植物生态学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (11): 1486-1500.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0122 cstr: 32100.14.cjpe.2024.0122
杨子龙, 罗光宇, 雷富民, 余静柔, 蔡圣轩, 于晶*()
收稿日期:
2024-04-23
接受日期:
2024-08-23
出版日期:
2024-11-20
发布日期:
2024-08-23
通讯作者:
*于晶(yujing@shnu.edu.cn)
基金资助:
YANG Zi-Long, LUO Guang-Yu, LEI Fu-Min, YU Jing-Rou, CAI Sheng-Xuan, YU Jing*()
Received:
2024-04-23
Accepted:
2024-08-23
Online:
2024-11-20
Published:
2024-08-23
Contact:
*YU Jing (yujing@shnu.edu.cn)
Supported by:
摘要:
种-面积关系描述了当取样面积增加时, 物种丰富度也随之变化的规律, 是群落生态学研究的核心问题之一。小岛屿效应(SIE)是种-面积关系的一种特殊现象, 是岛屿生物地理学和生物多样性研究理论框架的重要元素。沿海岛屿是一种实际存在的岛屿系统, 然而以苔藓植物为研究对象的SIE研究还比较少。该研究以浙江省象山地区沿海岛屿为研究区域, 调查了43个沿海岛屿苔藓植物的物种组成。采用了4种连续分段回归模型和2种对照模型, 分别检测了不同类群的苔藓植物是否存在SIE, 并对其产生的阈值大小进行比较。使用广义线性混合效应模型和Mantel检验分析探讨了包括景观特征、人为干扰等环境因子对海岛苔藓物种丰富度的影响, 以及不同类群(苔类、藓类、顶蒴藓类、侧蒴藓类)对海岛环境因子的响应。结果显示, 象山地区沿海43个岛屿共记录苔藓植物209种, 隶属于46科85属。苔藓植物所有类群均存在SIE, 双拐点模型被认为是最优模型, 其面积阈值分布在0.098-4.419 km2之间, 其中, 苔类高于藓类, 顶蒴藓类高于侧蒴藓类。广义线性混合效应模型结果表明, 苔藓植物物种丰富度随着岛屿面积、生境丰富度、形状指数、海岸线长度、人口数量、交通频率增加而增多, 随着隔离程度增大而减少, 生境丰富度是影响苔藓植物物种丰富度的最主要因素。一般而言, 资源需求较低, 传播能力更强的类群(藓类), 其小岛屿面积的阈值较低。远离大陆的几个大岛屿由于植被覆盖率低, 生境丰富度低, 不适合侧蒴藓类生长, 导致其小岛屿面积阈值低于顶蒴藓类。因此, 生境类型的多样性保护是维持物种多样性的重要保障。
杨子龙, 罗光宇, 雷富民, 余静柔, 蔡圣轩, 于晶. 浙江象山沿海岛屿苔藓植物种-面积关系及物种丰富度影响因素. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(11): 1486-1500. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0122
YANG Zi-Long, LUO Guang-Yu, LEI Fu-Min, YU Jing-Rou, CAI Sheng-Xuan, YU Jing. Species-area relationship of bryophytes and its influencing factors on the coastal islands in Xiangshan, Zhejiang, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2024, 48(11): 1486-1500. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2024.0122
图1 浙江象山43个沿海岛屿分布图。1-43为岛屿编号。灰色部分代表大陆, 绿色部分代表所选取岛屿。
Fig. 1 Distribution of 43 coastal islands in Xiangshan, Zhejiang. Different numbers indicate different islands. Gray area indicates the mainland, green area indicates the selected island.
模型 Model | 方程式 Equation |
---|---|
1 | S = C + Z1lnA (lnA ≤ T) + |Z1T + Z2 (lnA - T)|(lnA > T) |
2 | S = C + Z1lnA (lnA ≤ T1) + |Z1T1 + Z2 (lnA - T1)|(T2 ≥ lnA > T1) + |Z2 (T2 - T1) + Z3 (lnA - T2)|(lnA > T2) |
3 | S = C + |Z2 (lnA - T)|(lnA > T) |
4 | S = C + Z2 (lnA - T1)|(T2 ≥ lnA > T1) + |Z2 (T2 - T1) + Z3 (lnA - T2)|(A > T2) |
5 | S = C + Z1 logA |
6 | S = C |
表1 6种小岛屿效应检测模型方程式
Table 1 Equations of six different small island-effect detection models
模型 Model | 方程式 Equation |
---|---|
1 | S = C + Z1lnA (lnA ≤ T) + |Z1T + Z2 (lnA - T)|(lnA > T) |
2 | S = C + Z1lnA (lnA ≤ T1) + |Z1T1 + Z2 (lnA - T1)|(T2 ≥ lnA > T1) + |Z2 (T2 - T1) + Z3 (lnA - T2)|(lnA > T2) |
3 | S = C + |Z2 (lnA - T)|(lnA > T) |
4 | S = C + Z2 (lnA - T1)|(T2 ≥ lnA > T1) + |Z2 (T2 - T1) + Z3 (lnA - T2)|(A > T2) |
5 | S = C + Z1 logA |
6 | S = C |
岛屿编号 Island No. | 面积 Area (km2) | 生境丰富度 Habitat richness | 面积×生境丰富度 Area × habitat richness | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 形状指数 Shape index | 岛屿被海水的隔离 程度 Seawater isolation | 人口 Population | 岛屿的海岸线 长度 Coastline length (m) | 交通频率 Frequency of traffic |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.11 | 2 | 0.22 | 24 | 2.60 | 0.96 | 0 | 3 061.03 | 1 |
2 | 0.06 | 3 | 0.18 | 9 | 2.67 | 0.97 | 0 | 2 314.93 | 1 |
3 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.003 | 15 | 1.49 | 0.97 | 0 | 287.37 | 1 |
4 | 0.10 | 3 | 0.30 | 29 | 1.59 | 0.98 | 0 | 1 787.68 | 1 |
5 | 0.01 | 2 | 0.02 | 6 | 1.73 | 0.98 | 0 | 615.10 | 1 |
6 | 0.06 | 3 | 0.18 | 16 | 2.04 | 0.97 | 0 | 1 769.54 | 1 |
7 | 0.02 | 3 | 0.06 | 10 | 1.35 | 0.92 | 0 | 675.56 | 1 |
8 | 0.01 | 4 | 0.04 | 7 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0 | 317.71 | 1 |
9 | 0.30 | 5 | 1.50 | 16 | 1.80 | 0.60 | 0 | 3 502.88 | 1 |
10 | 0.84 | 5 | 4.20 | 7 | 1.53 | 0.88 | 0 | 4 982.03 | 1 |
11 | 0.004 | 7 | 0.03 | 4 | 1.28 | 0.83 | 0 | 277.98 | 1 |
12 | 0.83 | 7 | 5.81 | 11 | 2.33 | 0.77 | 0 | 7 551.65 | 2 |
13 | 0.14 | 13 | 1.82 | 14 | 1.34 | 0.42 | 310 | 1 779.01 | 4 |
14 | 0.03 | 6 | 0.18 | 4 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 10 | 652.24 | 3 |
15 | 0.06 | 5 | 0.30 | 10 | 1.62 | 0.94 | 0 | 1 409.28 | 1 |
16 | 0.11 | 1 | 0.11 | 9 | 1.75 | 0.89 | 0 | 2 056.60 | 1 |
17 | 2.02 | 18 | 36.36 | 103 | 1.66 | 0.49 | 380 6 | 8 369.43 | 5 |
18 | 0.08 | 1 | 0.08 | 17 | 1.30 | 0.88 | 0 | 1 303.04 | 1 |
19 | 0.02 | 2 | 0.04 | 8 | 1.24 | 0.77 | 0 | 620.52 | 1 |
20 | 0.02 | 3 | 0.06 | 33 | 1.24 | 0.76 | 0 | 619.50 | 2 |
21 | 0.01 | 2 | 0.02 | 5 | 1.11 | 0.76 | 0 | 393.85 | 1 |
22 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.03 | 3 | 1.86 | 0.77 | 0 | 1 145.30 | 1 |
23 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.003 | 4 | 1.24 | 0.81 | 0 | 235.16 | 1 |
24 | 0.02 | 3 | 0.06 | 4 | 1.28 | 0.44 | 0 | 643.89 | 1 |
