Chin J Plan Ecolo ›› 2009, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 911-918.doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2009.05.010

• Research Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

COMPARISON OF STYLE LENGTH AND REPRODUCTION SUCCESS IN FICUS OF DIFFERENT BREEDING SYSTEMS

MA Wen-Juan1,2;ZHANG Feng-Ping1,2;PENG Yan-Qiong1;YANG Da-Rong1*   

  1. 1Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China; 2Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Online:2009-09-30 Published:2009-09-30
  • Contact: YANG Da-Rong

Abstract: Aims Figs and fig wasps are classical materials for research on plant-animal coevolution. There are both monoecious and dioecious figs. The evolutionary mechanism of Ficus has attracted many biologists. Most recently, Chen (2005) deduced that Ficus evolved from monoecious to dioecious, based on comparison of style distribution, pollinators’ ovipositor length, and reproduction success in monoecious and dioecious figs. Our objective was to test the duduction and further study Ficus evolution.
Methods We collected figs in the female floral phase and measured the length of styles and pollinators’ ovipositors in both monoecious figs and dioecious figs using dissecting microscopy. Figs in the male florets phase were also collected. We counted (i) seeds, galls, bladders, and unparasitized ovaries for monoecious figs, (ii) galls, bladders, and unparasitized ovaries for dioecious male figs, and (iii) seeds and unparasitized ovaries for female figs.
Important findings Ovipositor length was significantly longer, and the coefficient of variation (CV) of style length was higher in the two monoecious figs than in dioecious figs. Style length had unimodal distributions in the two monoecious figs, and their CVs were higher than pollinators’ ovipositor length CVs. The style length had biomodal distributions in the two dioecious fig species, and the CVs of style length were also higher than those of the ovipositor length. Monoecious figs were more effective in producing galls, based on the proportions of ovaries that pollinators’ ovipositors could reach, but dioecious figs were more effective in producing seeds. Therefore, the deduction of Chen (2005) is not completely correct, and additional research is needed to resolve the Ficus evolution question.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Hu Shi-yi. Fertilization in Plants IV. Fertilization Barriers Inoompalibilty[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1984, 2(23): 93 -99 .
[2] JIANG Gao-Ming. On the Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems: with Special Reference of Protected Areas in the Restoration of Degraded Lands[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2003, 20(03): 373 -382 .
[3] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(专辑): 65 .
[4] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1996, 13(专辑): 103 .
[5] ZHANG Xiao-Ying;YANG Shi-Jie. Plasmodesmata and Intercellular Trafficking of Macromolecules[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1999, 16(02): 150 -156 .
[6] Chen Zheng. Arabidopsis thaliana as a Model Species for Plant Molecular Biology Studies[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(01): 6 -11 .
[7] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1996, 13(专辑): 13 -16 .
[8] LEI Xiao-Yong HUANG LeiTIAN Mei-ShengHU Xiao-SongDAI Yao-Ren. Isolation and Identification of AOX (Alternative Oxidase) in ‘Royal Gala’ Apple Fruits[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2002, 19(06): 739 -742 .
[9] Chunpeng Yao;Na Li. Research Advances on Abscisic Acid Receptor[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2006, 23(6): 718 -724 .
[10] Li Wang, Qinqin Wang, Youqun Wang. Cytochemical Localization of ATPase and Acid Phosphatase in Minor Veins of the Leaf of Vicia faba During Different Developmental Stages[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2014, 49(1): 78 -86 .