植物生态学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (12): 1463-1471.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.12.013
简在友1,2, 王文全2,*(), 孟丽1, 许桂芳1, 王秋玲2, 李卫东2, 俞敬波2
收稿日期:
2010-01-13
接受日期:
2010-05-07
出版日期:
2010-01-13
发布日期:
2010-12-28
通讯作者:
王文全
作者简介:
(E-mail: wwq57@126.com)
JIAN Zai-You1,2, WANG Wen-Quan2,*(), MENG Li1, XU Gui-Fang1, WANG Qiu-Ling2, LI Wei-Dong2, YU Jing-Bo2
Received:
2010-01-13
Accepted:
2010-05-07
Online:
2010-01-13
Published:
2010-12-28
Contact:
WANG Wen-Quan
摘要:
为了比较分析芍药组不同类群光合生理差异以及它们对各自不同光照环境的适应性, 测定了芍药组(Paeonia sect. Paeonia) 4种2变种的光合日变化、光响应曲线、CO2响应曲线, 以及叶绿素荧光特性。结果显示, 芍药组中不同类群之间光合速率差异明显, 各个种类的“午休”程度不同, 芍药(Paeonia lactiflora )和毛果芍药(P. lactiflora var. trichocarpa)的强光抑制现象没有川赤芍(P. veitchii)、美丽芍药(P. mairei)和窄叶芍药(P. anomala)明显。叶绿素荧光特征能够反映芍药组不同类群光合生理的差异。芍药组内不同类群地理分布的差异能部分从光合生理特征的适应性方面得到解释。
简在友, 王文全, 孟丽, 许桂芳, 王秋玲, 李卫东, 俞敬波. 芍药组内不同类群间光合特性及叶绿素荧光特性比较. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(12): 1463-1471. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.12.013
JIAN Zai-You, WANG Wen-Quan, MENG Li, XU Gui-Fang, WANG Qiu-Ling, LI Wei-Dong, YU Jing-Bo. Comparison of photosynthetic and fluorescence characteristics among taxa in Paeonia sect. Paeonia. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(12): 1463-1471. DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.12.013
分类群 Taxon | 地点 Location | 海拔, 经纬度Elevation (m), latitude, longitude | 生境, 分布Habitat, distribution | 气候特征(年平均) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
降雨量Rainfall (mm) | 气温 Air temperature (℃) | 大于10 ℃积温Accumulative temperature: above 10 ℃ (℃) | ||||
芍药 P. lactiflora | 内蒙古多伦蔡木山 Caimushan, Duolun, Inner Mongolia | 1 370, 42°24′16″ N 116°45′29″ E | 草原灌丛, 聚群Brush, cluster | 440 | 0.4 | 1 872 |
毛果芍药 P. lactiflora var. trichocarpa | 宁夏隆德沙塘 Shatang, Longde, Ningxia | 1 980, 35°35′45″ N, 105°58′54″ E | 耕地, 栽培 Tilth, cluster | 580 | 12.6 | 4 272 |
川赤芍 P. veitchii | 陕西眉县汤峪 Tangyu, Meixian, Shaanxi | 2 800, 34°08′15″ N 107°53′42″ E | 林下, 阳坡, 聚群 Forest, sunny, cluster | 700 | 11.9 | 3 768 |
窄叶芍药 P. anomala | 新疆额敏168团 168 regiment, Emin, Xinjiang | 1 480, 46°55′30″ N 84°28′27″ E | 灌丛, 阳坡, 聚群 Brush, sunny, cluster | 270 | 6.0 | 2 904 |
块根芍药 P. anomala var. intermedia | 新疆额敏168团 168 regiment, Emin, Xinjiang | 1 480, 46°55′30″ N 84°28′28″ E | 灌丛, 阳坡, 聚群 Brush, sunny, cluster | 270 | 6.0 | 2 904 |