25 | 0.10 | 5 | 0.50 | 34 | 1.60 | 0.45 | 5 | 1 789.21 | 3 |
26 | 0.03 | 3 | 0.09 | 10 | 1.50 | 0.78 | 0 | 924.41 | 1 |
27 | 0.28 | 10 | 2.80 | 32 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 298 | 2 138.81 | 4 |
28 | 0.40 | 13 | 5.20 | 35 | 1.11 | 0.25 | 707 | 2 489.83 | 4 |
29 | 4.42 | 14 | 61.88 | 33 | 1.82 | 0.58 | 120 | 13 535.31 | 4 |
30 | 11.30 | 21 | 237.30 | 100 | 4.14 | 0.85 | 100 | 49 331.42 | 4 |
31 | 0.79 | 15 | 11.85 | 41 | 1.19 | 0.27 | 707 | 3 756.32 | 4 |
32 | 0.01 | 4 | 0.04 | 9 | 1.63 | 0.26 | 0 | 577.22 | 1 |
33 | 0.82 | 8 | 6.56 | 96 | 1.47 | 0.28 | 20 | 4 705.48 | 3 |
34 | 1.48 | 8 | 11.84 | 26 | 1.22 | 0.27 | 350 | 5 248.01 | 4 |
35 | 0.04 | 11 | 0.44 | 57 | 1.11 | 0.51 | 0 | 788.13 | 3 |
36 | 0.04 | 11 | 0.44 | 61 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 0 | 876.24 | 3 |
37 | 0.08 | 14 | 1.12 | 48 | 1.51 | 0.26 | 30 | 1 510.69 | 3 |
38 | 0.02 | 4 | 0.08 | 21 | 1.61 | 0.25 | 0 | 806.15 | 2 |
39 | 0.02 | 6 | 0.12 | 98 | 1.40 | 0.55 | 0 | 700.93 | 2 |
40 | 0.21 | 11 | 2.31 | 31 | 1.46 | 0.27 | 6 | 2 366.80 | 3 |
41 | 47.52 | 25 | 118 8.00 | 129 | 1.39 | 0.29 | 20 000 | 33 898.23 | 5 |
42 | 89.70 | 25 | 224 2.50 | 117 | 1.73 | 0.10 | 35 000 | 58 082.13 | 5 |
43 | 16.92 | 18 | 304.56 | 54 | 1.82 | 0.58 | 1 026 | 26 559.84 | 4 |
表2 浙江象山43个海岛环境因子信息
Table 2 Information of environmental factors on 43 islands in Xiangshan, Zhejiang
岛屿编号 Island No. | 面积 Area (km2) | 生境丰富度 Habitat richness | 面积×生境丰富度 Area × habitat richness | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 形状指数 Shape index | 岛屿被海水的隔离 程度 Seawater isolation | 人口 Population | 岛屿的海岸线 长度 Coastline length (m) | 交通频率 Frequency of traffic |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.11 | 2 | 0.22 | 24 | 2.60 | 0.96 | 0 | 3 061.03 | 1 |
2 | 0.06 | 3 | 0.18 | 9 | 2.67 | 0.97 | 0 | 2 314.93 | 1 |
3 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.003 | 15 | 1.49 | 0.97 | 0 | 287.37 | 1 |
4 | 0.10 | 3 | 0.30 | 29 | 1.59 | 0.98 | 0 | 1 787.68 | 1 |
5 | 0.01 | 2 | 0.02 | 6 | 1.73 | 0.98 | 0 | 615.10 | 1 |
6 | 0.06 | 3 | 0.18 | 16 | 2.04 | 0.97 | 0 | 1 769.54 | 1 |
7 | 0.02 | 3 | 0.06 | 10 | 1.35 | 0.92 | 0 | 675.56 | 1 |
8 | 0.01 | 4 | 0.04 | 7 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0 | 317.71 | 1 |
9 | 0.30 | 5 | 1.50 | 16 | 1.80 | 0.60 | 0 | 3 502.88 | 1 |
10 | 0.84 | 5 | 4.20 | 7 | 1.53 | 0.88 | 0 | 4 982.03 | 1 |
11 | 0.004 | 7 | 0.03 | 4 | 1.28 | 0.83 | 0 | 277.98 | 1 |
12 | 0.83 | 7 | 5.81 | 11 | 2.33 | 0.77 | 0 | 7 551.65 | 2 |
13 | 0.14 | 13 | 1.82 | 14 | 1.34 | 0.42 | 310 | 1 779.01 | 4 |
14 | 0.03 | 6 | 0.18 | 4 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 10 | 652.24 | 3 |
15 | 0.06 | 5 | 0.30 | 10 | 1.62 | 0.94 | 0 | 1 409.28 | 1 |
16 | 0.11 | 1 | 0.11 | 9 | 1.75 | 0.89 | 0 | 2 056.60 | 1 |
17 | 2.02 | 18 | 36.36 | 103 | 1.66 | 0.49 | 380 6 | 8 369.43 | 5 |
18 | 0.08 | 1 | 0.08 | 17 | 1.30 | 0.88 | 0 | 1 303.04 | 1 |
19 | 0.02 | 2 | 0.04 | 8 | 1.24 | 0.77 | 0 | 620.52 | 1 |
20 | 0.02 | 3 | 0.06 | 33 | 1.24 | 0.76 | 0 | 619.50 | 2 |
21 | 0.01 | 2 | 0.02 | 5 | 1.11 | 0.76 | 0 | 393.85 | 1 |
22 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.03 | 3 | 1.86 | 0.77 | 0 | 1 145.30 | 1 |
23 | 0.003 | 1 | 0.003 | 4 | 1.24 | 0.81 | 0 | 235.16 | 1 |
24 | 0.02 | 3 | 0.06 | 4 | 1.28 | 0.44 | 0 | 643.89 | 1 |
25 | 0.10 | 5 | 0.50 | 34 | 1.60 | 0.45 | 5 | 1 789.21 | 3 |
26 | 0.03 | 3 | 0.09 | 10 | 1.50 | 0.78 | 0 | 924.41 | 1 |
27 | 0.28 | 10 | 2.80 | 32 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 298 | 2 138.81 | 4 |
28 | 0.40 | 13 | 5.20 | 35 | 1.11 | 0.25 | 707 | 2 489.83 | 4 |
29 | 4.42 | 14 | 61.88 | 33 | 1.82 | 0.58 | 120 | 13 535.31 | 4 |
30 | 11.30 | 21 | 237.30 | 100 | 4.14 | 0.85 | 100 | 49 331.42 | 4 |
31 | 0.79 | 15 | 11.85 | 41 | 1.19 | 0.27 | 707 | 3 756.32 | 4 |
32 | 0.01 | 4 | 0.04 | 9 | 1.63 | 0.26 | 0 | 577.22 | 1 |
33 | 0.82 | 8 | 6.56 | 96 | 1.47 | 0.28 | 20 | 4 705.48 | 3 |
34 | 1.48 | 8 | 11.84 | 26 | 1.22 | 0.27 | 350 | 5 248.01 | 4 |
35 | 0.04 | 11 | 0.44 | 57 | 1.11 | 0.51 | 0 | 788.13 | 3 |
36 | 0.04 | 11 | 0.44 | 61 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 0 | 876.24 | 3 |
37 | 0.08 | 14 | 1.12 | 48 | 1.51 | 0.26 | 30 | 1 510.69 | 3 |
38 | 0.02 | 4 | 0.08 | 21 | 1.61 | 0.25 | 0 | 806.15 | 2 |
39 | 0.02 | 6 | 0.12 | 98 | 1.40 | 0.55 | 0 | 700.93 | 2 |
40 | 0.21 | 11 | 2.31 | 31 | 1.46 | 0.27 | 6 | 2 366.80 | 3 |
41 | 47.52 | 25 | 118 8.00 | 129 | 1.39 | 0.29 | 20 000 | 33 898.23 | 5 |
42 | 89.70 | 25 | 224 2.50 | 117 | 1.73 | 0.10 | 35 000 | 58 082.13 | 5 |
43 | 16.92 | 18 | 304.56 | 54 | 1.82 | 0.58 | 1 026 | 26 559.84 | 4 |
