植物生态学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 63-71.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0007
收稿日期:
2014-07-07
接受日期:
2014-11-02
出版日期:
2015-01-10
发布日期:
2015-01-22
通讯作者:
江明喜
作者简介:
# 共同第一作者
基金资助:
WU Hao1,2, LU Zhi-Jun1, HUANG Han-Dong1, JIANG Ming-Xi1,*()
Received:
2014-07-07
Accepted:
2014-11-02
Online:
2015-01-10
Published:
2015-01-22
Contact:
Ming-Xi JIANG
About author:
# Co-first authors
摘要:
筛选磷富集植物是磷矿废弃地土壤与植被修复的关键。该文以向日葵(Helianthus annuus)、苏丹草(Sorghum sudanense)、南瓜(Cucurbita moschata)为研究对象, 采用盆栽试验, 设置5个磷浓度(0、100、300、500和700 mg·kg-1), 分别在3个不同生长时段(4周、7周、10周)内采样, 对这3种植物的磷吸收和富集能力进行了比较。结果表明: (1)在相同生长时间内, 向日葵、苏丹草、南瓜的地上部磷含量均随磷处理浓度的升高而增大, 最大值分别为9.67 g·kg-1、4.86 g·kg-1、6.32 g·kg-1; 相同浓度下, 向日葵地上部磷含量随着生长时间的延长呈上升趋势, 苏丹草则呈下降趋势, 南瓜无显著变化; (2) 3种植物的地上部磷累积量均在磷处理浓度为700 mg·kg-1时, 生长10周后达到最大值, 分别为217.83 mg·plant-1、93.92 mg·plant-1、135.82 mg·plant-1; (3)各浓度处理下, 向日葵、苏丹草的地上部磷富集系数和转移系数均大于1.00, 南瓜的地上部磷富集系数和转移系数波动较大; 向日葵的富集系数和转移系数最大值分别达11.39和4.09。综合比较可知, 3种植物磷吸收和富集能力的大小顺序为: 向日葵>南瓜>苏丹草。向日葵各项富磷特征基本符合磷富集植物的筛选标准, 可作为磷矿废弃地土壤与植被修复的备选物种。
吴浩, 卢志军, 黄汉东, 江明喜. 三种植物对土壤磷吸收和富集能力的比较. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(1): 63-71. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0007
WU Hao,LU Zhi-Jun,HUANG Han-Dong,JIANG Ming-Xi. Comparison of phosphorus uptake and accumulation capacity among three plant species. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2015, 39(1): 63-71. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0007
P处理 P treatment (mg·kg-1) | 向日葵 Helianthus annuus | 苏丹草 Sorghum sudanense | 南瓜 Cucurbita moschata | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | |||
0 | 5.43 ± 0.29Cd | 14.68 ± 0.14Ba | 18.93 ± 0.67Aa | 2.66 ± 0.45Ca | 11.00 ± 0.43Bc | 22.87 ± 1.58Aa | 5.24 ± 0.24Cc | 11.43 ± 1.16Ba | 18.02 ± 1.01Aa | ||
100 | 7.31 ± 0.38Cc | 15.05 ± 0.48Ba | 18.18 ± 0.75Aa | 3.44 ± 0.32Ca | 9.98 ± 0.49Bc | 25.90 ± 2.79Aa | 8.52 ± 0.23Ca | 13.03 ± 0.75Ba | 19.20 ± 0.64Aa | ||
300 | 9.61 ± 0.73Ca | 15.78 ± 1.47Ba | 19.78 ± 0.43Aa | 3.71 ± 0.59Ca | 15.05 ± 1.00Bb | 30.18 ± 1.69Aa | 6.29 ± 0.56Cbc | 12.43 ± 0.15Ba | 19.62 ± 1.22Aa | ||
500 | 8.09 ± 0.30Cbc | 14.48 ± 0.62Ba | 22.65 ± 1.05Aa | 2.77 ± 0.65Ca | 15.62 ± 0.84Bb | 24.68 ± 0.64Aa | 6.81 ± 0.08Cb | 12.43 ± 0.84Ba | 17.15 ± 0.73Aa | ||
700 | 8.65 ± 0.23Cab | 16.30 ± 0.48Ba | 22.50 ± 2.04Aa | 3.16 ± 0.11Ca | 18.25 ± 0.89Ba | 27.43 ± 3.42Aa | 7.53 ± 0.65Cab | 14.90 ± 0.68Ba | 21.43 ± 0.73Aa |
表1 五种磷(P)浓度处理下3种植物各生长时期地上部生物量(g)(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)