美丽芍药 P. mairei | 四川北川擂鼓 Leigu, Beichuan, Sichuan | 1 600, 31°50′20″ N 104°21′40″ E | 林下, 阳坡, 聚群 Forest, sunny, cluster | 1 110 | 16.1 | 5 184 |
北京·朝阳区 Chaoyang, Beijing | 50, 39°58′52″ N 116°27′58″ E | 市区 City | 580 | 11.4 | 4 320 |
表1 芍药组不同类群的生长环境
Table 1 Habitats of different species of Paeonia sect. Paeonia
分类群 Taxon | 地点 Location | 海拔, 经纬度Elevation (m), latitude, longitude | 生境, 分布Habitat, distribution | 气候特征(年平均) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
降雨量Rainfall (mm) | 气温 Air temperature (℃) | 大于10 ℃积温Accumulative temperature: above 10 ℃ (℃) | ||||
芍药 P. lactiflora | 内蒙古多伦蔡木山 Caimushan, Duolun, Inner Mongolia | 1 370, 42°24′16″ N 116°45′29″ E | 草原灌丛, 聚群Brush, cluster | 440 | 0.4 | 1 872 |
毛果芍药 P. lactiflora var. trichocarpa | 宁夏隆德沙塘 Shatang, Longde, Ningxia | 1 980, 35°35′45″ N, 105°58′54″ E | 耕地, 栽培 Tilth, cluster | 580 | 12.6 | 4 272 |
川赤芍 P. veitchii | 陕西眉县汤峪 Tangyu, Meixian, Shaanxi | 2 800, 34°08′15″ N 107°53′42″ E | 林下, 阳坡, 聚群 Forest, sunny, cluster | 700 | 11.9 | 3 768 |
窄叶芍药 P. anomala | 新疆额敏168团 168 regiment, Emin, Xinjiang | 1 480, 46°55′30″ N 84°28′27″ E | 灌丛, 阳坡, 聚群 Brush, sunny, cluster | 270 | 6.0 | 2 904 |
块根芍药 P. anomala var. intermedia | 新疆额敏168团 168 regiment, Emin, Xinjiang | 1 480, 46°55′30″ N 84°28′28″ E | 灌丛, 阳坡, 聚群 Brush, sunny, cluster | 270 | 6.0 | 2 904 |
美丽芍药 P. mairei | 四川北川擂鼓 Leigu, Beichuan, Sichuan | 1 600, 31°50′20″ N 104°21′40″ E | 林下, 阳坡, 聚群 Forest, sunny, cluster | 1 110 | 16.1 | 5 184 |
北京·朝阳区 Chaoyang, Beijing | 50, 39°58′52″ N 116°27′58″ E | 市区 City | 580 | 11.4 | 4 320 |
种类 Species | 项目 Index | 9:00 | 10:00 | 11:00 | 12:00 | 13:00 | 14:00 | 15:00 | 16:00 | 17:00 | 18:00 | 19:00 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
芍药 P. lactiflora | PAR | 1 330 | 1 373 | 1 615 | 1 685 | 1 671 | 1 584 | 1 296 | 388 | 184 | 114 | 44 |
Tl | 33.71 | 38.24 | 41.12 | 41.40 | 39.39 | 42.57 | 38.19 | 34.41 | 32.45 | 31.47 | 30.41 | |
Pn | 10.03b | 10.43b | 10.67b | 7.97b | 9.73b | 9.02b | 9.89b | 8.89b | 3.11c | 3.45c | 1.35a | |
Tr | 3.18d | 2.51c | 4.44b | 4.30b | 2.19b | 2.75c | 1.24c | 0.70c | 0.08c | -0.48e | -0.61c | |
川赤芍 P. veitchii | PAR | 1 224 | 1 399 | 1 548 | 1 543 | 1 525 | 1 237 | 1 141 | 301 | 270 | 259 | 39 |
Tl | 33.40 | 37.49 | 41.52 | 40.47 | 38.95 | 41.01 | 37.80 | 34.18 | 32.78 | 32.01 | 30.35 | |