岛屿编号 Island No. | 岛屿名称 Island name | 经度 Longitude (° E) | 纬度 Latitude (° N) | 苔藓植物 Bryophytes | 藓类 Mosses | 顶蒴藓类 Acrocarpous mosses | 侧蒴藓类 Pleurocarpous mosses | 苔类 Liverworts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 南块礁 Nankuai Jiao | 122.03 | 29.29 | 18 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 2 |
2 | 二岳山岛 Eryueshan Dao | 122.03 | 29.28 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
3 | 一岳山岛 Yiyueshan Dao | 122.03 | 29.28 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
4 | 三岳山岛 Sanyueshan Dao | 122.04 | 29.28 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 1 |
5 | 小蚕屿 Xiaocan Yu | 122.04 | 29.27 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 大蚕屿 Dacan Yu | 122.04 | 29.27 | 20 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 4 |
7 | 铜头岛咀 Tongtoudao Ju | 122.01 | 29.24 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
8 | 铜头屿 Tongtou Yu | 122.01 | 29.24 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 1 |
9 | 萝卜山岛 Luoboshan Dao | 121.97 | 29.23 | 18 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 2 |
10 | 铜头岛 Tongtou Dao | 122.01 | 29.23 | 20 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 1 |
11 | 牛栏礁 Niulan Jiao | 121.99 | 29.23 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
12 | 牛栏基岛 Niulanji Dao | 121.99 | 29.23 | 27 | 27 | 24 | 3 | 0 |
13 | 大铜钱屿岛 Datongqianyu Dao | 121.95 | 29.22 | 43 | 43 | 27 | 16 | 0 |
14 | 小铜钱屿岛 Xiaotongqianyu Dao | 121.95 | 29.22 | 15 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 1 |
15 | 北礁 Bei Jiao | 122.06 | 29.22 | 15 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 1 |
16 | 中礁 Zhong Jiao | 122.06 | 29.21 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
17 | 东门岛 Dongmen Dao | 121.96 | 29.20 | 57 | 52 | 34 | 18 | 5 |
18 | 南礁 Nan Jiao | 122.05 | 29.20 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
19 | 秤锤屿 Chenchui Yu | 121.99 | 29.20 | 16 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 2 |
20 | 灯塔礁 Dengta Jiao | 121.99 | 29.19 | 14 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
21 | 西礁 Xi Jiao | 121.99 | 29.19 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
22 | 秤锤礁 Chenchui Jiao | 121.99 | 29.19 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 2 |
23 | 石礁 Shi Jiao | 122.01 | 29.19 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
24 | 毛甘山岛 Maoganshan Dao | 121.95 | 29.18 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
25 | 灯塔岛 Dengta Dao | 121.94 | 29.19 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 |
26 | 南屿 Nan Yu | 121.99 | 29.19 | 21 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 2 |
27 | 雷公山岛 Leigongshan Dao | 121.89 | 29.18 | 48 | 44 | 31 | 13 | 4 |
28 | 朝天山门岛 Chaotianshanmeng Dao | 121.88 | 29.18 | 53 | 47 | 25 | 22 | 6 |
29 | 对面山岛 Duimianshan Dao | 121.96 | 29.18 | 65 | 63 | 42 | 21 | 2 |
30 | 檀头山岛 Tantoushan Dao | 122.04 | 29.18 | 102 | 95 | 59 | 36 | 7 |
31 | 百亩塘岛 Baimutang Dao | 121.87 | 29.18 | 37 | 35 | 21 | 14 | 2 |
32 | 老鼠山大礁 Laoshushanda Jiao | 121.91 | 29.17 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
33 | 中界山岛 Zhongjieshan Dao | 121.89 | 29.17 | 53 | 48 | 30 | 18 | 5 |
34 | 打鼓峙山岛 Dagushishan Dao | 121.86 | 29.16 | 30 | 29 | 21 | 8 | 1 |
35 | 路廊岛 Lulang Dao | 121.96 | 29.16 | 34 | 32 | 25 | 7 | 2 |
36 | 圆山岛 Yuanshan Dao | 121.97 | 29.16 | 31 | 29 | 26 | 3 | 2 |
37 | 庵山岛 Anshan Dao | 121.82 | 29.15 | 21 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 0 |
38 | 羊岛 Yang Dao | 121.82 | 29.15 | 17 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 1 |
39 | 马鞍头岛 Ma’antou Dao | 121.98 | 29.15 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
40 | 饭甑山岛 Fanzengshan Dao | 121.82 | 29.15 | 32 | 29 | 20 | 9 | 3 |
41 | 高塘岛 Gaotang Dao | 121.83 | 29.12 | 121 | 107 | 67 | 40 | 14 |
42 | 南田岛 Nantian Dao | 121.94 | 29.12 | 173 | 153 | 92 | 61 | 20 |
43 | 花岙岛 Hua’ao Dao | 121.81 | 29.08 | 60 | 55 | 43 | 12 | 5 |
表3 浙江象山43个海岛的苔藓物种数量
Table 3 Bryophytes species number on 43 islands in Xiangshan, Zhejiang
岛屿编号 Island No. | 岛屿名称 Island name | 经度 Longitude (° E) | 纬度 Latitude (° N) | 苔藓植物 Bryophytes | 藓类 Mosses | 顶蒴藓类 Acrocarpous mosses | 侧蒴藓类 Pleurocarpous mosses | 苔类 Liverworts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 南块礁 Nankuai Jiao | 122.03 | 29.29 | 18 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 2 |
2 | 二岳山岛 Eryueshan Dao | 122.03 | 29.28 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
3 | 一岳山岛 Yiyueshan Dao | 122.03 | 29.28 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
4 | 三岳山岛 Sanyueshan Dao | 122.04 | 29.28 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 1 |
5 | 小蚕屿 Xiaocan Yu | 122.04 | 29.27 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 大蚕屿 Dacan Yu | 122.04 | 29.27 | 20 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 4 |
7 | 铜头岛咀 Tongtoudao Ju | 122.01 | 29.24 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
