ML, Hall JD (1981). Varied effects of clear-cut logging on predators and their habitat in small streams of the Cascade mountains, Oregon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38,137-145.
[49] Naiman RJ, Balian EV, Bartz KK, Bilby RE, Latterell JJ (2002). Dead wood dynamics in stream ecosystems. USDA Forest Service General Technology Research, PSW-GTR-181,23-48.
[50] Nakamura F, Swanson FJ (2003). Dynamics of wood in rivers in the context of ecological disturbance. In: Gregory SV, Boyer KL Gurnell AM eds. The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 37, Bethesda, Maryland,279-297.
[51] Nakamura FS, Swanson FJ (1993). Effects of coarse woody debris on morphology and sediment storage of a mountain stream system in western Oregon. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 18,43-61.
[52] O'connor NA (1991). The effects of habitat complexity on the macroinvertebrates colonizing wood substrates in a lowland stream. Oecologia, 85,504-512.
[53] Palmer MA, Arensburger P, Martin AP, Denman DW (1996). Distribution and patch specific responses: the interactive effects of woody debris and floods on lotic invertebrates. Oecologia, 105,247-257.
[54] Pickett STA, White PS (1985). The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
[55] Reeves GH, Everest FH, Sedell JR (1993). Diversity of Juvenile anadromous salmonid assemblages in coastal Oregon basins with different levels of timber harvest. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 122,309-317.
[56] Richmond AD, Fausch KD (1995). Characteristics and function of large woody debris in subalpine Rocky Mountain streams in northern Colorado. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 52,1789-1802.
[57] Robison EG, Beschta RL (1990). Coarse woody debris and channel morphology interactions for undisturbed streams in southeast Alaska, USA. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 15,149-156.
[58] Scherer R (2006). Influence of Wildfire Disturbances on Temporal Dynamics, Characteristics and Function of In-stream Wood in Small Streams of South-central British Columbia. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
[59] Scherer R (2004). Decomposition and longevity of in-stream woody debris: a review of literature from North America. In: In: Scrimgeour GJ, Eisler G, McCulloch B, Silins U, Monita M eds. Forest Land-Fish Conference II-Ecosystem Stewardship through Collaboration. Proceedings of Forest-Land-Fish Conference II, April 26-28, 2004. Edmonton, Alberta.127-133.
[60] Sedell JR, Swanson FJ, Gregory SV (1985). Evaluating fish response to woody debris. In: Hassler TJ ed. Proceedings of the Pacific Northwest Stream Habitat Workshop. California Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA,222-245.
[61] Shields FD, Knight SS Jr, Cooper CM (1994). Effects of channel incision on base flow stream habitats and fishes. Environmental Management, 18,43-57.
[62] Smith RD, Sidle RC, Porter PE (1993). Effects on bedload transport of experimental removal of woody debris from a forest gravel-bed stream. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 18,455-468.
[63] Smock LA, Metzler GM, Gladden JE (1989). Role of debris dams in the structure and functioning of low-gradient headwater streams. Ecology, 70,764-775.
[64] Swanson FJ (2003). Wood in rivers: a landscape perspective. In: Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM eds. The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 37, Bethesda, Maryland,299-313.
[65] Swanson FI, Lienkaemper GW, Sedell JR (1976). History, physical effects, and management implications of large organic debris in western Oregon streams. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report GTR-PNW-56, Portland, Oregon.
[66] Tally T (1980). The Effects of Geology and Large Organic Debris an Stream ChannelMorphology and Process for Streams Flowing Through Old Growth Redwood Forests in Northwestern California. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA. 273.
[67] Wallace JB, Webster JR, Meyer JL (1995). Influence of log additions on physical and biotic characteristics of a mountain stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 52,2120-2137.
[68] Wallace JB, Grubaugh JW, Whiles MR (1996). Influences of coarse woody debris on stream habitat and invertebrate biodiversity. In: In: McMinn JW, Crossley DA Jr eds. Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests. Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity. USDA Forest Services, Southern Research Station General Technical Report GTR-SE-094, Asheville, North Carolina.119-129.
[69] Ward JV, Tockner K, Schiemer F (1999). Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystem: ecotones and connectivity. Regulated Rivers Research and Management, 15,125-139.
[70] Wei X (2003). Natural disturbance ecology and aquatic habitat. Canadian Water Resource Association Conference Proceeding, June 2003, Vancouver.
[71] Wondzell SM, Bisson PA (2003). Influence of wood on aquatic biodiversity. In: Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM eds. The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 37, Bethesda, Maryland.249-263.
文章导航

/

005-264X/bottom_cn.htm"-->