Pn | 6.30c | 8.79c | 7.72c | 4.47c | 7.18c | 7.96c | 9.00c | 8.00c | 7.62c | 6.86a | 1.42a | |
Tr | 3.85b | 3.31b | 3.83c | 3.50c | 2.16b | 3.86b | 2.10b | 1.19b | 0.73a | 0.79a | -0.01b | |
窄叶芍药 P. anomala | PAR | 1 389 | 1 517 | 1 623 | 1 664 | 1 649 | 1 208 | 1 160 | 466 | 140 | 87 | 28 |
Tl | 34.78 | 38.55 | 41.25 | 41.83 | 39.33 | 41.22 | 38.33 | 34.83 | 32.06 | 31.74 | 30.52 | |
Pn | 6.21c | 7.75d | 5.95d | 3.52d | 7.45c | 7.12d | 8.21d | 6.47d | 4.70b | 4.25b | 1.84a | |
Tr | 3.48c | 1.31e | 1.52e | 1.13e | 0.59d | 1.15e | 0.63d | 0.37d | -0.12d | -0.25d | -1.02d | |
美丽芍药 P. mairei | PAR | 1 497 | 1 603 | 1 704 | 1 650 | 1 538 | 1 090 | 946 | 242 | 93 | 43 | 16 |
Tl | 35.8 | 38.91 | 42.47 | 42.18 | 40.93 | 41.76 | 39.08 | 34.61 | 31.93 | 31.75 | 30.66 | |
Pn | 4.45d | 7.05e | 5.64e | 2.19e | 6.03d | 6.3e | 7.25e | 5.10e | 4.37b | 3.86c | -0.90b | |
Tr | 3.47c | 1.99d | 2.40d | 2.09d | 1.25c | 1.98d | 0.58d | 0.35d | -0.14d | -0.06c | 0.69a | |
毛果芍药 P. lacrtiflora var. trichocarpa | PAR | 1 456 | 1 427 | 1 517 | 1 557 | 1 564 | 1 294 | 1 163 | 1 071 | 189 | 109 | 17 |
Tl | 35.2 | 37.92 | 40.66 | 40.62 | 40.03 | 39.6 | 38.11 | 35.60 | 31.68 | 31.38 | 30.70 | |
Pn | 14.58a | 16.60a | 15.01a | 15.48a | 14.89a | 14.59a | 16.25a | 13.72a | 8.62a | 6.37a | -1.02b | |
Tr | 5.75a | 5.12a | 5.81a | 5.43a | 4.47 a | 5.34a | 3.68a | 3.31a | 0.62b | 0.37b | 0.90a |
表2 芍药组不同类群光合日变化及多重比较
Table 2 Variance analysis of diurnal photosynthetic changes of taxa of Paeonia sect. Paeonia
种类 Species | 项目 Index | 9:00 | 10:00 | 11:00 | 12:00 | 13:00 | 14:00 | 15:00 | 16:00 | 17:00 | 18:00 | 19:00 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
芍药 P. lactiflora | PAR | 1 330 | 1 373 | 1 615 | 1 685 | 1 671 | 1 584 | 1 296 | 388 | 184 | 114 | 44 |
Tl | 33.71 | 38.24 | 41.12 | 41.40 | 39.39 | 42.57 | 38.19 | 34.41 | 32.45 | 31.47 | 30.41 | |
Pn | 10.03b | 10.43b | 10.67b | 7.97b | 9.73b | 9.02b | 9.89b | 8.89b | 3.11c | 3.45c | 1.35a | |
Tr | 3.18d | 2.51c | 4.44b | 4.30b | 2.19b | 2.75c | 1.24c | 0.70c | 0.08c | -0.48e | -0.61c | |
川赤芍 P. veitchii | PAR | 1 224 | 1 399 | 1 548 | 1 543 | 1 525 | 1 237 | 1 141 | 301 | 270 | 259 | 39 |
Tl | 33.40 | 37.49 | 41.52 | 40.47 | 38.95 | 41.01 | 37.80 | 34.18 | 32.78 | 32.01 | 30.35 | |
Pn | 6.30c | 8.79c | 7.72c | 4.47c | 7.18c | 7.96c | 9.00c | 8.00c | 7.62c | 6.86a | 1.42a | |