8 | 铜头屿 Tongtou Yu | 122.01 | 29.24 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 1 |
9 | 萝卜山岛 Luoboshan Dao | 121.97 | 29.23 | 18 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 2 |
10 | 铜头岛 Tongtou Dao | 122.01 | 29.23 | 20 | 19 | 17 | 2 | 1 |
11 | 牛栏礁 Niulan Jiao | 121.99 | 29.23 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
12 | 牛栏基岛 Niulanji Dao | 121.99 | 29.23 | 27 | 27 | 24 | 3 | 0 |
13 | 大铜钱屿岛 Datongqianyu Dao | 121.95 | 29.22 | 43 | 43 | 27 | 16 | 0 |
14 | 小铜钱屿岛 Xiaotongqianyu Dao | 121.95 | 29.22 | 15 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 1 |
15 | 北礁 Bei Jiao | 122.06 | 29.22 | 15 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 1 |
16 | 中礁 Zhong Jiao | 122.06 | 29.21 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
17 | 东门岛 Dongmen Dao | 121.96 | 29.20 | 57 | 52 | 34 | 18 | 5 |
18 | 南礁 Nan Jiao | 122.05 | 29.20 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
19 | 秤锤屿 Chenchui Yu | 121.99 | 29.20 | 16 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 2 |
20 | 灯塔礁 Dengta Jiao | 121.99 | 29.19 | 14 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
21 | 西礁 Xi Jiao | 121.99 | 29.19 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
22 | 秤锤礁 Chenchui Jiao | 121.99 | 29.19 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 2 |
23 | 石礁 Shi Jiao | 122.01 | 29.19 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
24 | 毛甘山岛 Maoganshan Dao | 121.95 | 29.18 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
25 | 灯塔岛 Dengta Dao | 121.94 | 29.19 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 |
26 | 南屿 Nan Yu | 121.99 | 29.19 | 21 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 2 |
27 | 雷公山岛 Leigongshan Dao | 121.89 | 29.18 | 48 | 44 | 31 | 13 | 4 |
28 | 朝天山门岛 Chaotianshanmeng Dao | 121.88 | 29.18 | 53 | 47 | 25 | 22 | 6 |
29 | 对面山岛 Duimianshan Dao | 121.96 | 29.18 | 65 | 63 | 42 | 21 | 2 |
30 | 檀头山岛 Tantoushan Dao | 122.04 | 29.18 | 102 | 95 | 59 | 36 | 7 |
31 | 百亩塘岛 Baimutang Dao | 121.87 | 29.18 | 37 | 35 | 21 | 14 | 2 |
32 | 老鼠山大礁 Laoshushanda Jiao | 121.91 | 29.17 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
33 | 中界山岛 Zhongjieshan Dao | 121.89 | 29.17 | 53 | 48 | 30 | 18 | 5 |
34 | 打鼓峙山岛 Dagushishan Dao | 121.86 | 29.16 | 30 | 29 | 21 | 8 | 1 |
35 | 路廊岛 Lulang Dao | 121.96 | 29.16 | 34 | 32 | 25 | 7 | 2 |
36 | 圆山岛 Yuanshan Dao | 121.97 | 29.16 | 31 | 29 | 26 | 3 | 2 |
37 | 庵山岛 Anshan Dao | 121.82 | 29.15 | 21 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 0 |
38 | 羊岛 Yang Dao | 121.82 | 29.15 | 17 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 1 |
39 | 马鞍头岛 Ma’antou Dao | 121.98 | 29.15 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
40 | 饭甑山岛 Fanzengshan Dao | 121.82 | 29.15 | 32 | 29 | 20 | 9 | 3 |
41 | 高塘岛 Gaotang Dao | 121.83 | 29.12 | 121 | 107 | 67 | 40 | 14 |
42 | 南田岛 Nantian Dao | 121.94 | 29.12 | 173 | 153 | 92 | 61 | 20 |
43 | 花岙岛 Hua’ao Dao | 121.81 | 29.08 | 60 | 55 | 43 | 12 | 5 |
类群 Group | 模型 Model | 参数 Parameter | 模型比较 Model comparison | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Z1 | Z2 | Z3 | T1 | T2 | R2 | AICc | ΔAICc | ||
苔藓植物 Bryophytes | 1 | 43.97 | 8.08 | 81.57 | - | 25.43 | - | 0.87 | 344.04 | 1.67 |
2 | 17.37 | 6.04 | 24.28 | 81.69 | 1.01 | 34.67 | 0.89 | 342.37 | 0.00 | |
3 | 17.36 | 0.00 | 11.58 | - | 0.51 | - | 0.81 | 359.73 | 17.36 | |
4 | 37.10 | 0.00 | 16.44 | 81.66 | 0.07 | 30.14 | 0.88 | 343.40 | 1.03 | |
5 | 54.26 | 11.43 | - | - | - | - | 0.72 | 374.28 | 31.91 | |
6 | 39.96 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.00 | 427.63 | 85.26 | |
藓类植物 Mosses | 1 | 41.04 | 7.58 | 72.45 | - | 27.01 | - | 0.86 | 337.61 | 1.59 |
2 | 34.58 | 5.67 | 14.95 | 72.18 | 0.92 | 37.19 | 0.88 | 336.02 | 0.00 | |
3 | 13.46 | 0.00 | 17.00 | - | 0.18 | - | 0.81 | 350.05 | 14.03 | |
4 | 12.09 | 0.00 | 10.70 | 72.09 | 0.06 | 32.01 | 0.87 | 337.13 | 1.11 | |
5 | 49.53 | 10.36 | - | - | - | - | 0.73 | 363.00 | 26.98 | |
6 | 36.67 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.00 | 418.38 | 82.36 | |
苔类植物 Liverworts | 1 | 2.89 | 0.48 | 8.95 | - | 15.58 | - | 0.85 | 164.48 | 2.24 |
2 | 2.56 | 0.30 | 2.30 | 9.46 | 4.42 | 22.33 | 0.86 | 162.24 | 0.00 | |
3 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 6.89 | - | 7.07 | - | 0.82 | 168.45 | 6.21 | |
4 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 9.46 | 0.08 | 18.84 | 0.86 | 163.50 | 1.26 | |
5 | 4.72 | 1.08 | - | - | - | - | 0.51 | 209.95 | 47.71 | |
6 | 3.29 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.00 | 238.99 | 76.75 | |
顶蒴藓类植物 Acrocarpous mosses | 1 | 24.06 | 3.61 | 13.65 | - | 1.49 | - | 0.88 | 287.54 | 0.45 |
2 | 24.56 | 3.75 | 10.64 | 39.42 | 1.23 | 43.21 | 0.90 | 287.09 | 0.00 | |
3 | 9.97 | 0.00 | 9.23 | - | 0.10 | - | 0.83 | 302.17 | 15.08 | |