Table 1 The aboveground biomass of three plant species over different growth periods at five phosphorus (P) concentrations (mean ± SE, n = 3)
P处理 P treatment (mg·kg-1) | 向日葵 Helianthus annuus | 苏丹草 Sorghum sudanense | 南瓜 Cucurbita moschata | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | |||
0 | 5.43 ± 0.29Cd | 14.68 ± 0.14Ba | 18.93 ± 0.67Aa | 2.66 ± 0.45Ca | 11.00 ± 0.43Bc | 22.87 ± 1.58Aa | 5.24 ± 0.24Cc | 11.43 ± 1.16Ba | 18.02 ± 1.01Aa | ||
100 | 7.31 ± 0.38Cc | 15.05 ± 0.48Ba | 18.18 ± 0.75Aa | 3.44 ± 0.32Ca | 9.98 ± 0.49Bc | 25.90 ± 2.79Aa | 8.52 ± 0.23Ca | 13.03 ± 0.75Ba | 19.20 ± 0.64Aa | ||
300 | 9.61 ± 0.73Ca | 15.78 ± 1.47Ba | 19.78 ± 0.43Aa | 3.71 ± 0.59Ca | 15.05 ± 1.00Bb | 30.18 ± 1.69Aa | 6.29 ± 0.56Cbc | 12.43 ± 0.15Ba | 19.62 ± 1.22Aa | ||
500 | 8.09 ± 0.30Cbc | 14.48 ± 0.62Ba | 22.65 ± 1.05Aa | 2.77 ± 0.65Ca | 15.62 ± 0.84Bb | 24.68 ± 0.64Aa | 6.81 ± 0.08Cb | 12.43 ± 0.84Ba | 17.15 ± 0.73Aa | ||
700 | 8.65 ± 0.23Cab | 16.30 ± 0.48Ba | 22.50 ± 2.04Aa | 3.16 ± 0.11Ca | 18.25 ± 0.89Ba | 27.43 ± 3.42Aa | 7.53 ± 0.65Cab | 14.90 ± 0.68Ba | 21.43 ± 0.73Aa |
图1 五种浓度磷(P)处理下3种植物地上部磷含量随时间的变化(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)。不同小写字母表示不同磷处理间差异显著(p < 0.05); 不同大写字母表示各生长时段差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 1 Variations of phosphorus (P) concentration in shoots of three plant species with time at five P concentrations (mean ± SE, n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among P treatments (p < 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among growth periods (p < 0.05).
图2 三个生长时段内3种植物地上部磷累积量(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)。不同小写字母表示不同磷处理下差异显著(p < 0.05); 不同大写字母表示不同物种间差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 2 The aboveground total phosphorus (P) accumulations in three plant species over three growth periods (mean ± SE, n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among P treatments (p < 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among plant species (p < 0.05).
图3 三种植物盆栽土壤的全磷含量变化(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)。不同小写字母表示不同生长时段差异显著(p < 0.05); 不同大写字母表示不同磷处理下差异显著(p < 0.05)。
Fig. 3 Variations of total phosphorus (P) concentration in soils of the pots containing three plant species (mean ± SE, n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among growth periods (p < 0.05). Different capital letters indicate significant differences among P treatments (p < 0.05).