Tr | 3.85b | 3.31b | 3.83c | 3.50c | 2.16b | 3.86b | 2.10b | 1.19b | 0.73a | 0.79a | -0.01b | |
窄叶芍药 P. anomala | PAR | 1 389 | 1 517 | 1 623 | 1 664 | 1 649 | 1 208 | 1 160 | 466 | 140 | 87 | 28 |
Tl | 34.78 | 38.55 | 41.25 | 41.83 | 39.33 | 41.22 | 38.33 | 34.83 | 32.06 | 31.74 | 30.52 | |
Pn | 6.21c | 7.75d | 5.95d | 3.52d | 7.45c | 7.12d | 8.21d | 6.47d | 4.70b | 4.25b | 1.84a | |
Tr | 3.48c | 1.31e | 1.52e | 1.13e | 0.59d | 1.15e | 0.63d | 0.37d | -0.12d | -0.25d | -1.02d | |
美丽芍药 P. mairei | PAR | 1 497 | 1 603 | 1 704 | 1 650 | 1 538 | 1 090 | 946 | 242 | 93 | 43 | 16 |
Tl | 35.8 | 38.91 | 42.47 | 42.18 | 40.93 | 41.76 | 39.08 | 34.61 | 31.93 | 31.75 | 30.66 | |
Pn | 4.45d | 7.05e | 5.64e | 2.19e | 6.03d | 6.3e | 7.25e | 5.10e | 4.37b | 3.86c | -0.90b | |
Tr | 3.47c | 1.99d | 2.40d | 2.09d | 1.25c | 1.98d | 0.58d | 0.35d | -0.14d | -0.06c | 0.69a | |
毛果芍药 P. lacrtiflora var. trichocarpa | PAR | 1 456 | 1 427 | 1 517 | 1 557 | 1 564 | 1 294 | 1 163 | 1 071 | 189 | 109 | 17 |
Tl | 35.2 | 37.92 | 40.66 | 40.62 | 40.03 | 39.6 | 38.11 | 35.60 | 31.68 | 31.38 | 30.70 | |
Pn | 14.58a | 16.60a | 15.01a | 15.48a | 14.89a | 14.59a | 16.25a | 13.72a | 8.62a | 6.37a | -1.02b | |
Tr | 5.75a | 5.12a | 5.81a | 5.43a | 4.47 a | 5.34a | 3.68a | 3.31a | 0.62b | 0.37b | 0.90a |
项目 Item | 模型 Model | 指标 Index | 芍药 P. lactiflora | 川赤芍 P. veitchii | 美丽芍药 P. mairei | 块根芍药 P. anomala var. intermedia | 毛果芍药 P. lacrtiflora var. trichocarpa | 窄叶芍药 P. anomala | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
光响应曲线 Light- response curve | 观测Determined | PARmax | 1 499 | 1 600 | 1 000 | 1 800 | 1 501 | 1 000 | |
Amax | 14.9 | 11.5 | 7.8 | 18.8 | 11.5 | 7.3 | |||
模型1 Model 1 | Rday | 1.240 | 0.317 | 0.930 | 1.940 | 1.290 | 0.253 | ||
LCP | 16.0 | 6.0 | 13.7 | 26.0 | 21.0 | 5.0 | |||
Amax | 15.93 | 11.67 | 8.28 | 21.52 | 12.14 | 7.07 | |||
Φ | 0.049 | 0.028 | 0.036 | 0.050 | 0.036 | 0.047 | |||
r | 0.995 | 0.985 | 0.990 | 0.990 | 0.980 | 0.986 | |||
K | 0.820 | 0.960 | 0.932 | 0.774 | 0.872 | 0.996 | |||
观测值与预测值相关性Correlation of observed and forecast (R) | 0.995 | 0.984 | 0.990 | 0.989 | 0.981 | 0.972 | |||
模型2 Model 2 | Rday | 2.14 | 1.08 | 1.54 | 4.85 | 1.62 | 3.04 | ||
LCP | 31.43 | 25.22 | 24.12 | 61.40 | 34.33 | 18.00 | |||
LSP | 1 300.0 | 1 176.5 | 941.7 | 1 700.0 | 1 174.0 | 669.0 | |||
PLR | 14.04 | 11.68 | 7.54 | 18.03 | 10.60 | 7.25 | |||