4 | 4.66 | 0.00 | 3.77 | 13.53 | 0.01 | 1.49 | 0.88 | 290.06 | 2.97 | |
5 | 33.07 | 6.41 | - | - | - | - | 0.77 | 312.51 | 25.42 | |
6 | 25.10 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.00 | 374.89 | 87.80 | |
侧蒴藓类植物 Pleurocarpous mosses | 1 | 12.45 | 2.64 | 32.93 | - | 26.74 | - | 0.79 | 280.45 | 1.11 |
2 | 5.95 | 0.91 | 3.86 | 32.94 | 0.10 | 31.06 | 0.81 | 279.34 | 0.00 | |
3 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 7.06 | - | 0.24 | - | 0.72 | 290.86 | 11.52 | |
4 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 33.13 | 0.07 | 31.37 | 0.81 | 281.56 | 2.22 | |
5 | 16.46 | 3.95 | - | - | - | - | 0.62 | 302.19 | 22.85 | |
6 | 11.51 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.00 | 342.39 | 63.05 |
表4 浙江象山沿海岛屿苔藓植物种-面积关系拟合结果
Table 4 Fitting results of species-area relationship of bryophytes on coastal islands in Xiangshan, Zhejiang
类群 Group | 模型 Model | 参数 Parameter | 模型比较 Model comparison | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Z1 | Z2 | Z3 | T1 | T2 | R2 | AICc | ΔAICc | ||
苔藓植物 Bryophytes | 1 | 43.97 | 8.08 | 81.57 | - | 25.43 | - | 0.87 | 344.04 | 1.67 |
2 | 17.37 | 6.04 | 24.28 | 81.69 | 1.01 | 34.67 | 0.89 | 342.37 | 0.00 | |
3 | 17.36 | 0.00 | 11.58 | - | 0.51 | - | 0.81 | 359.73 | 17.36 | |
4 | 37.10 | 0.00 | 16.44 | 81.66 | 0.07 | 30.14 | 0.88 | 343.40 | 1.03 | |
5 | 54.26 | 11.43 | - | - | - | - | 0.72 | 374.28 | 31.91 | |
6 | 39.96 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.00 | 427.63 | 85.26 | |
藓类植物 Mosses | 1 | 41.04 | 7.58 | 72.45 | - | 27.01 | - | 0.86 | 337.61 | 1.59 |
2 | 34.58 | 5.67 | 14.95 | 72.18 | 0.92 | 37.19 | 0.88 | 336.02 | 0.00 | |
3 | 13.46 | 0.00 | 17.00 | - | 0.18 | - | 0.81 | 350.05 | 14.03 | |
4 | 12.09 | 0.00 | 10.70 | 72.09 | 0.06 | 32.01 | 0.87 | 337.13 | 1.11 | |
5 | 49.53 | 10.36 | - | - | - | - | 0.73 | 363.00 | 26.98 | |
6 | 36.67 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.00 | 418.38 | 82.36 | |
苔类植物 Liverworts | 1 | 2.89 | 0.48 | 8.95 | - | 15.58 | - | 0.85 | 164.48 | 2.24 |
2 | 2.56 | 0.30 | 2.30 | 9.46 | 4.42 | 22.33 | 0.86 | 162.24 | 0.00 | |
3 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 6.89 | - | 7.07 | - | 0.82 | 168.45 | 6.21 | |
4 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 9.46 | 0.08 | 18.84 | 0.86 | 163.50 | 1.26 | |
5 | 4.72 | 1.08 | - | - | - | - | 0.51 | 209.95 | 47.71 | |
6 | 3.29 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.00 | 238.99 | 76.75 | |
顶蒴藓类植物 Acrocarpous mosses | 1 | 24.06 | 3.61 | 13.65 | - | 1.49 | - | 0.88 | 287.54 | 0.45 |
2 | 24.56 | 3.75 | 10.64 | 39.42 | 1.23 | 43.21 | 0.90 | 287.09 | 0.00 | |
3 | 9.97 | 0.00 | 9.23 | - | 0.10 | - | 0.83 | 302.17 | 15.08 | |
4 | 4.66 | 0.00 | 3.77 | 13.53 | 0.01 | 1.49 | 0.88 | 290.06 | 2.97 | |
5 | 33.07 | 6.41 | - | - | - | - | 0.77 | 312.51 | 25.42 | |
6 | 25.10 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.00 | 374.89 | 87.80 | |
侧蒴藓类植物 Pleurocarpous mosses | 1 | 12.45 | 2.64 | 32.93 | - | 26.74 | - | 0.79 | 280.45 | 1.11 |
2 | 5.95 | 0.91 | 3.86 | 32.94 | 0.10 | 31.06 | 0.81 | 279.34 | 0.00 | |
3 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 7.06 | - | 0.24 | - | 0.72 | 290.86 | 11.52 | |
4 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 33.13 | 0.07 | 31.37 | 0.81 | 281.56 | 2.22 | |
5 | 16.46 | 3.95 | - | - | - | - | 0.62 | 302.19 | 22.85 | |
6 | 11.51 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.00 | 342.39 | 63.05 |
图2 浙江象山不同类群苔藓植物的种-面积关系最佳模型拟合结果。模型(Model)同表1。
Fig. 2 Regression results of the best fitting model of species-area relationship for different bryophyte groups in Xiangshan, Zhejiang. Models are shown in Table 1.
图3 浙江象山沿海岛屿环境因子之间的Pearson相关性分析和环境因子与物种丰富度间的Mantel检验。AH, 面积×生境丰富度; ALT, 海拔; ARE, 面积; COAS, 海岸线长度; FREQ, 交通频率; HAB, 生境丰富度; ISW, 岛屿被海水的隔离程度; POP, 人口; SHA, 形状指数。r, 相关系数; p, 显著性。
Fig. 3 Pearson correlation analysis between environmental factors and Mantel test between environmental factors and species richness in Xiangshan, Zhejiang. AH, area × habitat richness; ALT, altitude; ARE, area; COAS, coastline length; FREQ, frequency of traffic; HAB, habitat richness; ISW, seawater isolation; POP, population; SHA, shape index. r, correlation coefficient; p, significance.
图4 基于广义线性混合效应模型解析浙江象山岛屿环境因子对苔藓植物物种丰富度的贡献。ALT, 海拔; ARE, 面积; COAS, 海岸线长度; FREQ, 交通频率; HAB, 生境丰富度; ISW, 岛屿被海水的隔离程度; POP, 人口; SHA, 形状指数。顶蒴藓类和侧蒴藓类的线条一致。
Fig. 4 Analysis of the contribution of island environmental factors to bryophyte species richness based on generalized linear mixed models. ARE, area; ALT, altitude; COAS, coastline length; FREQ, frequency of traffic; HAB, habitat richness; ISW, seawater isolation; POP, population; SHA, shape index. The line of acrocarpous mosses is the same as pleurocarpous mosses.