P处理 P treatment (mg·kg-1) | 向日葵 Helianthus annuus | 苏丹草 Sorghum sudanense | 南瓜 Cucurbita moschata | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | |||
0 | 4.56 ± 0.16Aa | 3.40 ± 0.40Aabc | 4.35 ± 0.29Ae | 4.92 ± 0.50Aa | 3.87 ± 0.26Ba | 2.37 ± 0.15Ca | 3.96 ± 0.45Ab | 4.16 ± 0.17Ac | 3.54 ± 0.31Ad | ||
100 | 4.98 ± 0.14Aa | 3.83 ± 0.16Bc | 5.60 ± 0.42Ad | 5.48 ± 0.34Aa | 3.98 ± 0.47Ba | 2.73 ± 0.23Ca | 5.16 ± 0.25Aab | 5.72 ± 0.25Ab | 4.75 ± 0.16Ac | ||
300 | 4.65 ± 0.41Ba | 5.23 ± 0.11Bb | 7.36 ± 0.45Ac | 5.78 ± 0.31Aa | 3.84 ± 0.19Ba | 2.86 ± 0.07Ca | 5.30 ± 0.74Aab | 5.77 ± 0.33Ab | 5.66 ± 0.24Abc | ||
500 | 5.31 ± 0.67Ca | 6.78 ± 0.16Ba | 9.00 ± 0.21Ab | 5.33 ± 0.29Aa | 3.98 ± 0.32Ba | 3.24 ± 0.32Ba | 5.86 ± 0.37Aa | 5.70 ± 0.19Ab | 5.85 ± 0.42Ab | ||
700 | 5.28 ± 0.27Ca | 7.79 ± 0.63Babc | 11.39 ± 0.31Aa | 5.88 ± 0.16Aa | 4.32 ± 0.22Aa | 4.47 ± 0.60Aa | 6.19 ± 0.28Aa | 7.20 ± 0.57Aa | 7.90 ± 0.32Aa |
表2 五种磷浓度处理下3种植物各生长时期磷(P)富集系数(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)
Table 2 Bioaccumulation coefficients for three plant species over different growth periods at five phosphorus (P) concentration (mean ± SE, n = 3)
P处理 P treatment (mg·kg-1) | 向日葵 Helianthus annuus | 苏丹草 Sorghum sudanense | 南瓜 Cucurbita moschata | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | |||
0 | 4.56 ± 0.16Aa | 3.40 ± 0.40Aabc | 4.35 ± 0.29Ae | 4.92 ± 0.50Aa | 3.87 ± 0.26Ba | 2.37 ± 0.15Ca | 3.96 ± 0.45Ab | 4.16 ± 0.17Ac | 3.54 ± 0.31Ad | ||
100 | 4.98 ± 0.14Aa | 3.83 ± 0.16Bc | 5.60 ± 0.42Ad | 5.48 ± 0.34Aa | 3.98 ± 0.47Ba | 2.73 ± 0.23Ca | 5.16 ± 0.25Aab | 5.72 ± 0.25Ab | 4.75 ± 0.16Ac | ||
300 | 4.65 ± 0.41Ba | 5.23 ± 0.11Bb | 7.36 ± 0.45Ac | 5.78 ± 0.31Aa | 3.84 ± 0.19Ba | 2.86 ± 0.07Ca | 5.30 ± 0.74Aab | 5.77 ± 0.33Ab | 5.66 ± 0.24Abc | ||
500 | 5.31 ± 0.67Ca | 6.78 ± 0.16Ba | 9.00 ± 0.21Ab | 5.33 ± 0.29Aa | 3.98 ± 0.32Ba | 3.24 ± 0.32Ba | 5.86 ± 0.37Aa | 5.70 ± 0.19Ab | 5.85 ± 0.42Ab | ||
700 | 5.28 ± 0.27Ca | 7.79 ± 0.63Babc | 11.39 ± 0.31Aa | 5.88 ± 0.16Aa | 4.32 ± 0.22Aa | 4.47 ± 0.60Aa | 6.19 ± 0.28Aa | 7.20 ± 0.57Aa | 7.90 ± 0.32Aa |
P处理 P treatment (mg·kg-1) | 向日葵 Helianthus annuus | 苏丹草 Sorghum sudanense | 南瓜 Cucurbita moschata | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | |||
0 | 1.81 ± 0.15Aa | 1.61 ± 0.16Aa | 1.85 ± 0.20Ac | 3.03 ± 0.41Aa | 2.14 ± 0.17ABa | 1.85 ± 0.12Bc | 0.84 ± 0.15Aa | 0.85 ± 0.08Aa | 0.86 ± 0.04Aa | ||
100 | 2.18 ± 0.21Aa | 1.75 ± 0.12Aa | 2.55 ± 0.24Abc | 2.90 ± 0.15Aa | 2.07 ± 0.19Ba | 2.08 ± 0.22Bbc | 1.67 ± 0.24Aa | 1.15 ± 0.11ABa | 0.87 ± 0.04Ba | ||
300 | 2.30 ± 0.27Aa | 2.28 ± 0.15Aa | 2.56 ± 0.19Abc | 3.39 ± 0.34Aa | 2.16 ± 0.20Ba | 2.10 ± 0.11Bbc | 1.61 ± 0.52Aa | 1.01 ± 0.14Aa | 1.00 ± 0.06Aa | ||