r | 0.997 | 0.980 | 0.990 | 0.990 | 0.980 | 0.980 | |||
观测值与预测值相关性Correlation of observed and forecast (R) | 0.997 | 0.980 | 0.991 | 0.990 | 0.981 | 0.980 | |||
参数 Parameter | E | 0.068 | 0.043 | 0.064 | 0.079 | 0.047 | 0.169 | ||
M | 0.000 14 | 0.000 22 | 0.00016 | 0.000 10 | 0.000 17 | 0.000 14 | |||
N | 0.003 0 | 0.001 8 | 0.006 0 | 0.003 0 | 0.002 6 | 0.019 0 | |||
CO2响应曲线CO2-response curve | 观测Determined | PARmax | 1 575 | 975 | 2 046 | 966 | 1 155 | 1 547 | |
Amax | 19.8 | 18.4 | 5.4 | 24.4 | 29.5 | 17.6 | |||
模型1 Model 1 | Rday | 2.155 | 2.670 | 0.747 | 2.270 | 2.530 | 2.485 | ||
CCP | 34 | 40 | 52 | 29 | 41 | 43 | |||
CSP | 20.080 | 18.120 | 6.374 | 26.930 | 30.100 | 19.900 | |||
r | 0.993 | 0.960 | 0.995 | 0.998 | 0.992 | 0.995 | |||
观测值与预测值相关性Correlation of observed and forecast (R) | 0.993 | 0.955 | 0.996 | 0.877 | 0.993 | 0.995 | |||
参数 Parameter | Φ | 0.033 0 | 0.034 0 | 0.008 3 | 0.041 0 | 0.033 0 | 0.030 0 | ||
K | 0.985 | 0.990 | 0.891 | 0.979 | 0.990 | 0.961 | |||
模型2 Model 2 | Rday | 3.120 | 4.270 | 0.998 | 5.560 | 4.400 | 3.060 | ||
CCP | 72.29 | 79.35 | 92.98 | 85.21 | 95.70 | 77.20 | |||
CSP | 1 299 | 1 031 | 1 860 | 1 026 | 1 264 | 1 392 | |||
PCR | 20.12 | 17.95 | 5.29 | 23.59 | 23.06 | 17.44 | |||
r | 0.996 | 0.988 | 0.994 | 0.995 | 0.994 | 0.998 | |||
观测值与预测值相关性Correlation of observed and forecast (R) | 0.996 | 0.988 | 0.994 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.999 | |||
参数 Parameter | E | 0.043 | 0.054 | 0.011 | 0.065 | 0.046 | 0.040 | ||
M | 0.000 32 | 0.000 36 | 0.000 17 | 0.000 42 | 0.000 36 | 0.000 27 | |||
N | 0.000 42 | 0.000 76 | 0.000 78 | 0.000 45 | 0.000 20 | 0.000 63 |
表3 芍药组不同类群的光响应曲线和CO2响应曲线模型拟合值
Table 3 Indexes of models simulated to light-response curve and CO2-response curve of taxa of Paeonia sect. Paeonia
项目 Item | 模型 Model | 指标 Index | 芍药 P. lactiflora | 川赤芍 P. veitchii | 美丽芍药 P. mairei | 块根芍药 P. anomala var. intermedia | 毛果芍药 P. lacrtiflora var. trichocarpa | 窄叶芍药 P. anomala | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
光响应曲线 Light- response curve | 观测Determined | PARmax | 1 499 | 1 600 | 1 000 | 1 800 | 1 501 | 1 000 | |
Amax | 14.9 | 11.5 | 7.8 | 18.8 | 11.5 | 7.3 | |||
模型1 Model 1 | Rday | 1.240 | 0.317 | 0.930 | 1.940 | 1.290 | 0.253 | ||
LCP | 16.0 | 6.0 | 13.7 | 26.0 | 21.0 | 5.0 | |||
Amax | 15.93 | 11.67 | 8.28 | 21.52 | 12.14 | 7.07 | |||