环境因子 Environmental variables (X) | 苔藓类群(物种数) Bryophyte categories (species number) (Y) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
苔藓植物 Bryolphytes | 藓类植物 Mosses | 顶蒴藓类植物 Acrocarpous mosses | 侧蒴藓类植物 Pleurocarpous mosses | 苔类植物 Liverworts | |
ARE | Y = 1.154X + 44.3238 | Y = 0.936X + 42.978 | Y = 0.471X + 31.079 | Y = 0.471X + 31.079 | Y = 0.212X + 2.105 |
(0.340, 0.988, 34.42) | (0.160, 0.985, 16.25) | (0.179, 0.933, 19.28) | (0.179, 0.933, 19.27) | (0.729, 1.000, 72.91) | |
HAB | Y = 2.082X + 45.3925 | Y = 2.092X + 38.449 | Y = 1.638X + 19.878 | Y = 1.638X + 19.876 | Y = 0.111X + 4.840 |
(0.119, 0.989, 12.05) | (0.339, 0.979, 34.60) | (0.359, 0.954, 37.62) | (0.359, 0.954, 37.62) | (0.020, 0.987, 2.05) | |
ALT | Y = -0.0023X + 70.0916 | Y = -0.002X + 63.745 | Y = 0.070X + 38.857 | Y = 0.070X + 38.857 | Y = 0.011X + 5.723 |
(0.001, 0.989, 0.01) | (0.001, 0.988, 0.01) | (0.013, 0.964, 1.37) | (0.013, 0.964, 1.37) | (0.005, 0.971, 0.52) | |
SHA | Y = 1.108X + 67.4010 | Y = 1.290X + 60.542 | Y = -1.610X + 46.677 | Y = -1.610X + 46.677 | Y = -0.355X + 7.309 |
(0.001, 0.992, 0.04) | (0.001, 0.987, 0.07) | (0.003, 0.974, 0.32) | (0.003, 0.974, 0.33) | (0.002, 1.000, 0.27) | |
ISW | Y = -2.2071X + 76.5026 | Y = -2.102X + 70.003 | Y = -1.356X + 46.778 | Y = -1.356X + 46.778 | Y = 0.116X + 6.144 |
(0.006, 0.995, 0.62) | (0.007, 0.993, 0.71) | (0.009, 0.980, 0.92) | (0.009, 0.980, 0.92) | (0.001, 1.000, 0.11) | |
POP | Y = 0.0022X + 55.2000 | Y = 0.002X + 50.940 | Y = 0.001X + 35.590 | Y = 0.001X + 35.590 | Y = 0.000X + 3.671 |
(0.190, 0.978, 19.47) | (0.169, 0.974, 17.36) | (0.145, 0.947, 15.28) | (0.145, 0.948, 15.28) | (0.571, 0.996, 57.30) | |
COAS | Y = 21.33X + 10.6200 | Y = 18.856X + 10.982 | Y = 11.309X + 9.621 | Y = 11.309X + 9.621 | Y = 2.393X + 0.277 |
(0.322, 0.975, 33.05) | (0.259, 0.976, 26.49) | (0.311, 0.953, 32.66) | (0.311, 0.953, 32.68) | (0.282, 0.999, 28.20) | |
FRE | Y = 9.598X + 41.7900 | Y = 9.539X + 35.101 | Y = 7.021X + 19.408 | Y = 7.021X + 19.408 | Y = 0.145X + 6.266 |
(0.090, 0.988, 9.14) | (0.116, 0.986, 11.75) | (0.186, 0.967, 19.24) | (0.186, 0.967, 19.25) | (0.001, 1.000, 0.11) |
表5 基于广义线性混合效应模型解析环境因子对浙江象山沿海岛屿苔藓植物物种丰富度的贡献
Table 5 Contribution of environmental factors to bryophyte species richness in Xiangshan, Zhejiang based on generalized linear mixed models
环境因子 Environmental variables (X) | 苔藓类群(物种数) Bryophyte categories (species number) (Y) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
苔藓植物 Bryolphytes | 藓类植物 Mosses | 顶蒴藓类植物 Acrocarpous mosses | 侧蒴藓类植物 Pleurocarpous mosses | 苔类植物 Liverworts | |
ARE | Y = 1.154X + 44.3238 | Y = 0.936X + 42.978 | Y = 0.471X + 31.079 | Y = 0.471X + 31.079 | Y = 0.212X + 2.105 |
(0.340, 0.988, 34.42) | (0.160, 0.985, 16.25) | (0.179, 0.933, 19.28) | (0.179, 0.933, 19.27) | (0.729, 1.000, 72.91) | |
HAB | Y = 2.082X + 45.3925 | Y = 2.092X + 38.449 | Y = 1.638X + 19.878 | Y = 1.638X + 19.876 | Y = 0.111X + 4.840 |
(0.119, 0.989, 12.05) | (0.339, 0.979, 34.60) | (0.359, 0.954, 37.62) | (0.359, 0.954, 37.62) | (0.020, 0.987, 2.05) | |
ALT | Y = -0.0023X + 70.0916 | Y = -0.002X + 63.745 | Y = 0.070X + 38.857 | Y = 0.070X + 38.857 | Y = 0.011X + 5.723 |
(0.001, 0.989, 0.01) | (0.001, 0.988, 0.01) | (0.013, 0.964, 1.37) | (0.013, 0.964, 1.37) | (0.005, 0.971, 0.52) | |
SHA | Y = 1.108X + 67.4010 | Y = 1.290X + 60.542 | Y = -1.610X + 46.677 | Y = -1.610X + 46.677 | Y = -0.355X + 7.309 |
(0.001, 0.992, 0.04) | (0.001, 0.987, 0.07) | (0.003, 0.974, 0.32) | (0.003, 0.974, 0.33) | (0.002, 1.000, 0.27) | |
ISW | Y = -2.2071X + 76.5026 | Y = -2.102X + 70.003 | Y = -1.356X + 46.778 | Y = -1.356X + 46.778 | Y = 0.116X + 6.144 |
(0.006, 0.995, 0.62) | (0.007, 0.993, 0.71) | (0.009, 0.980, 0.92) | (0.009, 0.980, 0.92) | (0.001, 1.000, 0.11) | |
POP | Y = 0.0022X + 55.2000 | Y = 0.002X + 50.940 | Y = 0.001X + 35.590 | Y = 0.001X + 35.590 | Y = 0.000X + 3.671 |
(0.190, 0.978, 19.47) | (0.169, 0.974, 17.36) | (0.145, 0.947, 15.28) | (0.145, 0.948, 15.28) | (0.571, 0.996, 57.30) | |
COAS | Y = 21.33X + 10.6200 | Y = 18.856X + 10.982 | Y = 11.309X + 9.621 | Y = 11.309X + 9.621 | Y = 2.393X + 0.277 |
(0.322, 0.975, 33.05) | (0.259, 0.976, 26.49) | (0.311, 0.953, 32.66) | (0.311, 0.953, 32.68) | (0.282, 0.999, 28.20) | |
FRE | Y = 9.598X + 41.7900 | Y = 9.539X + 35.101 | Y = 7.021X + 19.408 | Y = 7.021X + 19.408 | Y = 0.145X + 6.266 |
(0.090, 0.988, 9.14) | (0.116, 0.986, 11.75) | (0.186, 0.967, 19.24) | (0.186, 0.967, 19.25) | (0.001, 1.000, 0.11) |
[1] | Anderson WB, Wait DA (2001). Subsidized Island Biogeography Hypothesis: another new twist on an old theory. Ecology Letters, 4, 289-291. |
[2] | Aranda SC, Gabriel R, Borges PAV, Santos AMC, de Azevedo EB, Patiño J, Hortal J, Lobo JM (2014). Geographical, temporal and environmental determinants of bryophyte species richness in the Macaronesian Islands. PLoS ONE, 9, e101786. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101786. |
[3] | Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach. Springer, New York. |
[4] | Cabral JS, Weigelt P, Kissling WD, Kreft H (2014). Biogeographic, climatic and spatial drivers differentially affect α-, β- and γ-diversities on oceanic archipelagos. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20133246. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3246. |
[5] | Cao T, Guo SL, Lou YX, Yu J, Zuo BR, Chen Y (2011). Bryophyte Diversity and Conservation. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. 1-25. |
[曹同, 郭水良, 娄玉霞, 于晶, 左本荣, 陈怡 (2011). 苔藓植物多样性及其保护. 中国林业出版社, 北京. 1-25.] | |
[6] |
Cao Z, Liu YY, Song SK, Zhang LN, Gao D (2023). Drivers of the small-island effect in moss assemblages on terrestrial habitat islands: a case study in mountaintops of the Middle Taihang Mountains, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 47, 65-76.
DOI |
[曹珍, 刘永英, 宋世凯, 张莉娜, 高德 (2023). 陆地生境岛屿藓类植物小岛屿效应驱动因素分析——以太行山脉中段山顶为例. 植物生态学报, 47, 65-76.]