500 | 1.65 ± 0.25Aa | 2.01 ± 0.04Aa | 3.05 ± 0.33Ab | 3.44 ± 0.35Aa | 2.15 ± 0.22Ba | 2.46 ± 0.12Bab | 1.69 ± 0.63Aa | 0.88 ± 0.09Aa | 0.95 ± 0.09Aa | ||
700 | 1.86 ± 0.14Ba | 2.43 ± 0.41Ba | 4.09 ± 0.30Aa | 3.54 ± 0.15Aa | 2.35 ± 0.14Ca | 2.92 ± 0.15Ba | 1.82 ± 0.36Aa | 0.71 ± 0.05Ba | 0.95 ± 0.04Ba |
表3 五种磷浓度处理下3种植物各生长时期磷(P)转移系数(平均值±标准误差, n = 3)
Table 3 Translation coefficients for three plant species over different growth periods at five phosphorus (P) concentrations (mean ± SE, n = 3)
P处理 P treatment (mg·kg-1) | 向日葵 Helianthus annuus | 苏丹草 Sorghum sudanense | 南瓜 Cucurbita moschata | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | 4周 4 weeks | 7周 7 weeks | 10周 10 weeks | |||
0 | 1.81 ± 0.15Aa | 1.61 ± 0.16Aa | 1.85 ± 0.20Ac | 3.03 ± 0.41Aa | 2.14 ± 0.17ABa | 1.85 ± 0.12Bc | 0.84 ± 0.15Aa | 0.85 ± 0.08Aa | 0.86 ± 0.04Aa | ||
100 | 2.18 ± 0.21Aa | 1.75 ± 0.12Aa | 2.55 ± 0.24Abc | 2.90 ± 0.15Aa | 2.07 ± 0.19Ba | 2.08 ± 0.22Bbc | 1.67 ± 0.24Aa | 1.15 ± 0.11ABa | 0.87 ± 0.04Ba | ||
300 | 2.30 ± 0.27Aa | 2.28 ± 0.15Aa | 2.56 ± 0.19Abc | 3.39 ± 0.34Aa | 2.16 ± 0.20Ba | 2.10 ± 0.11Bbc | 1.61 ± 0.52Aa | 1.01 ± 0.14Aa | 1.00 ± 0.06Aa | ||
500 | 1.65 ± 0.25Aa | 2.01 ± 0.04Aa | 3.05 ± 0.33Ab | 3.44 ± 0.35Aa | 2.15 ± 0.22Ba | 2.46 ± 0.12Bab | 1.69 ± 0.63Aa | 0.88 ± 0.09Aa | 0.95 ± 0.09Aa | ||
700 | 1.86 ± 0.14Ba | 2.43 ± 0.41Ba | 4.09 ± 0.30Aa | 3.54 ± 0.15Aa | 2.35 ± 0.14Ca | 2.92 ± 0.15Ba | 1.82 ± 0.36Aa | 0.71 ± 0.05Ba | 0.95 ± 0.04Ba |
参考文献 Reference | 研究对象 Species studied | 磷处理浓度 P treatment (KH2PO4) | 生长时间 Growth period | 地上部磷含量 P concentration in shoots (g·kg-1) | 地上部磷累积量 P accumulations in shoots (mg·plant-1) | 富集系数/转移系数Bioaccumulation/ Translation coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
本研究 This study | 向日葵 Helianthus annuus | 700 mg·kg-1 | 10 weeks | 9.67 | 217.83 | 11.39/4.09 |
水蓼 Polygonum hydropiper | 800 mg·kg-1 | 4 weeks 12 weeks | 5.25 3.31 | 7.32 105. 12 | 11.71/0.89 5.24/0.91 | |
Duo grass (Lolium × Festuca) | 7.5 mmol·L-1 | 5 weeks | 17.2 | - | - | |
粗齿冷水花 Pilea sinofasciata | 800 mg·L-1 | 30 days 30 days | 11.81 (stem) 22.85 (leaf) | - - | - - | |
黄瓜 Cucumis sativus | 2 500 mg·kg-1 | 8 weeks 12 weeks | 18.80 (stem) 11.00 (leaf) | - - | - - | |
西葫芦 Cucurbita pepo | 2 500 mg·kg-1 | 12 weeks 12 weeks | 9.00 (stem) 15.21 (leaf) | - - | - - |
表4 向日葵与其他磷(P)富集备选物种各项富集指标的比较
Table 4 Comparison of accumulation indexes between Helianthus annuus and other candidate plant species for phosphorus (P) phytoremediation
参考文献 Reference | 研究对象 Species studied | 磷处理浓度 P treatment (KH2PO4) | 生长时间 Growth period | 地上部磷含量 P concentration in shoots (g·kg-1) | 地上部磷累积量 P accumulations in shoots (mg·plant-1) | 富集系数/转移系数Bioaccumulation/ Translation coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
本研究 This study | 向日葵 Helianthus annuus | 700 mg·kg-1 | 10 weeks | 9.67 | 217.83 | 11.39/4.09 |