Φ | 0.049 | 0.028 | 0.036 | 0.050 | 0.036 | 0.047 | |||
r | 0.995 | 0.985 | 0.990 | 0.990 | 0.980 | 0.986 | |||
K | 0.820 | 0.960 | 0.932 | 0.774 | 0.872 | 0.996 | |||
观测值与预测值相关性Correlation of observed and forecast (R) | 0.995 | 0.984 | 0.990 | 0.989 | 0.981 | 0.972 | |||
模型2 Model 2 | Rday | 2.14 | 1.08 | 1.54 | 4.85 | 1.62 | 3.04 | ||
LCP | 31.43 | 25.22 | 24.12 | 61.40 | 34.33 | 18.00 | |||
LSP | 1 300.0 | 1 176.5 | 941.7 | 1 700.0 | 1 174.0 | 669.0 | |||
PLR | 14.04 | 11.68 | 7.54 | 18.03 | 10.60 | 7.25 | |||
r | 0.997 | 0.980 | 0.990 | 0.990 | 0.980 | 0.980 | |||
观测值与预测值相关性Correlation of observed and forecast (R) | 0.997 | 0.980 | 0.991 | 0.990 | 0.981 | 0.980 | |||
参数 Parameter | E | 0.068 | 0.043 | 0.064 | 0.079 | 0.047 | 0.169 | ||
M | 0.000 14 | 0.000 22 | 0.00016 | 0.000 10 | 0.000 17 | 0.000 14 | |||
N | 0.003 0 | 0.001 8 | 0.006 0 | 0.003 0 | 0.002 6 | 0.019 0 | |||
CO2响应曲线CO2-response curve | 观测Determined | PARmax | 1 575 | 975 | 2 046 | 966 | 1 155 | 1 547 | |
Amax | 19.8 | 18.4 | 5.4 | 24.4 | 29.5 | 17.6 | |||
模型1 Model 1 | Rday | 2.155 | 2.670 | 0.747 | 2.270 | 2.530 | 2.485 | ||
CCP | 34 | 40 | 52 | 29 | 41 | 43 | |||
CSP | 20.080 | 18.120 | 6.374 | 26.930 | 30.100 | 19.900 | |||
r | 0.993 | 0.960 | 0.995 | 0.998 | 0.992 | 0.995 | |||
观测值与预测值相关性Correlation of observed and forecast (R) | 0.993 | 0.955 | 0.996 | 0.877 | 0.993 | 0.995 | |||
参数 Parameter | Φ | 0.033 0 | 0.034 0 | 0.008 3 | 0.041 0 | 0.033 0 | 0.030 0 | ||
K | 0.985 | 0.990 | 0.891 | 0.979 | 0.990 | 0.961 | |||
模型2 Model 2 | Rday | 3.120 | 4.270 | 0.998 | 5.560 | 4.400 | 3.060 | ||
CCP | 72.29 | 79.35 | 92.98 | 85.21 | 95.70 | 77.20 | |||
CSP | 1 299 | 1 031 | 1 860 | 1 026 | 1 264 | 1 392 | |||
PCR | 20.12 | 17.95 | 5.29 | 23.59 | 23.06 | 17.44 | |||
r | 0.996 | 0.988 | 0.994 | 0.995 | 0.994 | 0.998 | |||
观测值与预测值相关性Correlation of observed and forecast (R) | 0.996 | 0.988 | 0.994 | 0.995 | 0.995 | 0.999 | |||
参数 Parameter | E | 0.043 | 0.054 | 0.011 | 0.065 | 0.046 | 0.040 | ||
M | 0.000 32 | 0.000 36 | 0.000 17 | 0.000 42 | 0.000 36 | 0.000 27 | |||
N | 0.000 42 | 0.000 76 | 0.000 78 | 0.000 45 | 0.000 20 | 0.000 63 |
图1 芍药组不同类群光合日变化(光强和气温的数据被按比例缩小)。Pn, 净光合速率。
Fig. 1 Diurnal photosynthetic changes of different taxa of Paeonia sect. Paeonia (light intensity and air temperature are reduced in rate). Pn, net photosynthetic rate.