DOI |
|
[7] | Chen CW, Yang XR, Tan XW, Wang YP (2020). The role of habitat diversity in generating the small-island effect. Ecography, 43, 1241-1249. |
[8] | Chen L, Yang XG, Wang L, Song NP, Zheng S, Wu MY (2024). Characteristics of evapotranspiration components of different plant communities in desert steppe and its relationship with environmental factors. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 44, 330-342. |
[陈林, 杨新国, 王磊, 宋乃平, 郑松, 吴梦瑶 (2024). 荒漠草原不同植物群落蒸散组分特征及其环境因子影响分析. 生态学报, 44, 330-342.] | |
[9] | Chen PC (1963). Genera Muscorum Sinicorum I. Science Press, Beijing. |
[10] | Chen PC (1978). Genera Muscorum Sinicorum II. Science Press, Beijing. 331. |
[11] | Chiarucci A, Bacaro G, Triantis KA, Fernández-Palacios JM (2011). Biogeographical determinants of pteridophytes and spermatophytes on oceanic archipelagos. Systematics and Biodiversity, 9, 191-201. |
[12] |
Colwell RK, Gotelli NJ, Ashton LA, Beck J, Brehm G, Fayle TM, Fiedler K, Forister ML, Kessler M, Kitching RL, Klimes P, Kluge J, Longino JT, Maunsell SC, McCain CM, et al. (2016). Midpoint attractors and species richness: modelling the interaction between environmental drivers and geometric constraints. Ecology Letters, 19, 1009-1022.
DOI PMID |
[13] | Dengler J (2009). Which function describes the species-area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 728-744. |
[14] | Dengler J (2010). Robust methods for detecting a small island effect. Diversity and Distributions, 16, 256-266. |
[15] | Desmet P, Cowling R (2004). Using the species-area relationship to set baseline targets for conservation. Ecology and Society, 9, art11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art11/. |
[16] | Francisco-Ramos V, Arias-González JE (2013). Additive partitioning of coral reef fish diversity across hierarchical spatial scales throughout the Caribbean. PLoS ONE, 8, e78761. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078761. |
[17] |
Gao D, Perry G (2016). Detecting the small island effect and nestedness of herpetofauna of the West Indies. Ecology and Evolution, 6, 5390-5403.
DOI PMID |
[18] | Gao D, Wang YP (2022). A global synthesis of the small-island effect in amphibians and reptiles. Ecography, 2022, e05957. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05957. |
[19] | Gao Q (1994). Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum: Vol. 1. Science Press, Beijing. |
[高谦 (1994). 中国苔藓志: 第1卷. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[20] | Gao Q (1996). Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum: Vol. 2. Science Press, Beijing. |
[高谦 (1996). 中国苔藓志: 第2卷. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[21] | Gentile G, Argano R (2005). Island biogeography of the Mediterranean Sea: the species-area relationship for terrestrial isopods. Journal of Biogeography, 32, 1715-1726. |
[22] |
Gilpin ME, Diamond JM (1976). Calculation of immigration and extinction curves from the species-area-distance relation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 73, 4130-4134.
PMID |
[23] | He X, He K, Hyvönen J (2016). Will bryophytes survive in a warming world? Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 19, 49-60. |
[24] | Hu RL, Wang YF (2005). Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum (Vol.7). Science Press, Beijing. |
[胡人亮, 王幼芳 (2005). 中国苔藓志(第7卷). 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[25] | Huang RL, Li DD, Lyu JQ, Zhang YC, Yang J, Deng T, He L, Guo SL (2022). Diversity patterns of mosses and its determinants in Maolan (Guizhou Province, China) in view of species and function. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Natural Sciences), 51, 750-761. |
[黄若玲, 李丹丹, 吕金桥, 张永昌, 杨军, 邓坦, 何林, 郭水良 (2022). 物种和功能维度上贵州茂兰藓类植物多样性格局及其环境因素. 上海师范大学学报(自然科学版), 51, 750-761.] | |
[26] | Huang YR, Xin ZM, Li YH, Ma YB, Dong X, Luo FM, Li XL, Duan RB (2020). Seasonal variation of the stem sap flow of artificial Haloxylon ammodendron (C. A. Mey.) Bunge and its relationship with meteorological factors in Ulan Buh Desert. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 44(6), 131-139. |
[黄雅茹, 辛智鸣, 李永华, 马迎宾, 董雪, 罗凤敏, 李新乐, 段瑞兵 (2020). 乌兰布和沙漠人工梭梭茎干液流季节变化及其与气象因子的关系. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 44(6), 131-139.]
DOI |
|
[27] | Jia Y, He S (2013). Species Catalogue of China: Volume 1. Science Press, Beijing. |
[贾渝, 何思 (2013). 中国生物物种名录: 第一卷. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[28] | Kimmerer RW, Driscoll MJL (2000). Bryophyte species richness on insular boulder habitats: the effect of area, isolation, and microsite diversity. The Bryologist, 103, 748-756. |
[29] | Kohn DD, Walsh DM (1994). Plant species richness—The effect of island size and habitat diversity. Journal of Ecology, 82, 367-377. |
[30] |
Kreft H, Jetz W, Mutke J, Kier G, Barthlott W (2008). Global diversity of island floras from a macroecological perspective. Ecology Letters, 11, 116-127.
DOI PMID |
[31] |
Legendre P, Fortin MJ (2010). Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Molecular Ecology Resources, 10, 831-844.
DOI PMID |
[32] | Li XJ (2000). Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum: Vol. 3. Science Press, Beijing. |
[黎兴江 (2000). 中国苔藓志: 第3卷. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[33] | Li XJ (2006). Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum: Vol. 4. Science Press, Beijing. |
[黎兴江 (2006). 中国苔藓志: 第4卷. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[34] | Lomolino MV (1990). The target area hypothesis: the influence of island area on immigration rates of non-volant mammals. Oikos, 57, 297-300. |
[35] | Lomolino MV (2000). Ecology’s most general, yet protean 1 pattern: the species-area relationship. Journal of Biogeography, 27, 17-26. |
[36] | Lomolino MV, Weiser MD (2001). Towards a more general species-area relationship: diversity on all islands, great and small. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 431-445. |
[37] | MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography, Monographs in Population Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton. |
[38] |
Matthews TJ, Triantis KA, Whittaker RJ, Guilhaumon F (2019). Sars: an R package for fitting, evaluating and comparing species-area relationship models. Ecography, 42, 1446-1455.