水蓼 Polygonum hydropiper | 800 mg·kg-1 | 4 weeks 12 weeks | 5.25 3.31 | 7.32 105. 12 | 11.71/0.89 5.24/0.91 | |
Duo grass (Lolium × Festuca) | 7.5 mmol·L-1 | 5 weeks | 17.2 | - | - | |
粗齿冷水花 Pilea sinofasciata | 800 mg·L-1 | 30 days 30 days | 11.81 (stem) 22.85 (leaf) | - - | - - | |
黄瓜 Cucumis sativus | 2 500 mg·kg-1 | 8 weeks 12 weeks | 18.80 (stem) 11.00 (leaf) | - - | - - | |
西葫芦 Cucurbita pepo | 2 500 mg·kg-1 | 12 weeks 12 weeks | 9.00 (stem) 15.21 (leaf) | - - | - - |
1 | Baker AJM, Brooks RR, Pease AJ, Malaisse F (1983). Studies on copper and cobalt tolerance in three closely related taxa within the genus Silene L. (Caryophyllaceae) from Zaïre. Plant and Soil, 73, 377-385. |
2 | Bao SD (2000). Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. 3rd edn. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. |
(in Chinese) [鲍士旦 (2000). 土壤农化分析. 第3版. 中国农业出版社, 北京.] | |
3 | Brooks RR, Morrison RS, Reeves RD, Dudley TR, Akman Y (1979). Hyperaccumulation of nickel by Alyssum linnaeus (Cruciferae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 203, 387-403. |
4 | Fu DG, He F, Guo Z, Yan K, Wu XN, Duan CQ (2013). Assessment of ecological restoration function of the Coriaria nepalensis-Erianthus rufipilus community in the phosphorus-enriched degraded mountain area in the Lake Dianchi Watershed, Southwestern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 326-334. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [付登高, 何锋, 郭震, 阎凯, 吴晓妮, 段昌群 (2013). 滇池流域富磷区退化山地马桑-蔗茅植物群落的生态修复效能评价.植物生态学报, 37, 326-334.] | |
5 | Guo P, Liu C, Zhang HB, Song XJ, Bao GZ (2007). Studies on enrichment and tolerance ability to Pb-Cu of sunflower seedlings. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 21(6), 92-95. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [郭平, 刘畅, 张海博, 宋晓娟, 包国章 (2007). 向日葵幼苗对Pb-Cu富集能力与耐受性研究.水土保持学报, 21(6), 92-95.] | |
6 | Guo YL, Tai PD, Han YP, Feng Q, Li PJ (2009). Effects of cadmium on the growth and physiological characteristics of sunflower seedlings. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 3, 2291-2996. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [郭艳丽, 台培东, 韩艳萍, 冯倩, 李培军 (2009). 镉胁迫对向日葵幼苗生长和生理特性的影响.环境工程学报, 3, 2291-2996.] | |
7 | Guo YR, Chen FQ, Xi GW, Zeng X (2009). Eco-physiological response of Ficus tikoua to different soil phosphorous content. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 18, 1908-1913. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [郭彦荣, 陈芳清, 郄光武, 曾旭 (2009). 铺地榕对不同土壤磷营养水平的生理生态学响应.生态环境学报, 18, 1908-1913.] | |
8 | Han SH, Huang SF, Tang H, Wang M, Wu J (2012). A comparative study on the performance of 3 plants for remediation of cadmium contaminated farmland soil. Environmental Pollution & Control, 34(12), 22-25. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [韩少华, 黄沈发, 唐浩, 王敏, 吴健 (2012). 3种植物对Cd污染农田土壤的修复效果比较试验研究.环境污染与防治, 34(12), 22-25.] | |