种类 Species | F0 (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Fm (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Fv (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Fv/Fm | Fs (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Fms (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Y | ETR | NPQ | Fv/F0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
美丽芍药 P. mairei | 608.0 | 2 047 | 1 439.0 | 0.702 | 173.7 | 512 | 0.655 | 5.90 | 3.01* | 2.575 |
川赤芍 P. veitchii | 757.7 | 2 047 | 1 289.3 | 0.629 | 308.0 | 792 | 0.608 | 8.10* | 1.59 | 1.760 |
芍药 P. lactiflora | 650. 7 | 2 046 | 1 396.3 | 0.681 | 209.0 | 693 | 0.699 | 7.63 | 1.95 | 2.200 |
毛果芍药 P. lacrtiflora var. trichocarpa | 706.0 | 2 047 | 1 341.0 | 0.654 | 169.0 | 665 | 0.742* | 3.80 | 2.93* | 1.900 |
窄叶芍药 P. anomala | 672.0 | 2 047 | 1 375.0 | 0.671 | 142.0 | 547 | 0.745* | 7.50 | 3.20* | 2.070 |
块根芍药 P. anomala var. intermedia | 828.0 | 2 047 | 1 219.0 | 0.595 | 205.0 | 608 | 0.662 | 11.90* | 2.37 | 1.470 |
表4 芍药组不同类群的叶绿素荧光特性
Table 4 Chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of taxa of Paeonia sect. Paeonia
种类 Species | F0 (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Fm (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Fv (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Fv/Fm | Fs (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Fms (μmol·m-2·s-1) | Y | ETR | NPQ | Fv/F0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
美丽芍药 P. mairei | 608.0 | 2 047 | 1 439.0 | 0.702 | 173.7 | 512 | 0.655 | 5.90 | 3.01* | 2.575 |
川赤芍 P. veitchii | 757.7 | 2 047 | 1 289.3 | 0.629 | 308.0 | 792 | 0.608 | 8.10* | 1.59 | 1.760 |
芍药 P. lactiflora | 650. 7 | 2 046 | 1 396.3 | 0.681 | 209.0 | 693 | 0.699 | 7.63 | 1.95 | 2.200 |
毛果芍药 P. lacrtiflora var. trichocarpa | 706.0 | 2 047 | 1 341.0 | 0.654 | 169.0 | 665 | 0.742* | 3.80 | 2.93* | 1.900 |
窄叶芍药 P. anomala | 672.0 | 2 047 | 1 375.0 | 0.671 | 142.0 | 547 | 0.745* | 7.50 | 3.20* | 2.070 |
块根芍药 P. anomala var. intermedia | 828.0 | 2 047 | 1 219.0 | 0.595 | 205.0 | 608 | 0.662 | 11.90* | 2.37 | 1.470 |
图2 芍药组不同类群光合及荧光特征的聚类分析。1-5分别表示芍药、川赤芍、窄叶芍药、美丽芍药和毛果芍药。
Fig. 2 Cluster analysis of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of taxa of Paeonia sect. Paeonia. 1-5 are P. lactiflora, P. veitchii, P. anomala, P. mairei and P. lactiflora var. trichocarpa, respectively.