DOI |
[39] | Murakami M, Hirao T (2010). Lizard predation alters the effect of habitat area on the species richness of insect assemblages on Bahamian Isles. Diversity and Distributions, 16, 952-958. |
[40] | Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed- effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 133-142. |
[41] | Niering WA (1963). Terrestrial ecology of Kapingamarangi Atoll, Caroline Islands. Ecological Monographs, 33, 131-160. |
[42] | Patiño J, Bisang I, Hedenäs L, Dirkse G, Bjarnason ÁH, Ah-Peng C, Vanderpoorten A (2013). Baker’s law and the island syndromes in bryophytes. Journal of Ecology, 101, 1245-1255. |
[43] | Patiño J, Gómez-Rodríguez C, Pupo-Correia A, Sequeira M, Vanderpoorten A (2018). Trees as habitat islands: temporal variation in alpha and beta diversity in epiphytic laurel forest bryophyte communities. Journal of Biogeography, 45, 1727-1738. |
[44] | Patiño J, Weigelt P, Guilhaumon F, Kreft H, Triantis KA, Naranjo-Cigala A, Sólymos P, Vanderpoorten A (2014). Differences in species-area relationships among the major lineages of land plants: a macroecological perspective. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23, 1275-1283. |
[45] | Patton DR (1975). A diversity index for quantifying habitat edge. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 3, 171-173. |
[46] | Peng H (2017). Application of Pearson correlation coefficient in correlation measurement of medical signals. Electronics World, (7), 163. |
[彭海 (2017). 皮尔逊相关系数应用于医学信号相关度测量. 电子世界, (7), 163.] | |
[47] | Rojas-Sandoval J, Ackerman JD, Tremblay RL (2020). Island biogeography of native and alien plant species: contrasting drivers of diversity across the Lesser Antilles. Diversity and Distributions, 26, 1539-1550. |
[48] | Rybicki J, Hanski I (2013). Species-area relationships and extinctions caused by habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecology Letters, 16, 27-38. |
[49] | Schrader J, König C, Triantis KA, Trigas P, Kreft H, Weigelt P (2020). Species-area relationships on small islands differ among plant growth forms. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29, 814-829. |
[50] | Sfenthourakis S (1996). A biogeographical analysis of terrestrial isopods (Isopoda, Oniscidea) from the central Aegean islands (Greece). Journal of Biogeography, 23, 687-698. |
[51] | Triantis KA, Mylonas M, Lika K, Vardinoyannis K (2003). A model for the species-area-habitat relationship. Journal of Biogeography, 30, 19-27. |
[52] | Triantis KA, Vardinoyannis K, Tsolaki EP, Botsaris I, Lika K, Mylonas M (2006). Re-approaching the small island effect. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 914-923. |
[53] | Vanderpoorten A, Goffinet B (2009). Introduction to Bryophytes. Cambridge University Press, London. |
[54] | Vanderpoorten A, Laenen B, Gabriel R, González-Mancebo JM, Rumsey FJ, Carine MA (2011). Dispersal, diversity and evolution of the Macaronesian cryptogamic floras// Bramwell D, Caujape’-Castells J. The Biology of Island Floras. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 338-364. |
[55] | Wang JW, Wei X, Chen QX, Li XW, Yang S (2017). Factors affecting species richness and beta diversity of vascular plants on small islands in the Wenzhou Region of Eastern China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 523-540. |
[王金旺, 魏馨, 陈秋夏, 李效文, 杨升 (2017). 温州沿海小型海岛植物丰富度和β多样性及其影响因子. 生态学报, 37, 523-540.] | |
[56] | Wang SX, Guo H, Wang XA, Fan WY (2013). Dispersal limitation versus environment filtering in the assembly of plant communities in the Ziwu Mountains. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 46, 4733-4744. |
[王世雄, 郭华, 王孝安, 范玮熠 (2013). 扩散限制和环境筛选对子午岭森林群落构建的相对贡献. 中国农业科学, 46, 4733-4744.]
DOI |
|
[57] | Wang Y, Millien V, Ding P (2016). On empty islands and the small-island effect. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25, 1333-1345. |
[58] | Wang YP, Wang X, Wu Q, Chen CS, Xu AC, Ding P (2018). The small-island effect in amphibian assemblages on subtropical land-bridge islands of an inundated lake. Current Zoology, 64, 303-309. |
[59] | Whittaker RJ, Fernández-Palacios JM (2007). Island Biogeography: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation. Oxford University Press, New York. |
[60] | Wu PC (2002). Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum: Vol. 6. Science Press, Beijing. |
[吴鹏程 (2002). 中国苔藓志: 第6卷. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[61] | Wu PC, Jia Y (2004). Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum: Vol. 8. Science Press, Beijing. |
[吴鹏程, 贾渝 (2004). 中国苔藓志: 第8卷. 科学出版社, 北京. ] | |
[62] | Wu PC, Jia Y (2011). Flora Bryophytorum Sinicorum: Vol. 5. Science Press, Beijing. |
[吴鹏程, 贾渝 (2011). 中国苔藓志: 第5卷. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[63] | Xie YQ, Huang H, Wang CX, He YQ, Jiang YX, Liu ZL, Deng CY, Zheng YS (2023). Determinants of species-area relationship and species richness of coastal endemic plants in the Fujian Islands. Biodiversity Science, 31, 22345. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022345. |
[谢艳秋, 黄晖, 王春晓, 何雅琴, 江怡萱, 刘子琳, 邓传远, 郑郁善 (2023). 福建海岛滨海特有植物种-面积关系及物种丰富度决定因素. 生物多样性, 31, 22345. DOI: 10.17520/biods. 2022345.] | |
[64] | Yu J, Li DD, Zhang ZY, Guo SL (2020). Species-area relationship and small-island effect of bryophytes on the Zhoushan Archipelago, China. Journal of Biogeography, 47, 978-992. |
[65] | Yu J, Shen L, Zang C, Cai J, Guo S (2019). Geographical, anthropogenic and climatic determinants of bryophyte species composition and richness in the Shengsi archipelago, East China Sea. Journal of Bryology, 41, 107-120. |
[66] | Zajac RN, Vozarik JM, Gibbons BR (2013). Spatial and temporal patterns in macrofaunal diversity components relative to sea floor landscape structure. PLoS ONE, 8, e65823. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065823. |
[67] | Zhang JT (2018). Quantitative Ecology. 3rd ed. Science Press, Beijing. |
[张金屯 (2018). 数量生态学. 3版. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[68] | Zheng LF (2014). China’s Island Atlas (Zhejiang:Vol. 1). Ocean Press, Beijing. |
[郑连福 (2014). 中国海岛志 (浙江卷第一册). 海洋出版社, 北京.] | |
[69] | Zhou B, He CY, Li R (2011). A study on exploiting of fishing cultural tourism resources: taking Xiangshan County in Zhejiang Province as an example. Ecological Economy, (9), 153-155. |
[周彬, 贺传阅, 李瑞 (2011). 渔文化旅游资源开发研究——以浙江省象山县为例. 生态经济, (9), 153-155.] | |
[70] | Zhou CJ (2009). On the development of coastal tourism in Xiangshan County. Management Observer, (12), 246-247. |
[周彩娟 (2009). 象山县滨海旅游业发展浅谈. 管理观察, (12), 246-247.] | |
[71] | Zhou W (2019). Research and Development of Plain Greening—Based on Plain Afforestation Construction of Xiangshan Country. Master degree dissertation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou. |
[周文 (2019). 平原绿化的研究及发展——以象山县平原绿化建设为例. 硕士学位论文, 浙江大学, 杭州.] |
[1] | 曹珍, 刘永英, 宋世凯, 张莉娜, 高德. 陆地生境岛屿藓类植物小岛屿效应驱动因素分析——以太行山脉中段山顶为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2023, 47(1): 65-76. |
[2] | 孟令君, 姚杰, 秦江环, 范春雨, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 吉林蛟河针阔混交林乔木幼苗组成及其密度格局影响因素[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(6): 653-662. |
[3] | 刘帅, 廖嘉星, 肖翠, 范秀华. 长白山次生针阔混交林乔木幼苗存活的影响因素分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(7): 711-722. |
[4] | 陈云, 王婷, 李培坤, 姚成亮, 袁志良, 叶永忠. 河南木札岭温带落叶阔叶林群落特征及主要乔木空间分布格局[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(11): 1179-1188. |
[5] | 姜俊, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 吉林蛟河42 hm2针阔混交林样地植物种-面积关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(1): 30-38. |
[6] | 池秀莲, 唐志尧. 面积、温度及分布区限制对物种丰富度海拔格局的影响: 以秦岭太白山为例[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(4): 362-370. |
[7] | 郭柯, 刘长成, 董鸣. 我国西南喀斯特植物生态适应性与石漠化治理[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10): 991-999. |
[8] | 李元恒, 王正文, 马晖玲. 生境斑块对比度对鹅绒委陵菜克隆内分工的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5): 1166-1174. |
[9] | 董鸣. 异质性生境中的植物克隆生长:风险分摊[J]. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20(6): 543-548. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《植物生态学报》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编: 100093
Tel.: 010-62836134, 62836138; Fax: 010-82599431; E-mail: apes@ibcas.ac.cn, cjpe@ibcas.ac.cn
备案号: 京ICP备16067583号-19