9 | Huang X, Li TX, Zhang XZ, Zheng ZC, Yu HY (2012). Growth, P accumulation, and physiological characteristics of two ecotypes of Polygonum hydropiper as affected by excess P supply. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 175, 293-302. |
10 | Lan CY, Shu WS, Sun QY, Chen CD (1993). Mining land reclamation. In: Chen CD ed. Sustainable Development and Ecology. China Science and Technology Press, Beijing. 132-138. |
(in Chinese) [蓝崇钰, 束文圣, 孙庆业, 陈昌笃 (1993). 采矿地的复垦. 见: 陈昌笃编. 持续发展与生态学. 中国科学技术出版社, 北京. 132-138.] | |
11 | Liu JX (2009). Phosphate rock resource characteristic and suggestion on its exploitation and utilization. Industrial Minerals & Processing, (3), 36-39. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [刘建雄 (2009). 我国磷矿资源特点及开发利用建议.化工矿物与加工, (3), 36-39.] | |
12 | Liu S, Li TX, Ji L, Zhang SJ (2013). Phosphorus accumulation and root morphological difference of two ecotypes of Pilea sinofasciata grown in different phosphorus treatments. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 22, 211-227. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [刘霜, 李廷轩, 戢林, 张树金 (2013). 不同磷处理下两种生态型粗齿冷水花的富磷特征及根系形态差异.草业学报, 22, 211-217.] | |
13 | Li YZ, Luo J, Zhang YM, Liu Q, Guo DD (2012). Plant resources investigation and hyperaccumulator screening in Xiangtan manganese mine area of Hunan Province, central-south China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 31, 16-22. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [李有志, 罗佳, 张灿明, 刘庆, 郭丹丹 (2012). 湘潭锰矿区植物资源调查及超富集植物筛选.生态学杂志, 31, 16-22.] | |
14 | Monni S, Salemaa M, White C, Tuittila E, Huopalainen M (2000). Copper resistance of Calluna vulgaris originating from the pollution gradient of a Cu-Ni smelter, in southwest Finland. Environmental Pollution, 109, 211-219. |
15 | Novak JM, Chan ASK (2002). Development of P hyperaccumulator plant strategies to remediate soils with excess P concentrations. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 21, 493-509. |
16 | Padmanabhan P, Starnes DL, Sahi SV (2013). Differential responses of Duo grass (Lolium × Festuca), a phosphorus hyperaccumulator to high phosphorus and poultry manure treatments. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12, 3191-3195. |
17 | Pant HK, Mislevy P, Rechcigl JE (2004). Effects of phosphorus and potassium on forage nutritive value and quantity: Environmental implications. Agronomy Journal, 96, 1299-1305. |
18 | Ruso J, Zapata J, Hernandez M, Ojeda MA, Benlloch M, Prats-Perez E, Tena M, Lopez R, Jorrin JV (2001). Toxic metals accumulation and total soluble phenolics in sunflower and tobacco plants. Minerva Biotechologica, 13, 93-95. |