[1] | Andrieu E, Thompson JD, Debussche M (2007). The impact of forest spread on a marginal population of a protected peony (Paeonia officinalis L.): the importance of conserving the habitat mosaic. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 643-658. |
[2] |
Chen J (陈建), Zhang GC (张光灿), Zhang SY (张淑勇), Wang MJ (王梦军) (2008). Response processes of Aralia elata photosynthesis and transpiration to light and soil moisture. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 19, 1185-1190. (in Chinese with English abstract)
URL PMID |
[3] | Chinese Pharmacopoeia Committee (国家药典委员会) (2005). Pharmacopoeia of People’s Republic of China Part I. (中华人民共和国药典一部). Chemical Industry Press, Beijing. 109. (in Chinese) |
[4] | Flora Republicae Popularis Sinicae Editorial Board of Chinese Academy of Sciences ( 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会) (1979). Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (中国植物志), Tomus, 27. Science Press, Beijing. 37-59. (in Chinese) |
[5] | Hong DY, Pan KY, Turland NJ (2001). Paeonia anomala subsp. veitchii(Paeoniaceae), a new combination. Novon, 11, 315-318. |
[6] | Jin TT (靳甜甜), Liu GH (刘国华), Hu CJ (胡婵娟), Su CH (苏常红), Liu Y (刘宇) (2008). Characteristics of photosynthetic and transpiration of three common afforestation species in the Loess Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 28, 5758-5765. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Luo QH (罗青红), Li ZJ (李志军), Wu WM (伍维模), Han L (韩路) (2006). Comparative study of photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa. Acta Botanica Boreali- Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 26, 983-988. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Meng LZ (孟令曾), Zhang JL (张教林), Cao KF (曹坤芳), Xu ZF (许再富) (2005). Diurnal changes of photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence in canopy leaves of four dipterocarp species under ex-situ conservation. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica (植物生态学报), 29, 976-984. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Ne’eman G (2003). To be or not to be—The effect of nature conservation management on flowering of Paeonia mascula(L.) Miller in Israel. Biological Conservation, 109, 103-109. |
[10] | Wu TG (吴统贵), Wu M (吴明), Xiao JH (萧江华) (2008). Ecophysiology of dominant plant species during succession in Hangzhou Bay Wetlands. Acta Botanica Boreali- Occidentalia Sinica (西北植物学报), 28, 1683-1688. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Ye ZP (叶子飘) (2007). Application of light-response model in estimating the photosynthesis of super-hybrid rice combination-II Youming 86. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 26, 1323-1326. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | Ye ZP (叶子飘), Yu Q (于强) (2008). Comparison of new and several classical models of photosynthesis in response to irradiance. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version) (植物生态学报), 32, 1356-1361. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Zhang YL (张艳丽), Zhang ZY (张重义), Li YJ (李友军), Liu H (刘辉), Li J (李娟) (2008). Chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Achyranthes bidentata under different planting densities. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 27, 1089-1094. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 程汉亭, 李勤奋, 刘景坤, 严廷良, 张俏燕, 王进闯. 橡胶林下益智光合特性的季节动态变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(5): 585-594. |
[2] | 罗辅燕,陈卫英,陈真勇. 指数改进模型在大麦光合-CO2响应曲线中的适用性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(7): 650-655. |
[3] | 苏华, 李永庚, 苏本营, 孙建新. 地下水位下降对浑善达克沙地榆树光合及抗逆性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(3): 177-186. |
[4] | 陈卫英, 陈真勇, 罗辅燕, 彭正松, 余懋群. 光响应曲线的指数改进模型与常用模型比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(12): 1277-1285. |
[5] | 焦娟玉, 尹春英, 陈珂. 土壤水、氮供应对麻疯树幼苗光合特性的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(1): 91-99. |
[6] | 徐振锋, 胡庭兴, 张力, 张远彬, 鲜骏仁, 王开运. 青藏高原东缘林线交错带糙皮桦幼苗光合特性对模拟增温的短期响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(3): 263-270. |
[7] | 黄娟, 吴彤, 孔国辉, 陈志东, 张进忠. 油页岩废渣地12种木本植物光合作用的季节变化[J]. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30(4): 666-674. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19