19 | Sharma NC, Sahi SV (2005). Characterization of phosphate accumulation in Lolium multiflorum for remediation of phosphorus-enriched soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 5475-5480. |
20 | Sharma NC, Starnes DL, Sahi SV (2007). Phytoextraction of excess soil phosphorus. Environmental Pollution, 146, 120-127. |
21 | Sharpley AN, McDowell RW, Kleinman PJA (2001). Phosphorus loss from land to water: integrating agricultural and environmental management. Plant and Soil, 237, 287-307. |
22 | Sun SY, Chen JZ (1985). A preliminary study of planting density of oil sunflower. Oil Crops of China, (3), 45-47. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [孙书蕴, 陈建忠 (1985). 油用向日葵种植密度的初步研究. 中国油料, (3), 45-47.] | |
23 | Wei CY, Chen TB (2001). Hyperaccumulators and phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soil: A review of studies in China and abroad. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21, 1196-1203. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [韦朝阳, 陈同斌 (2001). 重金属超富集植物及植物修复技术研究进展.生态学报, 21, 1196-1203.] | |
24 | Wu DL (1992). Exploitation and utilization of sunflower in China. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, (10), 14-15. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [武殿林 (1992). 中国向日葵带及其开发之探讨.山西农业科学, (10), 14-15.] | |
25 | Xiao GL, Li TX, Zhang XZ, Yu HY, Huang HG, Gupta DK (2009). Uptake and accumulation of phosphorus by dominant plant species growing in a phosphorus mining area. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 171, 542-550. |
26 | Xu L, Shen RF, Liang LZ, Dong XY (2012). Screening of high phosphorus accumulation varieties of Cucumis sativus. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 40(10), 137-139. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [徐蕾, 沈仁芳, 梁林洲, 董晓英 (2012). 磷高累积黄瓜品种筛选.江苏农业科学, 40(10), 137-139.] | |
27 | Ye DH, Li TX, Zhang XZ, Zheng ZC, Yu HY (2014). Effect of high phosphate supply on P accumulation characteristics of mining ecotype of Polygonum hydropiper. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 20, 186-194. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [叶代桦, 李廷轩, 张锡洲, 郑子成, 余海英 (2014). 高磷对矿山生态型水蓼磷富集特性的影响.植物营养与肥料学报, 20, 186-194.] | |
28 | Ye WL, Xu XY, Chen Z, Dong XL, Wang W, Fang S (2008). Study on adaptation of Sorghum sudanense (Piper) Stapf to copper tailing. Research of Environmental Science, 21(6), 193-196. |
(in Chinese with English abstract) [叶文玲, 徐晓燕, 陈增, 董晓玲, 王韡, 方胜 (2008). 苏丹草对铜尾矿的适应性研究.环境科学研究, 21(6), 193-196.] |
[1] | 朱育新, 钱君龙, 黄景苏, 柯善哲. 南京栖霞山地区树木元素富集的初步研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1995, 19(3): 261-269. |
阅读次数 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
全文 4900
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
摘要 1771
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19 51La